Redfish
Diamond Member
You can not find a link because you are distorting what Schumer said to start with. You are lying about the Schumer comment. He did not call for a 'no vote, no hearing, no consideration'. He said that after putting two far-right justices on the court, they should not put another one on it. He was suggesting a conservative of more moderate credentials be considered.No link, no credibility. You have to prove it.Bullshit. You claimed there were Democrats who backed Schumer when he suggested Bush nominees be denied confirmation by the Senate.I never lie. You will never "bust" me. You are incompetent and do not have the mental abilities to even participate in a discussion with me.
You then couldn't name a single one.
More bullshit. I never said I knew what was in any of their heads. I said Clinton had 8 years to go to war with Iraq had that been the route he cared to take -- and he didn't.You claim to know what was in Clinton's head, Bush's head, and Hillary's head. Is that because you want to give head to all of them?
Democrats who agreed with Schumer:
Reid, Pelosi, Durban, Clinton, just to name 4. Now, are you claiming that Schumer was the ONLY democrat who said that no Bush appointee would get a hearing in the senate?
yes, Clinton did not go to war in Iraq, he chose Bosnia. What's your point?
GFY. everything does not have to linked. Everyone who was alive during that time knows that Reid, Pelosi, Durban, and Clinton agreed with Schumer.
So I ask you one final time. Are you claiming that Schumer was the only democrat who wanted to block Bush nominees?
You are caught in the talking point lie and are unable to get out of it.
you are wrong.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/16/schumer-claims-he-didnt-call-for-blocking-bush-noms-even-though-he-clearly-did/
read the entire article, it contains his actual words.