Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

[Christophera]

he doesnt even know what was included in these documents
he's just assuming(and incorreectly) that they include the building plans

according to what i read someplace the building plans were kept in one of the world trade center towers and were destroyed in the collapse. thats why they needed robertson's plans, which were the only other original detailed copies.

naw, there would be several copies of those plans at various city offices
and every contractor that worked on the building
including, but not limited to, any contractor that did subsequent work on the buildings

Null text statement with no verification. The agent has not posted the location of the plans alleged to have existed.

 

[DiveCon]

They are substantiated and remove the buildings plans and construction photos of the concrete core. As an agent with the agenda of concealing the true building design you will fail to recognize that in service to treason.

again you make a significant and unjustified leap in logic. where is it documented that building plans and construction photos were taken? it only says photos and documents. guiliani had an office in the WTC complex. sounds like he took normal office contents to me.

Like I said, you will fail to recognize that the ex mayor enabled treasonous misrepresentation of the towers structure. All civic center "documents" contain the buildings plans of the center.
Emergency services require another set to be in the buildings. those were destroyed. Photos would show the concrete core to NIST and they would not believe FEMA.

You support treason.

and where is your PROOF?????
you have to have SOME proof before you can make charges, dipshit

 

[DiveCon]

according to what i read someplace the building plans were kept in one of the world trade center towers and were destroyed in the collapse. thats why they needed robertson's plans, which were the only other original detailed copies.

naw, there would be several copies of those plans at various city offices
and every contractor that worked on the building
including, but not limited to, any contractor that did subsequent work on the buildings

Null text statement with no verification. The agent has not posted the location of the plans alleged to have existed.

dipshit, that was all very logical knowing the number of sets of HOUSE plans one needs in even the smallest of towns here in America, it is IMPOSSIBLE that he could get them all and NONE would be still out of his control
you remain a delusional dipshit with no facts

 

[Christophera]

naw, there would be several copies of those plans at various city offices
and every contractor that worked on the building
including, but not limited to, any contractor that did subsequent work on the buildings

Null text statement with no verification. The agent has not posted the location of the plans alleged to have existed.

dipshit, that was all very logical knowing the number of sets of HOUSE plans one needs in even the smallest of towns here in America, it is IMPOSSIBLE that he could get them all and NONE would be still out of his control
you remain a delusional dipshit with no facts

All your evasion is obvious when you do not post a source for the towers actual plans.

WHY don't you have the official ones to show us?

The obsolete plans from silverstein have been digitally altered after scanning by the addition of revision tables. The revision have these weird anomalies in them that are impossible with a scan of a pencil drawing at the scale of the plans. The 1 pixel wide spaces and lines perfectly straight are not possible with scanned pencils. Observe the characters surrounding and their edges for samples.

 

[DiveCon]

Null text statement with no verification. The agent has not posted the location of the plans alleged to have existed.

dipshit, that was all very logical knowing the number of sets of HOUSE plans one needs in even the smallest of towns here in America, it is IMPOSSIBLE that he could get them all and NONE would be still out of his control
you remain a delusional dipshit with no facts

All your evasion is obvious when you do not post a source for the towers actual plans.

WHY don't you have the official ones to show us?

The obsolete plans from silverstein have been digitally altered after scanning by the addition of revision tables. The revision have these weird anomalies in them that are impossible with a scan of a pencil drawing at the scale of the plans. The 1 pixel wide spaces and lines perfectly straight are not possible with scanned pencils. Observe the characters surrounding and their edges for samples.

you have seen the official ones, dipshit
you just are too fucking delusional to admit it
what you show there is nothing more than a SCANNING ANOMALY

 

[Christophera]

agents, pretending to be Americans speculating about why NIST did not have the plans for the Twins in their analysis of collapse have no evidence to support the FEMA deception.

Their posting only cements their adversity to law, to reason, to the US Constitution and for treason.

 

[Fizz]

They are substantiated and remove the buildings plans and construction photos of the concrete core. As an agent with the agenda of concealing the true building design you will fail to recognize that in service to treason.

again you make a significant and unjustified leap in logic. where is it documented that building plans and construction photos were taken? it only says photos and documents. guiliani had an office in the WTC complex. sounds like he took normal office contents to me.

Like I said, you will fail to recognize that the ex mayor enabled treasonous misrepresentation of the towers structure. All civic center "documents" contain the buildings plans of the center.
Emergency services require another set to be in the buildings. those were destroyed. Photos would show the concrete core to NIST and they would not believe FEMA.

You support treason.

so how did the mayor remove all the pictures of your concrete core off the internet and from every book ever sold??

you fail to recognize you are delusional and simply dont make any sense.

 

[DiveCon]

here, dipshit, buy THIS book

[ame="http://www.amazon.com/High-Steel-Greatest-Skyline-Present/dp/B000H2MPJU/ref=pd_sim_b_4"]Amazon.com: High Steel: The Daring Men Who Built the World's Greatest Skyline, 1881 to the Present: Jim Rasenberger: Books[/ame]


notice the title of the book????

why didnt they call it high CONCRETE if you were right?

 

[Christophera]

Below is the core of WTC 2.

Absolutely no structural steel protrudes which is impossible for a steel core columned core. What is seen is too uniform and free of protruding steel wreakage to be steel. It is concrete.

The buildings engineer indentifies a concrete core to Newsweek

I believe some skycrapers have steel core columns, but not the Twin Towers.

Your concealing the true design of the towers revaling the means of mass murder is misprision of felony and treason.

 

[DiveCon]

more lies

 

[DiveCon]

Below is the core of WTC 2.

Absolutely no structural steel protrudes which is impossible for a steel core columned core. What is seen is too uniform and free of protruding steel wreakage to be steel. It is concrete.



The buildings engineer indentifies a concrete core to Newsweek

I believe some skycrapers have steel core columns, but not the Twin Towers.

Your concealing the true design of the towers revaling the means of mass murder is misprision of felony and treason.

dipshit, the only thing that was connected to the outside of the core was the floor trusses
there were not any steel beams that connected to the outer shell

 

[Christophera]

Below is the core of WTC 2.

Absolutely no structural steel protrudes which is impossible for a steel core columned core. What is seen is too uniform and free of protruding steel wreakage to be steel. It is concrete.



The buildings engineer indentifies a concrete core to Newsweek

I believe some skycrapers have steel core columns, but not the Twin Towers.

Your concealing the true design of the towers revaling the means of mass murder is misprision of felony and treason.

dipshit, the only thing that was connected to the outside of the core was the floor trusses
there were not any steel beams that connected to the outer shell

Wrong, there were floor beams every 20 feet between truss panels. That is an interior box column that surrounded the core with floor beams of 2 floors still attached.

Note the billowing web of the "I" beam where something expanding with tremendous force pushed the assembly out.

 

[DiveCon]

Below is the core of WTC 2.

Absolutely no structural steel protrudes which is impossible for a steel core columned core. What is seen is too uniform and free of protruding steel wreakage to be steel. It is concrete.



The buildings engineer indentifies a concrete core to Newsweek

I believe some skycrapers have steel core columns, but not the Twin Towers.

Your concealing the true design of the towers revaling the means of mass murder is misprision of felony and treason.

dipshit, the only thing that was connected to the outside of the core was the floor trusses
there were not any steel beams that connected to the outer shell

Wrong, there were floor beams every 20 feet between truss panels. That is an interior box column that surrounded the core with floor beams of 2 floors still attached.

Note the billowing web of the "I" beam where something expanding with tremendous force pushed the assembly out.

LOL
yes that is steel
but you have no proof of what part of the building it came from
and

AND

where is your fucking CONCRETE, DIPSHIT

 

[Fizz]

Wrong, there were floor beams every 20 feet between truss panels.

bullshit. you just made that up because when you were shown a picture of this yesterday it proved you were lying by claiming the columns were "elevator guide rail supports" and they were joined by butt plates.

you got owned!!

now you are lying and making sit up as you go along again.

 

[Liability]

A NYC retired DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF had some interesting things to note about the CONSTRUCTION of the TWIN TOWERS:

Why the WTC Building Collapsed

His CRITICISM included the fact that the development of the history of skyscraper construction had evolved to the point where the Twin Towers' cores had no concrete.

* * * * Concrete removal

Since the end of WWII builders designed most of the concrete from the modern high-rise constriction. First concrete they eliminated was the stone exterior wall. They replace them with the “curtain walls of glass, sheet steel, or plastics. This curtain wall acted as a lightweight skin to enclose the structure from the outside elements. Next the 8-inch thick concrete floors went. They were replaced with a combination of 2 or 3 inches of concrete on top of thin corrugated steel sheets. Next the masonry enclosure for stairs and elevators were replaced with several layers of sheet rock. Then the masonry smoke proof tower was eliminated in the 1968 building code. It contained too much concrete weight and took up valuable floor space. Then the solid steel beam was replace by the steel truss. And finally the concrete and brick encasement of steel columns girders and floor supports was eliminated. A lightweight spray-on coating of asbestos or mineral fiber was sprayed over the steel. This coating provided fireproofing. After asbestos was discovered hazardous vermiculite or volcanic rock ash substance was used as a spray-on coating for steel. Outside of the foundation walls and a thin 2 or 3 inches of floors surface, concrete has almost been eliminated from high-rise office building construction. If you look at the WTC rubble at ground zero you see very little concrete and lots of twisted steel.

Id. [Emphases added by me.]

I suppose ChrissytoFEARa will now advise us that Deputy Chief Vincent Dunn, ret. must be "in on" the conspiracy.

 

[slackjawed]

A NYC retired DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF had some interesting things to note about the CONSTRUCTION of the TWIN TOWERS:

Why the WTC Building Collapsed

His CRITICISM included the fact that the development of the history of skyscraper construction had evolved to the point where the Twin Towers' cores had no concrete.

* * * * Concrete removal

Since the end of WWII builders designed most of the concrete from the modern high-rise constriction. First concrete they eliminated was the stone exterior wall. They replace them with the “curtain walls of glass, sheet steel, or plastics. This curtain wall acted as a lightweight skin to enclose the structure from the outside elements. Next the 8-inch thick concrete floors went. They were replaced with a combination of 2 or 3 inches of concrete on top of thin corrugated steel sheets. Next the masonry enclosure for stairs and elevators were replaced with several layers of sheet rock. Then the masonry smoke proof tower was eliminated in the 1968 building code. It contained too much concrete weight and took up valuable floor space. Then the solid steel beam was replace by the steel truss. And finally the concrete and brick encasement of steel columns girders and floor supports was eliminated. A lightweight spray-on coating of asbestos or mineral fiber was sprayed over the steel. This coating provided fireproofing. After asbestos was discovered hazardous vermiculite or volcanic rock ash substance was used as a spray-on coating for steel. Outside of the foundation walls and a thin 2 or 3 inches of floors surface, concrete has almost been eliminated from high-rise office building construction. If you look at the WTC rubble at ground zero you see very little concrete and lots of twisted steel.

Id. [Emphases added by me.]

I suppose ChrissytoFEARa will now advise us that Deputy Chief Vincent Dunn, ret. must be "in on" the conspiracy.

There you go again citing facts to those who disapprove of facts.

 

[Christophera]

And that was written after 9-11. It is also completely inconsistent with every other account and makes no sense structurally. The account of ground zero wreakage is erroneous because most of the steel columns were straight.

Since no one can produce an image of the supposed steel core columns inthe core area on 9-11, it can be considered subterfuge. Also, no one can produce a construction photo showing the supposed steel core columns with the needed gusset plates on intersections or diagonal bracing which is going to be required to resist torsion.

Now, how are the elevators and hallways going to pass through the core on every floor with diagonal braces piercing floors?

The concrete core provided all lateral strength with shear walls and made the hollow core work for elevators and stairways while providing access to the core and and elevators with simple openings in the core wall faces.

 

[Fizz]

And that was written after 9-11. It is also completely inconsistent with every other account and makes no sense structurally.

no sense? like how the "perpetrators" stole every picture of a concrete core from the internet, fromn every book ever published, from all the building plans and from everybody's home that may have visited new york during construction of the WTC?

you mean "no sense" like that??

 

[Liability]

And that was written after 9-11. It is also completely inconsistent with every other account and makes no sense structurally.

It is perfectly consistent with a variety of reasonable accounts. That it was written after 9/11 is hardly surprising or invalidating. And there's not a single thing about it that doesn't make sense, structurally.

In fact, here's an article that discusses the collapse far more intelligently than a parnoid moron like you will ever be able to appreciate. There IS a mention of concrete, of course, but it is addressed to the FLOORING:

* * * * Web joists 80 cm tall connected the core to the perimeter at each story. Concrete slabs were poured over these joists to form the floors. In essence, the building is an egg-crate construction that is about 95 percent air, explaining why the rubble after the collapse was only a few stories high. * * * *

Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation

 

[Christophera]

And that was written after 9-11. It is also completely inconsistent with every other account and makes no sense structurally.

It is perfectly consistent with a variety of reasonable accounts. That it was written after 9/11 is hardly surprising or invalidating. And there's not a single thing about it that doesn't make sense, structurally.

In fact, here's an article that discusses the collapse far more intelligently than a parnoid moron like you will ever be able to appreciate. There IS a mention of concrete, of course, but it is addressed to the FLOORING:

* * * * Web joists 80 cm tall connected the core to the perimeter at each story. Concrete slabs were poured over these joists to form the floors. In essence, the building is an egg-crate construction that is about 95 percent air, explaining why the rubble after the collapse was only a few stories high. * * * *

Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation

An image from 9-11 showing the supposed steel core columns is needed before those assertions have any veracity at all.

Clearly, Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.