Trump has been EXONERATED of all charges.

So you don't question why trump refused witnesses, he's just exonerated despite the fact that evidence of his guilt or innocence was hidden from all investigators.

We all lost because of this, fool. We all have to follow the law. The only person that doesn't is trump.
Please show us all this "hidden" evidence, moron.


Innocent until proven guilty. He was not proven guilty, therefore Trump is INNOCENT.

Shove up up your ass moron. We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president because trump blocked them from testifying. So don't ask me to show a mother fucking thing. Ask trump why he was scared to let pompeo, pence, giuliani, mulvaney, bolton, parnas, fruman and himself testify. Innocent until proven guilty you say? Why does that only seem to apply when republi9cans are breaking the law?
Oh, I see. Your claim that there is hidden evidence of his guilt was a lie.

Got it.

And yes, innocent until proven guilty. This is still America. If you don't like it hike your ass down to Venezuela.
LOL

Dumbfuck, presumption of innocence is a legal construct; while impeachment is a political parliamentary procedure, not a legal one involving the criminal justice system.

face-palm-gif.278959


their shell of partisanship horseshit is uncrackable
They suffer from Trump Defending Sycophancy. :(
 
LOLOL

You cultists are truly brain-dead.

Yes, Impeached Trump was impeached and will forever remain impeached.


My comment was a play on Pelosi having said, "if TRUMP is acquitted he won't be acquitted". :itsok:
Actually, what she said was...

“He will not be acquitted. You cannot be acquitted if you don't have a trial. And you don't have a trial if you don't have witnesses and documentation.”

And yes, Impeached Trump is still Impeached Trump.




"Not guilty."

Not guilty ≠ innocent.

OJ Simpson was also found to be not guilty.

And again, Impeached Trump is still impeached.

Exonerated, Simpleton.

Deal with it. You lost.

LOLOL

Not guilty ≠ innocent.
 
Exonerated means Proven innocent.....NOT innocent beyond a reasonable doubt
'sOK....House Impeachment by Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler didn't mean proven 'Guilty'. They ADMITTED this was always a biased, political, partisan coup attempt initiated by Obama before Trump ever won the 2016 election and finally carried out as promised back then.

One of my favorite snowflake comments about Impeachment came yesterday when some Trump-hating snowflake declared, "Acquittal is just exoneration ON PAPER'.....Yeah, and House Impeachment was just 'Impeachment' ON PAPER as well.

Bwuhahahahaha........
It was partisan because the Repuicans CHOSE to WHIP their caucus in to voting in one republican block with threats if they strayed. Democrats were allowed to be impartial and vote their conscience based on the actual evidence thatt was allowed to be presented.....

As Mitch clearly and unquestionably stated before the trial began, the FIX WAS IN to acquit him...

Not allowing new pertinent evidence and witnesses in the SHAM trial sealed the FIXED DEAL....

Yes, he was acquitted, on paper only.... but for your side, it was better to have a SHAM trial with no witnesses than to follow their oath of impartiality and truth and the constitution.... And more important than our Nation and all the eyes watching their SHAM SCAM....

at least you could then keep crooked cheating Donald around.... :rolleyes:

ITS SHAMEFUL!!! imo

And the House hearings were completely unbiased and above board.
 
My comment was a play on Pelosi having said, "if TRUMP is acquitted he won't be acquitted". :itsok:
Actually, what she said was...

“He will not be acquitted. You cannot be acquitted if you don't have a trial. And you don't have a trial if you don't have witnesses and documentation.”

And yes, Impeached Trump is still Impeached Trump.




"Not guilty."

Not guilty ≠ innocent.

OJ Simpson was also found to be not guilty.

And again, Impeached Trump is still impeached.

Exonerated, Simpleton.

Deal with it. You lost.

LOLOL

Not guilty ≠ innocent.

Exonerated, Simpleton.

Deal with it. You lost.
 
The people have the final decision here. I just hope everybody else is not as dumb as you trump supporters.

People did make the decision. We voted for our senators they voted for us. You just did not agree with the outcome and now resort to calling half the country dumb. But keep going comments like yours and Hillary's are what put Trump in office in the first place.
Not really so.... imho

The senators, with each State getting 2, no matter a Wyoming having 575000 citizens and a California having 30,000,000 citizens, represent the State governments..... not we the people, equally or proportionately... the House of Representatives, represents we the people, and are appropriated by the number of people within each state... I believe it is something like 1 congressman for every 750000 people within each state....

So, we the people impeached Trump in the House, and the Senators, two representing each State, did not remove him from office, by acquitting him.

You mean "we the people" Progressives.
 
Not Guilty does not mean exoneration
He was exonerated, Sport.

Deal with it. You lost, again.:5_1_12024:
No, he was not exonerated, he was acquitted.... just a technical difference between finding a person not guilty, vs them being innocent.

Two different meanings.... acquitted is a finding that the prosecution did not have enough evidence to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt of their guilt...

An exoneration is when evidence is presented that PROVES innocence...

As example, if DNA evidence was found that completely exonerated a person of a crime, like DNA evidence that shows a man accused of raping a victim, could not have been the rapist etc...
In order for an acquittal you need to have a trial...in order to have a trial a crime must have been committed. no criminal action charged against Trump.
High crimes and misdemeanors do not require them to be a statutory crime.... that's been proven and every legal scholar that exists, except the President's motley crew, knows the precedent... And the founders specifically state it's a breach of the public trust with the power we give them... an abuse of power.... which can be a statutory crime or simply not honoring their oath of office.....or even something like using his office for cheating in an upcoming election.

So? Trump was EXONERATED of all those bullshit claims.

It was a whitewash by Trumpublicans who simply accept his corruption as their new normal, until the next Democrat President of course.
 
Exonerated means Proven innocent.....NOT innocent beyond a reasonable doubt
'sOK....House Impeachment by Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler didn't mean proven 'Guilty'. They ADMITTED this was always a biased, political, partisan coup attempt initiated by Obama before Trump ever won the 2016 election and finally carried out as promised back then.

One of my favorite snowflake comments about Impeachment came yesterday when some Trump-hating snowflake declared, "Acquittal is just exoneration ON PAPER'.....Yeah, and House Impeachment was just 'Impeachment' ON PAPER as well.

Bwuhahahahaha........
It was partisan because the Repuicans CHOSE to WHIP their caucus in to voting in one republican block with threats if they strayed. Democrats were allowed to be impartial and vote their conscience based on the actual evidence thatt was allowed to be presented.....

As Mitch clearly and unquestionably stated before the trial began, the FIX WAS IN to acquit him...

Not allowing new pertinent evidence and witnesses in the SHAM trial sealed the FIXED DEAL....

Yes, he was acquitted, on paper only.... but for your side, it was better to have a SHAM trial with no witnesses than to follow their oath of impartiality and truth and the constitution.... And more important than our Nation and all the eyes watching their SHAM SCAM....

at least you could then keep crooked cheating Donald around.... :rolleyes:

ITS SHAMEFUL!!! imo

And the House hearings were completely unbiased and above board.


right down the constitution line -
 
At least we are not so stupid as to let a man take us into a dictatorship



newsflash = you can vote against Trump in NOVEMBER, angry man.....

I notice you post Malcom X but not MLK. Do you hate MLK? Cocksucker Obama does.....

How about me liking them both. And others such as WEB Dubois, Mary MacLeod Bethune, Fannie Lou Hamer, Sojourner Truth, Harriet Tubman, Touissant L'Ouverture, Benjamin Banneker, Marcus Garvey, William Rodney, Patrice Lumumba, Nelson Mandela, and I can continue. Obama doesn't hate King.

Don't worry about who I vote for in November, the fact is trump should be gone today and not allowed to run again.

"We the people said no".
 
Perhaps next time the president will honor legal subpoenas, Sport.

Stuff it. Have you been a liar all of your life?

"That leaves civil contempt as a possible legal avenue. Congress can ask a federal court to compel obedience to a subpoena. This can take a while. In October 2011 Eric Holder, Barack Obama’s attorney-general, received a congressional subpoena. Mr Obama tried to block it by declaring executive privilege, in June 2012. A court rejected Mr Obama’s blanket claim of privilege, but not until January 2016."

Donald Trump is not the first president to fight subpoenas
He is the first president to face an impeachment trial with no witnesses.
YOUR House Clowns called 13 witnesses and submitted thousands of documents.

That lie won't fly. Get a new one.
Not in the trial. This is the first and only time in U.S. history a president faced an impeachment trial with no witnesses or documents.
Yes, in the trial. Over 100 video clips of the WITNESSES' TESTIMONY IN THE HOUSE was played during the trial.

About 28,000 documents were entered into the record, liar.

That lie won't fly. Get a new one.
Aww, you poor deranged TDSer, videos can't questioned. :cuckoo:

First and only president ever to not have witnesses called in an impeachment trial.
 
Exonerated means Proven innocent.....NOT innocent beyond a reasonable doubt
'sOK....House Impeachment by Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler didn't mean proven 'Guilty'. They ADMITTED this was always a biased, political, partisan coup attempt initiated by Obama before Trump ever won the 2016 election and finally carried out as promised back then.

One of my favorite snowflake comments about Impeachment came yesterday when some Trump-hating snowflake declared, "Acquittal is just exoneration ON PAPER'.....Yeah, and House Impeachment was just 'Impeachment' ON PAPER as well.

Bwuhahahahaha........
It was partisan because the Repuicans CHOSE to WHIP their caucus in to voting in one republican block with threats if they strayed. Democrats were allowed to be impartial and vote their conscience based on the actual evidence thatt was allowed to be presented.....

As Mitch clearly and unquestionably stated before the trial began, the FIX WAS IN to acquit him...

Not allowing new pertinent evidence and witnesses in the SHAM trial sealed the FIXED DEAL....

Yes, he was acquitted, on paper only.... but for your side, it was better to have a SHAM trial with no witnesses than to follow their oath of impartiality and truth and the constitution.... And more important than our Nation and all the eyes watching their SHAM SCAM....

at least you could then keep crooked cheating Donald around.... :rolleyes:

ITS SHAMEFUL!!! imo

And the House hearings were completely unbiased and above board.


right down the constitution line -
They violated House rules.

They issued invalid subpoenas.
 
Stuff it. Have you been a liar all of your life?

"That leaves civil contempt as a possible legal avenue. Congress can ask a federal court to compel obedience to a subpoena. This can take a while. In October 2011 Eric Holder, Barack Obama’s attorney-general, received a congressional subpoena. Mr Obama tried to block it by declaring executive privilege, in June 2012. A court rejected Mr Obama’s blanket claim of privilege, but not until January 2016."

Donald Trump is not the first president to fight subpoenas
He is the first president to face an impeachment trial with no witnesses.
YOUR House Clowns called 13 witnesses and submitted thousands of documents.

That lie won't fly. Get a new one.
Not in the trial. This is the first and only time in U.S. history a president faced an impeachment trial with no witnesses or documents.
Yes, in the trial. Over 100 video clips of the WITNESSES' TESTIMONY IN THE HOUSE was played during the trial.

About 28,000 documents were entered into the record, liar.

That lie won't fly. Get a new one.
Aww, you poor deranged TDSer, videos can't questioned. :cuckoo:

First and only president ever to not have witnesses called in an impeachment trial.
More lies.

ZERO new witnesses were called during the Clinton trial. They brought in 3 who had already testified in the House to clarify that testimony. That was done behind closed doors, and only parts were made public.

That lie won't fly. Get a new one.
 
Actually, what she said was...

“He will not be acquitted. You cannot be acquitted if you don't have a trial. And you don't have a trial if you don't have witnesses and documentation.”

And yes, Impeached Trump is still Impeached Trump.




"Not guilty."

Not guilty ≠ innocent.

OJ Simpson was also found to be not guilty.

And again, Impeached Trump is still impeached.

Exonerated, Simpleton.

Deal with it. You lost.

LOLOL

Not guilty ≠ innocent.

Exonerated, Simpleton.

Deal with it. You lost.

LOL

According to you, OJ was exonerated.

See how stupid you sound?
 

"Not guilty."

Not guilty ≠ innocent.

OJ Simpson was also found to be not guilty.

And again, Impeached Trump is still impeached.

Exonerated, Simpleton.

Deal with it. You lost.

LOLOL

Not guilty ≠ innocent.

Exonerated, Simpleton.

Deal with it. You lost.

LOL

According to you, OJ was exonerated.

See how stupid you sound?

Who?
 
He is the first president to face an impeachment trial with no witnesses.
YOUR House Clowns called 13 witnesses and submitted thousands of documents.

That lie won't fly. Get a new one.
Not in the trial. This is the first and only time in U.S. history a president faced an impeachment trial with no witnesses or documents.
Yes, in the trial. Over 100 video clips of the WITNESSES' TESTIMONY IN THE HOUSE was played during the trial.

About 28,000 documents were entered into the record, liar.

That lie won't fly. Get a new one.
Aww, you poor deranged TDSer, videos can't questioned. :cuckoo:

First and only president ever to not have witnesses called in an impeachment trial.
More lies.

ZERO new witnesses were called during the Clinton trial. They brought in 3 who had already testified in the House to clarify that testimony. That was done behind closed doors, and only parts were made public.

That lie won't fly. Get a new one.
I didn't say, "new."

Sadly, your TDS affects your ability to comprehend. :dunno:
 
Sorry, no removal from office for attempting to

INVESTIGATE HUNTER BIDEN's KICKBACK of US FOREIGN AID
 
YOUR House Clowns called 13 witnesses and submitted thousands of documents.

That lie won't fly. Get a new one.
Not in the trial. This is the first and only time in U.S. history a president faced an impeachment trial with no witnesses or documents.
Yes, in the trial. Over 100 video clips of the WITNESSES' TESTIMONY IN THE HOUSE was played during the trial.

About 28,000 documents were entered into the record, liar.

That lie won't fly. Get a new one.
Aww, you poor deranged TDSer, videos can't questioned. :cuckoo:

First and only president ever to not have witnesses called in an impeachment trial.
More lies.

ZERO new witnesses were called during the Clinton trial. They brought in 3 who had already testified in the House to clarify that testimony. That was done behind closed doors, and only parts were made public.

That lie won't fly. Get a new one.
I didn't say, "new."

Sadly, your TDS affects your ability to comprehend. :dunno:
List all the witnesses who testified during the Clinton trial...

GO!
 
The people have the final decision here. I just hope everybody else is not as dumb as you trump supporters.

People did make the decision. We voted for our senators they voted for us. You just did not agree with the outcome and now resort to calling half the country dumb. But keep going comments like yours and Hillary's are what put Trump in office in the first place.
Not really so.... imho

The senators, with each State getting 2, no matter a Wyoming having 575000 citizens and a California having 30,000,000 citizens, represent the State governments..... not we the people, equally... the House of Representatives, represents we the people, and are appropriated by the number of people within each state... I believe it is something like 1 congressman for every 750000 people within each state....

So, we the people impeached Trump in the House, and the Senators, two representing each State, did not remove him from office, by acquittal.
And I would argue that 1 person in Wyoming worth 1 million in California. California for as much as it wastes and costs the US should have negative representation. The senate is a better representation of the people that matter.
 

Forum List

Back
Top