RetiredGySgt
Diamond Member
- May 6, 2007
- 56,048
- 18,143
Actually he said one expert claimed that number, lie much?You can't make this stuff up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually he said one expert claimed that number, lie much?You can't make this stuff up.
UntrueObviously, the number you come up with depends entirely on how you calculate it, and what factors you consider relevant.
The Government (BLS) has a methodology that excludes people who have never worked a full time job,
Anyone not trying to workpeople who have given up looking for work,
You think people who have a job should be classified as unemployed?people who are working part time although they want to work full time,
Again, you want to call someone who has a job unemployed?and people who are mired in crappy jobs when they are qualified for something better.
How do you objectively measure that? Which do you think is more reliable....what people say, or what they do?Also, there are millions of Boomers now who have signed up for SS years before they intended to, simply because they lost their jobs and see no hope of finding another. Not "unemployed" according to BLS, although they would still be working if they could.
You think so? show your math. Here are the tables: CPS TablesIf you would add up the unemployed the government counts with the unhappy part timers, the "under-employed," and those who don't work because they simply don't see any opportunity to work gainfully, 42% doesn't seem totally out of line.
Check unemployment among blacks and black teens…….You can't make this stuff up.
Check unemployment among blacks and black teens…….You can't make this stuff up.
Ok. A-4. Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population by race, Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, sex, and age, seasonally adjustedCheck unemployment among blacks and black teens…….You can't make this stuff up.
Ok. A-4. Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population by race, Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, sex, and age, seasonally adjustedCheck unemployment among blacks and black teens…….You can't make this stuff up.
Unemployment rate African Americans ag 16+: 9.5%
African American Men age 20+: 9.2%
African american Women age 20+: 8.1%
African Americans age 16-19: 31% (that's 216,000 unemployed)
Ok. A-4. Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population by race, Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, sex, and age, seasonally adjustedCheck unemployment among blacks and black teens…….You can't make this stuff up.
Unemployment rate African Americans ag 16+: 9.5%
African American Men age 20+: 9.2%
African american Women age 20+: 8.1%
African Americans age 16-19: 31% (that's 216,000 unemployed)
Says a lot about the education system when many black people are leaving school without the ability to get a job.
Ok. A-4. Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population by race, Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, sex, and age, seasonally adjustedCheck unemployment among blacks and black teens…….You can't make this stuff up.
Unemployment rate African Americans ag 16+: 9.5%
African American Men age 20+: 9.2%
African american Women age 20+: 8.1%
African Americans age 16-19: 31% (that's 216,000 unemployed)
Says a lot about the education system when many black people are leaving school without the ability to get a job.
That's funny. I was thinking it says alot about the drop outs, that they all dropped out without the ability to get a job.
David Stockman says REAL Unemployment rate is 42.9. I'm not making this up!
From July of this year:
David Stockman Says Unemployment Is Really 42.9 Percent
Stockman cites the number of 210 million adult Americans, who if they worked 2,000 hours per year, or about 40 hours per week, would deliver 420 million labor hours per year. When compared to the 240 million labor hours per year reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the total workforce of the country is delivering 57.1 percent of those 420 million labor hours, and otherwise stated, 42.9 percent of those hours are not being delivered. Therefore, the calculation of unemployment by this measure is 42.9 percent.
Well, in August, in the U.S. there were 149,036,000 people who were working. There were 8,209,000 who wanted to work, could have started a job if offered, and were trying to get a job. So that's a total of 157,065,000 who could have been working. 8,209,000 were not. 8,209,000/157,065,000 = 5.1%David Stockman says REAL Unemployment rate is 42.9. I'm not making this up!
From July of this year:
David Stockman Says Unemployment Is Really 42.9 Percent
Stockman cites the number of 210 million adult Americans, who if they worked 2,000 hours per year, or about 40 hours per week, would deliver 420 million labor hours per year. When compared to the 240 million labor hours per year reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the total workforce of the country is delivering 57.1 percent of those 420 million labor hours, and otherwise stated, 42.9 percent of those hours are not being delivered. Therefore, the calculation of unemployment by this measure is 42.9 percent.
Well if anyone believes UE is 5.1% they are dumber than that box of rocks.
In fact, the box is smarter.
Ok. A-4. Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population by race, Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, sex, and age, seasonally adjustedCheck unemployment among blacks and black teens…….You can't make this stuff up.
Unemployment rate African Americans ag 16+: 9.5%
African American Men age 20+: 9.2%
African american Women age 20+: 8.1%
African Americans age 16-19: 31% (that's 216,000 unemployed)
Says a lot about the education system when many black people are leaving school without the ability to get a job.
That's funny. I was thinking it says alot about the drop outs, that they all dropped out without the ability to get a job.
='s whatever they want it to equal.
The U-6 rate dipped in August to 10.3 percent, the lowest since June 2008. The overall trend in the U-6 has been more volatile than the main unemployment rate (also known as the U-3). The U-6 is down 140 basis points over the past year, versus an 80-basis-point drop in the U-3.
Chart: What’s the real unemployment rate?
2007 8.4 8.2 8 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.8
2008 9.2 9 9.1 9.2 9.7 10.1 10.5 10.8 11 11.8 12.6 13.6
2009 14.2 15.2 15.8 15.9 16.5 16.5 16.4 16.7 16.7 17.1 17.1 17.1
2010 16.7 17 17.1 17.1 16.6 16.4 16.4 16.5 16.8 16.6 16.9 16.6
2011 16.2 16 15.9 16.1 15.8 16.1 15.9 16.1 16.3 15.8 15.5 15.2
2012 15.2 15 14.5 14.6 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.6 14.7 14.4 14.4 14.4
2013 14.5 14.3 13.8 14 13.8 14.2 13.8 13.6 13.6 13.7 13.1 13.1
2014 12.7 12.6 12.6 12.3 12.1 12 12.2 12 11.7 11.5 11.4 11.2
2015 11.3 11 10.9 10.8 10.8 10.5
And why? A good school, a good system with good schools, wouldn't let this happen in most cases.
You can't make this stuff up.
='s whatever they want it to equal.
The U-6 rate dipped in August to 10.3 percent, the lowest since June 2008. The overall trend in the U-6 has been more volatile than the main unemployment rate (also known as the U-3). The U-6 is down 140 basis points over the past year, versus an 80-basis-point drop in the U-3.
Chart: What’s the real unemployment rate?
2007 8.4 8.2 8 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.8
2008 9.2 9 9.1 9.2 9.7 10.1 10.5 10.8 11 11.8 12.6 13.6
2009 14.2 15.2 15.8 15.9 16.5 16.5 16.4 16.7 16.7 17.1 17.1 17.1
2010 16.7 17 17.1 17.1 16.6 16.4 16.4 16.5 16.8 16.6 16.9 16.6
2011 16.2 16 15.9 16.1 15.8 16.1 15.9 16.1 16.3 15.8 15.5 15.2
2012 15.2 15 14.5 14.6 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.6 14.7 14.4 14.4 14.4
2013 14.5 14.3 13.8 14 13.8 14.2 13.8 13.6 13.6 13.7 13.1 13.1
2014 12.7 12.6 12.6 12.3 12.1 12 12.2 12 11.7 11.5 11.4 11.2
2015 11.3 11 10.9 10.8 10.8 10.5
It's not clear what your point is. You seem to be saying that the official rate is UNDERSTATING the improvement since the U-6 has improved more.
='s whatever they want it to equal.
The U-6 rate dipped in August to 10.3 percent, the lowest since June 2008. The overall trend in the U-6 has been more volatile than the main unemployment rate (also known as the U-3). The U-6 is down 140 basis points over the past year, versus an 80-basis-point drop in the U-3.
Chart: What’s the real unemployment rate?
2007 8.4 8.2 8 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.8
2008 9.2 9 9.1 9.2 9.7 10.1 10.5 10.8 11 11.8 12.6 13.6
2009 14.2 15.2 15.8 15.9 16.5 16.5 16.4 16.7 16.7 17.1 17.1 17.1
2010 16.7 17 17.1 17.1 16.6 16.4 16.4 16.5 16.8 16.6 16.9 16.6
2011 16.2 16 15.9 16.1 15.8 16.1 15.9 16.1 16.3 15.8 15.5 15.2
2012 15.2 15 14.5 14.6 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.6 14.7 14.4 14.4 14.4
2013 14.5 14.3 13.8 14 13.8 14.2 13.8 13.6 13.6 13.7 13.1 13.1
2014 12.7 12.6 12.6 12.3 12.1 12 12.2 12 11.7 11.5 11.4 11.2
2015 11.3 11 10.9 10.8 10.8 10.5
No? What is the correct percent of those doing something about work who are not working? And what is you source?='s whatever they want it to equal.
The U-6 rate dipped in August to 10.3 percent, the lowest since June 2008. The overall trend in the U-6 has been more volatile than the main unemployment rate (also known as the U-3). The U-6 is down 140 basis points over the past year, versus an 80-basis-point drop in the U-3.
Chart: What’s the real unemployment rate?
2007 8.4 8.2 8 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.8
2008 9.2 9 9.1 9.2 9.7 10.1 10.5 10.8 11 11.8 12.6 13.6
2009 14.2 15.2 15.8 15.9 16.5 16.5 16.4 16.7 16.7 17.1 17.1 17.1
2010 16.7 17 17.1 17.1 16.6 16.4 16.4 16.5 16.8 16.6 16.9 16.6
2011 16.2 16 15.9 16.1 15.8 16.1 15.9 16.1 16.3 15.8 15.5 15.2
2012 15.2 15 14.5 14.6 14.8 14.8 14.8 14.6 14.7 14.4 14.4 14.4
2013 14.5 14.3 13.8 14 13.8 14.2 13.8 13.6 13.6 13.7 13.1 13.1
2014 12.7 12.6 12.6 12.3 12.1 12 12.2 12 11.7 11.5 11.4 11.2
2015 11.3 11 10.9 10.8 10.8 10.5
It's not clear what your point is. You seem to be saying that the official rate is UNDERSTATING the improvement since the U-6 has improved more.
The point is that the 5.1% isn't correct.