Trump Releases List of 11 Potential Nominees to U.S. Supreme Court

[Correll]

Don Willett is a justice on the Texas Supreme Court hostile to settled, accepted Establishment Clause jurisprudence and the Framers’ mandate that church and state remain separate.

This is further confirmation of Trump's contempt for the Constitution, its case law, and the rule of law.

The left's love of Disparate Impact, is proof that they have nothing but contempt for the Constitution, case law, the rule of law, and are looking forward to the day when they can blatantly discriminate against white people, especially white men.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Don Willett is a justice on the Texas Supreme Court hostile to settled, accepted Establishment Clause jurisprudence and the Framers’ mandate that church and state remain separate.

This is further confirmation of Trump's contempt for the Constitution, its case law, and the rule of law.

The left's love of Disparate Impact, is proof that they have nothing but contempt for the Constitution, case law, the rule of law, and are looking forward to the day when they can blatantly discriminate against white people, especially white men.

Yes! I demand that we discriminate against white men!! My kind must be treated unjustly or I can never be satisfied!

 

[pismoe]

Don Willett is a justice on the Texas Supreme Court hostile to settled, accepted Establishment Clause jurisprudence and the Framers’ mandate that church and state remain separate.

This is further confirmation of Trump's contempt for the Constitution, its case law, and the rule of law.

------------------------------------- GOOD for Don Willet and his hostility . Case Law is probably something that should be seen as Contemptible. Same goes for so called Settled Law / LIES Clayton .

 

[Correll]

--------------------- just do some googling , you have the names and where they are from so it should be easy to do L.L..

You misunderstand.

I want to hear John Miller discuss why he selected one or more of those people. I don't believe he could express an original thought regarding any one of them. I believe he had someone find him the names of some conservative judges....and that is the extent of his personal research.

You mean a New York Real Estate guy didn't have personal knowledge of all the judges in America?

He doesn't need to have any knowledge of all of the judges in America. But he does need to have detailed knowledge about the 11 judges that he has just suggested are his top choices for the SC.

Ya dumb shit ya.

I'm sure he gave some expert on judges some parameters on what he wanted, and then told them to go make him a list.

Just like Hillary will do, if she ever gets to that point.

YOu are just a dishonest partisan hack who is throwing crap against the wall desperately searching for something that might "Stick" that you can use against your enemies.

YOU DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT HOW MUCH TRUMP DOES OR DOES NOT KNOW ABOUT HIS LIST.

You seem upset. And...you are very dramatic for a tough guy.

Hillary will not provide a list of people she would appoint. It's not something she needs to do. Trump needed to do this because he has failed to get enough support from conservatives in his own party.

I think asking Trump to discuss the names on this list would bring joy to many people. Why do you want to deny people joy?

Oh, you are so full of shit, it's funny.

1. Insult someone and then act as though it is weird of them to be offended. Standard dishonest lefty asshole behavior. Fuck you.

2. I did not ask for a list from HIllary. I did not claim it was something she needs to do.

3. I do not care about her list. I know that they will all be leftists who want to abuse their power to advance their lefty agenda.

4. MY GOD. This is, I can't believe it, a valid point. Yes, this is an attempt by Trump to gather support from the Conservatives in the GOP who he does not yet have.

You say that like it is a bad thing. Would you like to explain why you think that is a bad thing?

5. And you lie.

YOu are just a dishonest partisan hack who is throwing crap against the wall desperately searching for something that might "Stick" that you can use against your enemies.

 

[Correll]

Don Willett is a justice on the Texas Supreme Court hostile to settled, accepted Establishment Clause jurisprudence and the Framers’ mandate that church and state remain separate.

This is further confirmation of Trump's contempt for the Constitution, its case law, and the rule of law.

The left's love of Disparate Impact, is proof that they have nothing but contempt for the Constitution, case law, the rule of law, and are looking forward to the day when they can blatantly discriminate against white people, especially white men.

Yes! I demand that we discriminate against white men!! My kind must be treated unjustly or I can never be satisfied!

That is what Disparate Impact causes. All lefty appointees on the Court support it.

Would you like a link on the subject so we can discuss it seriously, honestly and in depth?

Rhetorical question there. I crack me up.

 

[rightwinger]

Where do they stand on eminent domain for real estate developers?

Do you really care, or are you just trying for a gotcha?

We need to get our priorities right

Protection of real estate developers has to be a priority

I asked a serious question.

And you dodge.

Asking a question you don't care about is intellectually dishonest.

No dodge......

Trump is more interested in eminent domain than rightwing favorites Roe v Wade, Heller and Obamacare

 

[Uncensored2008]

Here they are in no particular order:

1. Steven Colloton of Iowa
2. Allison Eid of Colorado
3. Raymond Gruender of Missouri.
4. Thomas Hardiman of Pennsylvania
5. Raymond Kethledge of Michigan
6. Joan Larsen of Michigan
7. Thomas Lee of Utah
8. William Pryor of Alabama
9. David Stras of Minnesota
10. Diane Sykes of Wisconsin
11. Don Willett of Texas

William Pryor is the only one I really know, but he is a good man.

 

[LoneLaugher]

You misunderstand.

I want to hear John Miller discuss why he selected one or more of those people. I don't believe he could express an original thought regarding any one of them. I believe he had someone find him the names of some conservative judges....and that is the extent of his personal research.

You mean a New York Real Estate guy didn't have personal knowledge of all the judges in America?

He doesn't need to have any knowledge of all of the judges in America. But he does need to have detailed knowledge about the 11 judges that he has just suggested are his top choices for the SC.

Ya dumb shit ya.

I'm sure he gave some expert on judges some parameters on what he wanted, and then told them to go make him a list.

Just like Hillary will do, if she ever gets to that point.

YOu are just a dishonest partisan hack who is throwing crap against the wall desperately searching for something that might "Stick" that you can use against your enemies.

YOU DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT HOW MUCH TRUMP DOES OR DOES NOT KNOW ABOUT HIS LIST.

You seem upset. And...you are very dramatic for a tough guy.

Hillary will not provide a list of people she would appoint. It's not something she needs to do. Trump needed to do this because he has failed to get enough support from conservatives in his own party.

I think asking Trump to discuss the names on this list would bring joy to many people. Why do you want to deny people joy?

Oh, you are so full of shit, it's funny.

1. Insult someone and then act as though it is weird of them to be offended. Standard dishonest lefty asshole behavior. Fuck you.

2. I did not ask for a list from HIllary. I did not claim it was something she needs to do.

3. I do not care about her list. I know that they will all be leftists who want to abuse their power to advance their lefty agenda.

4. MY GOD. This is, I can't believe it, a valid point. Yes, this is an attempt by Trump to gather support from the Conservatives in the GOP who he does not yet have.

You say that like it is a bad thing. Would you like to explain why you think that is a bad thing?

5. And you lie.

YOu are just a dishonest partisan hack who is throwing crap against the wall desperately searching for something that might "Stick" that you can use against your enemies.

You ask a lot of questions. Maybe you'd like to answer one for a change?

 

[bripat9643]

Where do they stand on eminent domain for real estate developers?

Considering it was Republicans who handed down that decision they could be pretty cool with it.

All the justices voting in favor of it except for Kennedy were leftwingers.

 

[bripat9643]

Merrick Garland didn't make the list?

He's on the list of leftwing buffoons.

 

[bripat9643]

Here they are in no particular order:

1. Steven Colloton of Iowa
2. Allison Eid of Colorado
3. Raymond Gruender of Missouri.
4. Thomas Hardiman of Pennsylvania
5. Raymond Kethledge of Michigan
6. Joan Larsen of Michigan
7. Thomas Lee of Utah
8. William Pryor of Alabama
9. David Stras of Minnesota
10. Diane Sykes of Wisconsin
11. Don Willett of Texas

awwww..... how cute. all from states he needs to win.

and not a single decent judge among them.

Your idea of "decent" means "leftwing goose stepper."

 

[hazlnut]

Only 3 women and WHITES ONLY… A GOP wet dream…

 

[bripat9643]

Hillary should release a list of one...

...Joe Biden...

Game over.

Biden, a Supreme Court judge? You're joking, right? The man is a buffoon.

 

[bripat9643]

Only 3 women and WHITES ONLY… A GOP wet dream…

Some people don't view having a vagina as a qualification for the Supreme Court.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Hillary should release a list of one...

...Joe Biden...

Game over.

Biden, a Supreme Court judge? You're joking, right? The man is a buffoon.

What do you care? You don't even believe in the power of judicial review.

 

[rightwinger]

Only 3 women and WHITES ONLY… A GOP wet dream…

The woman on the top left is not Trump material

The other two may pass muster

 

[rightwinger]

Only 3 women and WHITES ONLY… A GOP wet dream…

Some people don't view having a vagina as a qualification for the Supreme Court.

Especially conservatives.....

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I'd love it if someone would ask him to discuss any one of those people in detail.

Yes, real estate moguls in NY have incredibly deep knowledge of every potential SC justice in the US. That's just like I am sure you can cite every major court decision they ever handed down and it's constitutional basis.

 

[Correll]

Where do they stand on eminent domain for real estate developers?

Do you really care, or are you just trying for a gotcha?

We need to get our priorities right

Protection of real estate developers has to be a priority

I asked a serious question.

And you dodge.

Asking a question you don't care about is intellectually dishonest.

No dodge......

Trump is more interested in eminent domain than rightwing favorites Roe v Wade, Heller and Obamacare

I was asking about YOUR priorities.

You were talking about YOUR priorities.

YOur words.


"We need to get our priorities right" (bolding added)


Do you really care, or are you just trying for a gotcha?

 

[Correll]

You mean a New York Real Estate guy didn't have personal knowledge of all the judges in America?

He doesn't need to have any knowledge of all of the judges in America. But he does need to have detailed knowledge about the 11 judges that he has just suggested are his top choices for the SC.

Ya dumb shit ya.

I'm sure he gave some expert on judges some parameters on what he wanted, and then told them to go make him a list.

Just like Hillary will do, if she ever gets to that point.

YOu are just a dishonest partisan hack who is throwing crap against the wall desperately searching for something that might "Stick" that you can use against your enemies.

YOU DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT HOW MUCH TRUMP DOES OR DOES NOT KNOW ABOUT HIS LIST.

You seem upset. And...you are very dramatic for a tough guy.

Hillary will not provide a list of people she would appoint. It's not something she needs to do. Trump needed to do this because he has failed to get enough support from conservatives in his own party.

I think asking Trump to discuss the names on this list would bring joy to many people. Why do you want to deny people joy?

Oh, you are so full of shit, it's funny.

1. Insult someone and then act as though it is weird of them to be offended. Standard dishonest lefty asshole behavior. Fuck you.

2. I did not ask for a list from HIllary. I did not claim it was something she needs to do.

3. I do not care about her list. I know that they will all be leftists who want to abuse their power to advance their lefty agenda.

4. MY GOD. This is, I can't believe it, a valid point. Yes, this is an attempt by Trump to gather support from the Conservatives in the GOP who he does not yet have.

You say that like it is a bad thing. Would you like to explain why you think that is a bad thing?

5. And you lie.

YOu are just a dishonest partisan hack who is throwing crap against the wall desperately searching for something that might "Stick" that you can use against your enemies.

You ask a lot of questions. Maybe you'd like to answer one for a change?

You answer my questions, and you have a serious and/or honest and/or on topic question, and I'll be happy to answer it.


Still, do you note where I admitted that you not only had a valid point, but agreed with you?

It really seemed to be the central point you were trying to make.

And you didn't follow up.

That's very odd.

Here, for discussion's sake.

The part where I agreed you were right.


4. MY GOD. This is, I can't believe it, a valid point. Yes, this is an attempt by Trump to gather support from the Conservatives in the GOP who he does not yet have.

You say that like it is a bad thing. Would you like to explain why you think that is a bad thing?