To African Americans: Watch the first 10 minutes of this video.

The2ndAmendment

Gold Member
Feb 16, 2013
13,383
3,659
Spread the word:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwueChZUgf8]NO GUNS FOR NEGROES 2of2 THE RACIST ROOTS OF GUN CONTROL - YouTube[/ame]

Read this link too:

The Secret History of Guns - Adam Winkler - The Atlantic

Spread the word. Go to your community events, your churches, and any other public venue you can think of and spread the word.

---------------------------------------

EDIT (someone played the race card in order to keep us divided):
The irony of the extreme right wing courting racial minorities is hilarious. Keep it up, OP!

I'm not right wing. I despise Republicans as much as I despise Democrats. They are both corporate engines of destruction, intent on demolishing your civil and economic liberties.

Republican - "I want small government, except when I want to impose my beliefs on you."

Democrat - "I want everyone to be free, except with their money and property."

-------------------------

Libertarianism is the only way. We're all in this together; black, white, latino, asian, christian, muslim, jewish, male, female, gay, straight ... etc.

We're all being fooled while the One Party system strips our rights away. The entire Bill of Rights and even Habeas Corpus and Treason (due process) are under siege. It started under Bush and Cheney, and has intensified under Obama.

Government in its best state is but a necessary evil, in its worst state, an intolerable one.

Your government is a conglomeration of corporations, that have established an oppressive aristocracy over us. They give you an illusion of choice.

We will all suffer together, no matter your race, religion, gender, orientation or creed. The time has come.

----------
Stop with the partisanship and demonization of each other, because if we don't have each other, we're doomed to fail. United we're unstoppable, divided we are conquered.
 
Last edited:
The irony of the extreme right wing courting racial minorities is hilarious. Keep it up, OP!
 
The irony of the extreme right wing courting racial minorities is hilarious. Keep it up, OP!

I'm not right wing. I despise Republicans as much as I despise Democrats. They are both corporate engines of destruction, intent on demolishing your civil and economic liberties.

Republican - "I want small government, except when I want to impose my beliefs on you."

Democrat - "I want every to be free, except with their money and property."

-------------------------

Libertarianism is the only way. We're all in this together; black, white, latino, asian, christian, muslim, jewish, male, female, gay, straight ... etc.

We're all being fooled while the One Party system strips our rights away. The entire Bill of Rights and even Habeas Corpus and Treason (due process) are under siege. It started under Bush and Cheney, and has intensified under Obama.

Government in its best state is but a necessary evil, in its worst state, an intolerable one.

Your government is a conglomeration of corporations, that have established an oppressive aristocracy over us. They give you an illusion of choice.

We will all suffer together, no matter your race, religion, gender, orientation or creed. The time has come.

----------
Stop with the partisanship and demonication of each other, because if we don't have each other, we're doomed to fail. United we're unstoppable, divided we are conquered.
 
Last edited:
Libertarianism is the only way.

So then you are right wing, aren't you?

I'm Libertarian Center.

bothaxes.gif


Also good job ignoring the rest of my post. Proves you're a corporate clown.
 
Last edited:
I don't think it is possible to be Libertarian (in the sense you mean it), and anything but extremely right wing.

The idea of minimal state intervention and a free market economy is right wing by definition.

Likewise, I don't think a person an claim to be a socialist and centrist - the two position are contadictory.
 
I don't think it is possible to be Libertarian (in the sense you mean it), and anything but extremely right wing.

The idea of minimal state intervention and a free market economy is right wing by definition.

Likewise, I don't think a person an claim to be a socialist and centrist - the two position are contadictory.

A completely free market allows men (or other entities) to violate the rights of others. Here's a very simple example. It looks somewhat comical at first glance, but when you really think about it, it makes a shitload of sense (copied and pasted my own words from another thread):

A true Classical-Liberal believes that no one rights may be restricted, so long as he does NOT INFRINGE upon the rights of others.

So pollution is easy to answer. Everyone has a right to Life. The rights that come under Life are so simple and basic, that it even sounds silly to discuss them. However, one of the rights of life is the right to breathe. If someone or something is making it toxic to breathe, then they are infringing on your right to life.

As such, Congress can make laws that are necessary and proper (or General Welfare Clause) to put an end to pollution, or limit it significantly.

That being said, Democrats abuse this and take it to the extreme, and they don't actually solve the pollution problem anyway. They prefer to "tax pollution," instead of "stop pollution."

The government can play referee (a necessary evil), but it can't be the players (an intolerable evil).


---------------------------
Thus necessity, like a gravitating power, would soon form our newly arrived emigrants into society, the reciprocal blessings of which, would supersede, and render the obligations of law and government unnecessary while they remained perfectly just to each other; but as nothing but heaven is impregnable to vice, it will unavoidably happen, that in proportion as they surmount the first difficulties of emigration, which bound them together in a common cause, they will begin to relax in their duty and attachment to each other; and this remissness, will point out the necessity, of establishing some form of government to supply the defect of moral virtue.

Some convenient tree will afford them a State-House, under the branches of which, the whole colony may assemble to deliberate on public matters. It is more than probable that their first laws will have the title only of Regulations, and be enforced by no other penalty than public disesteem. In this first parliament every man, by natural right will have a seat.

But as the colony increases, the public concerns will increase likewise, and the distance at which the members may be separated, will render it too inconvenient for all of them to meet on every occasion as at first, when their number was small, their habitations near, and the public concerns few and trifling. This will point out the convenience of their consenting to leave the legislative part to be managed by a select number chosen from the whole body, who are supposed to have the same concerns at stake which those have who appointed them, and who will act in the same manner as the whole body would act were they present. If the colony continue increasing, it will become necessary to augment the number of the representatives, and that the interest of every part of the colony may be attended to, it will be found best to divide the whole into convenient parts, each part sending its proper number; and that the elected might never form to themselves an interest separate from the electors, prudence will point out the propriety of having elections often; because as the elected might by that means return and mix again with the general body of the electors in a few months, their fidelity to the public will be secured by the prudent reflection of not making a rod for themselves. And as this frequent interchange will establish a common interest with every part of the community, they will mutually and naturally support each other, and on this (not on the unmeaning name of king) depends the strength of government, and the happiness of the governed.

Here then is the origin and rise of government; namely, a mode rendered necessary by the inability of moral virtue to govern the world; here too is the design and end of government, viz., freedom and security. And however our eyes may be dazzled with snow, or our ears deceived by sound; however prejudice may warp our wills, or interest darken our understanding, the simple voice of nature and of reason will say, it is right.

The people who believe in unlimited free markets are as silly as people who believe you have the right to yell FIRE in a theater. They do not recognize the concepts I put in bold.
 
Last edited:
Seeing how blacks do 52% of all murders and most of these are within our cities. The same cities that have GUN control...

What can be said? Liberals are really nuts.
 
Seeing how blacks do 52% of all murders and most of these are within our cities. The same cities that have GUN control...

What can be said? Liberals are really nuts.

Can I ask you to elaborate on what you mean here? I want to know why you deemed it necessary to mention that blacks do 52% of all murders (even though its true), what message are you trying to deliver, in what context?

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/uc...s.-2011/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-1

Whites aren't that far behind.

However, black on black murder (in proportion of population) is seven times higher than white on white. This is because the government is in a 21st Prohibition Era (Narcotics), and purposely keeps blacks impoverished and deny them education opportunities. Affirmative Action is a good and necessary thing, but it hardly makes a difference when many blacks drop out of high school before ever going to college. The government provides them with neither maintained nor modernized schools. They do not provide good quality teachers nor provide them with enough teachers to lower class size. They want as many blacks as possible behind bars so that they cannot vote (many felons cannot vote). The only way out of poverty for most blacks is crime, and the system is set up that way. They are FORCED to accept handouts just to survive, which means more votes for the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party has no interest in improving their condition. Sadly, Republicans have a negative interest, they want to oppress them and deny opportunities in order to kick them while they are already down. Anyway, main theme, Inferior Educational Facilities in order to decrease their opportunities.

The two parties use them as pawns. Democrats get their votes, because they have no choice but to vote Democrat, Republicans get off on coded racism to get White votes. Blacks are still slaves, that's why BOTH parties disarm them.

Also, the mess of taxes and regulations have caused massive unemployment in black areas. Leading to more poverty. Where there might be employment (private sector), blacks must often contend with racism. I find it surprising on Long Island (where I work), that my job (private sector, catering) only has three or four black employees (doing the lowest paid job) in an area that is dominated by blacks and latinos. Two of them work as hard and harder than the white waiters, and are for more efficient and intelligent at managing their responsibilities.

Libertarians must deliver this message. Freedom is a powerful message, it cannot be stopped, it cannot be silenced, it is God.
 
Last edited:
Seeing how blacks do 52% of all murders and most of these are within our cities. The same cities that have GUN control...

What can be said? Liberals are really nuts.

Can I ask you to elaborate on what you mean here? I want to know why you deemed it necessary to mention that blacks do 52% of all murders (even though its true), what message are you trying to deliver, in what context?

FBI ? Expanded Homicide Data Table 1

Whites aren't that far behind.

However, black on black murder (in proportion of population) is seven times higher than white on white.


My message is the fact that blacks are 7 times as likely per capita to murder over whites. Raw(63%) of course whites are close as we're 5-6 times as many. This is why our cities are war zones and gun control is idiocy. It won't work as the black community overall could care less about them. :eek:

My message simply is that the black community doesn't seem to give a damn. They will still have guns and they will just riot if the government tries anything. Yes, it maybe racist as they do cause such a high level of it.
 
Last edited:
My message is the fact that blacks are 7 times as likely per capita to murder over whites. Raw(63%) of course whites are close as we're 5-6 times as many. This is why our cities are war zones and gun control is idiocy. It won't work as the black community overall could care less about them. :eek:

My message simply is that the black community doesn't seem to give a damn. They will still have guns and they will just riot if the government tries anything. Yes, it maybe racist as they do cause such a high level of it.

Read my above post.

You need to address the causes of crime to fix crime. Gun violence is not a cause of crime, its an effect. Also, the majority of blacks are law abiding citizens and will comply with gun control laws, just like whites.
 
Last edited:
Seeing how blacks do 52% of all murders and most of these are within our cities. The same cities that have GUN control...

What can be said? Liberals are really nuts.

Can I ask you to elaborate on what you mean here? I want to know why you deemed it necessary to mention that blacks do 52% of all murders (even though its true), what message are you trying to deliver, in what context?

FBI ? Expanded Homicide Data Table 1

Whites aren't that far behind.

However, black on black murder (in proportion of population) is seven times higher than white on white. This is because the government is in a 21st Prohibition Era (Narcotics), and purposely keeps blacks impoverished and deny them education opportunities. Affirmative Action is a good and necessary thing, but it hardly makes a difference when many blacks drop out of high school before ever going to college. The government provides them with neither maintained nor modernized schools. They do not provide good quality teachers nor provide them with enough teachers to lower class size. They want as many blacks as possible behind bars so that they cannot vote (many felons cannot vote). The only way out of poverty for most blacks is crime, and the system is set up that way. They are FORCED to accept handouts just to survive, which means more votes for the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party has no interest in improving their condition. Sadly, Republicans have a negative interest, they want to oppress them and deny opportunities in order to kick them while they are already down. Anyway, main theme, Inferior Educational Facilities in order to decrease their opportunities.

The two parties use them as pawns. Democrats get their votes, because they have no choice but to vote Democrat, Republicans get off on coded racism to get White votes. Blacks are still slaves, that's why BOTH parties disarm them.

Also, the mess of taxes and regulations have caused massive unemployment in black areas. Leading to more poverty. Where there might be employment (private sector), blacks must often contend with racism. I find it surprising on Long Island (where I work), that my job (private sector, catering) only has three or four black employees (doing the lowest paid job) in an area that is dominated by blacks and latinos. Two of them work as hard and harder than the white waiters, and are for more efficient and intelligent at managing their responsibilities.

Libertarians must deliver this message. Freedom is a powerful message, it cannot be stopped, it cannot be silenced, it is God.

Excellent points.
 

Forum List

Back
Top