- Moderator
- #21
It is a scam. Collecting money for a recount that won't change results.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
I thought Trump never met a "scam" he didn't like!
I thought Trump never met a "scam" he didn't like!
View attachment 100002“This is a scam by the Green Party for an election that has already been conceded, and the results of this election should be respected instead of being challenged and abused, which is exactly what Jill Stein is doing.”
U.S. President-elect Donald Trump on Saturday called a request for a recount of votes in Wisconsin a “scam” by the Green Party and said even his Democratic challenger Hillary Clinton had said the election results should be accepted.
”This is a scam by the Green Party for an election that has already been conceded, and the results of this election should be respected instead of being challenged and abused, which is exactly what (Green Party leader) Jill Stein is doing,” Trump said in a statement about the recount.
“This recount is just a way for Jill Stein, who received less than one percent of the vote overall and wasn’t even on the ballot in many states, to fill her coffers with money, most of which she will never even spend on this ridiculous recount,” Trump said.
Trump Blasts ‘Ridiculous’ Recount ‘Scam’
Like Trump wouldn't do the same thing in a similar situation.
I take no pleasure in saying this - but Democrats will have the last laugh. However, the country will likely go through hell in the meantime.
Wait a second... Trump said that he may not concede the election if he thought something might be wrong, but now he doesn't want others to be able to carry out the same rights to audit the results from the electronic voting machines?
Wait a second... Trump said that he may not concede the election if he thought something might be wrong, but now he doesn't want others to be able to carry out the same rights to audit the results from the electronic voting machines?
You really think the green party won?
I take no pleasure in saying this - but Democrats will have the last laugh. However, the country will likely go through hell in the meantime.
Be more explicit.
Wait a second... Trump said that he may not concede the election if he thought something might be wrong, but now he doesn't want others to be able to carry out the same rights to audit the results from the electronic voting machines?
You really think the green party won?
Hey guess what, that's a fallacy. It doesn't matter what candidate calls for an audit.
Wait a second... Trump said that he may not concede the election if he thought something might be wrong, but now he doesn't want others to be able to carry out the same rights to audit the results from the electronic voting machines?
You really think the green party won?
Hey guess what, that's a fallacy. It doesn't matter what candidate calls for an audit.
Really? Which fallacy is it?
You can't say Jill stien is calling for a recount in good faith.
They gonna laugh like the fake indians in your tribe have in the past?I take no pleasure in saying this - but Democrats will have the last laugh. However, the country will likely go through hell in the meantime.
Why do you?Why does Trump whine about everything?
Care to try again?Wait a second... Trump said that he may not concede the election if he thought something might be wrong, but now he doesn't want others to be able to carry out the same rights to audit the results from the electronic voting machines?
You really think the green party won?
Hey guess what, that's a fallacy. It doesn't matter what candidate calls for an audit.
Really? Which fallacy is it?
You can't say Jill stien is calling for a recount in good faith.
It's not a recount. As soon as you get past that fact we can move on with the conversation.
Care to try again?Wait a second... Trump said that he may not concede the election if he thought something might be wrong, but now he doesn't want others to be able to carry out the same rights to audit the results from the electronic voting machines?
You really think the green party won?
Hey guess what, that's a fallacy. It doesn't matter what candidate calls for an audit.
Really? Which fallacy is it?
You can't say Jill stien is calling for a recount in good faith.
It's not a recount. As soon as you get past that fact we can move on with the conversation.
Green Party's Jill Stein files recount request in Wisconsin
What is the reason the Green party is giving for doing a recount? I told my buddy it's because they think the voting machines are rigged/hacked he says no.
So excepting the the election results was meant only for a Trump loss. Jill Stein is not doing this for the Green Party because they had a snow balls chance in hell of even placing 2nd in the election in any of the states she's contesting. I would also like to know what happen to the lefts vehement claims that voter fraud was nonexistent.