AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 31,362
- 9,195
- 1,340
I said we don't pay for tax cuts and you want to know how we pay for them.
Weasel, repeat after me: Budgetary effect of increased spending is same as lowered receipts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I said we don't pay for tax cuts and you want to know how we pay for them.
Trump has handlers?It's Trump speaking? Never mind.He's laying out this plan on tv now so don't ask for a stupid link.
One question though. Don't we need 100k+ jobs per month just to keep up with population growth? That is a serious question. How do the two numbers mesh?
Trump speaking is insightful, in an odd way; Trump reading a speech from his handlers is very odd and unbelievable.
That is, imo, the question. Trump's initial appeal was he was a problem solver working outside the box, and beholden to neither the gop nor dem special interest groups (or self-identified voter set)Trump has handlers?It's Trump speaking? Never mind.He's laying out this plan on tv now so don't ask for a stupid link.
One question though. Don't we need 100k+ jobs per month just to keep up with population growth? That is a serious question. How do the two numbers mesh?
Trump speaking is insightful, in an odd way; Trump reading a speech from his handlers is very odd and unbelievable.![]()
Trumps early appeal was the 'fu' vote. It was around 18% - 23% . His appeal started to broaden to the upper 20s and lower to mid 30s, and stayed that way even as most everyone of the other candidates dropped out.That is, imo, the question. Trump's initial appeal was he was a problem solver working outside the box, and beholden to neither the gop nor dem special interest groups (or self-identified voter set)Trump has handlers?![]()
So, as he himself put it, he could get them all in a room to hammer out a budget.
Now he reads a speech which is pretty much the gop House embraced tax plan.
So what is the point of Trump's entire candidacy and why is he even in this election?
That's more pathetic than Obama's numbers. Trump promised 4% growth. He's not going to get that if he's only adding 40,000 jobs a month you know.He's laying out this plan on tv now so don't ask for a stupid link.
One question though. Don't we need 100k+ jobs per month just to keep up with population growth? That is a serious question. How do the two numbers mesh?
Every President makes these kind of claims about their job creating plan very few take them serious.He's laying out this plan on tv now so don't ask for a stupid link.
One question though. Don't we need 100k+ jobs per month just to keep up with population growth? That is a serious question. How do the two numbers mesh?
Trump plans to claim personal credit for the jobs that would have been created anyway.
500,000 jobs created in an expanding economy is a good, but normal, figure for about 2 months. Trump claiming any special credit will look as clownish as everything else he does.