jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,218
- 29,148
- 2,180
Didn’t say shit!Hillary Clinton testified before Congress for 11 hours.
Ya kinda forgot that huh?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Didn’t say shit!Hillary Clinton testified before Congress for 11 hours.
Ya kinda forgot that huh?
The right wing and Russia would LOVE you to believe that the USA press is shit, just like them....congrats! You are their fool and their comrade!Fuck the media. They are nothing but Pravda of the old USSR.
Research my own. Dont lusten to overpaid talking heads
then have the committee read the book.Meadows lost any possible claim of Executive Privilege when he published his book.
there are demofks here, that qualifies as shit.The right wing and Russia would LOVE you to believe that the USA is shit, just like them....congrats! You are their fool and their comrade!
How can you continue to lie about Uranium One? Clinton, Obama, Holder, McCain, Biden all knew that Putin was the owner of Rosatom and was just waiting for the sale to be approved so he could purchase Uranium One. That's what the kickbacks were for to each of them.How could you be so ignorant about Uranium One after all this tiime?
Only the propagandists know what the Big Lie is. We want to hear it from a DemNazi Propagandist like you. What is "The Big Lie"?We both know what trump's big lie is. If you want to pretend you don't know what it is, then you aren't worth the time it would take to tell you.
the irony of that statement.How could you be so ignorant about Uranium One after all this tiime?
They could have had a non partisan independent commission, and in fact had agreed. Then Donnie said no.
how is it you know this exactly?Again...numerous GOP members of Congress were trying to get in touch with Trump on Jan 6 (through Meadows because Trump would not respond).
They wanted HIM to call off his dogs
Not only that but Fox News hosts were doing the same (because they were afraid the Capitol Attack would reflect badly on the GOP)
Clearly all these people did NOT think Trump was going to call off ANTIFA or anyone else.
These were clearly Trump attack dogs
Baloney. Our media are lying assesThe right wing and Russia would LOVE you to believe that the USA is shit, just like them....congrats! You are their fool and their comrade!
That “non-partisan commission” was NEVER non-partisan. Pelosi was still going to have final say on everything. Amazing these leftists think Cheney and Schittferbrains are better investigators than the FBI, despite having a fraction of the authority.Of course, you can't prove Trump did any such thing.
Several GOP members of Congress said they felt that since the FBI had already investigated and reported, there were more important things to do. It's a political trial and the object is to smear Trump. Pelosi only allowed 2 GOP members on the commission and she picked 2 that disliked Trump.
Yes we can prove it. The republicans agreed to it, and McCarthy assigned 3 or four republicans to the investigation committee to work out with Dems, on rules McCarthy wanted for the investigation, equal R members to Ds, equal veto power, equal subpoena power....of which Nancy gave all those concessions to the Rs and the Rs agreed to vote for it. Meanwhile McCarthy made his famous "kiss the ring" trip to Mara Largo, and when he returned he did an about face, made a big stink about not doing it and the Senate, voted it down.... Trump called it off, after it was agreed upon by Rs with D's on every single thing that McCarthy was asking for.... It was all over the press, at the time....Of course, you can't prove Trump did any such thing.
Several GOP members of Congress said they felt that since the FBI had already investigated and reported, there were more important things to do. It's a political trial and the object is to smear Trump. Pelosi only allowed 2 GOP members on the commission and she picked 2 that disliked Trump.
and what? he's not, but you can say it all fking day long. so what? what do you want anyone on here to do at your TDS?Meadows is a traitor. End of story. And history will show him to be a traitor.
nope, you'd post it if you had it. why haven't you?Yes we can prove it. The republicans agreed to it, and McCarthy assigned 3 or four republicans to the investigation committee to work out with Dems, on rules McCarthy wanted for the investigation, equal R members to Ds, equal veto power, equal subpoena power....of which Nancy gave all those concessions to the Rs and the Rs agreed to vote for it. Meanwhile McCarthy made his famous "kiss the ring" trip to Mara Largo, and when he returned he did an about face, made a big stink about not doing it and the Senate, voted it down.... Trump called it off, after it was agreed upon by Rs with D's on every single thing that McCarthy was asking for.... It was all over the press, at the time....
You're funny, but not in the Ha Ha sort of way. It's more in the odd sort of way.Only the propagandists know what the Big Lie is. We want to hear it from a DemNazi Propagandist like you. What is "The Big Lie"?
By your logic…they shouldn’t have spent all that time Hilary’s emails.Of course, you can't prove Trump did any such thing.
Several GOP members of Congress said they felt that since the FBI had already investigated and reported, there were more important things to do. It's a political trial and the object is to smear Trump. Pelosi only allowed 2 GOP members on the commission and she picked 2 that disliked Trump.
We should have opened up an investigation using all Federal agencies on a false premise to look for a crime.By your logic…they shouldn’t have spent all that time Hilary’s emails.
They could have had an independent 911 style commission. Equal numbers. But they refused.
I think this was serious enough to warrant an investigation.
Curious, why was this thread stickied?The January 6th House Committee may be filing criminal contempt charges against Mark Meadows if he continues to refuse to cooperate with their investigation. If Meadows is truly innocent then it shouldn't be a problem for him to come forward and lay out that case. The people have a right to know if malfeasance truly occurred or not.
Mark Meadows' lawyer argues against contempt charges ahead of Jan. 6 committee vote
The lawyer said a criminal contempt referral would violate the "long-held and well-established separation of powers principles."www.nbcnews.com