When conversing with me, it is best to keep in mind that I am most interested in religion and its history. It says a lot about me that you never crossed my mind when I wrote about hate shown to Catholics. I was focused on historical events. I was surprised--then amused--that you made it all about you...which alerts me to your own focus. Your misinterpretations of the Catholic faith should have warned me you are equally as likely to misinterpret me.
when you wrote this; " The last part is an attempt of taking scripture and twisting it into something it is not in order to exhibit a "justified" hatred towards others. ." you were referring to what I wrote accusing me of attempting to twist scripture to justify hatred towards others.
You wrote those words to me about what I wrote. I didn't misunderstand you, I do not twist scripture to justify exhibiting hatred towards others, so please, cut the crap. It was your attempt to interject emotion because you cannot rationally or honestly resolve the contradictions between what is written and what the church teaches. It is indefensible yet you are attempting to justify it. That tells me a lot about you. You are not focused on historical events, you are focused on remaining in darkness.
That does not surprise me.
Here's the deal. I am interested in talking about religion and the different perspectives people have of God and faith. I am not interested in talking about myself or any Internet diagnosis people propose. I am happy to discuss religion with you, but I am not going to address any more comments about you (or anything you have convinced yourself I said about you)--and I am certainly not going to talk about me.
To late.... Your predilection for pretense and dedication to falsehood has been already been exposed by you in your own words to all those who have eyes to see and ears to hear.
Last edited: