BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,638
- 16,610
- 2,180
Fast and Furious is a false analogy. It was a govt operation gone awry. But there was no assertion that Obama didn't have the authority to use executive power to try and hurt drug cartels. He did. His admin just screwed up. And tried to hide it. W's admin tried to hide the facts about bogus Niger uranium. I'd hazard a guess, that all adminsitartions have similar fuckupsPerhaps next time the president will honor legal subpoenas, Sport.
obama fast and furious subpoenas - Google Search
Cocksucker Obama tossed the subpoenas in her CLOSET, and YOU CHEERED when she did.....
Obama exerts Executive privilege over one set of documents and you use that as cover for Trumpybear's blanket refusal to for every single document the House investigator asked for.
Trumpublicans have set a dangerous precedent with that. Enjoy.
Not at all, the prescribed method was being followed but the Dems didn't want to go that way because it is time consuming. Oh well
The claim of executive blanket immunity is equal to no accountability. Do you want the next Democrat president to have no accountability?
But the reason for Trump holding up the aid was ITSELF a violation of his office - because he was trying to benefit himself personally.
Imagine if Obama had said the House has no right to investigate his actions in the F& F case and denied all document requests and told everyone involved to ignore the House subpoena's. Do you think House Democrats would have cried foul, or just the Republicans?
Last edited: