Trump Recieves a Warm and Loving Reception in London

[Wapasha]

You can't seem to explain yourself very well.

I don't know what point you are trying to make.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

I'm not sure what all the others have to do with this, but the last one, "economic justice," sounds like it probably does oppose liberty

"Economic justice" is a euphemism for socialism...the practice of removing money from the people who have too much (more than you) and giving it to the people who don't have enough (as much as they'd like to have).

You can bet since the UK is rife with socialist rabble they were highly instrumental in organizing and funding this grand mal public tantrum.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Partisan idiocy? WTF are you even talking about?

Partisan idiocy. Look it up in the dictionary.

I know what it means, smart ass. You didn't provide any examples of my doing so.

 

[MAGAman]

Without Gomer`s criminal attack on Iraq there would be no ISIS. His poodle Tony Blair has admitted as much. The alternative to withdrawing our troops from Iraq would be permanent occupation and a continuous flow of body bags to Dover. 4,500 dead and 6,000 double amputations wasn`t enough for you?
Tony Blair is right: without the Iraq war there would be no Islamic State

The United Nations had voted for hundreds of resolutions against Iraq as well as a resolution to use force. Our congress also voted to use force.

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow."
- President Clinton in 1998 “

[…], when I say to Saddam Hussein, "You cannot defy the will of the world", and when I say to him, "You have used weapons of mass destruction before; we are determined to deny you the capacity to use them again.”
- President Clinton , Jan. 27, 1998 – State of the Union

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 .

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

“Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraqis nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.”

“Their purpose is to protect the national interest of the United States, and indeed the interests of people throughout the Middle East and around the world.”

“Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons.”
- President Bill Clinton, Dec. 16, 1998

"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed."
- Madeline Albright, 1998 Clinton Secretary of State

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 "

Update: September 8, 2005 - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser was sentenced to community service and probation and fined $50,000 for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives and intentionally destroying some of them..

[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 .

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 .

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 .
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 .

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 .

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons but has not yet achieved nuclear capability."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002 .

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction."
- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 .

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003" (Currently President Barack Hussein Obama’s Secretary of State)

I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out."
- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

"Saddam is gone and good riddance," former President Bill Clinton said yesterday, but he urged President Bush to resist trying to get even with nations that opposed the war.
"There are German and French soldiers in Afghanistan today. Does the President want them to come home?" Clinton said at a Manhattan forum on corporate integrity

Democrats on Iraq + WMD's (Weapons of Mass Destruction)



He [President Clinton] praised Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for their handling of the war, but said Bush should have waited longer before attacking for the "chance that either [Saddam Hussein] would have disarmed or . . . we would have had far more members of the Security Council with us."

Clinton also said Bush should not be faulted if banned weapons of mass destruction aren't found.

"I don't think you can criticize the President for trying to act on the belief that they have a substantial amount of chemical and biological stock. . . . That is what I was always told," Clinton said.
- Former President Clinton Wednesday, April 16, 2003

"Could Be One of the Great Achievements of This Administration" The vice president said he’d been to Iraq 17 times and visits the country every three months or so. "I know every one of the major players in all the segments of that society" he said. "It's impressed me. I've been impressed how they have been deciding to use the political process rather than guns to settle their differences."

- Vice President Joe Biden (D) Feb. 10, 2010
How has the war President Barack Hussein Obama said we SHOULD have been fighting going? How is the Middle East going now that President Obama is President? Oh, Afghanistan just crossed 2,330 American fatalities. Seventy percent of whom died since President Obama took office.

The haters won't care about the facts

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

You can't seem to explain yourself very well.

I don't know what point you are trying to make.

The point right now is that you made an assertion about people who demonstrated against T-Rump are opposing liberty, but you can't seem to explain how.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

I know what it means, smart ass. You didn't provide any examples of my doing so.

Ironic because when someone wanted you to provide context to your comments you simply blew them off in a rude way.
It's known as karma.

 

[Wapasha]

"Economic justice" is a euphemism for socialism...the practice of removing money from the people who have too much (more than you) and giving it to the people who don't have enough (as much as they'd like to have).

You can bet since the UK is rife with socialist rabble they were highly instrumental in organizing and funding this grand mal public tantrum.

Well, his post did not provide any context into what he meant by economic justice. In most cases someone spouting that line is not concerned with anyones individual rights or liberties.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Donald Trump insists he is 'loved' in Britain despite protests

Suck it, you fucking anti-American fucks!

He's not their president, Y they mad tho? Hmm?

Soros and ANTIFA turning out? Sounds familiar.

One more time of that shit in America and the NG is going to ventilate those pieces of shit's heads.

There will be no Kent State type sympathy when it happens.
No. These are anti-American Communist fascists.

 

[BWK]

The hate came out.. god bless the greatest president ever.. real world leader

With the election of Trump, the left have succumbed to TDS, they have taken off their masks, and shown to the world which side of the isle the hate, bigotry and ignorance exists.

"ignorance?" Did you watch the video? Trump is a total retard. He hasn't a clue about what is going on. They tried to school him and he still doesn't have a clue. Everybody in this country should have TDS. The guy is friggin retarded.

 

[Jitss617]

The hate came out.. god bless the greatest president ever.. real world leader

With the election of Trump, the left have succumbed to TDS, they have taken off their masks, and shown to the world which side of the isle the hate, bigotry and ignorance exists.

"ignorance?" Did you watch the video? Trump is a total retard. He hasn't a clue about what is going on. They tried to school him and he still doesn't have a clue. Everybody in this country should have TDS. The guy is friggin retarded.

More tds lol

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

I know what it means, smart ass. You didn't provide any examples of my doing so.

Ironic because when someone wanted you to provide context to your comments you simply blew them off in a rude way.
It's known as karma.

Example? Who did I blow off? If that sort of context is relevant I might provide it.

 

[BWK]

How Trump is beloved in his Scottish homeland

Except that that retard is pissing all over "SCOTLAND."

Trump doesn't know wtf is going on;

 

[BWK]

The hate came out.. god bless the greatest president ever.. real world leader

With the election of Trump, the left have succumbed to TDS, they have taken off their masks, and shown to the world which side of the isle the hate, bigotry and ignorance exists.

"ignorance?" Did you watch the video? Trump is a total retard. He hasn't a clue about what is going on. They tried to school him and he still doesn't have a clue. Everybody in this country should have TDS. The guy is friggin retarded.

More tds lol

You voted for a retard you idiots. He embarrassed the shit out of us.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

I'm not sure what all the others have to do with this, but the last one, "economic justice," sounds like it probably does oppose liberty

"Economic justice" is a euphemism for socialism...the practice of removing money from the people who have too much (more than you) and giving it to the people who don't have enough (as much as they'd like to have).

You can bet since the UK is rife with socialist rabble they were highly instrumental in organizing and funding this grand mal public tantrum.

No slick. Economic justice means supporting policies that promote an economy where someone who holds down a full time job can make ends meet without moonlighting. It means opposing extremes of income and wealth disparity. An oligarchy is antithetical to democracy. You people toss "socialism:" around like a rag doll.

To you guys social security is socialism, Medicare and Medicaid is socialism, the graduated income tax is socialism Everything that you don't like is socialism. Let me know when private property is abolished, and the state takes over the means of production and then we can talk about socialism.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Well, his post did not provide any context into what he meant by economic justice. In most cases someone spouting that line is not concerned with anyones individual rights or liberties.

Yes. That's socialism and that was the gist of my post. Economic justice is always put forth as a noble sounding code phrase for correcting some long standing societal evil when it's most likely just a way of soaking the rich guy because, well, he must be a dick and a greedy pig if he has that much money.

And I, the economic justice warrior, can make much better use of the money he somehow happened to get a hold of, illegitimately undoubtedly, than him.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

No slick. Economic justice means supporting policies that promote an economy where someone who holds down a full time job can make ends meet without moonlighting. It means opposing extremes of income and wealth disparity. An oligarchy is antithetical to democracy. You people toss "socialism:" around like a rag doll.

"Economic justice" is not synonymous with socialism?
That's an interesting claim I don't think anyone buys at all.
I've seen what some people will do in order to become wealthy and I wholeheartedly admit I am not willing to live through an extreme case of deferred gratification for a good chunk of my life just to wind up richer than the next guy at some point (maybe).

I find it disgusting in the extreme that many people think they have a right to someone else's money because that person is better off than they are. Does the wealth of some people seem totally unjustifiable in some cases (entertainers, athletes, pretty people, heirs, etc.)? Yes. Of course. That's fate, luck, destiny...whatever you want to call it.
It's not a justification for robbing someone else.

To you guys social security is socialism, Medicare and Medicaid is socialism, the graduated income tax is socialism Everything that you don't like is socialism. Let me know when private property is abolished, and the state takes over the means of production and then we can talk about socialism.

I've paid into my Social Security account my entire life. That's not socialism, Slick. That's me getting back what was taken from me.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Example? Who did I blow off? If that sort of context is relevant I might provide it.

Post #348.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Example? Who did I blow off? If that sort of context is relevant I might provide it.

Post #348.

He was searching for ammo, not context. Irrelevant.

 

[Wapasha]

To you guys social security is socialism, Medicare and Medicaid is socialism, the graduated income tax is socialism Everything that you don't like is socialism. Let me know when private property is abolished, and the state takes over the means of production and then we can talk about socialism.

^^^ This is why a conversation with you is probably pointless. You don't know me, and yet you have already created a false narrative of me, comprised of entire list of negative stereotypes and false assumptions you've used to describe me. You will no doubt continue to use this false narrative of me, to justify your dislike for me.

 

[MAGAman]

The point right now is that you made an assertion about people who demonstrated against T-Rump are opposing liberty, but you can't seem to explain how.

They weren't demonstrating against tyrants, were they?