Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's how it worked before the 14th amendment, if you were born on this soil, you automatically had citizenship.It is hard to believe that the intent of the 14th amendment was to pretend jurisdiction over someone merely born here and raised in a different homeland, sometimes a very hostile homeland.
WE ARE TALKING ABOUT changing a Constitutional Amendment.
WHY IN HELL are YOU bringing some crap in here concerning POTUS nominees?
STOP SPREADING your shit.
No we are talking about the SCOTUS clarifying the 14th amendment. You libwits constantly harp about interpreting the 2nd amendment so fine we'll have the SCOTUS clear up the 14th. Tissue?
Yes, just like I stated in the first sentence you quoted = WE ARE TALKING ABOUT changing a Constitutional Amendment.
The other dumbass brought the concept of the 'nuclear option' into the conversation; that deals with POTUS nominees.
I see you also are NOT very good at paying attention.
WE ARE TALKING ABOUT changing a Constitutional Amendment.
WHY IN HELL are YOU bringing some crap in here concerning POTUS nominees?
STOP SPREADING your shit.
No we are talking about the SCOTUS clarifying the 14th amendment. You libwits constantly harp about interpreting the 2nd amendment so fine we'll have the SCOTUS clear up the 14th. Tissue?
Yes, just like I stated in the first sentence you quoted = WE ARE TALKING ABOUT changing a Constitutional Amendment.
The other dumbass brought the concept of the 'nuclear option' into the conversation; that deals with POTUS nominees.
I see you also are NOT very good at paying attention.
No the 14th is not being changed, its being interpreted.
Section 1, first sentence, All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
An illegal steps over the border and pops out an anchor baby, they are not "residing" in a state. I don't think an illegal can legally reside in a state. Squat maybe but they are not a legal resident. If Trump pushes this into the SCOTUS you fools won't like the ruling.
WE ARE TALKING ABOUT changing a Constitutional Amendment.
WHY IN HELL are YOU bringing some crap in here concerning POTUS nominees?
STOP SPREADING your shit.
No we are talking about the SCOTUS clarifying the 14th amendment. You libwits constantly harp about interpreting the 2nd amendment so fine we'll have the SCOTUS clear up the 14th. Tissue?
Yes, just like I stated in the first sentence you quoted = WE ARE TALKING ABOUT changing a Constitutional Amendment.
The other dumbass brought the concept of the 'nuclear option' into the conversation; that deals with POTUS nominees.
I see you also are NOT very good at paying attention.
No the 14th is not being changed, its being interpreted.
Section 1, first sentence, All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
An illegal steps over the border and pops out an anchor baby, they are not "residing" in a state. I don't think an illegal can legally reside in a state. Squat maybe but they are not a legal resident. If Trump pushes this into the SCOTUS you fools won't like the ruling.
Trump stated he would EO the Amendment; why? He wants it CHANGED.
Changed, interpreted = semantics
THE FACT REMAINS the other member brought the concept of 'the nuclear option' into the conversation, which deals with POTUS nominees. That has NOTHING to do with Amendments.
Me & you are basically on the same page so, I'm not sure why you're being a jack ass but oh well.
The Wisconsin WhiskbroomRyan's balls & spine didn't grow overnight.I take neither side...That said, Ryan needs to STFU for no better reason that he's a lame duck....Go away Eddie Munster, and take Hildabeest with you.
the moderate right gets to rejoice that their party still has a shred of decency left.
WE ARE TALKING ABOUT changing a Constitutional Amendment.
WHY IN HELL are YOU bringing some crap in here concerning POTUS nominees?
STOP SPREADING your shit.
No we are talking about the SCOTUS clarifying the 14th amendment. You libwits constantly harp about interpreting the 2nd amendment so fine we'll have the SCOTUS clear up the 14th. Tissue?
Yes, just like I stated in the first sentence you quoted = WE ARE TALKING ABOUT changing a Constitutional Amendment.
The other dumbass brought the concept of the 'nuclear option' into the conversation; that deals with POTUS nominees.
I see you also are NOT very good at paying attention.
No the 14th is not being changed, its being interpreted.
Section 1, first sentence, All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
An illegal steps over the border and pops out an anchor baby, they are not "residing" in a state. I don't think an illegal can legally reside in a state. Squat maybe but they are not a legal resident. If Trump pushes this into the SCOTUS you fools won't like the ruling.
Trump stated he would EO the Amendment; why? He wants it CHANGED.
Changed, interpreted = semantics
THE FACT REMAINS the other member brought the concept of 'the nuclear option' into the conversation, which deals with POTUS nominees. That has NOTHING to do with Amendments.
Me & you are basically on the same page so, I'm not sure why you're being a jack ass but oh well.
Breaking: SCOTUS rules the 14th amendment does not grant citizenship to illegals, liberals butthurt.
Whiteys Hating WhiteyIt is hard to believe that the intent of the 14th amendment was to pretend jurisdiction over someone merely born here and raised in a different homeland, sometimes a very hostile homeland.
WE ARE TALKING ABOUT changing a Constitutional Amendment.
WHY IN HELL are YOU bringing some crap in here concerning POTUS nominees?
STOP SPREADING your shit.
No we are talking about the SCOTUS clarifying the 14th amendment. You libwits constantly harp about interpreting the 2nd amendment so fine we'll have the SCOTUS clear up the 14th. Tissue?
Yes, just like I stated in the first sentence you quoted = WE ARE TALKING ABOUT changing a Constitutional Amendment.
The other dumbass brought the concept of the 'nuclear option' into the conversation; that deals with POTUS nominees.
I see you also are NOT very good at paying attention.
No the 14th is not being changed, its being interpreted.
Section 1, first sentence, All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
An illegal steps over the border and pops out an anchor baby, they are not "residing" in a state. I don't think an illegal can legally reside in a state. Squat maybe but they are not a legal resident. If Trump pushes this into the SCOTUS you fools won't like the ruling.
Trump stated he would EO the Amendment; why? He wants it CHANGED.
Changed, interpreted = semantics
THE FACT REMAINS the other member brought the concept of 'the nuclear option' into the conversation, which deals with POTUS nominees. That has NOTHING to do with Amendments.
Me & you are basically on the same page so, I'm not sure why you're being a jack ass but oh well.
Breaking: SCOTUS rules the 14th amendment does not grant citizenship to illegals, liberals butthurt.
No we are talking about the SCOTUS clarifying the 14th amendment. You libwits constantly harp about interpreting the 2nd amendment so fine we'll have the SCOTUS clear up the 14th. Tissue?
Yes, just like I stated in the first sentence you quoted = WE ARE TALKING ABOUT changing a Constitutional Amendment.
The other dumbass brought the concept of the 'nuclear option' into the conversation; that deals with POTUS nominees.
I see you also are NOT very good at paying attention.
No the 14th is not being changed, its being interpreted.
Section 1, first sentence, All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
An illegal steps over the border and pops out an anchor baby, they are not "residing" in a state. I don't think an illegal can legally reside in a state. Squat maybe but they are not a legal resident. If Trump pushes this into the SCOTUS you fools won't like the ruling.
Trump stated he would EO the Amendment; why? He wants it CHANGED.
Changed, interpreted = semantics
THE FACT REMAINS the other member brought the concept of 'the nuclear option' into the conversation, which deals with POTUS nominees. That has NOTHING to do with Amendments.
Me & you are basically on the same page so, I'm not sure why you're being a jack ass but oh well.
Breaking: SCOTUS rules the 14th amendment does not grant citizenship to illegals, liberals butthurt.
I could care less about the 14th: What I do care is about
(1) truth = Trump doesn't have that
(2) policy = Trump doesn't know what that means AFA the concept of changing any part of any Amendment
(3) having a POTUS with a brain that doesn't look stupid = Trump has no brain & he looks & sounds stupid
No we are talking about the SCOTUS clarifying the 14th amendment. You libwits constantly harp about interpreting the 2nd amendment so fine we'll have the SCOTUS clear up the 14th. Tissue?
Yes, just like I stated in the first sentence you quoted = WE ARE TALKING ABOUT changing a Constitutional Amendment.
The other dumbass brought the concept of the 'nuclear option' into the conversation; that deals with POTUS nominees.
I see you also are NOT very good at paying attention.
No the 14th is not being changed, its being interpreted.
Section 1, first sentence, All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
An illegal steps over the border and pops out an anchor baby, they are not "residing" in a state. I don't think an illegal can legally reside in a state. Squat maybe but they are not a legal resident. If Trump pushes this into the SCOTUS you fools won't like the ruling.
Trump stated he would EO the Amendment; why? He wants it CHANGED.
Changed, interpreted = semantics
THE FACT REMAINS the other member brought the concept of 'the nuclear option' into the conversation, which deals with POTUS nominees. That has NOTHING to do with Amendments.
Me & you are basically on the same page so, I'm not sure why you're being a jack ass but oh well.
Breaking: SCOTUS rules the 14th amendment does not grant citizenship to illegals, liberals butthurt.
I could care less about the 14th:
The 14th Amendment couldn't be clearer on the issue of birthright citizenship
How many votes are needed for a constitutional amendment?Or get congress to bring up the issue in session, and then either write a new law amending the 14th or being a turncoat and push for more illegal anchor babies, which would be a death wish for Paul.I used to think Ryan had a brain. That was some time ago. His comments on the birthright matter only serve to cement my opinion.
Everyone knows, including Trump, that he cannot erase the matter with a mere Executive Order. He can however steer the matter into the judicial system and into the Supreme Court.
It is hard to believe that the intent of the 14th amendment was to pretend jurisdiction over someone merely born here and raised in a different homeland, sometimes a very hostile homeland.
Our President is being laughed atI used to think Ryan had a brain. That was some time ago. His comments on the birthright matter only serve to cement my opinion.
Everyone knows, including Trump, that he cannot erase the matter with a mere Executive Order. He can however steer the matter into the judicial system and into the Supreme Court.
Our President is being laughed atI used to think Ryan had a brain. That was some time ago. His comments on the birthright matter only serve to cement my opinion.
Everyone knows, including Trump, that he cannot erase the matter with a mere Executive Order. He can however steer the matter into the judicial system and into the Supreme Court.
