Trump Indicted

Or you didn't have the evidence to charge folks with crimes.

Remember, Durham had 4 years to investigate. And managed one plea deal for community service.

Mueller in 18 months got 8 convictions, over 30 indictments, decades of prison sentences, millions in fines.

Smith has at least 2 indictments after barely 6 months.
We already have enough to charge people with crimes. We just need to take the DOJ away from the dems.
 

(e)Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it;
 
Seriously, why are your propagandists keeping you in the dark about the facts of the case?

Special counsel claims Trump deliberately misled his attorneys about classified documents, judge wrote


Prosecutors in the special counsel's office have presented compelling preliminary evidence that former President knowingly and deliberately misled his own attorneys about his retention of classified materials after leaving office, a top federal judge wrote Friday in a sealed filing, according to sources who described its contents to ABC News.

Gee, the peeps that have been trying to fuck him for seven years say it, it's gotta be true, right?

[snip]

Howell found that prosecutors showed "sufficient" evidence that Trump "intentionally concealed" the existence of additional classified documents from Corcoran, sources said, putting Corcoran in an unwitting position to deceive the government.


And that led to this:

Judge Rules Trump Lawyer Must Testify in Documents Inquiry

 
Last edited:
Is the FBI going to jail?
About that. What they did was violate interrnal protocols and it would be hard to pin an actual crime on them.

What they did was wrong, and it could be considered a traitorous attempt to sway an election, but that would be hard to prove.
 
Trump's two top lawyers just resigned.

Why? Because MAGA stands for "Making Attorneys Get Attorneys". Trump always instructs his lawyers to do very illegal things. Lawyers have a choice. Stay with Trump and end up in prison, or get the heck out.


Yeah, just the story on Reuter's, Rowley and Trusty quit. They know losing when they see one.
 
The WP is not a credible source on anything political. FACT.

And when the WP's list of charges matches the actual list of charges.....what then?

Good luck with desperate, willful ignorance. I'm sure Jack Smith will drop all charges because YOU refuse to believe the charges.
 

(e)Whoever having unauthorized possession of, access to, or control over any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it;
Trump was entitled to receive it.
 
And when the WP's list of charges matches the actual list of charges.....what then?

Good luck with desperate, willful ignorance. I'm sure Jack Smith will drop all charges because YOU refuse to believe the charges.
I am not talking about just this story. They have been caught in multiple lies, multiple times.
 

(b)Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to—

(1)influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;

(2)cause or induce any person to—

(A)withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding;
 
You defend the fraud of 2020. That is also a lie. And you are defending that lie.

What fraud, last?

Remember, every count, recount, hand count, machine count, audit, forensic audit, state tally, official tally and electoral vote showed the outcome was legit.

Every DOJ investigation, both of Trump's private investigations, every State investigation, every court ruling....all affirm the outcome was legit.

You just ignore it all and cling to your delusion. And your imagination isn't really my problem.
 

(c)Whoever corruptly—

(1)alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or

(2)otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
 
The lawyer said there were no additional documents with classified marketing. Signing documents to the claim.

Not 'to the best of my knowledge'. But that all the documents had been turned over.

That was a lie.

And you're defending that lie.
I'll ask again, What did Biden's lawyers say in their affidavits to the FBI about Bidens' caches of classified docs?
 

Forum List

Back
Top