WorldWatcher
Gold Member
- Dec 28, 2010
- 12,416
- 4,613
Update!
"The judge has made his ruling, now let’s see him enforce it.”
DJT
Two words: "Asset Seizure".
WW
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Update!
"The judge has made his ruling, now let’s see him enforce it.”
DJT
That was the excuse for making a ruling without a defense permitted. Any biased judge could do the same thing.
Yep. That sounds about right from a biased judge in a kangaroo court.That appears to be what you are not getting. The defense was permitted. They were told - to paraphrase - "You are wrong and full of shit.".
WW
If you are wise in the way of such proceedings, you should understand that Mazars disavowing a decade of work on Grifty's behalf robbed Grifty of a "corroborating witness". This left only Grifty and his loathsome spawn to testify to another set of values.I know. I have prepared and opposed many. In a summary judgment both parties agree that the facts presented in the complaint or response are true and no argument exists.
When I was sued by the two lesbians for refusing to paint their portrait, I had their complaint dismissed on a summary judgment.
There is no proceeding where a judgment is made only on the charging document. The judge also dismissed every objection and motion. Really he prohibited any defense.
It is doubtful that this will withstand an appeal.
There were appraisals done on the properties by the banks and insurers. Obviously they approved the evaluations and loans. The assessors also assigns valuations for tax purposes. They had no beef with the properties. Who was harmed?Other than being lazy, you think the bankers participated in fraud of some sort? Perhaps you could explain.
The judge rules that “errors” of this magnitude can only be fraudNobody was financially injured. All loans were paid back. The banks that loaned to Trump had their own appraisers of property value.
This is simply Lawfare in action.
Does anyone think that a Bank loans money on the claims of the borrower without 3rd party appraisal?
Property values go up and down daily, monthly, yearly, it is a moving target.
So why aren't the banks and insurers being reprimanded by the judge? They approved the property evaluations after having them assessed. Again, the property owner is not responsible for the appraisal…the bank sends those people out.The judge rules that “errors” of this magnitude can only be fraud
There were appraisals done on the properties by the banks and insurers. Obviously they approved the evaluations and loans. The assessors also assigns valuations for tax purposes. They had no beef with the properties. Who was harmed?
The kook left should be less transparent in their zeal to keep Trump from running. Even their own brainless idiots are starting to figure out what is going on.So why aren't the banks and insurers being reprimanded by the judge? They approved the property evaluations after having them assessed. Again, the property owner is not responsible for the appraisal…the bank sends those people out.
That's how the Soviets roll.....The judge rules that “errors” of this magnitude can only be fraud
I guess you gotta come up with some excuse why he is constantly losing in court. Facts show he is just scum, and he is guilty of all that shit.Nope. The judge is a biased, corrupt democrat. Dick nose.
The creep Deep State Judge should be disbarred, put in jail for not recusing himself, bread and water for life, if there is such a thing.Fascinating to watch leftists support a fascist judge. Ignorance is in full bloom around here.
Answer this:I guess you gotta come up with some excuse why he is constantly losing in court. Facts show he is just scum, and he is guilty of all that shit.
Answer this:
Is
this judge is factually wrong in the opinion?
Did any lenders sue the Trump organization because loans were not paid back?
Did any insurance companies sue the Trump organization claiming they had been defrauded?
And what of the banks and other Financial organizations who do appraisals when drawing up loan agreements , where the properties involved are the collateral?
Not buying it. The banks sent appraisers and they approved it. Why did they approve?For example claiming his living space in Trump Tower of 30,000 sq/ft when the actual space was 11,000 sq/ft.
WW
What laws has Trump broken, asshole?
So, like a dumbass, you can't answer!Tell it to the judge.
Not buying it. The banks sent appraisers and they approved it. Why did they approve?
Answer this:
Is
this judge is factually wrong in the opinion?
Did any lenders sue the Trump organization because loans were not paid back?
Did any insurance companies sue the Trump organization claiming they had been defrauded?
And what of the banks and other Financial organizations who do appraisals when drawing up loan agreements , where the properties involved are the collateral?