Trump has been EXONERATED of all charges.

Not Guilty does not mean exoneration
He was exonerated, Sport.

Deal with it. You lost, again.:5_1_12024:
No, he was not exonerated, he was acquitted.... just a technical difference between finding a person not guilty, vs them being innocent.

Two different meanings.... acquitted is a finding that the prosecution did not have enough evidence to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt of their guilt...

An exoneration is when evidence is presented that PROVES innocence...

As example, if DNA evidence was found that completely exonerated a person of a crime, like DNA evidence that shows a man accused of raping a victim, could not have been the rapist etc...

He was innocent until proven guilty. He was found Not guilty therefore - innocent. Exonerated.
This isn't a court of law..... and there are no statutory crimes being charged and tried with punishment.

Exonerated means Proven innocent.....NOT innocent beyond a reasonable doubt....

example: a man was charged, found guilty, and then evidence like DNA that came forward, PROVED without any doubt, that the person was INNOCENT, and a Judge exonerates them, wipes his record clean to where the being charged, indicted and trial is cleared from his record, he was EXONERATED.

Exonerated!

Go Trump!
 
Not Guilty does not mean exoneration
exonerate
[ ig-zon-uh-reyt ]
verb (used with object), ex·on·er·at·ed, ex·on·er·at·ing.
to clear, as of an accusation; free from guilt or blame; exculpate: He was exonerated from the accusation of cheating.
to relieve, as from an obligation, duty, or task.

acquitted
[ uh-kwit ]SEE DEFINITION OF acquitted
Funny - I thought I heard Chief Justice Roberts say he was acquitted. The thesaurus says exonerate is a synonym. Hmmmm.

Please educate me.

Acquitted
means that they were not proven guilty. There was insufficient evidence or the jury did not believe the evidence and they voted to acquit. Exonerated means that you were shown or proven to be innocent.

Trump was acquitted, not exonerated.

https://www.quora.com/In-the-legal-...d-on-the-basis-of-lack-of-evidence-equivalent
In America, people are innocent until proven guilty.

Not unless it is Trump. Amma right?
 
He was exonerated, Sport.

Deal with it. You lost, again.:5_1_12024:
No, he was not exonerated, he was acquitted.... just a technical difference between finding a person not guilty, vs them being innocent.

Two different meanings.... acquitted is a finding that the prosecution did not have enough evidence to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt of their guilt...

An exoneration is when evidence is presented that PROVES innocence...

As example, if DNA evidence was found that completely exonerated a person of a crime, like DNA evidence that shows a man accused of raping a victim, could not have been the rapist etc...

He was innocent until proven guilty. He was found Not guilty therefore - innocent. Exonerated.
This isn't a court of law..... and there are no statutory crimes being charged and tried with punishment.

Exonerated means Proven innocent.....NOT innocent beyond a reasonable doubt....

example: a man was charged, found guilty, and then evidence like DNA that came forward, PROVED without any doubt, that the person was INNOCENT, and a Judge exonerates them, wipes his record clean to where the being charged, indicted and trial is cleared from his record, he was EXONERATED.
Proven innocent" is the standard of justice used in totalitarian dictatorship. Every time you try to use it, you only demonstrate that you're a goose stepping Stalinist. All you TDS morons want to pretend this is some kind of legal process, but then when it's pointed out how Dims have violated the principles of the legal process, they resort to bleating that it's not a legal process. Anyone who isn't a brain damaged TDS moron can see that you're talking out of both sides of your mouth.

Are you crazy?

I don't think so....

That's factually correct.

You're a Stalinist.
 
Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.
So you don't question why trump refused witnesses, he's just exonerated despite the fact that evidence of his guilt or innocence was hidden from all investigators.

We all lost because of this, fool. We all have to follow the law. The only person that doesn't is trump.
Please show us all this "hidden" evidence, moron.


Innocent until proven guilty. He was not proven guilty, therefore Trump is INNOCENT.

Shove up up your ass moron. We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president because trump blocked them from testifying. So don't ask me to show a mother fucking thing. Ask trump why he was scared to let pompeo, pence, giuliani, mulvaney, bolton, parnas, fruman and himself testify. Innocent until proven guilty you say? Why does that only seem to apply when republi9cans are breaking the law?


We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president


Perhaps next time YOUR House Clowns won't try to overturn an election on hearsay and feelings, Sport.

Perhaps next time the president will honor legal subpoenas, Sport.

Except...

They weren't legal. Dems should have taken the to the courts for them to decide. But if you read the rules, subpoena power has to be granted to a committee in congress by a full House vote and Nancy just skipped that step.

Soooooo

Yur wrong.
 
No, he was not exonerated, he was acquitted.... just a technical difference between finding a person not guilty, vs them being innocent.

Two different meanings.... acquitted is a finding that the prosecution did not have enough evidence to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt of their guilt...

An exoneration is when evidence is presented that PROVES innocence...

As example, if DNA evidence was found that completely exonerated a person of a crime, like DNA evidence that shows a man accused of raping a victim, could not have been the rapist etc...

He was innocent until proven guilty. He was found Not guilty therefore - innocent. Exonerated.
This isn't a court of law..... and there are no statutory crimes being charged and tried with punishment.

Exonerated means Proven innocent.....NOT innocent beyond a reasonable doubt....

example: a man was charged, found guilty, and then evidence like DNA that came forward, PROVED without any doubt, that the person was INNOCENT, and a Judge exonerates them, wipes his record clean to where the being charged, indicted and trial is cleared from his record, he was EXONERATED.
Proven innocent" is the standard of justice used in totalitarian dictatorship. Every time you try to use it, you only demonstrate that you're a goose stepping Stalinist. All you TDS morons want to pretend this is some kind of legal process, but then when it's pointed out how Dims have violated the principles of the legal process, they resort to bleating that it's not a legal process. Anyone who isn't a brain damaged TDS moron can see that you're talking out of both sides of your mouth.

Are you crazy?

I don't think so....

That's factually correct.

You're a Stalinist.

Nah, but you support one.
 
So you don't question why trump refused witnesses, he's just exonerated despite the fact that evidence of his guilt or innocence was hidden from all investigators.

We all lost because of this, fool. We all have to follow the law. The only person that doesn't is trump.
Please show us all this "hidden" evidence, moron.


Innocent until proven guilty. He was not proven guilty, therefore Trump is INNOCENT.

Shove up up your ass moron. We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president because trump blocked them from testifying. So don't ask me to show a mother fucking thing. Ask trump why he was scared to let pompeo, pence, giuliani, mulvaney, bolton, parnas, fruman and himself testify. Innocent until proven guilty you say? Why does that only seem to apply when republi9cans are breaking the law?


We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president


Perhaps next time YOUR House Clowns won't try to overturn an election on hearsay and feelings, Sport.

Perhaps next time the president will honor legal subpoenas, Sport.

Except...

They weren't legal. Dems should have taken the to the courts for them to decide. But if you read the rules, subpoena power has to be granted to a committee in congress by a full House vote and Nancy just skipped that step.

Soooooo

Yur wrong.

They were legal.
 
Not Guilty does not mean exoneration
exonerate
[ ig-zon-uh-reyt ]
verb (used with object), ex·on·er·at·ed, ex·on·er·at·ing.
to clear, as of an accusation; free from guilt or blame; exculpate: He was exonerated from the accusation of cheating.
to relieve, as from an obligation, duty, or task.

acquitted
[ uh-kwit ]SEE DEFINITION OF acquitted
Funny - I thought I heard Chief Justice Roberts say he was acquitted. The thesaurus says exonerate is a synonym. Hmmmm.

Please educate me.

Acquitted
means that they were not proven guilty. There was insufficient evidence or the jury did not believe the evidence and they voted to acquit. Exonerated means that you were shown or proven to be innocent.

Trump was acquitted, not exonerated.

https://www.quora.com/In-the-legal-...d-on-the-basis-of-lack-of-evidence-equivalent
In America, people are innocent until proven guilty.

Not unless it is Trump. Amma right?

No. But keep on playing into his victimhood scam.
 
Please show us all this "hidden" evidence, moron.


Innocent until proven guilty. He was not proven guilty, therefore Trump is INNOCENT.

Shove up up your ass moron. We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president because trump blocked them from testifying. So don't ask me to show a mother fucking thing. Ask trump why he was scared to let pompeo, pence, giuliani, mulvaney, bolton, parnas, fruman and himself testify. Innocent until proven guilty you say? Why does that only seem to apply when republi9cans are breaking the law?


We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president


Perhaps next time YOUR House Clowns won't try to overturn an election on hearsay and feelings, Sport.

Perhaps next time the president will honor legal subpoenas, Sport.

Except...

They weren't legal. Dems should have taken the to the courts for them to decide. But if you read the rules, subpoena power has to be granted to a committee in congress by a full House vote and Nancy just skipped that step.

Soooooo

Yur wrong.

They were legal.
Same lie as before. You can post it a dozen times and it will still be a lie, liar.
 
Please show us all this "hidden" evidence, moron.


Innocent until proven guilty. He was not proven guilty, therefore Trump is INNOCENT.

Shove up up your ass moron. We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president because trump blocked them from testifying. So don't ask me to show a mother fucking thing. Ask trump why he was scared to let pompeo, pence, giuliani, mulvaney, bolton, parnas, fruman and himself testify. Innocent until proven guilty you say? Why does that only seem to apply when republi9cans are breaking the law?


We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president


Perhaps next time YOUR House Clowns won't try to overturn an election on hearsay and feelings, Sport.

Perhaps next time the president will honor legal subpoenas, Sport.

Except...

They weren't legal. Dems should have taken the to the courts for them to decide. But if you read the rules, subpoena power has to be granted to a committee in congress by a full House vote and Nancy just skipped that step.

Soooooo

Yur wrong.

They were legal.
:linky:
 
Not Guilty does not mean exoneration
exonerate
[ ig-zon-uh-reyt ]
verb (used with object), ex·on·er·at·ed, ex·on·er·at·ing.
to clear, as of an accusation; free from guilt or blame; exculpate: He was exonerated from the accusation of cheating.
to relieve, as from an obligation, duty, or task.

acquitted
[ uh-kwit ]SEE DEFINITION OF acquitted
Funny - I thought I heard Chief Justice Roberts say he was acquitted. The thesaurus says exonerate is a synonym. Hmmmm.

Please educate me.

Acquitted
means that they were not proven guilty. There was insufficient evidence or the jury did not believe the evidence and they voted to acquit. Exonerated means that you were shown or proven to be innocent.

Trump was acquitted, not exonerated.

https://www.quora.com/In-the-legal-...d-on-the-basis-of-lack-of-evidence-equivalent
In America, people are innocent until proven guilty.

Not unless it is Trump. Amma right?

No. But keep on playing into his victimhood scam.

You libs just love that word, dontcha.
 
Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.

Was OJ Exonerated when his jury voted unanimously to acquit him?

Trump got an average of 48.5 votes to convict - that does not show anything near vindication.

Grow up hack, you bother me - as do all trump supporters who continue to put the United States at risk by supporting this Plutocratic fascist. Putin should fire you, you are too incompetent to serve the Kremlin and the Russian effort to destroy our democracy.
 
Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.

Was OJ Exonerated when his jury voted unanimously to acquit him?

Trump got an average of 48.5 votes to convict - that does not show anything near vindication.

Grow up hack, you bother me - as do all trump supporters who continue to put the United States at risk by supporting this Plutocratic fascist. Putin should fire you, you are too incompetent to serve the Kremlin and the Russian effort to destroy our democracy.
Who?
 
Perhaps next time the president will honor legal subpoenas, Sport.



obama fast and furious subpoenas - Google Search


Cocksucker Obama tossed the subpoenas in her CLOSET, and YOU CHEERED when she did.....

Obama exerts Executive privilege over one set of documents and you use that as cover for Trumpybear's blanket refusal to for every single document the House investigator asked for.

Trumpublicans have set a dangerous precedent with that. Enjoy.
 
Perhaps next time the president will honor legal subpoenas, Sport.



obama fast and furious subpoenas - Google Search


Cocksucker Obama tossed the subpoenas in her CLOSET, and YOU CHEERED when she did.....

Obama exerts Executive privilege over one set of documents and you use that as cover for Trumpybear's blanket refusal to for every single document the House investigator asked for.

Trumpublicans have set a dangerous precedent with that. Enjoy.
^^^^Sore Loser^^^^
 
upload_2020-2-6_14-58-57.jpeg
 
Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.

Was OJ Exonerated when his jury voted unanimously to acquit him?

Trump got an average of 48.5 votes to convict - that does not show anything near vindication.

Grow up hack, you bother me - as do all trump supporters who continue to put the United States at risk by supporting this Plutocratic fascist. Putin should fire you, you are too incompetent to serve the Kremlin and the Russian effort to destroy our democracy.

Grow up child, he was aquitted. Time for the next fake scandal
 
Perhaps next time the president will honor legal subpoenas, Sport.



obama fast and furious subpoenas - Google Search


Cocksucker Obama tossed the subpoenas in her CLOSET, and YOU CHEERED when she did.....

Obama exerts Executive privilege over one set of documents and you use that as cover for Trumpybear's blanket refusal to for every single document the House investigator asked for.

Trumpublicans have set a dangerous precedent with that. Enjoy.

Not at all, the prescribed method was being followed but the Dems didn't want to go that way because it is time consuming. Oh well
 
Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.

Was OJ Exonerated when his jury voted unanimously to acquit him?

Trump got an average of 48.5 votes to convict - that does not show anything near vindication.

Grow up hack, you bother me - as do all trump supporters who continue to put the United States at risk by supporting this Plutocratic fascist. Putin should fire you, you are too incompetent to serve the Kremlin and the Russian effort to destroy our democracy.

Grow up child, he was aquitted. Time for the next fake scandal

How much did you pay for your brainwash? Reading a couple of your posts suggests that you could have saved money; its clear you only needed a lite rinse. That said, there was noting fake about the indictment of The President, even some Republicans who vote to acquit him said so. Those Senators who vote to acquit trump, did so to keep their job, not his.

Let's hope the people in Red States wake up and realize DJT is corrupt to his core, and a danger to all of us.
 
Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.

Was OJ Exonerated when his jury voted unanimously to acquit him?

Trump got an average of 48.5 votes to convict - that does not show anything near vindication.

Grow up hack, you bother me - as do all trump supporters who continue to put the United States at risk by supporting this Plutocratic fascist. Putin should fire you, you are too incompetent to serve the Kremlin and the Russian effort to destroy our democracy.

Grow up child, he was aquitted. Time for the next fake scandal

How much did you pay for your brainwash? Reading a couple of your posts suggests that you could have saved money; its clear you only needed a lite rinse.

Oh boy, we cross? He was aquitted and you lost. It will only hurt for a little while
 
Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.

Was OJ Exonerated when his jury voted unanimously to acquit him?

Trump got an average of 48.5 votes to convict - that does not show anything near vindication.

Grow up hack, you bother me - as do all trump supporters who continue to put the United States at risk by supporting this Plutocratic fascist. Putin should fire you, you are too incompetent to serve the Kremlin and the Russian effort to destroy our democracy.

Grow up child, he was aquitted. Time for the next fake scandal

How much did you pay for your brainwash? Reading a couple of your posts suggests that you could have saved money; its clear you only needed a lite rinse. That said, there was noting fake about the indictment of The President, even some Republicans who vote to acquit him said so. Those Senators who vote to acquit trump, did so to keep their job, not his.

Let's hope the people in Red States wake up and realize DJT is corrupt to his core, and a danger to all of us.

Exonerated, forever.
 

Forum List

Back
Top