Trump has been EXONERATED of all charges.

I'd like to know what we lost and you won. Because it's no win for us to live in a Mike Pence presidency. So what the fuck did you guys win? None of you get to tell the courts you won't obey a subpoena. None of you get to tell your friends not to testify if they see you commit a crime and are requested by the courts. What did you win, and what did we lose?

This he pissed of the libs so we won shit is childish. What you have won, is the chance to allow the president to do whatever he pleases, whenever he pleases and to whoever he pleases. Now this is not constitutional, but you guys swear you are all constitutional experts. You don't get to do whatever you want, to whoever you want, whenever you want. So what did you win and what did we lose?

We all lost in this situation and you republicans are too stump stupid to see it. Suckers.
That was quite the unhinged rant.

Buckle up Buttercup, your party is going to take a beating in November.
I doubt it.
 
Trump was charged with what the Dems felt were impeachable offenses but the court said No.
The only thing Trump ever was and always will be was “charged”

The court didn't have all the information necessary to make a decision. 70 percent of the people wanted witnesses. This trial was a sham. trump has been impeached. He will forever be impeached. What he was not was convicted.
If the court lacked information it was because the prosecution failed to provide it.
Neither the court nor the defense provides it for the nor allows more time to see if something can fall in their lap
No, it was because trump blocked witnesses and documents. The motherfuckers is guilty as sure as my name here is IM2. We all know it. You know it. The only reason you are using this infantile argument is that he has an R beside his name.
The House had testimony from 13 of their witnesses, and submitted thousands of documents. They got witnesses.

They showed up with what they claimed was an "overwhelming" case, and immediately cried that the Senate needed to do the job of the House by starting another investigation. That isn't the Senate's job, Dopey. The Senate votes on the case the House brings.

The trial wasn't a sham, they used the same rules as they used in the Clinton trial. The only part that was a sham was the bullshit case YOUR House Clowns showed up with.

You lost. Deal with it, Loser.

EXONERATED FOREVER!
 
I'd like to know what we lost and you won. Because it's no win for us to live in a Mike Pence presidency. So what the fuck did you guys win? None of you get to tell the courts you won't obey a subpoena. None of you get to tell your friends not to testify if they see you commit a crime and are requested by the courts. What did you win, and what did we lose?

This he pissed of the libs so we won shit is childish. What you have won, is the chance to allow the president to do whatever he pleases, whenever he pleases and to whoever he pleases. Now this is not constitutional, but you guys swear you are all constitutional experts. You don't get to do whatever you want, to whoever you want, whenever you want. So what did you win and what did we lose?

We all lost in this situation and you republicans are too stump stupid to see it. Suckers.
That was quite the unhinged rant.

Buckle up Buttercup, your party is going to take a beating in November.
I doubt it.
That further confirms my post. You have never been right on any subject.
 
Trump was charged with what the Dems felt were impeachable offenses but the court said No.
The only thing Trump ever was and always will be was “charged”

The court didn't have all the information necessary to make a decision. 70 percent of the people wanted witnesses. This trial was a sham. trump has been impeached. He will forever be impeached. What he was not was convicted.

The House had testimony from 13 of their witnesses, and submitted thousands of documents. They got witnesses.

They showed up with what they claimed was an "overwhelming" case, and immediately cried that the Senate needed to do the job of the House by starting another investigation. That isn't the Senate's job, Dopey. The Senate votes on the case the House brings.

The trial wasn't a sham, they used the same rules as they used in the Clinton trial. The only part that was a sham was the bullshit case YOUR House Clowns showed up with.

You lost. Deal with it, Loser.

EXONERATED FOREVER!
Very factually stated but remember these people operate from a suspension of reality platform

The only people operating from that kind of suspended reality is you trumpers.
 
Trump was charged with what the Dems felt were impeachable offenses but the court said No.
The only thing Trump ever was and always will be was “charged”

The court didn't have all the information necessary to make a decision. 70 percent of the people wanted witnesses. This trial was a sham. trump has been impeached. He will forever be impeached. What he was not was convicted.

Time to let go son.
It's over

When you guys let go of Obama and the Clintons, I'll let this go.

trump was impeached. That's what history will record.

So you're living a lie based on whataboutisms. Wow. You may want to see someone about that TDS you have. It may be a danger.
 
Not in the trial. This is the first and only time in U.S. history a president faced an impeachment trial with no witnesses or documents.
Yes, in the trial. Over 100 video clips of the WITNESSES' TESTIMONY IN THE HOUSE was played during the trial.

About 28,000 documents were entered into the record, liar.

That lie won't fly. Get a new one.
Aww, you poor deranged TDSer, videos can't questioned. :cuckoo:

First and only president ever to not have witnesses called in an impeachment trial.
More lies.

ZERO new witnesses were called during the Clinton trial. They brought in 3 who had already testified in the House to clarify that testimony. That was done behind closed doors, and only parts were made public.

That lie won't fly. Get a new one.
I didn't say, "new."

Sadly, your TDS affects your ability to comprehend. :dunno:
List all the witnesses who testified during the Clinton trial...

GO!
LOLOL

You're such a dumbfuck. You said there were 3. If you want their names... Google them yourself.

:abgg2q.jpg:
 
Trump was charged with what the Dems felt were impeachable offenses but the court said No.
The only thing Trump ever was and always will be was “charged”

The court didn't have all the information necessary to make a decision. 70 percent of the people wanted witnesses. This trial was a sham. trump has been impeached. He will forever be impeached. What he was not was convicted.

The House had testimony from 13 of their witnesses, and submitted thousands of documents. They got witnesses.

They showed up with what they claimed was an "overwhelming" case, and immediately cried that the Senate needed to do the job of the House by starting another investigation. That isn't the Senate's job, Dopey. The Senate votes on the case the House brings.

The trial wasn't a sham, they used the same rules as they used in the Clinton trial. The only part that was a sham was the bullshit case YOUR House Clowns showed up with.

You lost. Deal with it, Loser.

EXONERATED FOREVER!
Very factually stated but remember these people operate from a suspension of reality platform

The only people operating from that kind of suspended reality is you trumpers.
Now sticking out ones tongue
Good move Nancy
 
Not Guilty does not mean exoneration
He was exonerated, Sport.

Deal with it. You lost, again.:5_1_12024:
No, he was not exonerated, he was acquitted.... just a technical difference between finding a person not guilty, vs them being innocent.

Two different meanings.... acquitted is a finding that the prosecution did not have enough evidence to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt of their guilt...

An exoneration is when evidence is presented that PROVES innocence...

As example, if DNA evidence was found that completely exonerated a person of a crime, like DNA evidence that shows a man accused of raping a victim, could not have been the rapist etc...

He was innocent until proven guilty. He was found Not guilty therefore - innocent. Exonerated.
This isn't a court of law..... and there are no statutory crimes being charged and tried with punishment.

Exonerated means Proven innocent.....NOT innocent beyond a reasonable doubt....

example: a man was charged, found guilty, and then evidence like DNA that came forward, PROVED without any doubt, that the person was INNOCENT, and a Judge exonerates them, wipes his record clean to where the being charged, indicted and trial is cleared from his record, he was EXONERATED.
Proven innocent" is the standard of justice used in totalitarian dictatorship. Every time you try to use it, you only demonstrate that you're a goose stepping Stalinist. All you TDS morons want to pretend this is some kind of legal process, but then when it's pointed out how Dims have violated the principles of the legal process, they resort to bleating that it's not a legal process. Anyone who isn't a brain damaged TDS moron can see that you're talking out of both sides of your mouth.
No one is proved innocent, fucking moron. In a court of law, you may be found "not guilty." That doesn't mean you're innocent, let alone, exonerated. It means the prosecutor couldn't prove you're guilty under the law.
 
Obama exerts Executive privilege over one set of documents and you use that as cover for Trumpybear's blanket refusal to for every single document the House investigator asked for.

Trumpublicans have set a dangerous precedent with that. Enjoy.

Not at all, the prescribed method was being followed but the Dems didn't want to go that way because it is time consuming. Oh well

The claim of executive blanket immunity is equal to no accountability. Do you want the next Democrat president to have no accountability?
That isn't what happened, moron.

It's exactly what happened.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/PAC-Letter-10.08.2019.pdf

You seem to be missing the part where Trumps counsel challenged the validity of the subpoenas and the Dems did nothing about it. Like take him to court.

I know you already know that, but your refusal to acknowledge it puts you in the denial bucket with all of your dem friends.

A blanket immunity case is still working it's way through the courts.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
Trump was charged with what the Dems felt were impeachable offenses but the court said No.
The only thing Trump ever was and always will be was “charged”

The court didn't have all the information necessary to make a decision. 70 percent of the people wanted witnesses. This trial was a sham. trump has been impeached. He will forever be impeached. What he was not was convicted.
If the court lacked information it was because the prosecution failed to provide it.
Neither the court nor the defense provides it for the nor allows more time to see if something can fall in their lap
No, it was because trump blocked witnesses and documents. The motherfuckers is guilty as sure as my name here is IM2. We all know it. You know it. The only reason you are using this infantile argument is that he has an R beside his name.
The House had testimony from 13 of their witnesses, and submitted thousands of documents. They got witnesses.

They showed up with what they claimed was an "overwhelming" case, and immediately cried that the Senate needed to do the job of the House by starting another investigation. That isn't the Senate's job, Dopey. The Senate votes on the case the House brings.

The trial wasn't a sham, they used the same rules as they used in the Clinton trial. The only part that was a sham was the bullshit case YOUR House Clowns showed up with.

You lost. Deal with it, Loser.

EXONERATED FOREVER!

The trial was a sham. Clinton had witnesses. Clinton di8d not bl0ock all information. So just face the fact that you will be getting this in your face until trumps ass is gone. I don't care when it is, the mother fucker is guilty, he scammed the system with McConnell and the senate trial was a sham with an outcome that was determined before the house was done with its inquiry. I didn't lose anything. And you didn't win anything.
 
I'd like to know what we lost and you won. Because it's no win for us to live in a Mike Pence presidency. So what the fuck did you guys win? None of you get to tell the courts you won't obey a subpoena. None of you get to tell your friends not to testify if they see you commit a crime and are requested by the courts. What did you win, and what did we lose?

This he pissed of the libs so we won shit is childish. What you have won, is the chance to allow the president to do whatever he pleases, whenever he pleases and to whoever he pleases. Now this is not constitutional, but you guys swear you are all constitutional experts. You don't get to do whatever you want, to whoever you want, whenever you want. So what did you win and what did we lose?

We all lost in this situation and you republicans are too stump stupid to see it. Suckers.

You'll find out what you lost on November 8th, 2020
Trump will be officially removed on 1-20-2001.
 
Trump was charged with what the Dems felt were impeachable offenses but the court said No.
The only thing Trump ever was and always will be was “charged”

The court didn't have all the information necessary to make a decision. 70 percent of the people wanted witnesses. This trial was a sham. trump has been impeached. He will forever be impeached. What he was not was convicted.
If the court lacked information it was because the prosecution failed to provide it.
Neither the court nor the defense provides it for the nor allows more time to see if something can fall in their lap
No, it was because trump blocked witnesses and documents. The motherfuckers is guilty as sure as my name here is IM2. We all know it. You know it. The only reason you are using this infantile argument is that he has an R beside his name.
The House had testimony from 13 of their witnesses, and submitted thousands of documents. They got witnesses.

They showed up with what they claimed was an "overwhelming" case, and immediately cried that the Senate needed to do the job of the House by starting another investigation. That isn't the Senate's job, Dopey. The Senate votes on the case the House brings.

The trial wasn't a sham, they used the same rules as they used in the Clinton trial. The only part that was a sham was the bullshit case YOUR House Clowns showed up with.

You lost. Deal with it, Loser.

EXONERATED FOREVER!

The trial was a sham. Clinton had witnesses. Clinton di8d not bl0ock all information. So just face the fact that you will be getting this in your face until trumps ass is gone. I don't care when it is, the mother fucker is guilty, he scammed the system with McConnell and the senate trial was a sham with an outcome that was determined before the house was done with its inquiry. I didn't lose anything. And you didn't win anything.

Good it's settled then. You accept that Rump is your Prez.Now we;re getting somewhere.
 
He was exonerated, Sport.

Deal with it. You lost, again.:5_1_12024:
No, he was not exonerated, he was acquitted.... just a technical difference between finding a person not guilty, vs them being innocent.

Two different meanings.... acquitted is a finding that the prosecution did not have enough evidence to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt of their guilt...

An exoneration is when evidence is presented that PROVES innocence...

As example, if DNA evidence was found that completely exonerated a person of a crime, like DNA evidence that shows a man accused of raping a victim, could not have been the rapist etc...

He was innocent until proven guilty. He was found Not guilty therefore - innocent. Exonerated.
This isn't a court of law..... and there are no statutory crimes being charged and tried with punishment.

Exonerated means Proven innocent.....NOT innocent beyond a reasonable doubt....

example: a man was charged, found guilty, and then evidence like DNA that came forward, PROVED without any doubt, that the person was INNOCENT, and a Judge exonerates them, wipes his record clean to where the being charged, indicted and trial is cleared from his record, he was EXONERATED.
Proven innocent" is the standard of justice used in totalitarian dictatorship. Every time you try to use it, you only demonstrate that you're a goose stepping Stalinist. All you TDS morons want to pretend this is some kind of legal process, but then when it's pointed out how Dims have violated the principles of the legal process, they resort to bleating that it's not a legal process. Anyone who isn't a brain damaged TDS moron can see that you're talking out of both sides of your mouth.
No one is proved innocent, fucking moron. In a court of law, you may be found "not guilty." That doesn't mean you're innocent, let alone, exonerated. It means the prosecutor couldn't prove you're guilty under the law.

And while be charged and taken to trial you are assumed to be innocent unless proven guilty. Therefore if not proven guilty, your back to being innocent. That's how our system works. Once found not guilty - you can only revert to innocent.
 
I'd like to know what we lost and you won. Because it's no win for us to live in a Mike Pence presidency. So what the fuck did you guys win? None of you get to tell the courts you won't obey a subpoena. None of you get to tell your friends not to testify if they see you commit a crime and are requested by the courts. What did you win, and what did we lose?

This he pissed of the libs so we won shit is childish. What you have won, is the chance to allow the president to do whatever he pleases, whenever he pleases and to whoever he pleases. Now this is not constitutional, but you guys swear you are all constitutional experts. You don't get to do whatever you want, to whoever you want, whenever you want. So what did you win and what did we lose?

We all lost in this situation and you republicans are too stump stupid to see it. Suckers.

You'll find out what you lost on November 8th, 2020
Trump will be officially removed on 1-20-2001.

And if he isn't you'll kill yourself.
 
Obama exerts Executive privilege over one set of documents and you use that as cover for Trumpybear's blanket refusal to for every single document the House investigator asked for.

Trumpublicans have set a dangerous precedent with that. Enjoy.

Not at all, the prescribed method was being followed but the Dems didn't want to go that way because it is time consuming. Oh well

The claim of executive blanket immunity is equal to no accountability. Do you want the next Democrat president to have no accountability?
You are lying again. They didn't make a claim of blanket executive immunity.

The subpoenas were challenged on the basis they were invalid due to the refusal of Nazi Pelousy to hold a vote to initiate impeachment proceedings.

That lie won't fly. Get a new one.

Yes he did. The subpoenas were valid.

Then why not let the Court tell him so?

Still waiting on the courts.......
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
I'd like to know what we lost and you won. Because it's no win for us to live in a Mike Pence presidency. So what the fuck did you guys win? None of you get to tell the courts you won't obey a subpoena. None of you get to tell your friends not to testify if they see you commit a crime and are requested by the courts. What did you win, and what did we lose?

This he pissed of the libs so we won shit is childish. What you have won, is the chance to allow the president to do whatever he pleases, whenever he pleases and to whoever he pleases. Now this is not constitutional, but you guys swear you are all constitutional experts. You don't get to do whatever you want, to whoever you want, whenever you want. So what did you win and what did we lose?

We all lost in this situation and you republicans are too stump stupid to see it. Suckers.

You'll find out what you lost on November 8th, 2020
Trump will be officially removed on 1-20-2001.

Jeebus. Did you find the Delorean? You're gonna make bank on that shit. Just give me the winner of the next Superbowl and I'll be your friend forever (The one in 2021 not 2001 - that won't work for me)
 
I'd like to know what we lost and you won. Because it's no win for us to live in a Mike Pence presidency. So what the fuck did you guys win? None of you get to tell the courts you won't obey a subpoena. None of you get to tell your friends not to testify if they see you commit a crime and are requested by the courts. What did you win, and what did we lose?

This he pissed of the libs so we won shit is childish. What you have won, is the chance to allow the president to do whatever he pleases, whenever he pleases and to whoever he pleases. Now this is not constitutional, but you guys swear you are all constitutional experts. You don't get to do whatever you want, to whoever you want, whenever you want. So what did you win and what did we lose?

We all lost in this situation and you republicans are too stump stupid to see it. Suckers.

You'll find out what you lost on November 8th, 2020
Trump will be officially removed on 1-20-2001.

And if he isn't you'll kill yourself.

No, but I will watch our country crumble and die because we were stupid enough to give this fool a second term.
 
I'd like to know what we lost and you won. Because it's no win for us to live in a Mike Pence presidency. So what the fuck did you guys win? None of you get to tell the courts you won't obey a subpoena. None of you get to tell your friends not to testify if they see you commit a crime and are requested by the courts. What did you win, and what did we lose?

This he pissed of the libs so we won shit is childish. What you have won, is the chance to allow the president to do whatever he pleases, whenever he pleases and to whoever he pleases. Now this is not constitutional, but you guys swear you are all constitutional experts. You don't get to do whatever you want, to whoever you want, whenever you want. So what did you win and what did we lose?

We all lost in this situation and you republicans are too stump stupid to see it. Suckers.

You'll find out what you lost on November 8th, 2020
Trump will be officially removed on 1-20-2001.

And if he isn't you'll kill yourself.

No, but I will watch our country crumble and die because we were stupid enough to give this fool a second term.

Didn't you just write that he would be removed? Please be consistent. I'm not smart enough to keep up.
 
Shove up up your ass moron. We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president because trump blocked them from testifying. So don't ask me to show a mother fucking thing. Ask trump why he was scared to let pompeo, pence, giuliani, mulvaney, bolton, parnas, fruman and himself testify. Innocent until proven guilty you say? Why does that only seem to apply when republi9cans are breaking the law?


We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president


Perhaps next time YOUR House Clowns won't try to overturn an election on hearsay and feelings, Sport.

Perhaps next time the president will honor legal subpoenas, Sport.

Except...

They weren't legal. Dems should have taken the to the courts for them to decide. But if you read the rules, subpoena power has to be granted to a committee in congress by a full House vote and Nancy just skipped that step.

Soooooo

Yur wrong.

They were legal.
:linky:
Eastlan v. United States Servicemen's Fund

Issuance of subpoenas such as the one in question is a legitimate use by Congress of its power to investigate, and the subpoena power may be exercised by a committee acting, as here, on behalf of one of the Houses.
 
Not Guilty does not mean exoneration
tenor.gif
 

Forum List

Back
Top