Pogo
Diamond Member
- Dec 7, 2012
- 123,708
- 22,749
as noted before, it's the threat of lawsuit, and it would require some to expend money and time to fight it to have it thrown out.Non Disparagement contracts have held up in some courts.
For example?
She is correct, but the circumstances matter. A non-disparagement can prohibit a current or former employee from making true statements (they must be true statements, as false statements fall under "defamation") that harm the reputation of the employer. But such clauses cannot be designed as vague or ambiguous catch-all limitations. Because individuals have certain protected speech rights, a non-disparagement clause cannot be so ambiguously far reaching as to infringe upon those rights incidentally. As an example, broad ranging non-disparagement clauses have been rejected by courts where they were found to impede on workers' rights to provide negative feedback on their employer in the course of collective bargaining (which is a protected right via federal statute).
In this case we are talking about Donald Trump, candidate for President of the United States. Employees in question are employed by the Trump campaign. Any reputation questions apply to Donald Trump the Presidential candidate. Therefore, any alleged disparagement from a campaign employee would likely not be found to be an enforceable violation if not directed toward Trump's private business matters. Also, as soon as the campaign is over, Trump's reputation as a candidate for President would become moot. Therefore, it is likely that any attempt to sue for disparagement after the end of the campaign would fall flat. Finally, it is questionable whether or not non-disparagement agreements can be enforced for political candidates. The courts have tended to maintain that political speech is the highest form of protected speech by the constitution, and that above nearly all other considerations the preservation of unhindered political speech is generally by our constitution and system of law. Where "disparagement" of an employer political candidate is political speech, the courts could very likely decide any non-disparagement clause restricting the same is unenforceable in much the same way as the aforementioned instance where such clauses have been rejected in favor of collective bargaining rights.
"She"?
I've already looked this up -- these exist for employees while in the employ of some company. I don't see where they can possibly bind a person either for life, or after said contract is terminated. And of course the case where there's no contract at all is even shakier.
Donny lives for that.
Also, when you sign the agreement, look at the bottom of that contract -- you agree to abide by binding arbitration.
Yeah I agree, that's his whole MO through his whole life.
This thing though isn't even employment -- it's volunteering. What's he gonna do if you break the volunteer guidelines? Not pay you? Fire you? Of course he knows his audience and he knows anyone dim enough to voluteer for Rump would also be dim enough not to figure this out.
Rump's into thought control. He wants his own Narcissistic Personality Disorder to be spread among everybody. He's a Narcissism Socialist.