Time to go public with Soleimani attack intel

[Slade3200]

After watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.

This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?

Moron, we are not on the brink of war.....Iran doesn't want to have it's only source of revenue, oil, destroyed by American drones...you freaking doofus.

At most we will have a few terrorist attacks...that's it....you moron. Then we can kill more of their terrorists....

Moron......that asshat was the leader of the quds forces...the guys training islamic terrorists in how to make the IEDs that have killed and maimed American citizens fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan and they used the obama money to pay and equip those same terrorists...under this guys leadership.....

do you really think calling me moron doofus moron moron makes you sound smart? No it makes you sound emotional. Take a breath and chill out.

I hope your right and this doesn’t lead to escalated attacks or a declaration of war with Iran. Right now we are deploying troops and Iran’s leader is vowing retribution... but I’m glad you’re so comfortable with all of it.

 

[2aguy]

After watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.

This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?

Moron, we are not on the brink of war.....Iran doesn't want to have it's only source of revenue, oil, destroyed by American drones...you freaking doofus.

At most we will have a few terrorist attacks...that's it....you moron. Then we can kill more of their terrorists....

Moron......that asshat was the leader of the quds forces...the guys training islamic terrorists in how to make the IEDs that have killed and maimed American citizens fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan and they used the obama money to pay and equip those same terrorists...under this guys leadership.....

do you really think calling me moron doofus moron moron makes you sound smart? No it makes you sound emotional. Take a breath and chill out.

I hope your right and this doesn’t lead to escalated attacks or a declaration of war with Iran. Right now we are deploying troops and Iran’s leader is vowing retribution... but I’m glad you’re so comfortable with all of it.

We have a leader who understands the situation, and who our enemies understand will kill them, them, not kill their minions...if they pop their head up. That is what monsters understand...they also understand that when you give them 150 billion dollars to buy their love, they will use that money for killing Americans as they laugh at you...

 

[SAYIT]

After watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.

This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?

....people still wouldn't believe it --this goes on all over the world ...you should always give the least amount of your intel--this is a very old rule of warfare/etc

Yeah but some Americans are visibly upset that Trump had the audacity to take out an Iranian terror-rat.

Congressional Dems, for instance ... traitors, every one of 'em.

Ilhan Omar is Pretty Upset We Just Killed the World's Leading Islamic Terrorist

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Iran is an evil, radical Islamic regime. This was a justified attack on a terrorist in a foreign country. Obama wanted to appease and bribe the terror regime. Trump decided to kill their leadership. Good!

Deterrence aka bribery doesn’t work. Iran wants no part of war with the US as they would kill all the mullahs very quickly. They saw what happened with Hussein they don’t want the same thing.

USA!

 

[Ken Mac]

Iran is an evil, radical Islamic regime. This was a justified attack on a terrorist in a foreign country. Obama wanted to appease and bribe the terror regime. Trump decided to kill their leadership. Good!

Deterrence aka bribery doesn’t work. Iran wants no part of war with the US as they would kill all the mullahs very quickly. They saw what happened with Hussein they don’t want the same thing.

USA!

I would take a bet on their oilfield being destroyed. Talk about an economic hit. They wouldn't have any means of bringing in any substantial money. China would be pissed though. So that may not be a great idea.

But war has always been about resources (mostly funding) and not about killing people. The ends have always been funding and the means has always been taking it away which used to take killing a lot of people. Now, not so much.

Of course, killing strategic resources (people) such as leaders is always on the list of things to do.

 

[Lastamender]

Nonsense, the retired major general told CNN’s New Day yesterday. The question isn’t whether Trump set off a war, but whether America recognizes that Iran has been waging one for decades against us. “Why don’t you just be quiet?” Gen. Marks advised Murphy in absentia, to chuckles in the studio

Retired general on Soleimani strike: This would be an excellent time for Senate Dem to "just be quiet"

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Didn't know we were at the brink of war. Link?

Then pay fucking attention, because that is what it is when you assassinate the top commander of a foreign country's military.

because that is what it is when you assassinate the top commander of a foreign country's military.

The guy who has been waging war on our military in Iraq?

Just a bishop on the chessboard. The mad king told a pawn to take him out, while he was sitting in the wrong square, without even having to sacrifice the pawn.

Just a bishop on the chessboard.

Not safe for bishops to kill US soldiers anymore...…..

 

[Dick Foster]

After watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.

This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?

I think you are being very presumptuous. Do you have any sort of evidence that the strike was outside of protocol? Since we've been killing enemy soldiers in Iraq for over a quarter century, including dozens, if not hundreds, in the vicinity of the Baghdad airport, the strike that killed those enemy commanders seems like SOP to me. There was no break from protocol.

Also, calling it an "assassination" is a bit of a stretch.

how was it not an assassination?! It was a targeted drone strike while he was in a car leaving Baghdad’s airport.

Hey stupid everyone killed in a war is not assinated and the asshole was a military leader not the leader of that shithole of a nation. Members of the military are simply killed not assinated, you dumbass. If we took out Khamenei, that would be assination and not a half bad idea because he's been a major shit disturber for far too long now. If you want to piss on someone for creating turmoil in the region, look no further than that asshole.

 

[White 6]

Didn't know we were at the brink of war. Link?

Then pay fucking attention, because that is what it is when you assassinate the top commander of a foreign country's military.

because that is what it is when you assassinate the top commander of a foreign country's military.

The guy who has been waging war on our military in Iraq?

Just a bishop on the chessboard. The mad king told a pawn to take him out, while he was sitting in the wrong square, without even having to sacrifice the pawn.

Just a bishop on the chessboard.

Not safe for bishops to kill US soldiers anymore...…..

The mad king's move was nicely played, without a doubt.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Didn't know we were at the brink of war. Link?

Then pay fucking attention, because that is what it is when you assassinate the top commander of a foreign country's military.

because that is what it is when you assassinate the top commander of a foreign country's military.

The guy who has been waging war on our military in Iraq?

Just a bishop on the chessboard. The mad king told a pawn to take him out, while he was sitting in the wrong square, without even having to sacrifice the pawn.

Just a bishop on the chessboard.

Not safe for bishops to kill US soldiers anymore...…..

The mad king's move was nicely played, without a doubt.

If Obama had supported the Iranian people in 2009, the mad kings in Iran would have hung already.

 

[JustAGuy1]

I don't seem to remember any Dems asking for proof of threat while Obama was exercising 2800 drone strikes against terrorists ( and that was in only two countries - there were many more)

Dems had more trust in Obama than they do with Trump, that obvious. And Obama’s strikes didn’t take us to the brink of war with Iran

Didn't know we were at the brink of war. Link?

Trust? Dems? hahahhahahahhahahahhahahahahahahhahhahahahahhahhhahahhahaahah

Follow the news Mac. Iran is vowing retribution

Iran's president warns America has made a 'grave mistake' by killing Soleimani in an airstrike | Daily Mail Online

So what. Here's the deal, you know what keeps these fuckers quiet? Fear. The Tripoli pirates were preying on the US merchant fleet and holding hundreds of hostages till we built a navy and went and killed a bunch of them.

The same thing just happened. Obummer was buying them off, but they were still attacking us. They then killed an American under a real president, so he killed them back.

If they do it again, they now know they are targets too.

"So what. Here's the deal, you know what keeps these fuckers quiet? Fear. The Tripoli pirates were preying on the US merchant fleet and holding hundreds of hostages till we built a navy and went and killed a bunch of them."

Obama did good turning our Military loose on them.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

After watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.

This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?

....people still wouldn't believe it --this goes on all over the world
...you should always give the least amount of your intel--this is a very old rule of warfare/etc

Yale psychiatrist urges 72-hour mental health hold on Trump after Iran attack

 

[White 6]

Then pay fucking attention, because that is what it is when you assassinate the top commander of a foreign country's military.

because that is what it is when you assassinate the top commander of a foreign country's military.

The guy who has been waging war on our military in Iraq?

Just a bishop on the chessboard. The mad king told a pawn to take him out, while he was sitting in the wrong square, without even having to sacrifice the pawn.

Just a bishop on the chessboard.

Not safe for bishops to kill US soldiers anymore...…..

The mad king's move was nicely played, without a doubt.

If Obama had supported the Iranian people in 2009, the mad kings in Iran would have hung already.

History is history, to be interpreted at will in the present, only to try to control the future, but usually failing.

 

[Lastamender]

After watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.

This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?

....people still wouldn't believe it --this goes on all over the world
...you should always give the least amount of your intel--this is a very old rule of warfare/etc

Yale psychiatrist urges 72-hour mental health hold on Trump after Iran attack

Any doctor that makes a diagnosis without seeing the patient is a quack. Period.

 

[JustAGuy1]

After watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.

This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?

....people still wouldn't believe it --this goes on all over the world
...you should always give the least amount of your intel--this is a very old rule of warfare/etc

Yale psychiatrist urges 72-hour mental health hold on Trump after Iran attack

Too funny

 

[xyz]

After watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.

This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?

Coming soon, with G.W. Bush's evidence of Saddam possessing WMDs.

 

[White 6]

After watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.

This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?

....people still wouldn't believe it --this goes on all over the world
...you should always give the least amount of your intel--this is a very old rule of warfare/etc

Yale psychiatrist urges 72-hour mental health hold on Trump after Iran attack

Any doctor that makes a diagnosis without seeing the patient is a quack. Period.

Get Vi@gra Without Seeing a Doctor Best Price in the USA!

 

[LA RAM FAN]

After watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.

This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?

uh you have been brainwashed by the corporate controlled media,iran has always wanted to be left alone,out corrupt government is always provoking them,they have a LONG history if invading countrys and starting wars with them,we are the most corrupt government in the world.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

After watching the public reaction to Soleimani’s murder followed by vows of revenge by Iran, we are apparently on the brink of war. At this point it seems obvious that we need to go public with the intel we have showing the imminent attack that was being planned against Americans.

This intel should clearly show the world that Soleimani was a clear and present danger and we had no choice but to go outside of protocol and assassinate him. Do you agree? Thoughts?

Coming soon, with G.W. Bush's evidence of Saddam possessing WMDs.

and yet the sheep here at USMB for for the propaganda of the LAMESTREAM media over and over again despite their history of outright lies so they can invade another country.

 

[Muhammed]

Well then, by all means, let's stir ourselves up into a mass panic.

Or we can just send your kids to die, so we can rest easy. Sound good?

What makes you think Iran will escalate this , FFI?

Wouldn't it make more sense for them just to work to remove President Trump and get their deal back?

It wouldn't surprise me if Iran tried to assassinate Trump or somebody close to him, especially any Jew in his administration. Jared Kushner and Stephen Miller immediately come to mind as possible targets for retaliation.