This could go either way - Stay Tuned

[bill718]

Former White House aid Cassidy Hutchinson's damning testimony has even FOX News and many Republicans ceasing their cries of a "partisan which hunt" since many of the key witnesses are fellow Republicans. Underneath all the outrage however looms something bigger as several former prosecutors are now mumbling: The prosecution of a former President involves more than just checking the required evidence box's, more than enough of those have been checked...A.G. Merrick Garland now has to decide if the office of the President is so sacred that he will decline to prosecute or if he feels to prosecute would involve the justice department too deeply into partisan politics.

On one hand Merrick Garland is a former prosecutor, well-educated, experienced, and qualified to do this job, on the other hand he's very concerned about his legacy and reputation, especially if he should he decide to prosecute, and lose. Evidence aside, this could go either way - Stay Tuned

 

[hjmick]

Witch.

 

[westwall]

Former White House aid Cassidy Hutchinson's damning testimony has even FOX News and many Republicans ceasing their cries of a "partisan which hunt" since many of the key witnesses are fellow Republicans. Underneath all the outrage however looms something bigger as several former prosecutors are now mumbling: The prosecution of a former President involves more than just checking the required evidence box's, more than enough of those have been checked...A.G. Merrick Garland now has to decide if the office of the President is so sacred that he will decline to prosecute or if he feels to prosecute would involve the justice department too deeply into partisan politics.

On one hand Merrick Garland is a former prosecutor, well-educated, experienced, and qualified to do this job, on the other hand he's very concerned about his legacy and reputation, especially if he should he decide to prosecute, and lose. Evidence aside, this could go either way - Stay Tuned

You mean the unsubstantiated, unsupported, no real evidence "damning" testimony?

Who cares......

 

[scruffy]

Former White House aid Cassidy Hutchinson's damning testimony has even FOX News and many Republicans ceasing their cries of a "partisan which hunt" since many of the key witnesses are fellow Republicans.

Bullshit.

More dumbass DNC talking points

Lefties lie

It's what they do

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Former White House aid Cassidy Hutchinson's damning testimony has even FOX News and many Republicans ceasing their cries of a "partisan which hunt" since many of the key witnesses are fellow Republicans. Underneath all the outrage however looms something bigger as several former prosecutors are now mumbling: The prosecution of a former President involves more than just checking the required evidence box's, more than enough of those have been checked...A.G. Merrick Garland now has to decide if the office of the President is so sacred that he will decline to prosecute or if he feels to prosecute would involve the justice department too deeply into partisan politics.

On one hand Merrick Garland is a former prosecutor, well-educated, experienced, and qualified to do this job, on the other hand he's very concerned about his legacy and reputation, especially if he should he decide to prosecute, and lose. Evidence aside, this could go either way - Stay Tuned

"damning testimony"

 

[MisterBeale]

Former White House aid Cassidy Hutchinson's damning testimony has even FOX News and many Republicans ceasing their cries of a "partisan which hunt" since many of the key witnesses are fellow Republicans. Underneath all the outrage however looms something bigger as several former prosecutors are now mumbling: The prosecution of a former President involves more than just checking the required evidence box's, more than enough of those have been checked...A.G. Merrick Garland now has to decide if the office of the President is so sacred that he will decline to prosecute or if he feels to prosecute would involve the justice department too deeply into partisan politics.

On one hand Merrick Garland is a former prosecutor, well-educated, experienced, and qualified to do this job, on the other hand he's very concerned about his legacy and reputation, especially if he should he decide to prosecute, and lose. Evidence aside, this could go either way - Stay Tuned

 

[1srelluc]

Fuckin' thread title sucked me in so I can honestly say:

 

[miketx]

Former White House aid Cassidy Hutchinson's damning testimony has even FOX News and many Republicans ceasing their cries of a "partisan which hunt" since many of the key witnesses are fellow Republicans. Underneath all the outrage however looms something bigger as several former prosecutors are now mumbling: The prosecution of a former President involves more than just checking the required evidence box's, more than enough of those have been checked...A.G. Merrick Garland now has to decide if the office of the President is so sacred that he will decline to prosecute or if he feels to prosecute would involve the justice department too deeply into partisan politics.

On one hand Merrick Garland is a former prosecutor, well-educated, experienced, and qualified to do this job, on the other hand he's very concerned about his legacy and reputation, especially if he should he decide to prosecute, and lose. Evidence aside, this could go either way - Stay Tuned

Lol, more fake bs. Don't you clowns ever tire of falling for this crap?

 

[MarathonMike]

Former White House aid Cassidy Hutchinson's damning testimony has even FOX News and many Republicans ceasing their cries of a "partisan which hunt" since many of the key witnesses are fellow Republicans. Underneath all the outrage however looms something bigger as several former prosecutors are now mumbling: The prosecution of a former President involves more than just checking the required evidence box's, more than enough of those have been checked...A.G. Merrick Garland now has to decide if the office of the President is so sacred that he will decline to prosecute or if he feels to prosecute would involve the justice department too deeply into partisan politics.

On one hand Merrick Garland is a former prosecutor, well-educated, experienced, and qualified to do this job, on the other hand he's very concerned about his legacy and reputation, especially if he should he decide to prosecute, and lose. Evidence aside, this could go either way - Stay Tuned

Merrick Garland is hollow-eyed loser who has sold his soul.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Former White House aid Cassidy Hutchinson's damning testimony has even FOX News and many Republicans ceasing their cries of a "partisan which hunt" since many of the key witnesses are fellow Republicans. Underneath all the outrage however looms something bigger as several former prosecutors are now mumbling: The prosecution of a former President involves more than just checking the required evidence box's, more than enough of those have been checked...A.G. Merrick Garland now has to decide if the office of the President is so sacred that he will decline to prosecute or if he feels to prosecute would involve the justice department too deeply into partisan politics.

On one hand Merrick Garland is a former prosecutor, well-educated, experienced, and qualified to do this job, on the other hand he's very concerned about his legacy and reputation, especially if he should he decide to prosecute, and lose. Evidence aside, this could go either way - Stay Tuned

One of the principles of the United States is this, "No One Is Above The Law".

 

[scruffy]

One of the principles of the United States is this, "No One Is Above The Law".

Go tell George Gascon

 

[Calypso Jones]

email and telephone correspondence do not align with this stealth democrat's version.

 

[Foxfyre]

Former White House aid Cassidy Hutchinson's damning testimony has even FOX News and many Republicans ceasing their cries of a "partisan which hunt" since many of the key witnesses are fellow Republicans. Underneath all the outrage however looms something bigger as several former prosecutors are now mumbling: The prosecution of a former President involves more than just checking the required evidence box's, more than enough of those have been checked...A.G. Merrick Garland now has to decide if the office of the President is so sacred that he will decline to prosecute or if he feels to prosecute would involve the justice department too deeply into partisan politics.

On one hand Merrick Garland is a former prosecutor, well-educated, experienced, and qualified to do this job, on the other hand he's very concerned about his legacy and reputation, especially if he should he decide to prosecute, and lose. Evidence aside, this could go either way - Stay Tuned

I have not gotten involved in this, but after watching/reading testimony, the absence of ANY cross examination or challenge to the testimony which at best would mostly be ruled hearsay in any court in the land, I think all testimony has to be regarded at least as potentially suspect. What few have claimed personal witness have not been challenged to put their testimony into its full context.

We watched Adam Schiff's witch hunt on the Russian/Ukrainian collusion on national television, and watched as skilled attorneys shot down every single witness. All eventually said that no, they personally had witnessed or heard nothing of any criminal activity of any kind re Donald J. Trump. Schiff and company didn't make that mistake this time when they stacked the Jan 6 commission with all strong anti-Trump people and disallowed anybody who would question the testimony in any way.

If this process was being done in this way to a Democrat, the leftists would be screaming FOUL to high heaven.

 

[Darkwind]

One of the principles of the United States is this, "No One Is Above The Law".

An even older one is, "Innocent UNTIL PROVEN guilty."

 

[Godboy]

Former White House aid Cassidy Hutchinson's damning testimony has even FOX News and many Republicans ceasing their cries of a "partisan which hunt" since many of the key witnesses are fellow Republicans. Underneath all the outrage however looms something bigger as several former prosecutors are now mumbling: The prosecution of a former President involves more than just checking the required evidence box's, more than enough of those have been checked...A.G. Merrick Garland now has to decide if the office of the President is so sacred that he will decline to prosecute or if he feels to prosecute would involve the justice department too deeply into partisan politics.

On one hand Merrick Garland is a former prosecutor, well-educated, experienced, and qualified to do this job, on the other hand he's very concerned about his legacy and reputation, especially if he should he decide to prosecute, and lose. Evidence aside, this could go either way - Stay Tuned

You shouldnt spend a moment of your time watching that political sideshow, which will result in absolutely NOTHING! Its a waste of time and money.

 

[BluesLegend]

The Trump SCOTUS, end thread.

 

[mamooth]

or if he feels to prosecute would involve the justice department too deeply into partisan politics.

Not prosecuting would be a much deeper dive into partisan politics. It would be giving Republicans a free pass for any criminal behavior, solely because they're Republicans.

The fact that they're threatening so much violence is more incentive to prosecute. We need to show terrorists that making terrorist threats will be counterproductive to their terrorist cause.

If it was a Democrat being discussed as a criminal suspect, there would be no question anywhere of "not prosecuting it because it might look partisan". Both sides would absolutely be prosecuting. The same standard should hold with Republicans.

 

[Foxfyre]

For what it's worth, I see from reliable sources that both the secret service agent and the driver are more than willing to testify to rebut Cassidy Hutchinson's 'damning' testimony. They won't be allowed to of course.

Secret Service to ‘push back’ against Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony: report

The Secret Service will push back against bombshell testimony by former Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson, according to reports by NBC News and ABC News.Hutchinson testified about a conversation with Trump Deputy Chief of Staff Tony Ornato and Robert Engel, who ran Trump's Secret Service...

www.rawstory.com

 

[BluesLegend]

Not prosecuting would be a much deeper dive into partisan politics. It would be giving Republicans a free pass for any criminal behavior, solely because they're Republicans.

The fact that they're threatening so much violence is more incentive to prosecute. We need to show terrorists that making terrorist threats will be counterproductive to their terrorist cause.

If it was a Democrat being discussed as a criminal suspect, there would be no question anywhere of "not prosecuting it because it might look partisan". Both sides would absolutely be prosecuting. The same standard should hold with Republicans.

After Hillary was let off with a slap on the wrist for breaking multiple federal laws it's clear nobody will be prosecuted.

 

[Rambunctious]

Former White House aid Cassidy Hutchinson's damning testimony has even FOX News and many Republicans ceasing their cries of a "partisan which hunt" since many of the key witnesses are fellow Republicans. Underneath all the outrage however looms something bigger as several former prosecutors are now mumbling: The prosecution of a former President involves more than just checking the required evidence box's, more than enough of those have been checked...A.G. Merrick Garland now has to decide if the office of the President is so sacred that he will decline to prosecute or if he feels to prosecute would involve the justice department too deeply into partisan politics.

On one hand Merrick Garland is a former prosecutor, well-educated, experienced, and qualified to do this job, on the other hand he's very concerned about his legacy and reputation, especially if he should he decide to prosecute, and lose. Evidence aside, this could go either way - Stay Tuned

Damming testimony?... are you kidding?... she said that Trump dove from the back seat of the limo and grabbed the steering wheel and tried to go to the capitol... That is as silly as it can be... every dem should hang their head in shame today....