Totally bassackwards political logic!

[imawhosure]

How many of you Trump supporters are tired of listening to the establishment posters, and lefties on here telling you Trump can't win, no way, zilch, forget about it?!

Listen to their bassackwards logic, then maybe you should send them to the doctor using Obamacare for a mental health check up------------->

the establishment Republicans insist he can't win, but they can not even defeat him in the primaries. In fact, the number 2 guy is also anti establishment, and they are struggling to come out on top of him too.

So what these fools are basically telling you is................your guy can't win, but for some unknown reason, or mighty establishment can't defeat him with all of our money and power........but hey, support our little "sweat meister," because he can win in the general, he just can't win in the Republican primary! How dumb do they think we are!

If they want one of their people, then PUSH him in, and if you can't, why would we ever think that the person who can't win the primary, would do better in the general, "just because they say so." It is faulty logic.

Where are these "mythical" establishment, Republican voters who will push their candidate through in the general? If they are sooooooo powerful, why is it they can't coral them for the primary if this is what all these "mythical" voters want? Are we seeing how the "great GOP establishment" ground game works, just like it did for the guy "who couldn't lose" named Romney?

If this is the best they can do, is it any wonder they couldn't win a general election against one of the worst Presidents in modern history; namely the messiah. Isn't it funny that they seems to find their voices to tell you how awful Trump and Cruz are, but they didn't dare us their vocal chords against Obama, nor did Romney.

If these people actually consider themselves political operatives, the Democrats should be happy as hell they aren't working for them, because even an uneducated drone would see that their logic is no logic at all, and their entreaties are no more than disingenuous!

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The Democrat side of the Republican Party is upset. They know that if you run two Democrats against each other, the Democrats will always win.

Trump is a threat to applying that equation.

 

[aaronleland]

Backasswards political logic is supporting the most liberal candidate because you're tired of RINOs.

 

[imawhosure]

Backasswards political logic is supporting the most liberal candidate because you're tired of RINOs.

I bring this threads forward again. The OP is accurate, and rather conclusive. RINO's and Democrats can go pound sand, as their narrative is illogical, irrelevant, and immaterial-)

 

[Seawytch]

Don't listen to them...nominate Trump and show them!

 

[imawhosure]

Don't listen to them...nominate Trump and show them!

You think it is funny? So do I! I am able to see far more internals than you are, and right now, it is looking extremely bleak for you, but hey, your arrogance will be rewarded come November-)

 

[B. Kidd]

Backasswards political logic is supporting the most liberal candidate because you're tired of RINOs.

I bring this threads forward again. The OP is accurate, and rather conclusive. RINO's and Democrats can go pound sand, as their narrative is illogical, irrelevant, and immaterial-)

What most people forget and/or purposely omit, is that no Americans are left that would put up their own money and themselves up to run for the most 'bought and sold' office in the land.
Politically, no Americans would take the risk of financing themself and hold oneself out to run for the oval office under a R or a D label! This alone is the pinnacle of individuality!!

Trump is the last of a lot that will attempt this in a broken and disintegrating two-part system, and this alone speaks volumes as to his love of country and total appreciation of our core principles.

Trump.........2016..........Make America Great Again! (he's Americas' last shot at it!!!).

 

[imawhosure]

Backasswards political logic is supporting the most liberal candidate because you're tired of RINOs.

I bring this threads forward again. The OP is accurate, and rather conclusive. RINO's and Democrats can go pound sand, as their narrative is illogical, irrelevant, and immaterial-)

What most people forget and/or purposely omit, is that no Americans are left that would put up their own money and themselves up to run for the most 'bought and sold' office in the land.
Politically, no Americans would take the risk of financing themself and hold oneself out to run for the oval office under a R or a D label! This alone is the pinnacle of individuality!!

Trump is the last of a lot that will attempt this in a broken and disintegrating two-part system, and this alone speaks volumes as to his love of country and total appreciation of our core principles.

Trump.........2016..........Make America Great Again! (he's Americas' last shot at it!!!).

I am not about making a Trump advertisement, but I do agree with you. He is putting his money up when needed, and nobody owns him. Is he the perfect messenger? Hell no! But how many BILLIONAIRES have a clean enough record to run for President? Not many. So we are restricted to those with the money, then those who are able to, then those who would want to.

That just cut the pool down by 95%!

 

[imawhosure]

It is ridiculous that these people even try and convince anyone of their ASININE logic. Nobody with any kind of formal education would by such a premise, and if the establishment Republicans want to install a different candidate........then get their MYTHICAL voters to come to the polls. If they don't, then go to hell, PERIOD!

 

[SwimExpert]

How many of you Trump supporters are tired of listening to the establishment posters, and lefties on here telling you Trump can't win, no way, zilch, forget about it?!

Listen to their bassackwards logic, then maybe you should send them to the doctor using Obamacare for a mental health check up------------->

the establishment Republicans insist he can't win, but they can not even defeat him in the primaries. In fact, the number 2 guy is also anti establishment, and they are struggling to come out on top of him too.

So what these fools are basically telling you is................your guy can't win, but for some unknown reason, or mighty establishment can't defeat him with all of our money and power........but hey, support our little "sweat meister," because he can win in the general, he just can't win in the Republican primary! How dumb do they think we are!

If they want one of their people, then PUSH him in, and if you can't, why would we ever think that the person who can't win the primary, would do better in the general, "just because they say so." It is faulty logic.

Where are these "mythical" establishment, Republican voters who will push their candidate through in the general? If they are sooooooo powerful, why is it they can't coral them for the primary if this is what all these "mythical" voters want? Are we seeing how the "great GOP establishment" ground game works, just like it did for the guy "who couldn't lose" named Romney?

If this is the best they can do, is it any wonder they couldn't win a general election against one of the worst Presidents in modern history; namely the messiah. Isn't it funny that they seems to find their voices to tell you how awful Trump and Cruz are, but they didn't dare us their vocal chords against Obama, nor did Romney.

If these people actually consider themselves political operatives, the Democrats should be happy as hell they aren't working for them, because even an uneducated drone would see that their logic is no logic at all, and their entreaties are no more than disingenuous!

The "bass ackwards" logic is yours. You think that results in a primary are indicative of performance in a general election. That is a fail. An epic fail.

To demonstrate let's talk about attractive women in skimpy clothing, who happen to be able to kick your ass.

Ronda Rousey is currently the most celebrated female fighter in the world. Having been incredibly dominant in her professional career so far, she defeated challenger after challenger in defense of her championship belts. Including twice making mince meat out of our next candidate.

Miesha Tate has twice lost to Rousey. In their first matchup, Tate was the holder of a championship belt, which then passed to Rousey. Rousey would then go on to consolidate her Strikeforce title with UFC's belt, and successfully defended the same against Tate in a rematch. Rousey was unstoppable until this woman.

A former kickboxing champion, Holly Holm was a different type of fighter than Rousey had ever encountered. She had the intellect, the skills, and discipline to turn the frighteningly dominant Rousey into as minor a challenge as Rousey had done to every single one of hers thus far. With one powerful kick Holm brought an end to the Rousey reign, knocking her out and handing Rousey her first ever defeat.

Now that Holm is the champion, she is set to face off against the woman who Rousey demolished twice: Miesha Tate. Holm is greater than Rousey. Rousey is greater than Tate. Therefore, Holm must be greater than Tate. Right?

Not quite so fast. While Holm is undoubtedly the superior to Rousey, Tate is in many ways to Holm what Holm is to Rousey. Tate's style, skills, and athletic talents are a nightmare scenario for Holm. While Holm is known for her keen intellectual abilities both in the ring and in the leadup to the ring, they will be of little use against Tate who is by all accounts the greatest all around women's fighter in the world. Holm is good at identifying your inherent weaknesses and exploiting them, and that is what makes her better than Rousey. Tate has no inherent weaknesses to be exploited and can throw down with the best of them, which is what makes her greater than Holm. Rousey has the ability to penetrate even perfect defenses, which is what makes her better than Tate.

The moral of the story is this: Just because you defeat one opponent does not mean that you will be better than he would against the next opponent.

 

[Seawytch]

Don't listen to them...nominate Trump and show them!

You think it is funny? So do I! I am able to see far more internals than you are, and right now, it is looking extremely bleak for you, but hey, your arrogance will be rewarded come November-)

Uh huh...damn the polls, full speed ahead!

 

[imawhosure]

How many of you Trump supporters are tired of listening to the establishment posters, and lefties on here telling you Trump can't win, no way, zilch, forget about it?!

Listen to their bassackwards logic, then maybe you should send them to the doctor using Obamacare for a mental health check up------------->

the establishment Republicans insist he can't win, but they can not even defeat him in the primaries. In fact, the number 2 guy is also anti establishment, and they are struggling to come out on top of him too.

So what these fools are basically telling you is................your guy can't win, but for some unknown reason, or mighty establishment can't defeat him with all of our money and power........but hey, support our little "sweat meister," because he can win in the general, he just can't win in the Republican primary! How dumb do they think we are!

If they want one of their people, then PUSH him in, and if you can't, why would we ever think that the person who can't win the primary, would do better in the general, "just because they say so." It is faulty logic.

Where are these "mythical" establishment, Republican voters who will push their candidate through in the general? If they are sooooooo powerful, why is it they can't coral them for the primary if this is what all these "mythical" voters want? Are we seeing how the "great GOP establishment" ground game works, just like it did for the guy "who couldn't lose" named Romney?

If this is the best they can do, is it any wonder they couldn't win a general election against one of the worst Presidents in modern history; namely the messiah. Isn't it funny that they seems to find their voices to tell you how awful Trump and Cruz are, but they didn't dare us their vocal chords against Obama, nor did Romney.

If these people actually consider themselves political operatives, the Democrats should be happy as hell they aren't working for them, because even an uneducated drone would see that their logic is no logic at all, and their entreaties are no more than disingenuous!

The "bass ackwards" logic is yours. You think that results in a primary are indicative of performance in a general election. That is a fail. An epic fail.

To demonstrate let's talk about attractive women in skimpy clothing, who happen to be able to kick your ass.

Ronda Rousey is currently the most celebrated female fighter in the world. Having been incredibly dominant in her professional career so far, she defeated challenger after challenger in defense of her championship belts. Including twice making mince meat out of our next candidate.

Miesha Tate has twice lost to Rousey. In their first matchup, Tate was the holder of a championship belt, which then passed to Rousey. Rousey would then go on to consolidate her Strikeforce title with UFC's belt, and successfully defended the same against Tate in a rematch. Rousey was unstoppable until this woman.

A former kickboxing champion, Holly Holm was a different type of fighter than Rousey had ever encountered. She had the intellect, the skills, and discipline to turn the frighteningly dominant Rousey into as minor a challenge as Rousey had done to every single one of hers thus far. With one powerful kick Holm brought an end to the Rousey reign, knocking her out and handing Rousey her first ever defeat.

Now that Holm is the champion, she is set to face off against the woman who Rousey demolished twice: Miesha Tate. Holm is greater than Rousey. Rousey is greater than Tate. Therefore, Holm must be greater than Tate. Right?

Not quite so fast. While Holm is undoubtedly the superior to Rousey, Tate is in many ways to Holm what Holm is to Rousey. Tate's style, skills, and athletic talents are a nightmare scenario for Holm. While Holm is known for her keen intellectual abilities both in the ring and in the leadup to the ring, they will be of little use against Tate who is by all accounts the greatest all around women's fighter in the world. Holm is good at identifying your inherent weaknesses and exploiting them, and that is what makes her better than Rousey. Tate has no inherent weaknesses to be exploited and can throw down with the best of them, which is what makes her greater than Holm. Rousey has the ability to penetrate even perfect defenses, which is what makes her better than Tate.

The moral of the story is this: Just because you defeat one opponent does not mean that you will be better than he would against the next opponent.

Your logic is so faulty, let me count the ways-)

1. You are trying to convince people that the whole arsenal is not being used in both of our examples. Your arsenal is sitting home, that is a fact, lol!

2. You are also talking about 2 people and who will win against each other in a physical battle. I am talking about who's supporters will win because they show up.

3. If choosing a candidate who can win was done by your logic, why would anyone's vote count? Oh, that is correct; many EXTRA votes are given in the Democratic primary with super delegates. Why are we not surprised.

4. You are spinning and using PROPAGANDA, because you just can't get your itty-bitty way, now can you. Then get your mythical voters off their asses, or is that to much to ask?

Your logic is bullsh**. You have no idea of what you are talking about, and if you want to change it get off the computer, and go canvass for your guy; although it won't make a difference from what I see. You keyboard "warriors" are funny as hell. You are so busy complaining or beating your chests all day, you have no time to make a difference at all, lol.

Keep up the good work there "keyboard warrior!" I, on the other hand, can only debate a few hours a day, because I am actually trying to help SOMEBODY WIN!

 

[candycorn]

How many of you Trump supporters are tired of listening to the establishment posters, and lefties on here telling you Trump can't win, no way, zilch, forget about it?!

Listen to their bassackwards logic, then maybe you should send them to the doctor using Obamacare for a mental health check up------------->

the establishment Republicans insist he can't win, but they can not even defeat him in the primaries. In fact, the number 2 guy is also anti establishment, and they are struggling to come out on top of him too.

So what these fools are basically telling you is................your guy can't win, but for some unknown reason, or mighty establishment can't defeat him with all of our money and power........but hey, support our little "sweat meister," because he can win in the general, he just can't win in the Republican primary! How dumb do they think we are!

If they want one of their people, then PUSH him in, and if you can't, why would we ever think that the person who can't win the primary, would do better in the general, "just because they say so." It is faulty logic.

Where are these "mythical" establishment, Republican voters who will push their candidate through in the general? If they are sooooooo powerful, why is it they can't coral them for the primary if this is what all these "mythical" voters want? Are we seeing how the "great GOP establishment" ground game works, just like it did for the guy "who couldn't lose" named Romney?

If this is the best they can do, is it any wonder they couldn't win a general election against one of the worst Presidents in modern history; namely the messiah. Isn't it funny that they seems to find their voices to tell you how awful Trump and Cruz are, but they didn't dare us their vocal chords against Obama, nor did Romney.

If these people actually consider themselves political operatives, the Democrats should be happy as hell they aren't working for them, because even an uneducated drone would see that their logic is no logic at all, and their entreaties are no more than disingenuous!

There is some truth to that. Be careful though. Just because they are wrong, that doesn't make any other alternative correct.

The GOP was hijacked by religious nut jobs like Pat Robertson, Tax douches like Grover Norquist, and political absolutists DeLay, Atwater, and Gingrich. They offered safety for timid behavior and the Hatches, McCains, McConnells, et. al. ate it up. Meanwhile the Dems were innovative with initiatives they could push through the parcheesi blockade of the GOP.

And now you see the GOP is thought of as cavemen and the Dems are seen as only slightly better since they are continually hamstrung by the do nothing House and the filibuster in the Senate.