Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

[Liability]

The perpetrators would have agents pretend that the images of the concrete core from 9-11 were something other than proof off a concrete core. Of course, considering all the corrobration, that assumption is not logical.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

Except as you know but refuse to admit, Robertson never said what was erroneously attributed to him. Thus he cannot have anything he DIDN'T say "verified," you lying piece of shit.

Domel was wrong. Yep. Even an expert can make a mistake, asshole.

The Oxford crap doesn't actually say that which you imagine it says; but even if it did, in the case of the Twin Towers, it would simply be providing mistaken information.

None of the images you have ever shared show "concrete."

And repeating that stupid meaningless always refuted paragraph you rely upon so ignorantly still doesn't support it.

You remain a fucking scumbag imbecile liar and a sack of rancid pus.

 

[Fizz]

That is a fraudulent diagram.

says who? YOU?!!!!

HAHAHAhahahahahahahaha!!!!! thats funny!!!

 

[Christophera]

The diagram matches the fake plan

Which has been shown to NOT represent what was on the ground. The above 12 foot wide concrete wall is where the fake plan shows an air shaft, a steam shaft and a janitors closet.

Your diagram is a fraud.

 

[DiveCon]

The diagram matches the fake plan



Which has been shown to NOT represent what was on the ground. The above 12 foot wide concrete wall is where the fake plan shows an air shaft, a steam shaft and a janitors closet.



Your diagram is a fraud.

the diagram is just a simplification of the tube within a tube construction, and had no bearing on the actual plans, dipshit

 

[Fizz]

The diagram matches the fake plan

Which has been shown to NOT represent what was on the ground. The above 12 foot wide concrete wall is where the fake plan shows an air shaft, a steam shaft and a janitors closet.

Your diagram is a fraud.

no moron. your entire concrete core hoax is a fraud. you have no plans. you have no pictures. you have nothing.

you are delusional. you see things that arent there. you make crap up constantly. none of your shit makes any sense. you ignore facts and make up stupid lies.

you need a doctor and desperately need to be taking your psych meds.

 

[Christophera]

The agents are going to try and get people to believe,

Newsweek can't get info correct from an engineer regarding fundamental design of skyscrapers that supposedly collapsed killing 3,0000. Or that the engineer would not ask for a correction with the immense liability

the info has attached to it.

Oxford encylopedia cannot get the fundamental design of 2 of the worlds tallest towers correct.

That a structural engineer certified in 12 states would publish a .pdf describing the fundmental design of skyscrapers that supposedly colapse killing 3,000, cannot get the design correct from sources available to him 2 weeks after 9-11.

That drywall can survive the crash of hundreds of thousands of tons of steel from a height of 500 feet.


And that conceptual diagrams of a skyscraper core do not need to show diagonal bracing which is needed for stability and resistence to sway.


And that it is okay for such a diagram to be the SOLITARY depiction (correct, no plans) for 2 of the worlds tallest buildings.


Agents, this is a conspiracy forum, not COMEDY

 

[DiveCon]

The agents are going to try and get people to believe,

Agents, this is a conspiracy forum, not COMEDY

you are a fucking comedy, dipshit

 

[Fizz]

The agents are going to try and get people to believe,

Newsweek can't get info correct from an engineer regarding fundamental design of skyscrapers that supposedly collapsed killing 3,0000. Or that the engineer would not ask for a correction with the immense liability

the info has attached to it.

Oxford encylopedia cannot get the fundamental design of 2 of the worlds tallest towers correct.

That a structural engineer certified in 12 states would publish a .pdf describing the fundmental design of skyscrapers that supposedly colapse killing 3,000, cannot get the design correct from sources available to him 2 weeks after 9-11.

That drywall can survive the crash of hundreds of thousands of tons of steel from a height of 500 feet.


And that conceptual diagrams of a skyscraper core do not need to show diagonal bracing which is needed for stability and resistence to sway.


And that it is okay for such a diagram to be the SOLITARY depiction (correct, no plans) for 2 of the worlds tallest buildings.


Agents, this is a conspiracy forum, not COMEDY

all that shit has been debunked over and over again.


the deadbeat scumbag that refuses to pay his child support because he cant find a paper from 1876 wants you to believe that THIS is concrete!!!

 

[Christophera]

Because the agents have no evidence they must try and create emotional reasoning. However what I show with the failure to appear on subpoena definitely estoppes what the county was doing in retaliation for my exposing that over 1,000 case files were missing from the district court records. But judges can and do lie on the bench these days.

Meanwhile, in stark contrast to your abject lack of evidence, Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[Fizz]

steel core.

compulsive liar.

 

[DiveCon]

steel core.

pathological liar.

fixed

 

[DiveCon]

Because the agents have no evidence they must try and create emotional reasoning. However what I show with the failure to appear on subpoena definitely estoppes what the county was doing in retaliation for my exposing that over 1,000 case files were missing from the district court records. But judges can and do lie on the bench these days.

<repetitive bullshit removed>

records from 1876 have NOTHING to do with your case of failure to pay child support, thus there were not material to your case

 

[Christophera]

The infiltrating perpetrators expect you to pretend that people cannot tell your image showing the massive columns that surrounded the core does not show steel columns inside the core. Literealy, it does not show one.

Then you demonstrate what a coward you are by not posting your picture with mine.

I mean you could look like this,

Or this.

 

[DiveCon]

The infiltrating perpetrators expect you to pretend that people cannot tell your image showing the massive columns that surrounded the core does not show steel columns inside the core. Literealy, it does not show one.

Then you demonstrate what a coward you are by not posting your picture with mine.

I mean you could look like this,



Or this.

you are the dipshit that not only used his own name here, but also posted his own photo online to be found by anyone
and clearly from your posts you are a pathological liar
as well as delusional beyond belief

 

[Rat in the Hat]

steel core.

Kryptonian liar.

So this is what Tard-El looks like. Well, that answers a few questions.

 

[Fizz]

The infiltrating perpetrators expect you to pretend that people cannot tell your image showing the massive columns that surrounded the core does not show steel columns inside the core. Literealy, it does not show one.

another lie.

where are you getting this information that massive steel columns surrounded the core?

its just another stupid fucking lie you made up.

the steel core columns ARE THE CORE you deabeat moron.

get a job and pay the $30,000 in child support you owe.

 

[Liability]

There she is, Misprision of Treason

There she is, your ideal (lunatic)

Conspiracy nutbars all want to be like her

but they can't be, because

She's one of a KIND!

Miss Prision of Treason 2010.

(Where's her crown?)

 

[Christophera]

where are you getting this information that massive steel columns surrounded the core?

All of your photos show it. Mine too, but they show some concrete too. This one shows the massive core base wall of WTC 1. The north core wall has the massive interior box column still standing, to the left, outside the core.

s.jones uses this one in error like you do. This shows ONLY the columns surrounding the core. It does not "look into" the core area.

 

[Fizz]

where are you getting this information that massive steel columns surrounded the core?

All of your photos show it. Mine too, but they show some concrete too. This one shows the massive core base wall of WTC 1. The north core wall has the massive interior box column still standing, to the left, outside the core.

so you admit you are just making it up. you have no information to back up your claim that box columns surrounded a concrete core.

the pictures ALL show a steel core and no concrete. in your delusional mind you simply lie and say they surround concrete.

got it.

thanks.

 

[Christophera]

Your continued posting without asserting that there were steel core columns WHILE NOT posting images of the supposed steel core columns indicates that the agents are weak at supporting the steel core columns because FEMA made them up.