This board is full of gullible idiots.

[skye]

Left wing sheeple are gullible idiots.

So yes.

 

[francoHFW]

In the whole world, only dupes don't know.

 

[francoHFW]

Left wing sheeple are gullible idiots.

So yes.

White is black, up is down, real news is fake news, the GOP dupe screed.
After 30 years of Voodoo: worst min. wage, work conditions, illegal work safeguards, vacations, work week, college costs, rich/poor gap, upward social mobility, % homeless and in prison EVAH, and in the modern world!! And you complain about the victims? Are you an idiot or an A-hole?
Pubs have blocked EVERYTHING since 2/4/2010- don't be duped...again. Stimulus worked-ran out in 2010.
Total Pub Propaganda BS: Obama had 2 years of control, his poicies caused inequality lol. ACORN, Kenyan Muslim Marxist,Tides, Mosque, Death Panel, lose your doctor, huge costs, DEBT CRISIS, Obama Recession, stimulus failed, Barney Frank, Nazi Soros, Nazi socialists, Volt suqs, Iran making bomb etc etc.
I'm sorry- dupes are lovely people- but I can't take their lazy, ignorant, careless, stupid politics a minute longer. Sorry

 

[Markle]

I do not have any goto sources. I also don't discredit any sources outright. I wait, absorbe all the info, try to come to my own conclusions as to the validity of any given story based on all the factors & evidence provided.

Not surprising. Your thread is worth nothing and you are a common Troll.

Good day.

 

[Markle]

I call my local tv station and tell them there is an active shooter at some location. They then report there is an active shooter.
True or not who is the source? Me or them?

Do you dumbfucks get it now?

If they're an actual TV station, they would check the story out since they know it came from an unreliable source.

 

[CowboyTed]

I call my local tv station and tell them there is an active shooter at some location. They then report there is an active shooter.
True or not who is the source? Me or them?

Do you dumbfucks get it now?

Did the Washington Post print your story of a shooter?

Newspapers print shit they have to retract all the time. Of course they printed it. Ultimately it was just some kids high & shooting off fireworks.

The anecdote is clearly a bullshit simple one but it gets the point across.

I was the source NOT the paper.

We actually the Washington Post had a retraction over the weekend... They said that Spicer was hiding in the Bushes and he demanded that they say he was hiding among the bushes... Seriously. So you can see how accurate they are asked to be.

As to your local TV station, the Washington Post runs a lot better checks than that... They are pretty good at there job and you can see plenty of stories pulling up Obama as well... They are rarely wrong and if they were they will apologise...
Lets compare that to the side who accuses them of lying, Trump and Others have called them fake news, etc, etc.... He had a 70% false statement rate on Poltifact, these were hundreds of statements... He never retracted any of them individually, on top of that there was the innuendo he used as well, Remember what he said about the Gold Star Mother, McCain POW, Handicapped Reporter, Ted Cruz's Wife,... The guys he complimented Alex Jones, Putin, Duterte,...

I am still asking for:
Can you show a story which has not been retracted by the Washington Post which you have proof (that involves evidence) that is false?

 

[Mac1958]

i got my pencil!!!!!!

Now give me sumthin to write on man!!

Whoa, Van Halen reference, well played.
.

 

[iceberg]

i got my pencil!!!!!!

Now give me sumthin to write on man!!

Whoa, Van Halen reference, well played.
.

heh, it all just wrote itself.

kudos to all who joined into the "hot for teacher" thread while i celebrate not being banned for hijacking the original premise of the post.

but in all fairness - "he started it" >g<

 

[ChrisL]

Yeah, there are a bunch of gullible people on this board. They are called Trump supporters.

And what would you call the Hillary supporters? Lol!

 

[Borillar]

Yeah, there are a bunch of gullible people on this board. They are called Trump supporters.

And what would you call the Hillary supporters? Lol!

Disappointed.

 

[CowboyTed]

Please provide us with your top five GO TO sources for reliable information when a new story breaks. If you refuse, you've just labeled yourself a troll, haven't you?

I do not have any goto sources. I also don't discredit any sources outright. I wait, absorbe all the info, try to come to my own conclusions as to the validity of any given story based on all the factors & evidence provided.

Simply saying "unnamed sources say..." proves NOTHING. Unnamed sources can be right or they can be bold faced liars. It is up to us as individuals to determine what's most plausible based on all the information.

I've seen your sources. They're also known as "fake news."

My sources? Lol

Rarely do I offer links. In all my years here there's one thing I've learned about most of you. YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT FACTS, JUST OBJECTIVES.
Does no good to post links on this site. They serve nothing more than being platforms to launch attacks most of the time.

So you offer no evidence to back up your claims... We care about facts, we use reputable sources and I again will ask you:

Can you show a story which has not been retracted by the Washington Post which you have proof (that involves evidence) that is false?


You called them 'Not a source.' and I am calling your bluff... Show me the oceans of fake stories from them with evidence...

They are a purveyor of information gathered from their sources. Very rarely are news agencies the original source of their stories. The fact that this simple truth eludes you is quite astonishing. Makes no difference if their stories are real or not because the stories don't originate with them. They originate at the source

When they say 'Trump Says .....' that is not untrue... They are in the the room at the time....

When Trump said he was for the Iraq War they have him on Tape saying his support.

When Trump said:
Says Hillary Clinton "wants to let people just pour in. You could have 650 million people pour in and we do nothing about it. Think of it. That’s what could happen. You triple the size of our country in one week."

This is easily verifiable facts that can be checked.... She did not a policy ever close to that...

This is called Journalism, it still exists...

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I do not have any goto sources. I also don't discredit any sources outright. I wait, absorbe all the info, try to come to my own conclusions as to the validity of any given story based on all the factors & evidence provided.

Simply saying "unnamed sources say..." proves NOTHING. Unnamed sources can be right or they can be bold faced liars. It is up to us as individuals to determine what's most plausible based on all the information.

I've seen your sources. They're also known as "fake news."

My sources? Lol

Rarely do I offer links. In all my years here there's one thing I've learned about most of you. YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT FACTS, JUST OBJECTIVES.
Does no good to post links on this site. They serve nothing more than being platforms to launch attacks most of the time.

So you offer no evidence to back up your claims... We care about facts, we use reputable sources and I again will ask you:

Can you show a story which has not been retracted by the Washington Post which you have proof (that involves evidence) that is false?


You called them 'Not a source.' and I am calling your bluff... Show me the oceans of fake stories from them with evidence...

They are a purveyor of information gathered from their sources. Very rarely are news agencies the original source of their stories. The fact that this simple truth eludes you is quite astonishing. Makes no difference if their stories are real or not because the stories don't originate with them. They originate at the source

When they say 'Trump Says .....' that is not untrue... They are in the the room at the time....

When Trump said he was for the Iraq War they have him on Tape saying his support.

When Trump said:
Says Hillary Clinton "wants to let people just pour in. You could have 650 million people pour in and we do nothing about it. Think of it. That’s what could happen. You triple the size of our country in one week."

This is easily verifiable facts that can be checked.... She did not a policy ever close to that...

This is called Journalism, it still exists...

I'm not responsible for what Trump says or does.

I didn't even vote for him.

Get it? Fuck off with this stupid shit

 

[g5000]

Not a source:

Fox News
ABC news
NBC news
Msnbc
CNN
Wapo
Rush Limbaugh
Any other reporting agency...

There are news outlets which are biased, and then there are news outlets which are piss outlets.

To put ABC News on the same level as Rush Limbaugh is to be an even bigger asshole than the "fake news" you are attacking. You are actually the one who is the most gullible fuck of all.

 

[bodecea]

I think most of the libstains here are just promoting discord and trying to hurt the country. I'd like to see charges brought against them and then sentences carried out.

And the charges would be.....? What laws would be broken?

 

[miketx]

I think most of the libstains here are just promoting discord and trying to hurt the country. I'd like to see charges brought against them and then sentences carried out.

And the charges would be.....? What laws would be broken?

I could tell you, but it would be a complete waste of time, as you know. You scum accept no facts, tell no truth, and will admit no wrongdoing. Suffice it say I don't think any charges should be brought. Just a soviet like purge, which if you liars really think Trump is in with them, then you know what you can expect. Now after reading this click on the "funny" link, after you crap your pants.

 

[CowboyTed]

I've seen your sources. They're also known as "fake news."

My sources? Lol

Rarely do I offer links. In all my years here there's one thing I've learned about most of you. YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT FACTS, JUST OBJECTIVES.
Does no good to post links on this site. They serve nothing more than being platforms to launch attacks most of the time.

So you offer no evidence to back up your claims... We care about facts, we use reputable sources and I again will ask you:

Can you show a story which has not been retracted by the Washington Post which you have proof (that involves evidence) that is false?


You called them 'Not a source.' and I am calling your bluff... Show me the oceans of fake stories from them with evidence...

They are a purveyor of information gathered from their sources. Very rarely are news agencies the original source of their stories. The fact that this simple truth eludes you is quite astonishing. Makes no difference if their stories are real or not because the stories don't originate with them. They originate at the source

When they say 'Trump Says .....' that is not untrue... They are in the the room at the time....

When Trump said he was for the Iraq War they have him on Tape saying his support.

When Trump said:
Says Hillary Clinton "wants to let people just pour in. You could have 650 million people pour in and we do nothing about it. Think of it. That’s what could happen. You triple the size of our country in one week."

This is easily verifiable facts that can be checked.... She did not a policy ever close to that...

This is called Journalism, it still exists...

I'm not responsible for what Trump says or does.

I didn't even vote for him.

Get it? Fuck off with this stupid shit

I didn't say you voted for Trump.... But you attacked Washington Post with no proof or evidence...

 

[miketx]

My sources? Lol

Rarely do I offer links. In all my years here there's one thing I've learned about most of you. YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT FACTS, JUST OBJECTIVES.
Does no good to post links on this site. They serve nothing more than being platforms to launch attacks most of the time.

So you offer no evidence to back up your claims... We care about facts, we use reputable sources and I again will ask you:

Can you show a story which has not been retracted by the Washington Post which you have proof (that involves evidence) that is false?


You called them 'Not a source.' and I am calling your bluff... Show me the oceans of fake stories from them with evidence...

They are a purveyor of information gathered from their sources. Very rarely are news agencies the original source of their stories. The fact that this simple truth eludes you is quite astonishing. Makes no difference if their stories are real or not because the stories don't originate with them. They originate at the source

When they say 'Trump Says .....' that is not untrue... They are in the the room at the time....

When Trump said he was for the Iraq War they have him on Tape saying his support.

When Trump said:
Says Hillary Clinton "wants to let people just pour in. You could have 650 million people pour in and we do nothing about it. Think of it. That’s what could happen. You triple the size of our country in one week."

This is easily verifiable facts that can be checked.... She did not a policy ever close to that...

This is called Journalism, it still exists...

I'm not responsible for what Trump says or does.

I didn't even vote for him.

Get it? Fuck off with this stupid shit

I didn't say you voted for Trump.... But you attacked Washington Post with no proof or evidence...

All one need do is read the wapo...all the proof you need....

 

[CowboyTed]

So you offer no evidence to back up your claims... We care about facts, we use reputable sources and I again will ask you:

Can you show a story which has not been retracted by the Washington Post which you have proof (that involves evidence) that is false?


You called them 'Not a source.' and I am calling your bluff... Show me the oceans of fake stories from them with evidence...

They are a purveyor of information gathered from their sources. Very rarely are news agencies the original source of their stories. The fact that this simple truth eludes you is quite astonishing. Makes no difference if their stories are real or not because the stories don't originate with them. They originate at the source

When they say 'Trump Says .....' that is not untrue... They are in the the room at the time....

When Trump said he was for the Iraq War they have him on Tape saying his support.

When Trump said:
Says Hillary Clinton "wants to let people just pour in. You could have 650 million people pour in and we do nothing about it. Think of it. That’s what could happen. You triple the size of our country in one week."

This is easily verifiable facts that can be checked.... She did not a policy ever close to that...

This is called Journalism, it still exists...

I'm not responsible for what Trump says or does.

I didn't even vote for him.

Get it? Fuck off with this stupid shit

I didn't say you voted for Trump.... But you attacked Washington Post with no proof or evidence...

All one need do is read the wapo...all the proof you need....

Again... Bullshit:

I repeat:

Can you show a story which has not been retracted by the Washington Post which you have proof (that involves evidence) that is false?

 

[EnterSandman]

Not a source:

Fox News
ABC news
NBC news
Msnbc
CNN
Wapo
Rush Limbaugh
Any other reporting agency...




Purported news outlets:

Fox News
ABC news
NBC news
Msnbc
CNN
Wapo
Rush Limbaugh
Any other reporting agency...




Sources:

People who give the above agencies stories.




Class dismissed

Maybe we should all get on the shortwave like you and get the real news.

Much like a child, Felonious gets upset when his spam is being ignored.

 

[miketx]

They are a purveyor of information gathered from their sources. Very rarely are news agencies the original source of their stories. The fact that this simple truth eludes you is quite astonishing. Makes no difference if their stories are real or not because the stories don't originate with them. They originate at the source

When they say 'Trump Says .....' that is not untrue... They are in the the room at the time....

When Trump said he was for the Iraq War they have him on Tape saying his support.

When Trump said:
Says Hillary Clinton "wants to let people just pour in. You could have 650 million people pour in and we do nothing about it. Think of it. That’s what could happen. You triple the size of our country in one week."

This is easily verifiable facts that can be checked.... She did not a policy ever close to that...

This is called Journalism, it still exists...

I'm not responsible for what Trump says or does.

I didn't even vote for him.

Get it? Fuck off with this stupid shit

I didn't say you voted for Trump.... But you attacked Washington Post with no proof or evidence...

All one need do is read the wapo...all the proof you need....

Again... Bullshit:

I repeat:

Can you show a story which has not been retracted by the Washington Post which you have proof (that involves evidence) that is false?

Why do you want proof of this when when you never provide any proof of Trump russia connection or any other thing? Wapo is right up there with all the other fake news. never a day goes by they don't have some negative story about Trump could have, Trump might have....unnamed source.... there's your bullshit mr stain.