This tenet of fascism is a value shared by modern leftists

[surada]

They are internationalists.
Communism is international socialism.

Our leftist friends have a very narrow understanding of political and economic ideologies, as well as terms such as "nationalism". They know that Hitler was a nationalist so, for them, that means that ALL nationalism is bad. And when you ask them to discuss Abraham Lincoln's nationalism, they become flummoxed and then begin performing contortions with their illogic.

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.


It's the 'socialism' part that is deadly.....the Democrat hallmark.


And communism is far more dangerous.

.…as Martin Amis put it, 'Bolshevism was exportable and produced near-identical results elsewhere. Nazism could not be duplicated. Compared to it, the other fascist states were simply amateurish' (Amis, 'Koba the Dread,' 2002, p. 91).

This makes communism more dangerous than Nazism.

Nazism was based on blood and nationalism, so, could not be duplicated in nations like America, which is made up of so very many nations.

In 1933 Hitler purged both socialists and communists.. He killed them or put them in Dachau. I thought you had some superior homeschool education.

 

[struth]

They are internationalists.
Communism is international socialism.

Our leftist friends have a very narrow understanding of political and economic ideologies, as well as terms such as "nationalism". They know that Hitler was a nationalist so, for them, that means that ALL nationalism is bad. And when you ask them to discuss Abraham Lincoln's nationalism, they become flummoxed and then begin performing contortions with their illogic.

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.


It's the 'socialism' part that is deadly.....the Democrat hallmark.


And communism is far more dangerous.

.…as Martin Amis put it, 'Bolshevism was exportable and produced near-identical results elsewhere. Nazism could not be duplicated. Compared to it, the other fascist states were simply amateurish' (Amis, 'Koba the Dread,' 2002, p. 91).

This makes communism more dangerous than Nazism.

Nazism was based on blood and nationalism, so, could not be duplicated in nations like America, which is made up of so very many nations.

In 1933 Hitler purged both socialists and communists.. He killed them or put them in Dachau. I thought you had some superior homeschool education.

just the socialist that didn’t join his socialist party or the ones he felt threatened by

 

[surada]

socialism with some hand picked private industries that only worked for the state and party interest

Yea, just like AT&T, Amazon, Twitter, etc.

Start your own platform if you want hate speech and lies. I don't know where you'll get sponsors, but have at it.. Freedom of speech doesn't mean anyone owes you a venue.

i don’t disagree, but when tweeter no longer has bulletin board and asks as a publisher it loses its immunity from liability that the govt has given it.

Privately held companies don't owe you a platform. Even this website can boot you off.

 

[surada]

They are internationalists.
Communism is international socialism.

Our leftist friends have a very narrow understanding of political and economic ideologies, as well as terms such as "nationalism". They know that Hitler was a nationalist so, for them, that means that ALL nationalism is bad. And when you ask them to discuss Abraham Lincoln's nationalism, they become flummoxed and then begin performing contortions with their illogic.

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.


It's the 'socialism' part that is deadly.....the Democrat hallmark.


And communism is far more dangerous.

.…as Martin Amis put it, 'Bolshevism was exportable and produced near-identical results elsewhere. Nazism could not be duplicated. Compared to it, the other fascist states were simply amateurish' (Amis, 'Koba the Dread,' 2002, p. 91).

This makes communism more dangerous than Nazism.

Nazism was based on blood and nationalism, so, could not be duplicated in nations like America, which is made up of so very many nations.

In 1933 Hitler purged both socialists and communists.. He killed them or put them in Dachau. I thought you had some superior homeschool education.

just the socialist that didn’t join his socialist party or the ones he felt threatened by

Hitler broke with the socialists in 1926,

 

[PoliticalChic]

They are internationalists.
Communism is international socialism.

Our leftist friends have a very narrow understanding of political and economic ideologies, as well as terms such as "nationalism". They know that Hitler was a nationalist so, for them, that means that ALL nationalism is bad. And when you ask them to discuss Abraham Lincoln's nationalism, they become flummoxed and then begin performing contortions with their illogic.

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.


It's the 'socialism' part that is deadly.....the Democrat hallmark.


And communism is far more dangerous.

.…as Martin Amis put it, 'Bolshevism was exportable and produced near-identical results elsewhere. Nazism could not be duplicated. Compared to it, the other fascist states were simply amateurish' (Amis, 'Koba the Dread,' 2002, p. 91).

This makes communism more dangerous than Nazism.

Nazism was based on blood and nationalism, so, could not be duplicated in nations like America, which is made up of so very many nations.

In 1933 Hitler purged both socialists and communists.. He killed them or put them in Dachau. I thought you had some superior homeschool education.

Can you name three or four of the books that have informed your historic outlook?

I provided sources, links and documentation for everything I post......and I am always 100% true, correct and accurate.

Morons like you continue to be our best source of greenhouse gases.

 

[K9Buck]

Nationalism is always aggressive

Not at all. America's founding fathers were nationalists. So was Mahatma Ghandi. Once again, you have a flawed understanding. Here is a definition of nationalism with which I agree:

Nationalism is an idea and movement that promotes the interests of a particular nation (as in a group of people), especially with the aim of gaining and maintaining the nation's sovereignty (self-governance) over its homeland.

 

[PoliticalChic]

They are internationalists.
Communism is international socialism.

Our leftist friends have a very narrow understanding of political and economic ideologies, as well as terms such as "nationalism". They know that Hitler was a nationalist so, for them, that means that ALL nationalism is bad. And when you ask them to discuss Abraham Lincoln's nationalism, they become flummoxed and then begin performing contortions with their illogic.

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.


It's the 'socialism' part that is deadly.....the Democrat hallmark.


And communism is far more dangerous.

.…as Martin Amis put it, 'Bolshevism was exportable and produced near-identical results elsewhere. Nazism could not be duplicated. Compared to it, the other fascist states were simply amateurish' (Amis, 'Koba the Dread,' 2002, p. 91).

This makes communism more dangerous than Nazism.

Nazism was based on blood and nationalism, so, could not be duplicated in nations like America, which is made up of so very many nations.

In 1933 Hitler purged both socialists and communists.. He killed them or put them in Dachau. I thought you had some superior homeschool education.

just the socialist that didn’t join his socialist party or the ones he felt threatened by

Hitler broke with the socialists in 1926,

Watch this, dope:
A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." November 27, 1925.


Socialists, just like the Democrat Party....and you.

 

[struth]

socialism with some hand picked private industries that only worked for the state and party interest

Yea, just like AT&T, Amazon, Twitter, etc.

Start your own platform if you want hate speech and lies. I don't know where you'll get sponsors, but have at it.. Freedom of speech doesn't mean anyone owes you a venue.

i don’t disagree, but when tweeter no longer has bulletin board and asks as a publisher it loses its immunity from liability that the govt has given it.

Privately held companies don't owe you a platform. Even this website can boot you off.

sure, but tweeter and facebook are immune from liability...when they act like publishers and censor information...ie that hurts the biden campaign they ahoukd lose that. the dems continue to protect them, because they do the party’s bidding

 

[K9Buck]

Start your own platform if you want hate speech and lies. I don't know where you'll get sponsors, but have at it.. Freedom of speech doesn't mean anyone owes you a venue.

Hysterical response. Your party masters protect them with special treatment and, in return, they serve and protect the party, just like you. The losers of such collusion are the American people but, as I've said repeatedly, you don't care about them; all that matters to you is the party. You're fascist that way.

 

[struth]

They are internationalists.
Communism is international socialism.

Our leftist friends have a very narrow understanding of political and economic ideologies, as well as terms such as "nationalism". They know that Hitler was a nationalist so, for them, that means that ALL nationalism is bad. And when you ask them to discuss Abraham Lincoln's nationalism, they become flummoxed and then begin performing contortions with their illogic.

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.


It's the 'socialism' part that is deadly.....the Democrat hallmark.


And communism is far more dangerous.

.…as Martin Amis put it, 'Bolshevism was exportable and produced near-identical results elsewhere. Nazism could not be duplicated. Compared to it, the other fascist states were simply amateurish' (Amis, 'Koba the Dread,' 2002, p. 91).

This makes communism more dangerous than Nazism.

Nazism was based on blood and nationalism, so, could not be duplicated in nations like America, which is made up of so very many nations.

In 1933 Hitler purged both socialists and communists.. He killed them or put them in Dachau. I thought you had some superior homeschool education.

just the socialist that didn’t join his socialist party or the ones he felt threatened by

Hitler broke with the socialists in 1926,

no, he just created another party....a left leaning one like Benito created

 

[surada]

Start your own platform if you want hate speech and lies. I don't know where you'll get sponsors, but have at it.. Freedom of speech doesn't mean anyone owes you a venue.

Hysterical response. Your party masters protect them with special treatment and, in return, they serve and protect the party, just like you. The losers of such collusion are the American people but, as I've said repeatedly, you don't care about them; all that matters to you is the party. You're fascist that way.

You don't have the right to post on twitter or facebook.. What is it that you fail to understand?

 

[K9Buck]

Privately held companies...

Privately held companies shouldn't be given sweetheart deals by crooked politicians and at the expense of the American people. But, again, the American people are of no consequence to you.

 

[K9Buck]

You don't have the right to post on twitter or facebook.. What is it that you fail to understand?

It goes way beyond that but considering that you cannot acknowledge basic facts on a myriad of matters, there is zero chance that you will acknowledge that these entities serve the party and, in return, receive special treatment from the party that most other companies are not afforded.

 

[K9Buck]

because they do the party’s bidding

As does surada

He doesn't care about truth or fair treatment or even poor and middle-class Americans. His love, loyalty, and devotion are to serving the party and, in particular, their mega-rich elites.

 

[colfax_m]

You’ve described nationalism, which received quite the makeover under Trump.

I'll ask again, what is your issue with nationalism?

A little nationalism is fine. Too much nationalism spoils the broth.

 

[colfax_m]

i don’t disagree, but when tweeter no longer has bulletin board and asks as a publisher it loses its immunity from liability that the govt has given it.

Twitter never was a bulletin board, it’s always moderated content. The protections from liability were put in place specifically to allow for moderation to occur.

 

[K9Buck]

A little nationalism is fine. Too much nationalism spoils the broth.

What is your definition of "nationalism"?

 

[struth]

i don’t disagree, but when tweeter no longer has bulletin board and asks as a publisher it loses its immunity from liability that the govt has given it.

Twitter never was a bulletin board, it’s always moderated content. The protections from liability were put in place specifically to allow for moderation to occur.

incorrect. they were alllowed obviously to moderate porn, and illegal activity, but nothing else.

i don’t disagree, but when tweeter no longer has bulletin board and asks as a publisher it loses its immunity from liability that the govt has given it.

Twitter never was a bulletin board, it’s always moderated content. The protections from liability were put in place specifically to allow for moderation to occur.

 

[K9Buck]

Twitter never was a bulletin board, it’s always moderated content. The protections from liability were put in place specifically to allow for moderation to occur.

Twitter receives special protections as a platform when, in fact, it's a publisher. But since they serve the party, they are rewarded. And you guys complain about "corporate welfare". LOL.

 

[colfax_m]

A little nationalism is fine. Too much nationalism spoils the broth.

What is your definition of "nationalism"?

Same as anyone’s else, but too much nationalism always seems to end in disaster.