Trump wants blacks to gamble on his "what the hell do you have to lose"

[jc456]

Seems like it's you suggesting blacks can't do what you do.

But do they have a car like you? Do they have a babysitter? Id? Money to get an ID?

And are whites going to make blacks in poor area wait 2 hours to vote while you 20 minutes?

That's entirely up to the district. Each district or county sets their parameters on voting; how many workers will there be, how many voting tables will there be, what facility to use for voting and so on.

But as long as you bring it up, how do those people with no car or baby sitter go shopping? Go to the bank? Go to see relatives?

Most states that I'm aware of that have Voter-ID give poor people who can't afford an ID one free of charge.

Aw cut out the BS, we all know what the GOP is doing with their voter ID antics. The North Carolina Court decision has exposed that strategy already. But if that isn't proof enough of the GOP national agenda to suppress voting rights, here is more:

Republicans have long tried to drive Democratic voters away from the polls. "I don't want everybody to vote," the influential conservative activist Paul Weyrich told a gathering of evangelical leaders in 1980. "As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down." But since the 2010 election, thanks to a conservative advocacy group founded by Weyrich, the GOP's effort to disrupt voting rights has been more widespread and effective than ever. In a systematic campaign orchestrated by the American Legislative Exchange Council – and funded in part by David and Charles Koch, the billionaire brothers who bankrolled the Tea Party – 38 states introduced legislation this year designed to impede voters at every step of the electoral process. The GOP War on Voting

so I'm still confused at what having an ID does to discriminate a voter. Can you explain?

Again, one needs an ID do most everything in society as we've shown. So tell us what asking to prove who you are is a discrimination.

 

[jc456]

Democrats living off the grid, who would have thought it.

the ones six feet under?

 

[jc456]

Yep, a lot of blacks did build their neighborhoods plank by plank and nail by nail or brick by brick.

And then they get mad and set it on fire.

No, only the renters living in white owned blight houses do that!

cause they're racist and hate criminals eh?

 

[jc456]

So you admit you lied. But even more shocking is your unabashed confession giving sordid details about the justification for violating another American's Constitutional rights. Because of laziness? That wasn't the verdict in North Carolina….

Is that the game you wish to play? Because if you do, I'll be glad to play it with all the court decisions in other states that say Voter-ID is indeed constitutional.

Once again you have proved you don't know what you are talking about. The NC decision took place in a federal appeals court, not a state court. A federal precedent has been set that will have a domino effect on the other state's ID laws. There is nothing in the Constitution requiring voter ID to vote. The larger question is WHY does voter ID matter now? There was no worry about it during the last 44 presidential elections except in the South where the mission was to keep Blacks from voting.

the question really is why don't you want people to prove they are who they are when voting?

 

[jon_berzerk]

what he is really saying is

stop picking the losing hand

makes sense really

 

[jc456]

Seems like it's you suggesting blacks can't do what you do.

But do they have a car like you? Do they have a babysitter? Id? Money to get an ID?

And are whites going to make blacks in poor area wait 2 hours to vote while you 20 minutes?

That's entirely up to the district. Each district or county sets their parameters on voting; how many workers will there be, how many voting tables will there be, what facility to use for voting and so on.

But as long as you bring it up, how do those people with no car or baby sitter go shopping? Go to the bank? Go to see relatives?

Most states that I'm aware of that have Voter-ID give poor people who can't afford an ID one free of charge.

Aw cut out the BS, we all know what the GOP is doing with their voter ID antics. The North Carolina Court decision has exposed that strategy already. But if that isn't proof enough of the GOP national agenda to suppress voting rights, here is more:

Republicans have long tried to drive Democratic voters away from the polls. "I don't want everybody to vote," the influential conservative activist Paul Weyrich told a gathering of evangelical leaders in 1980. "As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down." But since the 2010 election, thanks to a conservative advocacy group founded by Weyrich, the GOP's effort to disrupt voting rights has been more widespread and effective than ever. In a systematic campaign orchestrated by the American Legislative Exchange Council – and funded in part by David and Charles Koch, the billionaire brothers who bankrolled the Tea Party – 38 states introduced legislation this year designed to impede voters at every step of the electoral process. The GOP War on Voting

So one no longer needs an ID to board a plane? Is that in the constitution?

 

[jc456]

what he is really saying is

stop picking the losing hand

makes sense really

why would I stop picking who I want? Are you trying to tell me I'm not allowed to vote for who I want? is that really what you're after, suppress everyones vote? How leftist of you

 

[jon_berzerk]

what he is really saying is

stop picking the losing hand

makes sense really

why would I stop picking who I want? Are you trying to tell me I'm not allowed to vote for who I want? is that really what you're after, suppress everyones vote? How leftist of you

--LOL

trump was only pointing out past behavior

folks certainly can still pick a losing hand

--LOL

a lying and corrupt losing hand i might add

--LOL

 

[jc456]

what he is really saying is

stop picking the losing hand

makes sense really

why would I stop picking who I want? Are you trying to tell me I'm not allowed to vote for who I want? is that really what you're after, suppress everyones vote? How leftist of you

--LOL

trump was only pointing out past behavior

folks certainly can still pick a losing hand

--LOL

a lying and corrupt losing hand i might add

--LOL

I thought that was my right. I didn't realize I needed your permission. Wow, you dudes are out there for sure. control freakies much?

so you all can comment on my voting habits but a voter ID is discrimination? holy crap batman.

 

[jon_berzerk]

what he is really saying is

stop picking the losing hand

makes sense really

why would I stop picking who I want? Are you trying to tell me I'm not allowed to vote for who I want? is that really what you're after, suppress everyones vote? How leftist of you

--LOL

trump was only pointing out past behavior

folks certainly can still pick a losing hand

--LOL

a lying and corrupt losing hand i might add

--LOL

I thought that was my right. I didn't realize I needed your permission. Wow, you dudes are out there for sure. control freakies much?

so you all can comment on my voting habits but a voter ID is discrimination? holy crap batman.

you are over the edge idiot

no one is telling you how to vote fuckhead

 

[jc456]

what he is really saying is

stop picking the losing hand

makes sense really

why would I stop picking who I want? Are you trying to tell me I'm not allowed to vote for who I want? is that really what you're after, suppress everyones vote? How leftist of you

--LOL

trump was only pointing out past behavior

folks certainly can still pick a losing hand

--LOL

a lying and corrupt losing hand i might add

--LOL

I thought that was my right. I didn't realize I needed your permission. Wow, you dudes are out there for sure. control freakies much?

so you all can comment on my voting habits but a voter ID is discrimination? holy crap batman.

you are over the edge idiot

no one is telling you how to vote fuckhead

yeah,...you are you fk

 

[jon_berzerk]

what he is really saying is

stop picking the losing hand

makes sense really

why would I stop picking who I want? Are you trying to tell me I'm not allowed to vote for who I want? is that really what you're after, suppress everyones vote? How leftist of you

--LOL

trump was only pointing out past behavior

folks certainly can still pick a losing hand

--LOL

a lying and corrupt losing hand i might add

--LOL

I thought that was my right. I didn't realize I needed your permission. Wow, you dudes are out there for sure. control freakies much?

so you all can comment on my voting habits but a voter ID is discrimination? holy crap batman.

you are over the edge idiot

no one is telling you how to vote fuckhead

yeah,...you are you fk

whatever mush for brains

 

[jc456]

why would I stop picking who I want? Are you trying to tell me I'm not allowed to vote for who I want? is that really what you're after, suppress everyones vote? How leftist of you

--LOL

trump was only pointing out past behavior

folks certainly can still pick a losing hand

--LOL

a lying and corrupt losing hand i might add

--LOL

I thought that was my right. I didn't realize I needed your permission. Wow, you dudes are out there for sure. control freakies much?

so you all can comment on my voting habits but a voter ID is discrimination? holy crap batman.

you are over the edge idiot

no one is telling you how to vote fuckhead

yeah,...you are you fk

whatever mush for brains

At least my guy didn't murder four americans in Benghazi. To knowingly vote for that is pathetic.

BTW, to state that the four americans died as a result of a video being released is saying the action was spontaneous and not a movement that was happening over time. And that sir is mther fking fat ass lie. And that is who you are voting for. Congrats on your selection of evil.

 

[the_human_being]

 

[the_human_being]

Would some of you Liberals please try to explain something to me? Hillary says she will raise the taxes and impose more regulations on corporations. She says she will create thousands of jobs. My question is, how would increasing corporate taxes and adding more regulations create thousands of jobs?

I should also point out that we currently are experiencing a stagnate economy. She intends to bring in several thousands of Syrian refugees and has openly stated that she will do nothing to curb immigration, either legal or illegal immigration. She will also continue Obama's war on coal which has produced ghost towns in states with a large population of folks working in the coal industry. She says she will retrain the coal folks. Retrain them to do what? Don't you first need new industry to locate themselves into these coal towns in order to retrain for employment?

Where are the jobs to accommodate all these refugees and those who migrate either legally or illegally into our country. We don't have enough jobs now. Many folks have dropped out of the jobs market because they have given up hope of finding employment. 58% of black males are unemployed right now. Where is the industry going to come from that Hillary says will produce the thousands of jobs her policies will create? Will these thousands of new jobs come from these corporation upon which she will levy new regulations upon while also raising their taxes.

I admit I am not an economics expert but please, will some of you Liberal business majors and economics majors explain these job creating policies to a simple man who ran a successful corporation for thirty-five years? I promise I will listen.

 

[nat4900]

Must be REALLY frustrating to right wingers on here to know that no matter how they and their orange clown spin it....BLACKS WILL NOT VOTE for A CONSERVATIVE TICKET....

Bear in mind that Trump delivered his "conciliatory speech" to blacks, in front of an almost ALL WHITE audience; the conclusion one must reach is that he (Trump) is not really addressing blacks, but those republicans who may be rejecting him for being too obvious a racist, with the hope that such republicans will see him as the "sweetheart" that he is now trying to be...

IT'S OVER, right wingers....Blacks will NEVER vote for you.

 

[the_human_being]

Must be REALLY frustrating to right wingers on here to know that no matter how they and their orange clown spin it....BLACKS WILL NOT VOTE for A CONSERVATIVE TICKET....

Bear in mind that Trump delivered his "conciliatory speech" to blacks, in front of an almost ALL WHITE audience; the conclusion one must reach is that he (Trump) is not really addressing blacks, but those republicans who may be rejecting him for being too obvious a racist, with the hope that such republicans will see him as the "sweetheart" that he is now trying to be...

IT'S OVER, right wingers....Blacks will NEVER vote for you.

Then resign yourself to remain the most backward of ethnic groups in America. It is your choice to make.

 

[the_human_being]

I realy didn't actually believe any Liberal would have the guts to come forward and answer my question in Post # 535.

 

[JQPublic1]

It becomes a choice between staying with the same roofer or going with the guy who wants to tear off your roof and won't tell you what he will give you in its place

The problem is you want the government to constantly give people something. How about people that have been given start earning it for a change.

They already have earned it:

The slavery excuse makes you a failure.

You don't know the difference between an excuse and a debt.

You think people that were never slaves are owed a debt by people that never owned them. That makes what you posted an excuse.

See how easy that was if you want to learn?

You Right Wingers think people who never commit crime should be tainted by race based crime statistics committed by a few Black criminals. I see you using it against Blacks all the time. But more on point, the wealth of this nation was made possible by slave labor.
The entire country sanctioned that peculiar institution for hundreds of years and the repercussions have been reverberating among Blacks and Whites since manumission. That wealth some white people enjoy today was paid for by Black people, some who lived less than 200 years ago.. Although the suffering and misery caused by slavery cannot be adequately compensated, not enough time has passed to erase the memories of that broken promise of 40 acres and a mule.

Black people are not aggressively seeking reparations for slavery. It is the lost inheritance your people stole from them via uncompensated labor and teh subsequent lack of opportunity. Those are two different grievances. However, with 75% of Black people living above the poverty level and with many prospering beyond belief, that debt might have been partially relieved by White liberalism. But, people like you have fought Back progress every step of the way. So, get out of my face with your petty selfishness and immorality based on racialism and lies. The vast majority of Blacks work for a living and live ABOVE the poverty level and that makes you a liar when you say the government constantly give s them stuff.

 

[JQPublic1]

So you admit you lied. But even more shocking is your unabashed confession giving sordid details about the justification for violating another American's Constitutional rights. Because of laziness? That wasn't the verdict in North Carolina….

Is that the game you wish to play? Because if you do, I'll be glad to play it with all the court decisions in other states that say Voter-ID is indeed constitutional.

Once again you have proved you don't know what you are talking about. The NC decision took place in a federal appeals court, not a state court. A federal precedent has been set that will have a domino effect on the other state's ID laws. There is nothing in the Constitution requiring voter ID to vote. The larger question is WHY does voter ID matter now? There was no worry about it during the last 44 presidential elections except in the South where the mission was to keep Blacks from voting.

For you to say that there is nothing in the Constitution requiring voter ID to vote proves you know nothing about who sets the regulations and requirements when it comes to voting. It doesn't have to be in the Constitution for a state to do it.

See, you learned something today despite not wanting to.

And, predictably, you know nothing about Civil Rights. When a motive can be established and linked to voter suppression of certain groups within a state, the game changes. That is unConstitutional.