Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

[Christophera]

Amatuer evasion.

There is no such thing as a "scanning anomalie". There are scanning "artifacts". These are are not "artifacts" these are a irregularity very carefully controlled and centered in the cells in the place of intials in the revision table.

 

[DiveCon]

Amatuer evasion.

There is no such thing as a "scanning anomalie". There are scanning "artifacts". These are are not "artifacts" these are a irregularity very carefully controlled and centered in the cells in the place of intials in the revision table.

wrong again, dipshit
scanners will always try to put things in square pixels and thats exactly what you see there

if that was edited digitally you wouldnt see the distortion

 

[Fizz]

Amatuer evasion.

There is no such thing as a "scanning anomalie". There are scanning "artifacts". These are are not "artifacts" these are a irregularity very carefully controlled and centered in the cells in the place of intials in the revision table.

and where is your proof that what is shown here is not in the original document that was scanned?

 

[Christophera]

Amatuer evasion.

There is no such thing as a "scanning anomalie". There are scanning "artifacts". These are are not "artifacts" these are a irregularity very carefully controlled and centered in the cells in the place of intials in the revision table.

and where is your proof that what is shown here is not in the original document that was scanned?

A pencil original cannot have that. If it did, it would not reproduce as we see, that is the nature of pencil. It does not do that. The edges are fuzzy, as can be seen in the edges of the adjacent penciled characters.

 

[DiveCon]

Amatuer evasion.

There is no such thing as a "scanning anomalie". There are scanning "artifacts". These are are not "artifacts" these are a irregularity very carefully controlled and centered in the cells in the place of intials in the revision table.

and where is your proof that what is shown here is not in the original document that was scanned?

A pencil original cannot have that. If it did, it would not reproduce as we see, that is the nature of pencil. It does not do that. The edges are fuzzy, as can be seen in the edges of the adjacent penciled characters.

WRONG, dipshit

and "anomaly" is what it is called

 

[Fizz]

A pencil original cannot have that. If it did, it would not reproduce as we see, that is the nature of pencil. It does not do that. The edges are fuzzy, as can be seen in the edges of the adjacent penciled characters.

who says a pencil cant do that? where is your proof? scanners dont care if a line is made of pencil or ink or paint.

the edges arent "fuzzy", moron. they are pixelated. you cant compare horizontal and vertical lines to lines that are diagonal. a pixel is square. it doesnt have diagnal sides.

 

[Christophera]

A pencil original cannot have that. If it did, it would not reproduce as we see, that is the nature of pencil. It does not do that. The edges are fuzzy, as can be seen in the edges of the adjacent penciled characters.

who says a pencil cant do that? where is your proof? scanners dont care if a line is made of pencil or ink or paint.

the edges arent "fuzzy", moron. they are pixelated. you cant compare horizontal and vertical lines to lines that are diagonal. a pixel is square. it doesnt have diagnal sides.

No way, not even with a ruler at that scale can you make a line that clean edged. That is why ink was used. Ink on mylar created the densist edge in that day. And, I would bet that the official plans are at least ink on vellum.

 

[DiveCon]

A pencil original cannot have that. If it did, it would not reproduce as we see, that is the nature of pencil. It does not do that. The edges are fuzzy, as can be seen in the edges of the adjacent penciled characters.

who says a pencil cant do that? where is your proof? scanners dont care if a line is made of pencil or ink or paint.

the edges arent "fuzzy", moron. they are pixelated. you cant compare horizontal and vertical lines to lines that are diagonal. a pixel is square. it doesnt have diagnal sides.

No way, not even with a ruler at that scale can you make a line that clean edged. That is why ink was used. Ink on mylar created the densist edge in that day. And, I would bet that the official plans are at least ink on vellum.

sorry dipshit, but those lines are not "clean"

 

[Fizz]

A pencil original cannot have that. If it did, it would not reproduce as we see, that is the nature of pencil. It does not do that. The edges are fuzzy, as can be seen in the edges of the adjacent penciled characters.

who says a pencil cant do that? where is your proof? scanners dont care if a line is made of pencil or ink or paint.

the edges arent "fuzzy", moron. they are pixelated. you cant compare horizontal and vertical lines to lines that are diagonal. a pixel is square. it doesnt have diagnal sides.

No way, not even with a ruler at that scale can you make a line that clean edged. That is why ink was used. Ink on mylar created the densist edge in that day. And, I would bet that the official plans are at least ink on vellum.

you say it was digitally altered. in order to prove it you need to show what it was altered from!! how are we to know that what is shown in your scan isnt on the original? you simply claim it was changed. you have no proof that the scan isnt accurate to the original paper document. its just you making another stupid fucking claim you cant back up.

 

[Christophera]

who says a pencil cant do that? where is your proof? scanners dont care if a line is made of pencil or ink or paint.

the edges arent "fuzzy", moron. they are pixelated. you cant compare horizontal and vertical lines to lines that are diagonal. a pixel is square. it doesnt have diagnal sides.

No way, not even with a ruler at that scale can you make a line that clean edged. That is why ink was used. Ink on mylar created the densist edge in that day. And, I would bet that the official plans are at least ink on vellum.

you say it was digitally altered. in order to prove it you need to show what it was altered from!!

No, the fact that it has impossible pixel width spaces and lines is adequate.

The orignal paper does not have a revision table and that would prove it. That may be found sometime.

 

[Fizz]

The orignal paper does not have a revision table and that would prove it. That may be found sometime.

the original paper doesnt have a revision table? then what was scanned?

 

[Christophera]

The orignal paper does not have a revision table and that would prove it. That may be found sometime.

the original paper doesnt have a revision table? then what was scanned?

Some other set of palns with a revision table was scanned and then revision table cut and pasted.

However, since there were 200 sheets that needed to the alteration, that revision table had to be dublicated and altered to appear slightly differently. Here is where the photoshoppers screwed up.

They cut and pasted the contents of the cells into separate files having the cell size or slightly smaller. Then altered those cell contents in a variety of ways getting a different look. This is where the anomalies were generated. They lost track of them and created an abberation that was not a character of the alphabet by reducing size, resolution or other graphic factors. But, they were working at a small scale to make the work faster. Therein they did not notice the anomalie.

Placement of the altered initials with automation such as "quick keys" in identical revision table files with empty cells can be done easily and takes the bulk of the difficult work and gets it done very quickly. So they did not even notice what was being placed in the cells.

 

[Fizz]

The orignal paper does not have a revision table and that would prove it. That may be found sometime.

the original paper doesnt have a revision table? then what was scanned?

Some other set of palns with a revision table was scanned and then revision table cut and pasted.

However, since there were 200 sheets that needed to the alteration, that revision table had to be dublicated and altered to appear slightly differently. Here is where the photoshoppers screwed up.

They cut and pasted the contents of the cells into separate files having the cell size or slightly smaller. Then altered those cell contents in a variety of ways getting a different look. This is where the anomalies were generated. They lost track of them and created an abberation that was not a character of the alphabet by reducing size, resolution or other graphic factors. But, they were working at a small scale to make the work faster. Therein they did not notice the anomalie.

Placement of the altered initials with automation such as "quick keys" in identical revision table files with empty cells can be done easily and takes the bulk of the difficult work and gets it done very quickly. So they did not even notice what was being placed in the cells.

you are talking out of your ass again and just making shit up!!!

you're caught again!!

 

[Christophera]

This does not lie, so I have not lied. Something is very wrong.

 

[Fizz]

This does not lie, so I have not lied. Something is very wrong.

so where is your proof that this is not what was on the paper that was scanned?

 

[Liability]

Fucking Troofers don't have the slightest clue on how a scanner works. The optical readers gather up the image on a document and have to immediately translate it into something the computer can recognize. It's never a perfect one to one correspondence. It's more akin to an algorithm.

he basic principle of a scanner is to analyze an image and process it in some way. Image and text capture (optical character recognition or OCR) allow you to save information to a file on your computer. You can then alter or enhance the image, print it out or use it on your Web page.

In this article, we'll be focusing on flatbed scanners, but the basic principles apply to most other scanner technologies. You will learn about the different types of scanners, how the scanning mechanism works and what TWAIN means. You will also learn about resolution, interpolation and bit depth.

On the next page, you will learn about the various parts of a flatbed scanner.
*
Next Page

HowStuffWorks "How Scanners Work"

The image of the document that you scan reaches the CCD array through a series of mirrors, filters and lenses. The exact configuration of these components will depend on the model of scanner, but the basics are pretty much the same.

On the next page, you will see just how all the pieces of the scanner work together.

HowStuffWorks "How Scanners Work"

* The image of the document is reflected by an angled mirror to another mirror. In some scanners, there are only two mirrors while others use a three mirror approach. Each mirror is slightly curved to focus the image it reflects onto a smaller surface.

* The last mirror reflects the image onto a lens. The lens focuses the image through a filter on the CCD array.

* * * * We will take a look at what happens between the computer and scanner, but first let's talk about resolution.

HowStuffWorks "How Scanners Work"

* * * * Interpolation is a process that the scanning software uses to increase the perceived resolution of an image. It does this by creating extra pixels in between the ones actually scanned by the CCD array. These extra pixels are an average of the adjacent pixels. For example, if the hardware resolution is 300x300 and the interpolated resolution is 600x300, then the software is adding a pixel between every one scanned by a CCD sensor in each row. * * * *

HowStuffWorks "How Scanners Work"

AND NOW we get to the real nub of it:

On your computer, you need software, called a driver, that knows how to communicate with the scanner. Most scanners speak a common language, TWAIN. The TWAIN driver acts as an interpreter between any application that supports the TWAIN standard and the scanner. This means that the application does not need to know the specific details of the scanner in order to access it directly. For example, you can choose to acquire an image from the scanner from within Adobe Photoshop because Photoshop supports the TWAIN standard.

In addition to the driver, most scanners come with other software. Typically, a scanning utility and some type of image editing application are included. A lot of scanners include OCR software. OCR allows you to scan in words from a document and convert them into computer-based text. It uses an averaging process to determine what the shape of a character is and match it to the correct letter or number.

The great thing about scanner technology today is that you can get exactly what you need. You can find a decent scanner with good software for less than $200, or get a fantastic scanner with incredible software for less than $1,000. It all depends on your needs and budget.
* * * *

HowStuffWorks "How Scanners Work"

Once we get into the realm of interpolation and OCR translation and averaging, it become immediately clear that a scanned image of something like an architectural plan will not end up looking (at the pixel level) exactly like the original.

And from this, fucking dishonest scumbag Troofers add yet more conspiracy to their already dishonest and absurd conspiracy bullshit.

I can't abide these fucking Troofers. They are all lying scum.

 

[DiveCon]

This does not lie, so I have not lied. Something is very wrong.

so where is your proof that this is not what was on the paper that was scanned?

he has none

 

[Christophera]

This does not lie, so I have not lied. Something is very wrong.

so where is your proof that this is not what was on the paper that was scanned?

The perps would not want you to observe what is technically correct, or that a pencil drawing at that scale cannot be scanned to create what is seen.

You cannot even create that with a pencil and scan it to create perfect pixel clean lines. That is why inked originals are required for some official records. Line density.

 

[DiveCon]

Fucking Troofers don't have the slightest clue on how a scanner works. The optical readers gather up the image on a document and have to immediately translate it into something the computer can recognize. It's never a perfect one to one correspondence. It's more akin to an algorithm.

he basic principle of a scanner is to analyze an image and process it in some way. Image and text capture (optical character recognition or OCR) allow you to save information to a file on your computer. You can then alter or enhance the image, print it out or use it on your Web page.

In this article, we'll be focusing on flatbed scanners, but the basic principles apply to most other scanner technologies. You will learn about the different types of scanners, how the scanning mechanism works and what TWAIN means. You will also learn about resolution, interpolation and bit depth.

On the next page, you will learn about the various parts of a flatbed scanner.
*
Next Page

HowStuffWorks "How Scanners Work"

The image of the document that you scan reaches the CCD array through a series of mirrors, filters and lenses. The exact configuration of these components will depend on the model of scanner, but the basics are pretty much the same.

On the next page, you will see just how all the pieces of the scanner work together.

HowStuffWorks "How Scanners Work"

HowStuffWorks "How Scanners Work"

* * * * Interpolation is a process that the scanning software uses to increase the perceived resolution of an image. It does this by creating extra pixels in between the ones actually scanned by the CCD array. These extra pixels are an average of the adjacent pixels. For example, if the hardware resolution is 300x300 and the interpolated resolution is 600x300, then the software is adding a pixel between every one scanned by a CCD sensor in each row. * * * *

HowStuffWorks "How Scanners Work"

AND NOW we get to the real nub of it:

On your computer, you need software, called a driver, that knows how to communicate with the scanner. Most scanners speak a common language, TWAIN. The TWAIN driver acts as an interpreter between any application that supports the TWAIN standard and the scanner. This means that the application does not need to know the specific details of the scanner in order to access it directly. For example, you can choose to acquire an image from the scanner from within Adobe Photoshop because Photoshop supports the TWAIN standard.

In addition to the driver, most scanners come with other software. Typically, a scanning utility and some type of image editing application are included. A lot of scanners include OCR software. OCR allows you to scan in words from a document and convert them into computer-based text. It uses an averaging process to determine what the shape of a character is and match it to the correct letter or number.

The great thing about scanner technology today is that you can get exactly what you need. You can find a decent scanner with good software for less than $200, or get a fantastic scanner with incredible software for less than $1,000. It all depends on your needs and budget.
* * * *

HowStuffWorks "How Scanners Work"

Once we get into the realm of interpolation and OCR translation and averaging, it become immediately clear that a scanned image of something like an architectural plan will not end up looking (at the pixel level) exactly like the original.

And from this, fucking dishonest scumbag Troofers add yet more conspiracy to their already dishonest and absurd conspiracy bullshit.

I can't abide these fucking Troofers. They are all lying scum.

yup, but entirely too much work for a moron that will just ignore it or reject it in favor of his own delusional rantings

 

[DiveCon]

This does not lie, so I have not lied. Something is very wrong.

so where is your proof that this is not what was on the paper that was scanned?

The perps would not want you to observe what is technically correct, or that a pencil drawing at that scale cannot be scanned to create what is seen.

You cannot even create that with a pencil and scan it to create perfect pixel clean lines. That is why inked originals are required for some official records. Line density.

you are the perp

do you even own a scanner?
have you ever actually USED one?