Hellbilly
Platinum Member
- Oct 13, 2016
- 20,148
- 9,601
Under certain circumstances. A political rally is not one of them.The Fair Use doctrine allows for someone to play that music for non profit purposes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Under certain circumstances. A political rally is not one of them.The Fair Use doctrine allows for someone to play that music for non profit purposes.
Seriously, they appear to be getting dumber by the minute. I always thought Petty hid his political leanings well. These reactionary idiots probably all scream his lyrics out loud when played on their car radios. This story though,.. whoa, look out, Keri Lake was at stake!Net worth is the value of the assets a person owns, minus the liabilities they owe.
They do! This thread is providing an insight into how they think. I provide information from the government stating how copyright works and they still refuse to believe it.Seriously, they appear to be getting dumber by the minute. I always thought Petty hid his political leanings well. These reactionary idiots probably all scream his lyrics out loud when played on their car radios. This story though,.. whoa, look out, Keri Lake was at stake!
Yep, once expired. On January 1st of this year, for example, many published, copyrighted works from 1926 entered the public domain for the first time!
See my thumb? JFC you are dumb!
If it were up to me, there would be no "intellectual property." There would be no "public domain" licenses. No "copyright" protections. Being an eternal optimist, I look forward to such a day. But I'm also a realist. Being a nation of laws means people can't just do whatever they fucking please just because they feel like it really bad!
Did she?All of which is utterly irrelevant to the fact that Lake can use whatever she wants, provided she pays the statutory royalties.
You certainly appear oblivious, and proudly so. Congratulations.All of which is utterly irrelevant to the fact that Lake can use whatever she wants, provided she pays the statutory royalties.
The idiocy of you Nazis thinking that artists can decide who listens to or plays their songs is as childish as it is funny.
Tom Petty would have actively campaigned against the anti-democratic loon Kari Lake.
Too bad the MAGA losers don't understand this.
Link to and quote the law substantiating that claim.. or go fish. Your word on things has proven more useless than a porcupine in a balloon factory.Lake can use whatever she wants, provided she pays the statutory royalties.
Heh.George Harrison's estate denounced the use of the Harrison-written Beatles song "Here Comes the Sun" after the Trump campaign used the song to introduce Ivanka Trump at the 2016 Republican National Convention.[6] The estate noted that Trump did not have permission to use this song, but that they would consider allowing him to use the Harrison song "Beware of Darkness".
You do know that songs are copywritten, right?
That's exactly how it's done.This is not how it is done.
It's stealing. It's a crime punishable by a fine of anywhere from $200 to $150,000.
Did she?
Not according to the article.Yes, she did. Read the article.
Quote it!Not according to the article.
Quote it!
In a Tweet posted late Thursday Nov. 17, the official Tom Petty account shared, "The Tom Petty Estate and our partners were shocked to find out that Tom's song 'I Won't Back Down' was stolen and used without permission or a license to promote Kari Lake's failed campaign."