Trump Responds After Democrat New York Judge Orders His Business Licenses to be Rescinded as Punishment in Letitia James’ Lawsuit

[The5thHorseman]

Nothing but road apples out of your ASS!!!!

Your losing streak has miles to go...

Pace yourself.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Ruling from a judge that permitted no defense. This was a hand picked Marxist judge. This is just a peek into how bad the judiciary has become.

No...it's called "Summary Judgment"....it's when the case is much too "open&shut" to waste the court's time debating it.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Your losing streak has miles to go...

Pace yourself.

Your a Marxist HACK, Horseshit.
Go fuck yourself!

 

[The5thHorseman]

Your a Marxist HACK, Horseshit.
Go fuck yourself!

You're a dead end magat loser.

Do the right thing.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Then you should be able to state them.

No need, it's in the decision.

You should be able to read them.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

Ruling from a judge that permitted no defense. This was a hand picked Marxist judge. This is just a peek into how bad the judiciary has become.

Where do you get no defense.

The defense team was fully able to file their briefs and motions.

WW

 

[Kondor3]

These states are booming. Do you have any clue as to why?

• Florida.
• Nevada.
• South Dakota.
• Texas.
• Washington.

I'm sure there are a myriad of reasons... but I'm not sufficiently well-read on those differences to really be able to say...

I'm sure that some of it has to do with taxation and political leanings but you've served-up a diverse mix-and-match here...

How about serving-up some insight?

 

[SeaMajor7]

You're a dead end magat loser.

Do the right thing.

Trotsky thought he was all in too! Good luck!!!!

 

[White 6]

Since when does a financial institution not do its due diligence in appraising the collateral for a loan? And how is that any of the government's business if the bank does their due diligence or not? Other than the bank not following regs, which would then be on the bank, not the individual seeking the financing. Is this implying that I can just call up a bank and say I own a 10 million dollar property and want to borrow 80% of value, and they just give it to me, no questions asked? Please. You people demonstrate daily on here that you have no clue how the real world works, and your shill 'media' takes advantage of that at every opportunity.

Puh-lease! Where were you in 2007-2009, when the greedy banker sold each other worthless loans as if they were assets, culminating in a house of cards that came down at the end of the Son-Ova-Bush administration? Do not try to sell me, bankers always do due diligence.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

No...it's called "Summary Judgment"....it's when the case is much too "open&shut" to waste the court's time debating it.

I know. I have prepared and opposed many. In a summary judgment both parties agree that the facts presented in the complaint or response are true and no argument exists.

When I was sued by the two lesbians for refusing to paint their portrait, I had their complaint dismissed on a summary judgment.

There is no proceeding where a judgment is made only on the charging document. The judge also dismissed every objection and motion. Really he prohibited any defense.

It is doubtful that this will withstand an appeal.

 

[jbrownson0831]

I know. I have prepared and opposed many. In a summary judgment both parties agree that the facts presented in the complaint or response are true and no argument exists.

When I was sued by the two lesbians for refusing to paint their portrait, I had their complaint dismissed on a summary judgment.

There is no proceeding where a judgment is made only on the charging document. The judge also dismissed every objection and motion. Really he prohibited any defense.

It is doubtful that this will withstand an appeal.

Of course it won't. But the Dimtards have to make sure they do everything possible to ensure Trump gets elected again.,

 

[OldFlame]

No need, it's in the decision.

You should be able to read them.

WW

A decision that's 30 pages long? You read that entire thing? Then please provide the page number where it lists them.

 

[OldFlame]

Puh-lease! Where were you in 2007-2009, when the greedy banker sold each other worthless loans as if they were assets, culminating in a house of cards that came down at the end of the Son-Ova-Bush administration? Do not try to sell me, bankers always do due diligence.

Where are the charges against these financial institutions then? Or don't you care?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Where do you get no defense.

The defense team was fully able to file their briefs and motions.

WW

They did and each and every one was dismissed. The judge knew the ruling before he ever took the bench.

 

[BS Filter]

I'm sure there are a myriad of reasons... but I'm not sufficiently well-read on those differences to really be able to say...

I'm sure that some of it has to do with taxation and political leanings but you've served-up a diverse mix-and-match here...

How about serving-up some insight?

Eastern Washington and Western Idaho are booming because of low crime and no income tax compared to California. Same with South Dakota.

 

[WorldWatcher]

A decision that's 30 pages long? You read that entire thing? Then please provide the page number where it lists them.

Yes I did.


Listed as PDF pages:

• 3
• 4
• 5
• 7
• 10
• 16
• 17
• 19
• 20
• 25
• 34

Pardon me if I missed a couple.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

They did and each and every one was dismissed. The judge knew the ruling before he ever took the bench.

Judges routinely dismiss inaccurate and frivolous pleadings.

Not only were the lawyers pleading dismissed, but they were sanctioned for making the same frivolous claims repeated after being warned.

WW

 

[MAGA Macho Man]

Update!

"The judge has made his ruling, now let’s see him enforce it.”

DJT

 

[White 6]

Where are the charges against these financial institutions then? Or don't you care?

Other than being lazy, you think the bankers participated in fraud of some sort? Perhaps you could explain.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Judges routinely dismiss inaccurate and frivolous pleadings.

Not only were the lawyers pleading dismissed, but they were sanctioned for making the same frivolous claims repeated after being warned.

WW

That was the excuse for making a ruling without a defense permitted. Any biased judge could do the same thing.