Trump has been EXONERATED of all charges.

So you don't question why trump refused witnesses, he's just exonerated despite the fact that evidence of his guilt or innocence was hidden from all investigators.

We all lost because of this, fool. We all have to follow the law. The only person that doesn't is trump.
Please show us all this "hidden" evidence, moron.


Innocent until proven guilty. He was not proven guilty, therefore Trump is INNOCENT.

Shove up up your ass moron. We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president because trump blocked them from testifying. So don't ask me to show a mother fucking thing. Ask trump why he was scared to let pompeo, pence, giuliani, mulvaney, bolton, parnas, fruman and himself testify. Innocent until proven guilty you say? Why does that only seem to apply when republi9cans are breaking the law?


We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president


Perhaps next time YOUR House Clowns won't try to overturn an election on hearsay and feelings, Sport.

Perhaps next time the president will honor legal subpoenas, Sport.
Perhaps next time YOUR House Clowns will send legal subpoenas, Chowderhead.

They did.
 
Please show us all this "hidden" evidence, moron.


Innocent until proven guilty. He was not proven guilty, therefore Trump is INNOCENT.

Shove up up your ass moron. We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president because trump blocked them from testifying. So don't ask me to show a mother fucking thing. Ask trump why he was scared to let pompeo, pence, giuliani, mulvaney, bolton, parnas, fruman and himself testify. Innocent until proven guilty you say? Why does that only seem to apply when republi9cans are breaking the law?


We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president


Perhaps next time YOUR House Clowns won't try to overturn an election on hearsay and feelings, Sport.

Perhaps next time the president will honor legal subpoenas, Sport.
Perhaps next time YOUR House Clowns will send legal subpoenas, Chowderhead.

They did.
Lies.
 
Not Guilty does not mean exoneration
He was exonerated, Sport.

Deal with it. You lost, again.:5_1_12024:
No, he was not exonerated, he was acquitted.... just a technical difference between finding a person not guilty, vs them being innocent.

Two different meanings.... acquitted is a finding that the prosecution did not have enough evidence to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt of their guilt...

An exoneration is when evidence is presented that PROVES innocence...

As example, if DNA evidence was found that completely exonerated a person of a crime, like DNA evidence that shows a man accused of raping a victim, could not have been the rapist etc...

He was innocent until proven guilty. He was found Not guilty therefore - innocent. Exonerated.
This isn't a court of law..... and there are no statutory crimes being charged and tried with punishment.

Exonerated means Proven innocent.....NOT innocent beyond a reasonable doubt....

example: a man was charged, found guilty, and then evidence like DNA that came forward, PROVED without any doubt, that the person was INNOCENT, and a Judge exonerates them, wipes his record clean to where the being charged, indicted and trial is cleared from his record, he was EXONERATED.
Proven innocent" is the standard of justice used in totalitarian dictatorship. Every time you try to use it, you only demonstrate that you're a goose stepping Stalinist. All you TDS morons want to pretend this is some kind of legal process, but then when it's pointed out how Dims have violated the principles of the legal process, they resort to bleating that it's not a legal process. Anyone who isn't a brain damaged TDS moron can see that you're talking out of both sides of your mouth.
 
The people have the final decision here. I just hope everybody else is not as dumb as you trump supporters.

People did make the decision. We voted for our senators they voted for us. You just did not agree with the outcome and now resort to calling half the country dumb. But keep going comments like yours and Hillary's are what put Trump in office in the first place.
Not really so.... imho

The senators, with each State getting 2, no matter a Wyoming having 575000 citizens and a California having 30,000,000 citizens, represent the State governments..... not we the people, equally... the House of Representatives, represents we the people, and are appropriated by the number of people within each state... I believe it is something like 1 congressman for every 750000 people within each state....

So, we the people impeached Trump in the House, and the Senators, two representing each State, did not remove him from office, by acquittal.
And I would argue that 1 person in Wyoming worth 1 million in California. California for as much as it wastes and costs the US should have negative representation. The senate is a better representation of the people that matter.
California takes less that what it sends to Washington. California pays for a lot of right wing states. The only reason you make your last comment is because the senate is republican majority. You weren't saying the same thing when democrats were.
 
They violated House rules.
They issued invalid subpoenas.

They violated the Constitution
They failed to meet their own and the Constitution's requirements for Impeachment.
They denied the Constitutional Rights of Americans to Due Process.
They broke laws.
They committed Perjury.
They obstructed Justice.
They engaged in Sedition.
They attempted to present personally authored fiction as 'evidence'.
They leaked classified information with the intent of undermining / hurting the President.
They committed Treason.
They admitted their Impeachment was the 1st politically partisan Impeachment in US history.
They rushed the fastest Impeachment based on the weakest case in US history
- No crime, no evidence, no witnesses.
 
Shove up up your ass moron. We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president because trump blocked them from testifying. So don't ask me to show a mother fucking thing. Ask trump why he was scared to let pompeo, pence, giuliani, mulvaney, bolton, parnas, fruman and himself testify. Innocent until proven guilty you say? Why does that only seem to apply when republi9cans are breaking the law?


We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president


Perhaps next time YOUR House Clowns won't try to overturn an election on hearsay and feelings, Sport.

Perhaps next time the president will honor legal subpoenas, Sport.
Perhaps next time YOUR House Clowns will send legal subpoenas, Chowderhead.

They did.
Lies.

Nope. It is the truth you cannot face.
 
We did not hear from anyone directly involved with the president


Perhaps next time YOUR House Clowns won't try to overturn an election on hearsay and feelings, Sport.

Perhaps next time the president will honor legal subpoenas, Sport.
Perhaps next time YOUR House Clowns will send legal subpoenas, Chowderhead.

They did.
Lies.

Nope. It is the truth you cannot face.
More lies.
 
Not Guilty does not mean exoneration
He was exonerated, Sport.

Deal with it. You lost, again.:5_1_12024:
No, he was not exonerated, he was acquitted.... just a technical difference between finding a person not guilty, vs them being innocent.

Two different meanings.... acquitted is a finding that the prosecution did not have enough evidence to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt of their guilt...

An exoneration is when evidence is presented that PROVES innocence...

As example, if DNA evidence was found that completely exonerated a person of a crime, like DNA evidence that shows a man accused of raping a victim, could not have been the rapist etc...

He was innocent until proven guilty. He was found Not guilty therefore - innocent. Exonerated.
This isn't a court of law..... and there are no statutory crimes being charged and tried with punishment.

Exonerated means Proven innocent.....NOT innocent beyond a reasonable doubt....

example: a man was charged, found guilty, and then evidence like DNA that came forward, PROVED without any doubt, that the person was INNOCENT, and a Judge exonerates them, wipes his record clean to where the being charged, indicted and trial is cleared from his record, he was EXONERATED.
Proven innocent" is the standard of justice used in totalitarian dictatorship. Every time you try to use it, you only demonstrate that you're a goose stepping Stalinist. All you TDS morons want to pretend this is some kind of legal process, but then when it's pointed out how Dims have violated the principles of the legal process, they resort to bleating that it's not a legal process. Anyone who isn't a brain damaged TDS moron can see that you're talking out of both sides of your mouth.

Are you crazy?
 
Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.
So you don't question why trump refused witnesses, he's just exonerated despite the fact that evidence of his guilt or innocence was hidden from all investigators.

We all lost because of this, fool. We all have to follow the law. The only person that doesn't is trump.
We lost because Adolph Schiffler and Nadless ran a Soviet style show trial. The Repubs in the Senate wisely decided they weren't playing along with your game. It's hilarious watching douchebags like you waxing sanctimonious about your scam falling flat.
 
Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.
So you don't question why trump refused witnesses, he's just exonerated despite the fact that evidence of his guilt or innocence was hidden from all investigators.

We all lost because of this, fool. We all have to follow the law. The only person that doesn't is trump.
We lost because Adolph Schiffler and Nadless ran a Soviet style show trial. The Repubs in the Senate wisely decided they weren't playing along with your game. It's hilarious watching douchebags like you waxing sanctimonious about your scam falling flat.

Nah. We lost because we allowed trump to become above the law. There was only 1 scam, the senate "trial."
 
Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.
So you don't question why trump refused witnesses, he's just exonerated despite the fact that evidence of his guilt or innocence was hidden from all investigators.

We all lost because of this, fool. We all have to follow the law. The only person that doesn't is trump.
We lost because Adolph Schiffler and Nadless ran a Soviet style show trial. The Repubs in the Senate wisely decided they weren't playing along with your game. It's hilarious watching douchebags like you waxing sanctimonious about your scam falling flat.

Nah. We lost because we allowed trump to become above the law. There was only 1 scam, the senate "trial."
Anyone who says there was anything legit about the shampeachment is a douchebag
 
Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.

Now it's over, and you are losers.
So you don't question why trump refused witnesses, he's just exonerated despite the fact that evidence of his guilt or innocence was hidden from all investigators.

We all lost because of this, fool. We all have to follow the law. The only person that doesn't is trump.
We lost because Adolph Schiffler and Nadless ran a Soviet style show trial. The Repubs in the Senate wisely decided they weren't playing along with your game. It's hilarious watching douchebags like you waxing sanctimonious about your scam falling flat.

Nah. We lost because we allowed trump to become above the law. There was only 1 scam, the senate "trial."
The Senate trial used the same rules they used for Clinton.

YOUR House Clowns showed up without a case, moron.

You lost, deal with it.
 
Not Guilty does not mean exoneration
He was exonerated, Sport.

Deal with it. You lost, again.:5_1_12024:
No, he was not exonerated, he was acquitted.... just a technical difference between finding a person not guilty, vs them being innocent.

Two different meanings.... acquitted is a finding that the prosecution did not have enough evidence to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt of their guilt...

An exoneration is when evidence is presented that PROVES innocence...

As example, if DNA evidence was found that completely exonerated a person of a crime, like DNA evidence that shows a man accused of raping a victim, could not have been the rapist etc...

He was innocent until proven guilty. He was found Not guilty therefore - innocent. Exonerated.
Just like OJ!

Yes!

well....

Maybe

Trump didn't break any laws or commit any impeachable offenses.

So.... There's that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top