Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And he ended the Cold War doing it, saving us trillions for future Presidents. At least until Barry reignited the Cold War that is.It does, dope. Reagan's tax rate was 70% coming into office and 28% when he left and the GDP increased substantially. Like he said, liberals know so much that isn't true.No mention on how he is going to pay for anything either; a lot of tax cuts….
Don't you know that cutting taxes actually increases revenue?
View attachment 84849
Who Increased the Debt?
Yeah, economy is so good 43 million Americans require aid just to put food on the table.I like how you rightards are trying to change the official measurement of unemployment because it just eats you alive that we are back to full employment under Obama.Yeah, 4.9% unemployment is such a failure.I didn't deflect. CC brought Hillary's experience into to the discussion. Sadly Hillary has nothing of merit to offer. Sad that not one of the candidates is worth a crap.
.
Decades of experience on the world stage is a great asset as President. But what I was talking about, you learn scale and what amounts are needed to get “there from here”.
She's failed at everything she's touched....much like Ears has
Oh and you believe that horseshit. Of course you do. Idiot.
The real number is 9.7%
Now that you know the official jobs number, here's the REAL unemployment rate
Righties turn to Reagan to brag about job growth because there's not a single other Republican president since Harding to leave office with an unemployment rate lower than when they started.Reagan saw a million jobs gained in one month. Trump set the bar very low for himself.He's laying out this plan on tv now so don't ask for a stupid link.
One question though. Don't we need 100k+ jobs per month just to keep up with population growth? That is a serious question. How do the two numbers mesh?
Prove they require it....Yeah, economy is so good 43 million Americans require aid just to put food on the table.I like how you rightards are trying to change the official measurement of unemployment because it just eats you alive that we are back to full employment under Obama.Yeah, 4.9% unemployment is such a failure.Decades of experience on the world stage is a great asset as President. But what I was talking about, you learn scale and what amounts are needed to get “there from here”.
She's failed at everything she's touched....much like Ears has
Oh and you believe that horseshit. Of course you do. Idiot.
The real number is 9.7%
Now that you know the official jobs number, here's the REAL unemployment rate
And he ended the Cold War doing it, saving us trillions for future Presidents. At least until Barry reignited the Cold War that is.It does, dope. Reagan's tax rate was 70% coming into office and 28% when he left and the GDP increased substantially. Like he said, liberals know so much that isn't true.No mention on how he is going to pay for anything either; a lot of tax cuts….
Don't you know that cutting taxes actually increases revenue?
View attachment 84849
Who Increased the Debt?
Yeah, economy is so good 43 million Americans require aid just to put food on the table.I like how you rightards are trying to change the official measurement of unemployment because it just eats you alive that we are back to full employment under Obama.Yeah, 4.9% unemployment is such a failure.Decades of experience on the world stage is a great asset as President. But what I was talking about, you learn scale and what amounts are needed to get “there from here”.
She's failed at everything she's touched....much like Ears has
Oh and you believe that horseshit. Of course you do. Idiot.
The real number is 9.7%
Now that you know the official jobs number, here's the REAL unemployment rate
Are you kidding? Defense spending skyrocketed under Reagan.And he ended the Cold War doing it, saving us trillions for future Presidents. At least until Barry reignited the Cold War that is.It does, dope. Reagan's tax rate was 70% coming into office and 28% when he left and the GDP increased substantially. Like he said, liberals know so much that isn't true.No mention on how he is going to pay for anything either; a lot of tax cuts….
Don't you know that cutting taxes actually increases revenue?
View attachment 84849
Who Increased the Debt?
The issue was tax cuts and revenue. Not the cold war.
No shit Sherlock.Are you kidding? Defense spending skyrocketed under Reagan.And he ended the Cold War doing it, saving us trillions for future Presidents. At least until Barry reignited the Cold War that is.It does, dope. Reagan's tax rate was 70% coming into office and 28% when he left and the GDP increased substantially. Like he said, liberals know so much that isn't true.Don't you know that cutting taxes actually increases revenue?
View attachment 84849
Who Increased the Debt?
The issue was tax cuts and revenue. Not the cold war.
He's laying out this plan on tv now so don't ask for a stupid link.
One question though. Don't we need 100k+ jobs per month just to keep up with population growth? That is a serious question. How do the two numbers mesh?
You keep repeating yourself. GDP went up, not down. Spending went up too for reasons already mentioned. Money well spent to defeat the commies. That still bothers leftists apparently.No shit Sherlock.Are you kidding? Defense spending skyrocketed under Reagan.And he ended the Cold War doing it, saving us trillions for future Presidents. At least until Barry reignited the Cold War that is.It does, dope. Reagan's tax rate was 70% coming into office and 28% when he left and the GDP increased substantially. Like he said, liberals know so much that isn't true.
View attachment 84849
Who Increased the Debt?
The issue was tax cuts and revenue. Not the cold war.
You've missed the point entirely.
Again, the issue was tax cuts and how they affect revenue. Not what Regan spent on.
He ran such huge deficits because he cut taxes so dramatically.
Clinton had the advantage of a Republican congress hell bent on balancing the buget. Billy went kicking and screaming into it, don't make it sound like it was his baby. Reagan started with 70% under Carter and took it down to 28%. Only in Libtardville is that an overall increase.
Wow amazing, except of course after initial cuts Reagan raised taxes and so did Bush Sr. and Clinton so while 80's receipts grew by 450 billion, 90's receipts grew by a 1 Trillion. Both doubled but 80s also had higher inflation rates.
He's laying out this plan on tv now so don't ask for a stupid link.
One question though. Don't we need 100k+ jobs per month just to keep up with population growth? That is a serious question. How do the two numbers mesh?
Clinton had the advantage of a Republican congress hell bent on balancing the buget. Billy went kicking and screaming into it, don't make it sound like it was his baby. Reagan started with 70% under Carter and took it down to 28%. Only in Libtardville is that an overall increase.
He's laying out this plan on tv now so don't ask for a stupid link.
One question though. Don't we need 100k+ jobs per month just to keep up with population growth? That is a serious question. How do the two numbers mesh?
LOL He's going to 'create' 41,000 jobs a month? Last month alone there were 280,000 jobs created. Trump's going to put an end to that!
You didn't read the posts then. You don't get to dictate answers, I don't feed stupid.Clinton had the advantage of a Republican congress hell bent on balancing the buget. Billy went kicking and screaming into it, don't make it sound like it was his baby. Reagan started with 70% under Carter and took it down to 28%. Only in Libtardville is that an overall increase.
We are not even discussing spending (the second component of the budget), so what is your point?
And what the fuck do these numbers refer to???? "Reagan started with 70% under Carter and took it down to 28%."
You keep repeating yourself. GDP went up, not down. Spending went up too for reasons already mentioned. Money well spent to defeat the commies. That still bothers leftists apparently.No shit Sherlock.Are you kidding? Defense spending skyrocketed under Reagan.And he ended the Cold War doing it, saving us trillions for future Presidents. At least until Barry reignited the Cold War that is.
The issue was tax cuts and revenue. Not the cold war.
You've missed the point entirely.
Again, the issue was tax cuts and how they affect revenue. Not what Regan spent on.
He ran such huge deficits because he cut taxes so dramatically.
Since when do righties champion government spending as being good for the econony?Are you kidding? Defense spending skyrocketed under Reagan.And he ended the Cold War doing it, saving us trillions for future Presidents. At least until Barry reignited the Cold War that is.It does, dope. Reagan's tax rate was 70% coming into office and 28% when he left and the GDP increased substantially. Like he said, liberals know so much that isn't true.Don't you know that cutting taxes actually increases revenue?
View attachment 84849
Who Increased the Debt?
The issue was tax cuts and revenue. Not the cold war.
Clinton had the advantage of a Republican congress hell bent on balancing the buget. Billy went kicking and screaming into it, don't make it sound like it was his baby. Reagan started with 70% under Carter and took it down to 28%. Only in Libtardville is that an overall increase.
Wow amazing, except of course after initial cuts Reagan raised taxes and so did Bush Sr. and Clinton so while 80's receipts grew by 450 billion, 90's receipts grew by a 1 Trillion. Both doubled but 80s also had higher inflation rates.
You didn't read the posts then. You don't get to dictate answers, I don't feed stupid.Clinton had the advantage of a Republican congress hell bent on balancing the buget. Billy went kicking and screaming into it, don't make it sound like it was his baby. Reagan started with 70% under Carter and took it down to 28%. Only in Libtardville is that an overall increase.
We are not even discussing spending (the second component of the budget), so what is your point?
And what the fuck do these numbers refer to???? "Reagan started with 70% under Carter and took it down to 28%."
