Trump campaign DID collude with Russia

Status
Not open for further replies.
If Mueller had anything on Trump, it would have been leaked to the press long ago.

Just sayin'.

Not the way Mueller works...no.

Several opinions have been offered on Mueller's finds. He may indict POTUS which would end up in Supreme Court. But most legal dudes think he will issue a report to Congress. Of there are charges of illegal activity in the report...the GOP congress will have to decide to do something or lose in the November election

If members of the crime family are charges or indicted...the orange one will need to decide if pardoning them is worth a HUGE political got.
nothing gets him out of office. run all the scenarios you want. the fact is it has never happened. and it won't it takes 2/3 majority of the senate.

If it was presented to congress right now, I'd agree with you but once collusion is proved and it's shown that the Trump team took part in corrupting the election process maybe the GOP House and Senate will feel they have no choice but to do the right thing.

Not because it is the right thing but because as usual they are worried about losing their own jobs. I think the Mueller investigation will leave no doubt as to the guilt of Trump and most of his inner circle in the pay for play. Office for sanctions.

It didn't work out that way but the crime was committed as soon as the offer was accepted. And the cover-up will rake in the rest of the rats via obstruction charges. Just watch.

The walls are closing in and it may not become necessary to oust Trump because being the coward that he is, he'll probably resign like the last crook who thought he was too smart to get caught.
dude, it takes two thirds of the senate to remove him. It ain't ever going to happen. it's why our FF's wrote the language that way. you can jerk off all day on your thought, but it ain't ever gonna happen. what a waste of money.


He's toast. Just a matter of time.
 
the FBI was complicit in trying to help Hillary win. of course they would say that.
LOL

The same FBI that cost her the election by publicly announcing they were reopening the investigation into her email server; while Americans were voting???

Dayam, you’re fucking crazy too. :cuckoo:


she did not lose because of Comey

she lost because
1. she was a terrible candidate
2. she has a history of lying and corruption
3. she is old and sick
4. Obama was a terrible president
5. Trump appealed to blue collar America of all races
6. Voters wanted a business approach to government
7. americans are fed up with the lying media
8. The DNC shit on Bernie
Of course she lost because of Comey. Her double- digit lead in the polls evaporated after the FBI reopened the case.

Do you think it matters if an unabashed liar like you denies reality? :dunno:


The truth about Hillary and her corrupt campaign doomed her. Doesn't really matter where the truth came from does it? the American people rejected her, Obama, democrat socialism, the lying media, and the corrupt cheating DNC.

Trump won because the American people are tired of lying do-nothing wash establishment pukes that are only in it to enrich themselves and to cater to their funders.

Trump cannot be bought, he is not a member of the establishment. that is why both parties are trying to bring him down. He is the first independent president we have had in a long long time.

He didn't need the presidency to get rich, he already was. he didn't need it to become famous, he already was. He didn't need it for power, he already had it.

He is trying to fix the mess created by years of incompetence by both parties, and the corruption that we all know dominates DC.

You hate him because he beat crooked Hillary, and because he isn't a polished politician who can talk all day and say nothing. He is a real person, talks like a real American, and you lefties cannot stand that. What does that say about you?
Trump’s won because of Comey.

Are we talking the same Comey that the Democrats defended for doing his job when they cried Trump obstruction? You progressives really need to get your story straight.
 
Carter Page wasn't part of the Trump campaign when they got the FISA warrant against him, based largely on his behavior since 2013, including unexplained travels to Russia.

That had nothing whatsoever to do with President Trump's campaign other than an excuse to illegally listen in to people in the Trump campaign.

If they had so much on Carter Page, why did they need to use the phony dossier bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC?

Who was colluding?

Clinton%20Foundation-XL.jpg
Parts of the dossier were verified. You have no evidence that unverified parts were presented to the FISC.

Show me in a link, evidence used for the dossier, where a private citizen’s actions of communications and meetings of suspicious illegal activity connected to a foreign government power has been collaberated and verified by the CIA. Evidence that is not supported solely by a paid retired British operative as the only foreign intelligence source. A government agency who’s business is in uncovering government threats, the sharing of information, and knowledgeable in known foreign operatives that can be specifically linked to the Kremlin. Any information that can be collaberated by Secret Intelligence Service (MI-6), CIA, someone involved in the gathering of foreign intelligence for personal or national gain. Again a independent foreign source that is “credible”, with integrity that is not left to question, that can not be in any way traced to a certain political party's Wallet.
How true is the Trump-Russia dossier? One year later, what we know about its claims

Verified: Former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page met with representatives of Russian state-owned oil giant Rosneft.

Verified: The Kremlin targeted educated youth and swing state voters during its cyber attacks in the 2016 campaign.

Verified: Trump maintains ties to rich businessmen from Azerbaijan.

Name for me specifically which foreign intelligence agencies collaberated with each of the claims that Trump did something illegal to undermine the election. The FBI is not an agency that deals in foreign espionage and foreign intelligence.
 
LOL

The same FBI that cost her the election by publicly announcing they were reopening the investigation into her email server; while Americans were voting???

Dayam, you’re fucking crazy too. :cuckoo:


she did not lose because of Comey

she lost because
1. she was a terrible candidate
2. she has a history of lying and corruption
3. she is old and sick
4. Obama was a terrible president
5. Trump appealed to blue collar America of all races
6. Voters wanted a business approach to government
7. americans are fed up with the lying media
8. The DNC shit on Bernie
Of course she lost because of Comey. Her double- digit lead in the polls evaporated after the FBI reopened the case.

Do you think it matters if an unabashed liar like you denies reality? :dunno:


The truth about Hillary and her corrupt campaign doomed her. Doesn't really matter where the truth came from does it? the American people rejected her, Obama, democrat socialism, the lying media, and the corrupt cheating DNC.

Trump won because the American people are tired of lying do-nothing wash establishment pukes that are only in it to enrich themselves and to cater to their funders.

Trump cannot be bought, he is not a member of the establishment. that is why both parties are trying to bring him down. He is the first independent president we have had in a long long time.

He didn't need the presidency to get rich, he already was. he didn't need it to become famous, he already was. He didn't need it for power, he already had it.

He is trying to fix the mess created by years of incompetence by both parties, and the corruption that we all know dominates DC.

You hate him because he beat crooked Hillary, and because he isn't a polished politician who can talk all day and say nothing. He is a real person, talks like a real American, and you lefties cannot stand that. What does that say about you?
Trump’s won because of Comey.

Are we talking the same Comey that the Democrats defended for doing his job when they cried Trump obstruction? You progressives really need to get your story straight.
My story is straight. Hillary had a comfortable lead in the polls when Americans began voting. That lead was gone when early voting ended and there was no other major event other than Comey announcements g he was reopening the investigation into Hillary’s email server. An investigation he then closed down saying there was no reason for it to begin with.
 
Not the way Mueller works...no.

Several opinions have been offered on Mueller's finds. He may indict POTUS which would end up in Supreme Court. But most legal dudes think he will issue a report to Congress. Of there are charges of illegal activity in the report...the GOP congress will have to decide to do something or lose in the November election

If members of the crime family are charges or indicted...the orange one will need to decide if pardoning them is worth a HUGE political got.
nothing gets him out of office. run all the scenarios you want. the fact is it has never happened. and it won't it takes 2/3 majority of the senate.

If it was presented to congress right now, I'd agree with you but once collusion is proved and it's shown that the Trump team took part in corrupting the election process maybe the GOP House and Senate will feel they have no choice but to do the right thing.

Not because it is the right thing but because as usual they are worried about losing their own jobs. I think the Mueller investigation will leave no doubt as to the guilt of Trump and most of his inner circle in the pay for play. Office for sanctions.

It didn't work out that way but the crime was committed as soon as the offer was accepted. And the cover-up will rake in the rest of the rats via obstruction charges. Just watch.

The walls are closing in and it may not become necessary to oust Trump because being the coward that he is, he'll probably resign like the last crook who thought he was too smart to get caught.
dude, it takes two thirds of the senate to remove him. It ain't ever going to happen. it's why our FF's wrote the language that way. you can jerk off all day on your thought, but it ain't ever gonna happen. what a waste of money.


dems and libs live in a fantasy world dominated by hate and misinformation. They are actually quite pathetic.

If the Orange one allows Mueller to finish his job...we will see how many members of the royal crime family will need a presidential pardon. That will be a political homerun for the Democrats.

How can voters support a party whose leader has to pardon members of his own family? Jarvanka...the prince and princess of the royal family...need to return to New York. They are an embarrassment to the WH and the country.
 
Several opinions have been offered on Mueller's finds. He may indict POTUS which would end up in Supreme Court. But most legal dudes think he will issue a report to Congress. Of there are charges of illegal activity in the report...the GOP congress will have to decide to do something or lose in the November election

If members of the crime family are charges or indicted...the orange one will need to decide if pardoning them is worth a HUGE political got.
nothing gets him out of office. run all the scenarios you want. the fact is it has never happened. and it won't it takes 2/3 majority of the senate.

If it was presented to congress right now, I'd agree with you but once collusion is proved and it's shown that the Trump team took part in corrupting the election process maybe the GOP House and Senate will feel they have no choice but to do the right thing.

Not because it is the right thing but because as usual they are worried about losing their own jobs. I think the Mueller investigation will leave no doubt as to the guilt of Trump and most of his inner circle in the pay for play. Office for sanctions.

It didn't work out that way but the crime was committed as soon as the offer was accepted. And the cover-up will rake in the rest of the rats via obstruction charges. Just watch.

The walls are closing in and it may not become necessary to oust Trump because being the coward that he is, he'll probably resign like the last crook who thought he was too smart to get caught.
dude, it takes two thirds of the senate to remove him. It ain't ever going to happen. it's why our FF's wrote the language that way. you can jerk off all day on your thought, but it ain't ever gonna happen. what a waste of money.


dems and libs live in a fantasy world dominated by hate and misinformation. They are actually quite pathetic.

If the Orange one allows Mueller to finish his job...we will see how many members of the royal crime family will need a presidential pardon. That will be a political homerun for the Democrats.

How can voters support a party whose leader has to pardon members of his own family? Jarvanka...the prince and princess of the royal family...need to return to New York. They are an embarrassment to the WH and the country.
There will be no pardons for any of them should Trump be indicted and impeached. The president loses their pardon power over cases of impeachment.
 
Carter Page wasn't part of the Trump campaign when they got the FISA warrant against him, based largely on his behavior since 2013, including unexplained travels to Russia.

That had nothing whatsoever to do with President Trump's campaign other than an excuse to illegally listen in to people in the Trump campaign.

If they had so much on Carter Page, why did they need to use the phony dossier bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC?

Who was colluding?

Clinton%20Foundation-XL.jpg
Parts of the dossier were verified. You have no evidence that unverified parts were presented to the FISC.

Show me in a link, evidence used for the dossier, where a private citizen’s actions of communications and meetings of suspicious illegal activity connected to a foreign government power has been collaberated and verified by the CIA. Evidence that is not supported solely by a paid retired British operative as the only foreign intelligence source. A government agency who’s business is in uncovering government threats, the sharing of information, and knowledgeable in known foreign operatives that can be specifically linked to the Kremlin. Any information that can be collaberated by Secret Intelligence Service (MI-6), CIA, someone involved in the gathering of foreign intelligence for personal or national gain. Again a independent foreign source that is “credible”, with integrity that is not left to question, that can not be in any way traced to a certain political party's Wallet.
How true is the Trump-Russia dossier? One year later, what we know about its claims

Verified: Former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page met with representatives of Russian state-owned oil giant Rosneft.

Verified: The Kremlin targeted educated youth and swing state voters during its cyber attacks in the 2016 campaign.

Verified: Trump maintains ties to rich businessmen from Azerbaijan.

Name for me specifically which foreign intelligence agencies collaberated with each of the claims that Trump did something illegal to undermine the election. The FBI is not an agency that deals in foreign espionage and foreign intelligence.

The FBI doesn't investigate foreign threats? Really? I'll bet that's news to them.
 
Ya know, that's why we are under attack by foreign actors. Because the electorate is clueless and doesn't know enough to be alarmed by those threats. The FBI doesn't care about espionage? Foreign threats? This is a prime example. And the person who said this will still be allowed to vote and weigh in on discussions of Russian interference etc.
 
Carter Page wasn't part of the Trump campaign when they got the FISA warrant against him, based largely on his behavior since 2013, including unexplained travels to Russia.

That had nothing whatsoever to do with President Trump's campaign other than an excuse to illegally listen in to people in the Trump campaign.

If they had so much on Carter Page, why did they need to use the phony dossier bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC?

Who was colluding?

Clinton%20Foundation-XL.jpg
Parts of the dossier were verified. You have no evidence that unverified parts were presented to the FISC.

Show me in a link, evidence used for the dossier, where a private citizen’s actions of communications and meetings of suspicious illegal activity connected to a foreign government power has been collaberated and verified by the CIA. Evidence that is not supported solely by a paid retired British operative as the only foreign intelligence source. A government agency who’s business is in uncovering government threats, the sharing of information, and knowledgeable in known foreign operatives that can be specifically linked to the Kremlin. Any information that can be collaberated by Secret Intelligence Service (MI-6), CIA, someone involved in the gathering of foreign intelligence for personal or national gain. Again a independent foreign source that is “credible”, with integrity that is not left to question, that can not be in any way traced to a certain political party's Wallet.
How true is the Trump-Russia dossier? One year later, what we know about its claims

Verified: Former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page met with representatives of Russian state-owned oil giant Rosneft.

Verified: The Kremlin targeted educated youth and swing state voters during its cyber attacks in the 2016 campaign.

Verified: Trump maintains ties to rich businessmen from Azerbaijan.

Name for me specifically which foreign intelligence agencies collaberated with each of the claims that Trump did something illegal to undermine the election. The FBI is not an agency that deals in foreign espionage and foreign intelligence.
You asked for evidence of my claim that parts of the dossier had been verified and I provided that. I am under no further obligation to follow you down your rabbit hole.
 
That had nothing whatsoever to do with President Trump's campaign other than an excuse to illegally listen in to people in the Trump campaign.

If they had so much on Carter Page, why did they need to use the phony dossier bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC?

Who was colluding?

Clinton%20Foundation-XL.jpg
Parts of the dossier were verified. You have no evidence that unverified parts were presented to the FISC.

Show me in a link, evidence used for the dossier, where a private citizen’s actions of communications and meetings of suspicious illegal activity connected to a foreign government power has been collaberated and verified by the CIA. Evidence that is not supported solely by a paid retired British operative as the only foreign intelligence source. A government agency who’s business is in uncovering government threats, the sharing of information, and knowledgeable in known foreign operatives that can be specifically linked to the Kremlin. Any information that can be collaberated by Secret Intelligence Service (MI-6), CIA, someone involved in the gathering of foreign intelligence for personal or national gain. Again a independent foreign source that is “credible”, with integrity that is not left to question, that can not be in any way traced to a certain political party's Wallet.
How true is the Trump-Russia dossier? One year later, what we know about its claims

Verified: Former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page met with representatives of Russian state-owned oil giant Rosneft.

Verified: The Kremlin targeted educated youth and swing state voters during its cyber attacks in the 2016 campaign.

Verified: Trump maintains ties to rich businessmen from Azerbaijan.

Name for me specifically which foreign intelligence agencies collaberated with each of the claims that Trump did something illegal to undermine the election. The FBI is not an agency that deals in foreign espionage and foreign intelligence.

The FBI doesn't investigate foreign threats? Really? I'll bet that's news to them.

I think that may get the award for the stupidest statement that I ever read on this board...and I have been here a long time.

These people not only vote, they walk around in supermarkets buying food...often standing right beside sane people. SCARY!
 
she did not lose because of Comey

she lost because
1. she was a terrible candidate
2. she has a history of lying and corruption
3. she is old and sick
4. Obama was a terrible president
5. Trump appealed to blue collar America of all races
6. Voters wanted a business approach to government
7. americans are fed up with the lying media
8. The DNC shit on Bernie
Of course she lost because of Comey. Her double- digit lead in the polls evaporated after the FBI reopened the case.

Do you think it matters if an unabashed liar like you denies reality? :dunno:


The truth about Hillary and her corrupt campaign doomed her. Doesn't really matter where the truth came from does it? the American people rejected her, Obama, democrat socialism, the lying media, and the corrupt cheating DNC.

Trump won because the American people are tired of lying do-nothing wash establishment pukes that are only in it to enrich themselves and to cater to their funders.

Trump cannot be bought, he is not a member of the establishment. that is why both parties are trying to bring him down. He is the first independent president we have had in a long long time.

He didn't need the presidency to get rich, he already was. he didn't need it to become famous, he already was. He didn't need it for power, he already had it.

He is trying to fix the mess created by years of incompetence by both parties, and the corruption that we all know dominates DC.

You hate him because he beat crooked Hillary, and because he isn't a polished politician who can talk all day and say nothing. He is a real person, talks like a real American, and you lefties cannot stand that. What does that say about you?
Trump’s won because of Comey.

Are we talking the same Comey that the Democrats defended for doing his job when they cried Trump obstruction? You progressives really need to get your story straight.
My story is straight. Hillary had a comfortable lead in the polls when Americans began voting. That lead was gone when early voting ended and there was no other major event other than Comey announcements g he was reopening the investigation into Hillary’s email server. An investigation he then closed down saying there was no reason for it to begin with.

That “lead”, much like those CNN polls, were weighed heavily democrat to get the projection they needed over Trump. I already proved that through the “fine print” following the poll numbers up and to the election. Like trusting a car report that later turns out to be a lemon, don’t believe everything you see without spreading the fine print.
 
That had nothing whatsoever to do with President Trump's campaign other than an excuse to illegally listen in to people in the Trump campaign.

If they had so much on Carter Page, why did they need to use the phony dossier bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC?

Who was colluding?

Clinton%20Foundation-XL.jpg
Parts of the dossier were verified. You have no evidence that unverified parts were presented to the FISC.

Show me in a link, evidence used for the dossier, where a private citizen’s actions of communications and meetings of suspicious illegal activity connected to a foreign government power has been collaberated and verified by the CIA. Evidence that is not supported solely by a paid retired British operative as the only foreign intelligence source. A government agency who’s business is in uncovering government threats, the sharing of information, and knowledgeable in known foreign operatives that can be specifically linked to the Kremlin. Any information that can be collaberated by Secret Intelligence Service (MI-6), CIA, someone involved in the gathering of foreign intelligence for personal or national gain. Again a independent foreign source that is “credible”, with integrity that is not left to question, that can not be in any way traced to a certain political party's Wallet.
How true is the Trump-Russia dossier? One year later, what we know about its claims

Verified: Former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page met with representatives of Russian state-owned oil giant Rosneft.

Verified: The Kremlin targeted educated youth and swing state voters during its cyber attacks in the 2016 campaign.

Verified: Trump maintains ties to rich businessmen from Azerbaijan.

Name for me specifically which foreign intelligence agencies collaberated with each of the claims that Trump did something illegal to undermine the election. The FBI is not an agency that deals in foreign espionage and foreign intelligence.

The FBI doesn't investigate foreign threats? Really? I'll bet that's news to them.

They may find evidence of hacking and tampering but they don’t have the foreign intelligence resources like the CIA. How many foreign government agents does the FBI have a personal knowledge of in conspiring against our government, as well as foreign contacts do they “personally” deal with on a daily basis? Get a clue before you post.
 
Of course she lost because of Comey. Her double- digit lead in the polls evaporated after the FBI reopened the case.

Do you think it matters if an unabashed liar like you denies reality? :dunno:


The truth about Hillary and her corrupt campaign doomed her. Doesn't really matter where the truth came from does it? the American people rejected her, Obama, democrat socialism, the lying media, and the corrupt cheating DNC.

Trump won because the American people are tired of lying do-nothing wash establishment pukes that are only in it to enrich themselves and to cater to their funders.

Trump cannot be bought, he is not a member of the establishment. that is why both parties are trying to bring him down. He is the first independent president we have had in a long long time.

He didn't need the presidency to get rich, he already was. he didn't need it to become famous, he already was. He didn't need it for power, he already had it.

He is trying to fix the mess created by years of incompetence by both parties, and the corruption that we all know dominates DC.

You hate him because he beat crooked Hillary, and because he isn't a polished politician who can talk all day and say nothing. He is a real person, talks like a real American, and you lefties cannot stand that. What does that say about you?
Trump’s won because of Comey.

Are we talking the same Comey that the Democrats defended for doing his job when they cried Trump obstruction? You progressives really need to get your story straight.
My story is straight. Hillary had a comfortable lead in the polls when Americans began voting. That lead was gone when early voting ended and there was no other major event other than Comey announcements g he was reopening the investigation into Hillary’s email server. An investigation he then closed down saying there was no reason for it to begin with.

That “lead”, much like those CNN polls, were weighed heavily democrat to get the projection they needed over Trump. I already proved that through the “fine print” following the poll numbers up and to the election. Like trusting a car report that later turns out to be a lemon, don’t believe everything you see without spreading the fine print.
Whatever weighting was applied prior to mid-October is the same as what was applied after. So even if weighting were an issue, and there is no indication it was since the average polling was off by only 1 percentage point, the evaporation of Hillary’s lead following the announcement of the investigation into her email server cannot be explained by weighting.
 
Last edited:
What the F do you think the Junior meeting was about? They were seeking dirt on Hillary. That IS collusion.

Was there information passed during that meeting? Did this begin a system of criminal collaboration?

Mueller will find out. Please don't say there was NO COLLUSION. There clearly was....

So, when Hillary was meeting with the Ukrainian officials and paying the Russians for the Steele dossier, she was colluding with TWO foreign governments?

(BTW, meeting with a Russian citizen to get dirt is not collusion with the Russians. Collusion means taking actions in concert with others.
 
What the F do you think the Junior meeting was about? They were seeking dirt on Hillary. That IS collusion.

Was there information passed during that meeting? Did this begin a system of criminal collaboration?

Mueller will find out. Please don't say there was NO COLLUSION. There clearly was....

So, when Hillary was meeting with the Ukrainian officials and paying the Russians for the Steele dossier, she was colluding with TWO foreign governments?

(BTW, meeting with a Russian citizen to get dirt is not collusion with the Russians. Collusion means taking actions in concert with others.

You are very late to the game. That has all been proved wrong. Please catch up or play in your sandbox...
 
Parts of the dossier were verified. You have no evidence that unverified parts were presented to the FISC.

Show me in a link, evidence used for the dossier, where a private citizen’s actions of communications and meetings of suspicious illegal activity connected to a foreign government power has been collaberated and verified by the CIA. Evidence that is not supported solely by a paid retired British operative as the only foreign intelligence source. A government agency who’s business is in uncovering government threats, the sharing of information, and knowledgeable in known foreign operatives that can be specifically linked to the Kremlin. Any information that can be collaberated by Secret Intelligence Service (MI-6), CIA, someone involved in the gathering of foreign intelligence for personal or national gain. Again a independent foreign source that is “credible”, with integrity that is not left to question, that can not be in any way traced to a certain political party's Wallet.
How true is the Trump-Russia dossier? One year later, what we know about its claims

Verified: Former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page met with representatives of Russian state-owned oil giant Rosneft.

Verified: The Kremlin targeted educated youth and swing state voters during its cyber attacks in the 2016 campaign.

Verified: Trump maintains ties to rich businessmen from Azerbaijan.

Name for me specifically which foreign intelligence agencies collaberated with each of the claims that Trump did something illegal to undermine the election. The FBI is not an agency that deals in foreign espionage and foreign intelligence.

The FBI doesn't investigate foreign threats? Really? I'll bet that's news to them.

How many foreign government agents does the FBI have a personal knowledge of in conspiring against our government, as well as foreign contacts do they “personally” deal with on a daily basis? Get a clue before you post.

How many? I don't know and neither do you. You can't wish away your statement that they don't concern themselves with foreign govts or espionage. They certainly have and will continue to concern themselves with Putin, Kislyak, the Foreign Minister and the slew of Trump team members who have been in constant contact with Putin's govt and have denied such contacts and lied under oath.

"All enemies, Foreign and Domestic" That's what our Constitution says. In Trump and Putin and the cast of characters surrounding this collusion issue, we have both and to a degree that should concern every American, not just a one party issue.


But that's all we hear from the right. Defending Trump and in doing so, defending Putin's govt and the corruption of our very Democracy. You've allowed it to become a personal issue and have lost sight of the bigger picture of what did Trump do and know and when did he do it or know it.

In other words, you've been suckered by both entities into looking the other way. Luckily, we have checks on power built into that Constitution and that check is under way as we speak. But even that check is under attack by the suckered. Folks like you who can't see what's right in front of them. The truth will come to light soon. Thanks in large part to the FBI, the agency that you claim isn't interested in such mundane matters.

You'll continue to defend Russia and Trump and I'll continue to defend my country from those intruders. That's the difference between the sheepdog and the sheep.
 
What the F do you think the Junior meeting was about? They were seeking dirt on Hillary. That IS collusion.

Was there information passed during that meeting? Did this begin a system of criminal collaboration?

Mueller will find out. Please don't say there was NO COLLUSION. There clearly was....

So, when Hillary was meeting with the Ukrainian officials and paying the Russians for the Steele dossier, she was colluding with TWO foreign governments?

(BTW, meeting with a Russian citizen to get dirt is not collusion with the Russians. Collusion means taking actions in concert with others.

You are very late to the game. That has all been proved wrong. Please catch up or play in your sandbox...

I am merely pointing out that just because you and your ilk repeat lies does not make them true.
 
Parts of the dossier were verified. You have no evidence that unverified parts were presented to the FISC.

Show me in a link, evidence used for the dossier, where a private citizen’s actions of communications and meetings of suspicious illegal activity connected to a foreign government power has been collaberated and verified by the CIA. Evidence that is not supported solely by a paid retired British operative as the only foreign intelligence source. A government agency who’s business is in uncovering government threats, the sharing of information, and knowledgeable in known foreign operatives that can be specifically linked to the Kremlin. Any information that can be collaberated by Secret Intelligence Service (MI-6), CIA, someone involved in the gathering of foreign intelligence for personal or national gain. Again a independent foreign source that is “credible”, with integrity that is not left to question, that can not be in any way traced to a certain political party's Wallet.
How true is the Trump-Russia dossier? One year later, what we know about its claims

Verified: Former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page met with representatives of Russian state-owned oil giant Rosneft.

Verified: The Kremlin targeted educated youth and swing state voters during its cyber attacks in the 2016 campaign.

Verified: Trump maintains ties to rich businessmen from Azerbaijan.

Name for me specifically which foreign intelligence agencies collaberated with each of the claims that Trump did something illegal to undermine the election. The FBI is not an agency that deals in foreign espionage and foreign intelligence.

The FBI doesn't investigate foreign threats? Really? I'll bet that's news to them.

They may find evidence of hacking and tampering but they don’t have the foreign intelligence resources like the CIA. How many foreign government agents does the FBI have a personal knowledge of in conspiring against our government, as well as foreign contacts do they “personally” deal with on a daily basis? Get a clue before you post.
Nice strawman, but that has nothing to do with you asking me to corroborate my claim that parts of Steele’s dossier were verified or me corroborating exactly that.

Seems you’re simply not happy to learn that parts of the dossier were in fact, verified, so now you’re trying desperately to deflect.
 
What the F do you think the Junior meeting was about? They were seeking dirt on Hillary. That IS collusion.

Was there information passed during that meeting? Did this begin a system of criminal collaboration?

Mueller will find out. Please don't say there was NO COLLUSION. There clearly was....

So, when Hillary was meeting with the Ukrainian officials and paying the Russians for the Steele dossier, she was colluding with TWO foreign governments?

(BTW, meeting with a Russian citizen to get dirt is not collusion with the Russians. Collusion means taking actions in concert with others.

Exactly! Taking actions in concert with others. You just defined it perfectly. And when those actions are to corrupt our system and our elections, that's the very definition of treason. "Enemies both Foreign and Domestic. That's what we've got here. And you've chosen to be on the side of the enemies.
 
Show me in a link, evidence used for the dossier, where a private citizen’s actions of communications and meetings of suspicious illegal activity connected to a foreign government power has been collaberated and verified by the CIA. Evidence that is not supported solely by a paid retired British operative as the only foreign intelligence source. A government agency who’s business is in uncovering government threats, the sharing of information, and knowledgeable in known foreign operatives that can be specifically linked to the Kremlin. Any information that can be collaberated by Secret Intelligence Service (MI-6), CIA, someone involved in the gathering of foreign intelligence for personal or national gain. Again a independent foreign source that is “credible”, with integrity that is not left to question, that can not be in any way traced to a certain political party's Wallet.
How true is the Trump-Russia dossier? One year later, what we know about its claims

Verified: Former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page met with representatives of Russian state-owned oil giant Rosneft.

Verified: The Kremlin targeted educated youth and swing state voters during its cyber attacks in the 2016 campaign.

Verified: Trump maintains ties to rich businessmen from Azerbaijan.

Name for me specifically which foreign intelligence agencies collaberated with each of the claims that Trump did something illegal to undermine the election. The FBI is not an agency that deals in foreign espionage and foreign intelligence.

The FBI doesn't investigate foreign threats? Really? I'll bet that's news to them.

How many foreign government agents does the FBI have a personal knowledge of in conspiring against our government, as well as foreign contacts do they “personally” deal with on a daily basis? Get a clue before you post.

How many? I don't know and neither do you. You can't wish away your statement that they don't concern themselves with foreign govts or espionage. They certainly have and will continue to concern themselves with Putin, Kislyak, the Foreign Minister and the slew of Trump team members who have been in constant contact with Putin's govt and have denied such contacts and lied under oath.

"All enemies, Foreign and Domestic" That's what our Constitution says. In Trump and Putin and the cast of characters surrounding this collusion issue, we have both and to a degree that should concern every American, not just a one party issue.


But that's all we hear from the right. Defending Trump and in doing so, defending Putin's govt and the corruption of our very Democracy. You've allowed it to become a personal issue and have lost sight of the bigger picture of what did Trump do and know and when did he do it or know it.

In other words, you've been suckered by both entities into looking the other way. Luckily, we have checks on power built into that Constitution and that check is under way as we speak. But even that check is under attack by the suckered. Folks like you who can't see what's right in front of them. The truth will come to light soon. Thanks in large part to the FBI, the agency that you claim isn't interested in such mundane matters.

You'll continue to defend Russia and Trump and I'll continue to defend my country from those intruders. That's the difference between the sheepdog and the sheep.

The person in the WH is not at all interested in defending this country from election meddling in the United States. He hopes their continued meddling in 2018 will keep the House in GOP hands. He is not living up to his sworn duty to protect this country. The head of the NSA says as much...

White House Has Given No Orders to Counter Russian Meddling, N.S.A. Chief Says

He has not even implemented the sanctions overwhelmingly approved by Congress. He is carrying the Putin banner and the Republican cowards in Congress are not doing anything. They are allowing Contempt of Congress on a daily basis.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top