Trouble: Hillary Just Refused To Say Right To Bear Arms Is A Constitutional Right

[bripat9643]

I guess that means the following agencies are all unconstitutional

FAA - no aircraft
DOT - no trucks, cars, whatever
FCC - no radio or television
Dept Energy - no electricity
Air Force - no planes
Amtrak - no railroads
FDA - no drugs
NASA - no planes, rockets

Are they mentioned in the 2nd Amendment?

They aren't mentioned, period, so the government must not have any authority to regulate them, right?

By your reasoning, then, the feds and the states and the courts do have a right to regulate.

Nope.

Yup. That is the back side of your suggestion. If X, then Y.

No it isn't, moron.

 

[rightwinger]

Face it...Hillary is going to take your guns

Just like Obama did

 

[JakeStarkey]

Are they mentioned in the 2nd Amendment?

They aren't mentioned, period, so the government must not have any authority to regulate them, right?

By your reasoning, then, the feds and the states and the courts do have a right to regulate.

Nope.

Yup. That is the back side of your suggestion. If X, then Y.

No it isn't, moron.

Of course it is; you are wrong again.

 

[bripat9643]

They aren't mentioned, period, so the government must not have any authority to regulate them, right?

By your reasoning, then, the feds and the states and the courts do have a right to regulate.

Nope.

Yup. That is the back side of your suggestion. If X, then Y.

No it isn't, moron.

Of course it is; you are wrong again.

It's not wrong. You have as much credibility as lying Hillary.

 

[rightwinger]

It won't be so bad once Hillary takes your guns

She will let you keep a picture of you and your guns

 

[Desperado]

Yes, all militia members have a right to a single-shot muzzleloader.

But at the time, it was their top of the line military assault rifle!
So accordingly, we the citizens of today, should be accorded the same right to purchase today's top of the line military assault rifle, just as the Founders granted its' first citizens.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Yes, all militia members have a right to a single-shot muzzleloader.

Would you allow yourself to be shot with a revolutionary war era flintlock at close range to test your assanine theory that these guns are usually survivable at close range?

PS. There were no antibiotics in the revolution dude, no surgery to fix internal organs either which added to death rates dramatically. But u keep up posting nunsense, it's quite amusing.

Yeah, sparky, but you got the point of what was in use at the time the thoroughly fucked up 2nd Amendment was written. Oh, and are you in a "militia"...?

hey lakota.....what does the 2nd part of this amendment mean?...."the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."....who are the PEOPLE?....

 

[JakeStarkey]

By your reasoning, then, the feds and the states and the courts do have a right to regulate.

Nope.

Yup. That is the back side of your suggestion. If X, then Y.

No it isn't, moron.

Of course it is; you are wrong again.

It's not wrong. You have as much credibility as lying Hillary.

Of course you are wrong. You always are

 

[rightwinger]

Let Hillary decide who is allowed to own guns

 

[edthecynic]

the gun lobby (is there such a thing? Doubt it)

Just a few members:

National Rifle Assn
Safari Club International
National Shooting Sports Foundation
Gun Owners of America
National Assn for Gun Rights
Ohio Gun Collectors Assn

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Yes, all militia members have a right to a single-shot muzzleloader.

when the founding fathers said All men are created equal, they were talking about white men that owned property.
Guess we should put those coloreds and women back in their place.
Of course the 2nd was written to protect the constitution and to fight off a government that became too powerful and corrupt (liberals) so it would only go to reason that the 2nd would more likely allow for the citizens to have ALL the weapons that the government does. But why do I try to explain these things to a brainless troll.

 

[edthecynic]

hey lakota.....what does the 2nd part of this amendment mean?...."the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."....who are the PEOPLE?....

At the time of the Constitution certainly not BLACK people!

 

[charwin95]

Clinton was just interviewed by Stephanopoulos. She is dishonest and the questions are dishonest. But it is clear Clinton supports government confiscation of guns from private citizens.


Watch: Hillary Refuses Say Right to Bear Arms Is a 'Constitutional Right' - Breitbart

BWHAHAHAHAHA! She just lost the election. There goes Pennsylvania.

You can easily con trump supporters by a CON MAN .................... but you cannot con Hillary supporters.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Clinton was just interviewed by Stephanopoulos. She is dishonest and the questions are dishonest. But it is clear Clinton supports government confiscation of guns from private citizens.


Watch: Hillary Refuses Say Right to Bear Arms Is a 'Constitutional Right' - Breitbart

BWHAHAHAHAHA! She just lost the election. There goes Pennsylvania.

You can easily con trump supporters by a CON MAN .................... but you cannot con Hillary supporters.

you dont have to con brainless sheep, they just follow regardless of the consequences

 

[bripat9643]

Clinton was just interviewed by Stephanopoulos. She is dishonest and the questions are dishonest. But it is clear Clinton supports government confiscation of guns from private citizens.


Watch: Hillary Refuses Say Right to Bear Arms Is a 'Constitutional Right' - Breitbart

BWHAHAHAHAHA! She just lost the election. There goes Pennsylvania.

You can easily con trump supporters by a CON MAN .................... but you cannot con Hillary supporters.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

You're serious? Really?

 

[Grizz]

hey lakota.....what does the 2nd part of this amendment mean?...."the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."....who are the PEOPLE?....

At the time of the Constitution certainly not BLACK people!

Says one more dumbass who has no idea what the 3/5ths clause was about.

 

[Harry Dresden]

hey lakota.....what does the 2nd part of this amendment mean?...."the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."....who are the PEOPLE?....

At the time of the Constitution certainly not BLACK people!

ok....but who were the people they mentioned?....

 

[Auld Phart]

Clinton was just interviewed by Stephanopoulos. She is dishonest and the questions are dishonest. But it is clear Clinton supports government confiscation of guns from private citizens.


Watch: Hillary Refuses Say Right to Bear Arms Is a 'Constitutional Right' - Breitbart

BWHAHAHAHAHA! She just lost the election. There goes Pennsylvania.

You can easily con trump supporters by a CON MAN .................... but you cannot con Hillary supporters.

you dont have to con brainless sheep, they just follow regardless of the consequences

you dont have to con brainless sheep, they just follow regardless of the consequences

I've noticed that...
on both sides of the aisle

 

[rightwinger]

hey lakota.....what does the 2nd part of this amendment mean?...."the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."....who are the PEOPLE?....

At the time of the Constitution certainly not BLACK people!

Says one more dumbass who has no idea what the 3/5ths clause was about.

I suspect he understands it better than you

 

[Grizz]

hey lakota.....what does the 2nd part of this amendment mean?...."the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."....who are the PEOPLE?....

At the time of the Constitution certainly not BLACK people!

Says one more dumbass who has no idea what the 3/5ths clause was about.

I suspect he understands it better than you

Maybe, but probably not. In all likelihood he is as uneducated as you are.