Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If this attack didn't end the chemical attacks then the next US missile strike will or the next one or so on. Assad lost 20 of his jets to this attack meaning Russia has to now commit 20 more of its planes to keep the bombing going. At what point will Assad's losses become too great to sustain?thats a good one toomuch but how has he stopped the gassing? that attack was a no harm bs attack that did nothing to stop planes taking off the next day inflicting more damageThere you go, if he doesn't want to allow them to come to the US, he has no right to keep them from being gassed.There's only two words for him.
Fucking hypocrite.
These refugees are fleeing precisely the type of violence we are seeing this week in Syria.
Trump Still Wants to Keep Syria's "Beautiful Babies" Out of the US | Mother Jones
Thre is a world wide prohibition against chemical weapons and every country, including Russia has signed an agreement to never use chemical weapons. That you do not understand why is a damnable indictment against our educational system and underlines a need to restore history to the curriculum.I'll say it again. You can blow up bodies with gunpowder bombs, 50cal machine guns, bazooka, rpg, crash airliner, burn them to death in the aftermath, run them over with tanks, cut off heads, toss off buildings, send millions w/o food-water to march 1000km through desert......but if you dump a bleach bomb, that is a bridge too far! Huh?
Thre is a world wide prohibition against chemical weapons and every country, including Russia has signed an agreement to never use chemical weapons. That you do not understand why is a damnable indictment against our educational system and underlines a need to restore history to the curriculum.I'll say it again. You can blow up bodies with gunpowder bombs, 50cal machine guns, bazooka, rpg, crash airliner, burn them to death in the aftermath, run them over with tanks, cut off heads, toss off buildings, send millions w/o food-water to march 1000km through desert......but if you dump a bleach bomb, that is a bridge too far! Huh?
Obama lied after running away from his red line. It's a shame he allowed them to keep chemical weapons and then lie about it. Despicable human.Did he keep them from being gassed?There you go, if he doesn't want to allow them to come to the US, he has no right to keep them from being gassed.There's only two words for him.
Fucking hypocrite.
These refugees are fleeing precisely the type of violence we are seeing this week in Syria.
Trump Still Wants to Keep Syria's "Beautiful Babies" Out of the US | Mother Jones
Plus your logic is convoluted and stupid,
thats a good one toomuch but how has he stopped the gassing? that attack was a no harm bs attack that did nothing to stop planes taking off the next day inflicting more damageThere you go, if he doesn't want to allow them to come to the US, he has no right to keep them from being gassed.There's only two words for him.
Fucking hypocrite.
These refugees are fleeing precisely the type of violence we are seeing this week in Syria.
Trump Still Wants to Keep Syria's "Beautiful Babies" Out of the US | Mother Jones
CECILIE you're breaking my heartthats a good one toomuch but how has he stopped the gassing? that attack was a no harm bs attack that did nothing to stop planes taking off the next day inflicting more damageThere you go, if he doesn't want to allow them to come to the US, he has no right to keep them from being gassed.There's only two words for him.
Fucking hypocrite.
These refugees are fleeing precisely the type of violence we are seeing this week in Syria.
Trump Still Wants to Keep Syria's "Beautiful Babies" Out of the US | Mother Jones
. . . And your source for the confident assertion that it "did nothing to stop planes taking off the next day"? Because I sure as shit don't see anything except your word for it here.
But they need future Democrat voters!Your team should not have created the refugee crisis.
In a weird way, it's kind of like those pro-lifers that only care about what's going on in the womb but not too much after the birth.
The refugee crisis was not caused by the US. At least not for the most part. The people of Syria rose up against a dictator, and started a civil war.
There are only two possibly valid arguments for a connection to the US....
A: it's possible the Syrian rebels would not have attempted to overthrow the government, if they had not thought the US would help, because Obama did with Libya.
Again, speculation, but it's plausible.
B: An additional source of refugees, could be the creation of Islamic State, but that is entirely on Obama.... or no one. We're not entirely sure who did this. In 2010, the military testified that nearly the entire group that was AQI, was in detention camps.
We don't know who made the decision, nor do we know exactly when this decision was made, but all these dangerous people were released.
Either the decision was made to turn over control of the camps, and the detainees, to the Iraqi government, who then released them, or they were released after they were refused to be sent to Gitmo, because some idiot in government promised to close gitmo.
Regardless of the specifics, because we choose to allow them to be released in 2011, they formed Islamic State and started a war.
However, no matter which way you cut it, more blame should be laid at the feet of the Obama administration, than the Bush.
No. The valid connection comes with moving weapons from Libya to Syria via Benghazi, requesting the Saudi's to do it, and Qatar on it as well. Doing everything to keep finger prints off of it.And then deciding Assad must go. Part and parcel of the Arab Spring.
But they need future Democrat voters!Your team should not have created the refugee crisis.
In a weird way, it's kind of like those pro-lifers that only care about what's going on in the womb but not too much after the birth.
The refugee crisis was not caused by the US. At least not for the most part. The people of Syria rose up against a dictator, and started a civil war.
There are only two possibly valid arguments for a connection to the US....
A: it's possible the Syrian rebels would not have attempted to overthrow the government, if they had not thought the US would help, because Obama did with Libya.
Again, speculation, but it's plausible.
B: An additional source of refugees, could be the creation of Islamic State, but that is entirely on Obama.... or no one. We're not entirely sure who did this. In 2010, the military testified that nearly the entire group that was AQI, was in detention camps.
We don't know who made the decision, nor do we know exactly when this decision was made, but all these dangerous people were released.
Either the decision was made to turn over control of the camps, and the detainees, to the Iraqi government, who then released them, or they were released after they were refused to be sent to Gitmo, because some idiot in government promised to close gitmo.
Regardless of the specifics, because we choose to allow them to be released in 2011, they formed Islamic State and started a war.
However, no matter which way you cut it, more blame should be laid at the feet of the Obama administration, than the Bush.
No. The valid connection comes with moving weapons from Libya to Syria via Benghazi, requesting the Saudi's to do it, and Qatar on it as well. Doing everything to keep finger prints off of it.And then deciding Assad must go. Part and parcel of the Arab Spring.
Huh? So the refugee crisis is the result of arms deliveries, which didn't start until a year after Assad was wiping out his people?
That doesn't seem logical to me.
