Tomorrow feb 12 is birthday of our most famous white supremacist

[Syriusly]

The war was not about 'freeing the slaves" and no one but you keeps saying that.

.

HAHAHA. Uranidioit. 99% of americans stupidly say the war was about freeing the slaves.

Yet here you are- the ONLY one in this thread repeatedly telling us that the war was not about freeing the slaves- when not one person here has said that it was.

You said it was.

Feel free to provide the quote.

I have consistently said that the rebel states tried to secede to protect slavery- but the North did not fight to free the slaves.

 

[rightwinger]

Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri And Delaware all kept their slaves until December 1865.

Yup - those 4 UNION states had around 400,000 slaves throughout the civil war. How could the war have been about freeing the slaves when both sides practiced slavery?? Libs can't answer that.

The rebel states attempted to secede to protect slavery.

The war was not about 'freeing the slaves" and no one but you keeps saying that.

The war was the result of the rebel states attempting to secede to protect their slaves.

The United States didn't go to war to free the slaves. She went to war to preserve the union.

Preserve a union fractured because southerners were more loyal to their slavery than their country

 

[Syriusly]

Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri And Delaware all kept their slaves until December 1865.

Yup - those 4 UNION states had around 400,000 slaves throughout the civil war. How could the war have been about freeing the slaves when both sides practiced slavery?? Libs can't answer that.

The rebel states attempted to secede to protect slavery.

The war was not about 'freeing the slaves" and no one but you keeps saying that.

The war was the result of the rebel states attempting to secede to protect their slaves.

The United States didn't go to war to free the slaves. She went to war to preserve the union.

The United States went to war because rebel states attacked soldiers of the United States Army.

Which has zilch to do with freeing the slaves.

Actually, the Rebel states attacking American army soldiers started the chain of events which resulted in the freedom of all slaves in America.

 

[jc456]

If the war was about freeing slaves, why did lincoln let the slave-owning border states stay in the union?. Why didn't he tell them "abolish slavery or go with the confederacy?" THINK

Because Lincoln was trying to preserve the union

You're right. Lincoln didn't care a bit about freeing the slaves. He cared about keeping the south in the union so the north could collect tariff money from the south.

You have to do one thing at a time

First he had to preserve the Union and then he had to go after the Slave Rapers

He ended up doing both

and ended up killing quite a few americans eh?

 

[rightwinger]

Do you have to use the Washington Times?
Why not use the National Enquirer and be done with it

It is more of the same Lincoln investigating options of what to do with freed slaves......none of which proved workable

It's a book review. I'm sorry if it destroys your argument that, "Lincoln never wanted to deport freed slaves" (your words).

Workable, or not, Lincoln wanted to deport the freed slaves.

We are looking at 1860s sociology.....not the best our country had to offer

We were a country that thought human bondage was a good idea. A country for slaves to go to seemed like a good idea. Not too different from Israel.
The idea proved unworkable

None of which changes the fact that Lincoln wanted to deport the slaves.

Lincoln listened to the greatest sociological minds of his day. None of which were outraged at the thought of freed slaves going to their own country

I loved the outer-limits.

Twilight Zone

 

[jc456]

Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri And Delaware all kept their slaves until December 1865.

Yup - those 4 UNION states had around 400,000 slaves throughout the civil war. How could the war have been about freeing the slaves when both sides practiced slavery?? Libs can't answer that.

The rebel states attempted to secede to protect slavery.

The war was not about 'freeing the slaves" and no one but you keeps saying that.

The war was the result of the rebel states attempting to secede to protect their slaves.

The United States didn't go to war to free the slaves. She went to war to preserve the union.

Preserve a union fractured because southerners were more loyal to their slavery than their country

spoken like a true libturd. Does the government get your home too?

 

[jc456]

It's a book review. I'm sorry if it destroys your argument that, "Lincoln never wanted to deport freed slaves" (your words).

Workable, or not, Lincoln wanted to deport the freed slaves.

We are looking at 1860s sociology.....not the best our country had to offer

We were a country that thought human bondage was a good idea. A country for slaves to go to seemed like a good idea. Not too different from Israel.
The idea proved unworkable

None of which changes the fact that Lincoln wanted to deport the slaves.

Lincoln listened to the greatest sociological minds of his day. None of which were outraged at the thought of freed slaves going to their own country

I loved the outer-limits.

Twilight Zone

ah yeah, ok, I was thinking outer-limits. Loved them both.

 

[rightwinger]

If the war was about freeing slaves, why did lincoln let the slave-owning border states stay in the union?. Why didn't he tell them "abolish slavery or go with the confederacy?" THINK

Because Lincoln was trying to preserve the union

You're right. Lincoln didn't care a bit about freeing the slaves. He cared about keeping the south in the union so the north could collect tariff money from the south.

You have to do one thing at a time

First he had to preserve the Union and then he had to go after the Slave Rapers

He ended up doing both

and ended up killing quite a few americans eh?

The Slave Rapers fought very hard to preserve their right to own other human beings

 

[rightwinger]

Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri And Delaware all kept their slaves until December 1865.

Yup - those 4 UNION states had around 400,000 slaves throughout the civil war. How could the war have been about freeing the slaves when both sides practiced slavery?? Libs can't answer that.

The rebel states attempted to secede to protect slavery.

The war was not about 'freeing the slaves" and no one but you keeps saying that.

The war was the result of the rebel states attempting to secede to protect their slaves.

The United States didn't go to war to free the slaves. She went to war to preserve the union.

Preserve a union fractured because southerners were more loyal to their slavery than their country

spoken like a true libturd. Does the government get your home too?

You are right on that one

Liberals fought hard to end the horrendous institution of slavery

 

[Syriusly]

Because Lincoln was trying to preserve the union

You're right. Lincoln didn't care a bit about freeing the slaves. He cared about keeping the south in the union so the north could collect tariff money from the south.

Not exactly- Lincoln was consistently opposed to slavery- and considered the Emancipation Proclamation one of his greatest achievements.

There is no indication that he ever cared about 'tariff money from the south'.

Unlike yourself, Lincoln considered slavery to be an evil institution.

Lincoln didn't give two shots about slavery. He married into a slave holding family.

Actually Lincoln's record is quite clear that he personally opposed slavery.

Link?

LOL- I love people who demand links- after posting dozens of times without any links- but sure.


Abraham Lincoln and slavery - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
On October 16, 1854, in his "Peoria Speech", Lincoln declared his opposition to slavery, which he repeated in his route to presidency.[14] Speaking in his Kentucky accent, with a very powerful voice,[15] he said the Kansas Act had a "declared indifference, but as I must think, a covert real zeal for the spread of slavery. I cannot but hate it. I hate it because of the monstrous injustice of slavery itself. I hate it because it deprives our republican example of its just influence in the world..."[16]

 

[rcfieldz]

Hmmm...I have yet to see blacks offer free rides to Africa for work.

 

[jc456]

If the war was about freeing slaves, why did lincoln let the slave-owning border states stay in the union?. Why didn't he tell them "abolish slavery or go with the confederacy?" THINK

Because Lincoln was trying to preserve the union

You're right. Lincoln didn't care a bit about freeing the slaves. He cared about keeping the south in the union so the north could collect tariff money from the south.

You have to do one thing at a time

First he had to preserve the Union and then he had to go after the Slave Rapers

He ended up doing both

and ended up killing quite a few americans eh?

The Slave Rapers fought very hard to preserve their right to own other human beings

but the North owned slaves and still owned them after the war. Maybe the south was more adamant about it, but the north had them as well. It was the practice of the country at the time agreed?

 

[jc456]

Yup - those 4 UNION states had around 400,000 slaves throughout the civil war. How could the war have been about freeing the slaves when both sides practiced slavery?? Libs can't answer that.

The rebel states attempted to secede to protect slavery.

The war was not about 'freeing the slaves" and no one but you keeps saying that.

The war was the result of the rebel states attempting to secede to protect their slaves.

The United States didn't go to war to free the slaves. She went to war to preserve the union.

Preserve a union fractured because southerners were more loyal to their slavery than their country

spoken like a true libturd. Does the government get your home too?

You are right on that one

Liberals fought hard to end the horrendous institution of slavery

and continue the practice today. For instance, the libturd cities of Chicago, Detroit, Ferguson, and Baltimore suppress their black families to this day. Keep them in poor neighborhoods with little opportunities. Yep I agree, the libturds love their slaves.

 

[rightwinger]

Because Lincoln was trying to preserve the union

You're right. Lincoln didn't care a bit about freeing the slaves. He cared about keeping the south in the union so the north could collect tariff money from the south.

You have to do one thing at a time

First he had to preserve the Union and then he had to go after the Slave Rapers

He ended up doing both

and ended up killing quite a few americans eh?

The Slave Rapers fought very hard to preserve their right to own other human beings

but the North owned slaves and still owned them after the war. Maybe the south was more adamant about it, but the north had them as well. It was the practice of the country at the time agreed?

The North was willing to work within the bounds of our Constitution. The south feared our Constitution and made one of their own that guaranteed slavery in perpetuity

 

[rcfieldz]

buy Crack not house paint.

 

[rightwinger]

The rebel states attempted to secede to protect slavery.

The war was not about 'freeing the slaves" and no one but you keeps saying that.

The war was the result of the rebel states attempting to secede to protect their slaves.

The United States didn't go to war to free the slaves. She went to war to preserve the union.

Preserve a union fractured because southerners were more loyal to their slavery than their country

spoken like a true libturd. Does the government get your home too?

You are right on that one

Liberals fought hard to end the horrendous institution of slavery

and continue the practice today. For instance, the libturd cities of Chicago, Detroit, Ferguson, and Baltimore suppress their black families to this day. Keep them in poor neighborhoods with little opportunities. Yep I agree, the libturds love their slaves.

Complete nonsense....please stay on topic

 

[the_human_being]

 

[Faun]

View attachment 63200

That's all past history when the northeast Liberals were mostly Republican and southern conservatives were mostly Democrat. Now northeast Liberals are mostly Democrat and the southern conservatives are mostly Republican.

 

[the_human_being]

View attachment 63200

That's all past history when the northeast Liberals were mostly Republican and southern conservatives were mostly Democrat. Now northeast Liberals are mostly Democrat and the southern conservatives are mostly Republican.

 

[jc456]

The United States didn't go to war to free the slaves. She went to war to preserve the union.

Preserve a union fractured because southerners were more loyal to their slavery than their country

spoken like a true libturd. Does the government get your home too?

You are right on that one

Liberals fought hard to end the horrendous institution of slavery

and continue the practice today. For instance, the libturd cities of Chicago, Detroit, Ferguson, and Baltimore suppress their black families to this day. Keep them in poor neighborhoods with little opportunities. Yep I agree, the libturds love their slaves.

Complete nonsense....please stay on topic

slaves is the topic, I'm all over it. it's funny when the factual information hits home.