Trump is right to call it "treason"...

[Mac1958]

Since Ronnie Ray Guns was elected, Republican voters have accepted an every more dangerous and toxic set of lies from Republicans.

We're watching supply side economics not work, right now, as we speak, in real time. The Laffer Curve is flatlining. And that's even with a few hundred billion dollars added to the deficit to goose things along.

Reagan had been an ACTOR. Perhaps that should have been a red flag.

This crap is what they're told to believe, by the people who tell them what to believe. Reality is irrelevant.
.

 

[Faun]

Non-democratic means? You mean using the Constitution? Funny...

which part? there isn't any words about starting a coup.

And by 'coup', you mean an impeachment?

You may want to look up the meaning of Coup. As it has nothing to do with impeachments.

Spreading false information to make impeachment seem proper is indeed a coup you ignorant twerp.

Oh? What false information?

Trump "colluded" with russia. Even mewler who had the bestest, and the brightest anti trump people on his team couldn't find shit. Hell, they couldn't even manufacture anything.

Mueller determined there was no collusion and Democrats are not seeking to impeach him over that; so what the fuck are you talking about?

 

[Skylar]

No, motherfucker, they can't change the constitution without a Constitutional convention, and you need a two thirds vote to amend the constitution.

Nobody is changing the constitution. Everything the Democrats are doing is Constitutional.

Thus it ain't a fucking impeachment....

Correct. It is an inquiry into impeachment. You win the boob prize.

Yeah....in other words a total waste of taxpayer's money.
They're inquiring if they should think about impeachment sometime in the future.
Then they're going to go on a search for possible reasons to think about an impeachment.
Then they're going to give a bunch of speeches about how pissed they are at Trump.
Then they're going to lose the House and spend the next 4 years whining about how Trump is such a murderous dictator.

No, they perceived a crime and are investigating. There will be articles drawn and voted on and the Senate will very likely have to have a trial.

Perceived a crime based on nothing. There's no crime, there's no investigation, there's no prosecution of Biden's kid.

Their working theory is that Biden forced the removal of a prosecutor that *wasn't* prosecuting his kid for anything.

Which is just another stupid story in a litany of stupidity. And yet these mindless fanatics repeat whatever they're told to say, no matter how fact free and laughable.

 

[Skylar]

which part? there isn't any words about starting a coup.

And by 'coup', you mean an impeachment?

You may want to look up the meaning of Coup. As it has nothing to do with impeachments.

Spreading false information to make impeachment seem proper is indeed a coup you ignorant twerp.

Oh? What false information?

Trump "colluded" with russia. Even mewler who had the bestest, and the brightest anti trump people on his team couldn't find shit. Hell, they couldn't even manufacture anything.

Mueller determined there was no collusion and Democrats are not seeking to impeach him over that; so what the fuck are you talking about?

The democrats should definitely get Trump on obstruction, though.

Ordering the firing of the lead investigator looking into your OWN obstruction, ordering officials to go easy on his political allies, order his officials to create fake documents to try and cover up the obstruction........Trump would be in jail now if he weren't president.

And if he loses this election or is removed from office, I fully expect him to be indicted for obstruction of justice. I'll strongly advocate it.

 

[Yarddog]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

Non-democratic means? You mean using the Constitution? Funny...

based on Lies.... I guess you dont get that part. The Leaker had second hand knowledge, but why is it that a CIA operative gets what was said completely wrong? did you even read the transcript? He gets it wrong because he got it wrong ON PURPOSE. Like Schiff Lied to the American people ON PURPOSE. Tell, what is constitutional about that?

 

[Skylar]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

Non-democratic means? You mean using the Constitution? Funny...

based on Lies.... I guess you dont get that part. The Leaker had second hand knowledge, but why is it that a CIA operative gets what was said completely wrong? did you even read the transcript? He gets it wrong because he got it wrong ON PURPOSE. Like Schiff Lied to the American people ON PURPOSE. Tell, what is constitutional about that?

Based on lies....according to you. And your assessment of lies has no legal relevance.

When you're talking about the law, you're subject to the standards of the law. And your personal opinion has no bearing on any aspect of the investigation, impeachment inquiry or legality.

Under the constitution its the House and their assessment of crimes committed that determine whether or not an impeachment occurs. And their assessments are explicitly authorized, explicitly constitutional.

Utterly debunking the absurd 'coup' 'treason' or 'overthrow' hysterics.

 

[Faun]

says, you....the same hapless dipshit that just said 'There is no law that says you can't ask for or accept aid from foreign countries.'

The FEC's disabusing you of your comic misunderstanding elegantly demonstrates that you have no idea what you're talking about.

And trying to solicit personal benefit using the power of the office of the presidency is not, nor has ever been Trump's job.

Which explains the impeachment inquiry. And the rapidly increasing support for impeachment.

This "rapidly increasing support for impeachment" you're talking about?

Were those polls done by the same zipperheads whose polls said it would be Hillary by a landslide?

You people never seem to learn, do you?

This support for impeachment:

Support for impeaching Trump hits new high

The same people that called the 2018 elections.....you know, where Trump insisted the pollsters were wrong, that Republicans were going to win, calling it a 'big Red Wave'?

And yet the pollsters were right. Rather than Trump's imaginary 'Big Red Wave' where republicans made huge gains in Congress, it was a Blue Wave, where the Republicans lost 33 seats. So yeah, I'll go with the pollsters.

And the pollsters predicted in 2016 that Hillary would win the vote by about 3.2%. With her winning the vote by 2.1%.

So the pollsters were off by barely 1% in 2016. Yeah, I'll take the pollsters over Trump's latest delusional fantasy anyday.

Don't care. Trump is still the President, Hillary isn't, and I get entertained daily by you knuckleheads.

That's all that matters.

Of course you don't care. But your willful ignorance doesn't change election results. As 2018 demonstrated elegantly.

The pollsters were right. Trump was laughably, comically wrong.

2018 wasn't shit. You didn't even take as many seats as Obama lost in 2010.

Keep stroking yourself though, you might get it up.

LOLOL

Nearly 400 seats and federal and state levels.

 

[Yarddog]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

Non-democratic means? You mean using the Constitution? Funny...

based on Lies.... I guess you dont get that part. The Leaker had second hand knowledge, but why is it that a CIA operative gets what was said completely wrong? did you even read the transcript? He gets it wrong because he got it wrong ON PURPOSE. Like Schiff Lied to the American people ON PURPOSE. Tell, what is constitutional about that?

Based on lies....according to you. And your assessment of lies has no legal relevance.

When you're talking about the law, you're subject to the standards of the law. And your personal opinion has no bearing on any aspect of the investigation, impeachment inquiry or legality.

Under the constitution its the House and their assessment of crimes committed that determine whether or not an impeachment occurs. And their assessments are explicitly authorized, explicitly constitutional.

Utterly debunking the absurd 'coup' 'treason' or 'overthrow' hysterics.

as said by Schiff below

"IM going to say this only 7 times and I want you to listen good... I want you to MAKE UP DIRT on my political opponent and I want you to make lots of it"

Now Skyler, go back and read the real transcripts and tell me where it says this. Yes, a lie is a lie, and the CIA Operative also who knew nothing, gave false statements.

Right, what we the American people think has no relevance and neither does our votes which is why one political party is trying to steal an election.

 

[JGalt]

T

This "rapidly increasing support for impeachment" you're talking about?

Were those polls done by the same zipperheads whose polls said it would be Hillary by a landslide?

You people never seem to learn, do you?

This support for impeachment:

Support for impeaching Trump hits new high

The same people that called the 2018 elections.....you know, where Trump insisted the pollsters were wrong, that Republicans were going to win, calling it a 'big Red Wave'?

And yet the pollsters were right. Rather than Trump's imaginary 'Big Red Wave' where republicans made huge gains in Congress, it was a Blue Wave, where the Republicans lost 33 seats. So yeah, I'll go with the pollsters.

And the pollsters predicted in 2016 that Hillary would win the vote by about 3.2%. With her winning the vote by 2.1%.

So the pollsters were off by barely 1% in 2016. Yeah, I'll take the pollsters over Trump's latest delusional fantasy anyday.

Don't care. Trump is still the President, Hillary isn't, and I get entertained daily by you knuckleheads.

That's all that matters.

Of course you don't care. But your willful ignorance doesn't change election results. As 2018 demonstrated elegantly.

The pollsters were right. Trump was laughably, comically wrong.

2018 wasn't shit. You didn't even take as many seats as Obama lost in 2010.

Keep stroking yourself though, you might get it up.

LOLOL

Nearly 400 seats and federal and state levels.

That's paltry. The Democrats lost over 1,000 seats in the 2010 massacre:

** 14 Senate seats
** 69 House seats
** 12 governorships
** 910 state legislature seats

Not to mention the the local elections.

The Obama Legacy: Over 1,000 Democratic Seats Lost to Republicans

 

[Skylar]

T

This support for impeachment:

Support for impeaching Trump hits new high

The same people that called the 2018 elections.....you know, where Trump insisted the pollsters were wrong, that Republicans were going to win, calling it a 'big Red Wave'?

And yet the pollsters were right. Rather than Trump's imaginary 'Big Red Wave' where republicans made huge gains in Congress, it was a Blue Wave, where the Republicans lost 33 seats. So yeah, I'll go with the pollsters.

And the pollsters predicted in 2016 that Hillary would win the vote by about 3.2%. With her winning the vote by 2.1%.

So the pollsters were off by barely 1% in 2016. Yeah, I'll take the pollsters over Trump's latest delusional fantasy anyday.

Don't care. Trump is still the President, Hillary isn't, and I get entertained daily by you knuckleheads.

That's all that matters.

Of course you don't care. But your willful ignorance doesn't change election results. As 2018 demonstrated elegantly.

The pollsters were right. Trump was laughably, comically wrong.

2018 wasn't shit. You didn't even take as many seats as Obama lost in 2010.

Keep stroking yourself though, you might get it up.

LOLOL

Nearly 400 seats and federal and state levels.

That's paltry. The Democrats lost over 1,000 seats in the 2010 massacre:

** 14 Senate seats
** 69 House seats
** 12 governorships
** 910 state legislature seats

Not to mention the the local elections.

The Obama Legacy: Over 1,000 Democratic Seats Lost to Republicans

And the pollsters predicted a big Republican gain in 2010. Just like they predicted a big Democratic gain in 2018. Just like they predicted that Hillary would win the most votes in 2016.

And yet laughably, you're still relying on the *word* of Trump, who stupidly predicted a 'Big Red Wave' in 2018........and ended up with a huge gain for Democrats.

Exactly as the pollsters you're intent on ignoring, predicted.

 

[Yarddog]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

Non-democratic means? You mean using the Constitution? Funny...

which part? there isn't any words about starting a coup.

And by 'coup', you mean an impeachment?

You may want to look up the meaning of Coup. As it has nothing to do with impeachments.

Spreading false information to make impeachment seem proper is indeed a coup you ignorant twerp.

Oh? What false information?

Start with Trump threatening to withhold funds unless Ukraine Made up false dirt on his political opponent. That was never asked, but thats what we have been told. Its also what the Dunces in the Democratic House believe to be truth because they take any anti Trump news report as gospel

 

[Yarddog]

...they are attempting to overthrow a Democratically-elected President using non-democratic means, and all of is based on lies.

Non-democratic means? You mean using the Constitution? Funny...

which part? there isn't any words about starting a coup.

And by 'coup', you mean an impeachment?

You may want to look up the meaning of Coup. As it has nothing to do with impeachments.

Spreading false information to make impeachment seem proper is indeed a coup you ignorant twerp.

What false information? Trump has already confessed to the asking the Ukrainians for "a favour" in the transcript. He can't take that back, but he's now trying to say that the transcript doesn't say, what it says.

Trump has Barr going around the world investigating the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA. Do you know how STUPID that is? He is asking foreign security agencies to investigate American security agencies, to help Trump's campaign. What do you think other governments are making of these requests?

Your president is unfit for office. Removing him from office is a necessity for the safety and security of the country, and the rest of the free world as well.

Its not illegal for one president to ask another to do him a favor. He did not ask anyone to make up false dirt against a political opponent. The favor was only in regards to computer servers, and that was it. He asked if they could help get down to the bottom of what happened. Now prove that should be interpreted as looking for false dirt... and not looking for the truth into what happened.

 

[Faun]

T

This support for impeachment:

Support for impeaching Trump hits new high

The same people that called the 2018 elections.....you know, where Trump insisted the pollsters were wrong, that Republicans were going to win, calling it a 'big Red Wave'?

And yet the pollsters were right. Rather than Trump's imaginary 'Big Red Wave' where republicans made huge gains in Congress, it was a Blue Wave, where the Republicans lost 33 seats. So yeah, I'll go with the pollsters.

And the pollsters predicted in 2016 that Hillary would win the vote by about 3.2%. With her winning the vote by 2.1%.

So the pollsters were off by barely 1% in 2016. Yeah, I'll take the pollsters over Trump's latest delusional fantasy anyday.

Don't care. Trump is still the President, Hillary isn't, and I get entertained daily by you knuckleheads.

That's all that matters.

Of course you don't care. But your willful ignorance doesn't change election results. As 2018 demonstrated elegantly.

The pollsters were right. Trump was laughably, comically wrong.

2018 wasn't shit. You didn't even take as many seats as Obama lost in 2010.

Keep stroking yourself though, you might get it up.

LOLOL

Nearly 400 seats and federal and state levels.

That's paltry. The Democrats lost over 1,000 seats in the 2010 massacre:

** 14 Senate seats
** 69 House seats
** 12 governorships
** 910 state legislature seats

Not to mention the the local elections.

The Obama Legacy: Over 1,000 Democratic Seats Lost to Republicans

Liar. That was actually over the course of two elections (and skips over the the 2012 election where Democrats won the WH and gained seats)

If truth and facts were on your side, you wouldn't have to lie like that.

 

[lennypartiv]

It's stunning that so many Democrats and FBI agents would engage in treasonous behavior. Hopefully Barr can get McCabe, Comey, and Mueller sent to prison soon.

 

[Faun]

Non-democratic means? You mean using the Constitution? Funny...

which part? there isn't any words about starting a coup.

And by 'coup', you mean an impeachment?

You may want to look up the meaning of Coup. As it has nothing to do with impeachments.

Spreading false information to make impeachment seem proper is indeed a coup you ignorant twerp.

Oh? What false information?

Start with Trump threatening to withhold funds unless Ukraine Made up false dirt on his political opponent. That was never asked, but thats what we have been told. Its also what the Dunces in the Democratic House believe to be truth because they take any anti Trump news report as gospel

Here's what we have from trump, while he was holding up the funds....

Zelensky: ...we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes.

Trump: I would like you to do us a favor though...​

 

[Faun]

Non-democratic means? You mean using the Constitution? Funny...

which part? there isn't any words about starting a coup.

And by 'coup', you mean an impeachment?

You may want to look up the meaning of Coup. As it has nothing to do with impeachments.

Spreading false information to make impeachment seem proper is indeed a coup you ignorant twerp.

What false information? Trump has already confessed to the asking the Ukrainians for "a favour" in the transcript. He can't take that back, but he's now trying to say that the transcript doesn't say, what it says.

Trump has Barr going around the world investigating the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA. Do you know how STUPID that is? He is asking foreign security agencies to investigate American security agencies, to help Trump's campaign. What do you think other governments are making of these requests?

Your president is unfit for office. Removing him from office is a necessity for the safety and security of the country, and the rest of the free world as well.

Its not illegal for one president to ask another to do him a favor. He did not ask anyone to make up false dirt against a political opponent. The favor was only in regards to computer servers, and that was it. He asked if they could help get down to the bottom of what happened. Now prove that should be interpreted as looking for false dirt... and not looking for the truth into what happened.

It is illegal when said president asking for favors is running in the same election as the target of his favors.

 

[Skylar]

It's stunning that so many Democrats and FBI agents would engage in treasonous behavior. Hopefully Barr can get McCabe, Comey, and Mueller sent to prison soon.

I don't think treason means what you think it means. Treason consist only in levying war against the US or in giving aid and comfort to US enemies.

 

[Blackrook]

It is not illegal for the President to ask a foreign leader to look into the corrupt activities of a corrupt politician.

 

[Skylar]

It is not illegal for the President to ask a foreign leader to look into the corrupt activities of a corrupt politician.

What corrupt activities? Remember, there's no evidence of any crime. There's no investigation, there was no prosecution.

Your entire story is made up. And its a stupid story. The working conspiracy is: Biden forced out a prosecutor in the Ukraine that wasn't prosecuting his son for any crime.

Goddamn, guys. Did you ever think before you ape this stupid shit?

 

[lennypartiv]

Here's what we have from trump, while he was holding up the funds....

Zelensky: ...we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes.
Trump: I would like you to do us a favor though...​

So you think we should give them the weapons if they are hostile to our leaders?​