- Thread starter
- #41
***chuckles*** do remember that this is not a legal proceeding..it's a political proceeding with legal implications--something quite different. Anyway...looks like Pelosi is ready to take it all public anyway.It has also been widely reported that Schitt isn't allowing "witnesses" to answer certain questions....That's tampering, a fucking felony.Nobody is hearing any "testimony"...It's all coached hearsay, with absolutely zero cross-examination or contrary evidence allowed to be shown.What the fuck can any of them say that isn't already in the released transcript?He figures he won't be very welcome when he says what he has to say, I reckon.
That is what we would like to hear. I am sure you are looking forward to his testimony also.
The perfect kind of star chamber court for fascists.
Poor little Trumpettes.....you do just regurgitate what your Dear Leader tells you.
41 Republicans are sitting in on that testimony and yes they have an opportunity to ask questions.
And you had no problem with a 'star chamber' when it came go Benghazi.......odd isn't it that you do now