Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 67,153
- 57,842
- 3,615
- Thread starter
- #521
How does that have any bearing on the invalid subpoenas the House issued due to the fact they didn't have a vote to initiate impeachment proceedings?LOLThe didn't go to court on any of them, as our system requires.They withdrew the subpoena on Charles Kupperman. They didn't withdraw every subpoena.The House Clowns withdrew the subpoenas. It was on them to challenge the White House's opinion in court. They didn't.Please cite the court case Trump filed to fight the subpoenas issued during the House inquiry...Faun, Please keep up. My point was that Trump's counsel was challenging the validity. It is up to the court to decide. Somewhere in that document (which I've read) the full committee has to sign off on the subpoenas and only the three chairpersons signed off on it. That makes it invalid. The dems needed to challenge it and the didn't cuz they wanted to hurry up and get him out before the election. After wouldn't do them any good. Don't be fooled by the BS.
The House pretty much agreed they were invalid by not going to court and getting a ruling.
Oops!
I already posted a link to the Eastland v. U.S. Servicemen's Fund case....
Have someone explain to you the implication of Eastland's name appearing first in that case.
Hint: It doesn't.