Trump wants to dramatically expand "STOP AND FRISK" historically targeting blacks and Hispanics.

[rdean]

Trump praises 'stop-and-frisk' police tactic

Stop-and-frisk, however, has been the target of protests and successful legal challenges in New York and other big American cities in recent years as a tactic that unfairly singles out minority citizens and violates their civil rights.

Trump calls for nationwide 'stop-and-frisk' policy

Donald Trump Says "Stop and Frisk Works," Wants to Expand the Police State - Freedom Outpost

Polanco explained in a 2013 Democracy Now interview that 600,000 of the around 700,000 police-initiated stop-and-frisk incidents the previous year would not have occurred but for improper encouragement by the city government, police department, and police union. The quota system, he says, even would result, near the end of a work shift, in some police just arresting “whoever’s at the corner.”

Trump proposes expanding use of stop-and-frisk

---------------------

Stop and Frisk generally means the police can stop and frisk anyone (blacks) and everyone (Hispanics) they want to. It's one way whites can show blacks and Hispanics what they think of them.

 

[washamericom]

he should "target" liberal sedition.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

he should "target" liberal sedition.

And make them have a "LOSER" tattoo on their forehead

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

he should "target" liberal sedition.

And make them have a "LOSER" tattoo on their forehead

We'll just tell em it stands for liberal....

 

[Timmy]

Stop n frisk expansion is an affront to the constitution.

Constitution shouldn't change because you are in a rich neighborhood.

 

[Auld Phart]

Trump praises 'stop-and-frisk' police tactic

Stop-and-frisk, however, has been the target of protests and successful legal challenges in New York and other big American cities in recent years as a tactic that unfairly singles out minority citizens and violates their civil rights.

Trump calls for nationwide 'stop-and-frisk' policy

Donald Trump Says "Stop and Frisk Works," Wants to Expand the Police State - Freedom Outpost

Polanco explained in a 2013 Democracy Now interview that 600,000 of the around 700,000 police-initiated stop-and-frisk incidents the previous year would not have occurred but for improper encouragement by the city government, police department, and police union. The quota system, he says, even would result, near the end of a work shift, in some police just arresting “whoever’s at the corner.”

Trump proposes expanding use of stop-and-frisk

---------------------

Stop and Frisk generally means the police can stop and frisk anyone (blacks) and everyone (Hispanics) they want to. It's one way whites can show blacks and Hispanics what they think of them.

Have laugh at your take on it.

I have no problem as long as it is done equally.

Blacks, whites, Hispanics, far easterners, mid easterners, etc

 

[Iceweasel]

Stop n frisk expansion is an affront to the constitution.

Constitution shouldn't change because you are in a rich neighborhood.

What in the Constitution prevents it? Guilliano reduced crime by a lot in NYC with it. Now it's back up with the socialist in charge.

 

[Timmy]

Stop n frisk expansion is an affront to the constitution.

Constitution shouldn't change because you are in a rich neighborhood.

What in the Constitution prevents it? Guilliano reduced crime by a lot in NYC with it. Now it's back up with the socialist in charge.

Ya know . That whacky "unreasonable search " thing of in the bill o rights . The 4th I believe.

 

[Zoom-boing]

he should "target" liberal sedition.

And make them have a "LOSER" tattoo on their forehead

We'll just tell em it stands for liberal....

HA ha ha ha ha!

 

[Iceweasel]

Stop n frisk expansion is an affront to the constitution.

Constitution shouldn't change because you are in a rich neighborhood.

What in the Constitution prevents it? Guilliano reduced crime by a lot in NYC with it. Now it's back up with the socialist in charge.

Ya know . That whacky "unreasonable search " thing of in the bill o rights . The 4th I believe.

How is it unreasonable if they catch a lot of criminals that way?

 

[Katzndogz]

It worked and made the streets much safer.

 

[Timmy]

Stop n frisk expansion is an affront to the constitution.

Constitution shouldn't change because you are in a rich neighborhood.

What in the Constitution prevents it? Guilliano reduced crime by a lot in NYC with it. Now it's back up with the socialist in charge.

Ya know . That whacky "unreasonable search " thing of in the bill o rights . The 4th I believe.

How is it unreasonable if they catch a lot of criminals that way?

Because this is America . I'm sure the cops can catch everyone if they didn't need warrants or cause to search people and their things .

That's not the standard we live under .

 

[NYcarbineer]

It worked and made the streets much safer.

lol, so does the genocide of crazy cat people. Are you on board with that?

 

[rdean]

Stop n frisk expansion is an affront to the constitution.

Constitution shouldn't change because you are in a rich neighborhood.

What in the Constitution prevents it? Guilliano reduced crime by a lot in NYC with it. Now it's back up with the socialist in charge.

Ya know . That whacky "unreasonable search " thing of in the bill o rights . The 4th I believe.

How is it unreasonable if they catch a lot of criminals that way?

Do they catch a lot of criminal that way? Or do they make them?

 

[rdean]

It worked and made the streets much safer.

Did it? Are you sure?

 

[NYcarbineer]

I guess most people have missed Trump's pandering to the 'hands up don't shoot' crowd today?

 

[NYcarbineer]

It worked and made the streets much safer.

Did it? Are you sure?

She thinks that because everyone on her street fled that somehow translates into stop and frisk working.

 

[rdean]

Stop n frisk expansion is an affront to the constitution.

Constitution shouldn't change because you are in a rich neighborhood.

What in the Constitution prevents it? Guilliano reduced crime by a lot in NYC with it. Now it's back up with the socialist in charge.

Ya know . That whacky "unreasonable search " thing of in the bill o rights . The 4th I believe.

How is it unreasonable if they catch a lot of criminals that way?

Because this is America . I'm sure the cops can catch everyone if they didn't need warrants or cause to search people and their things .

That's not the standard we live under .

White wingers know they won't be targeted.

 

[NoNukes]

Stop n frisk expansion is an affront to the constitution.

Constitution shouldn't change because you are in a rich neighborhood.

What in the Constitution prevents it? Guilliano reduced crime by a lot in NYC with it. Now it's back up with the socialist in charge.

Giuliani took the credit from Braxton, and then fired Braxton when he complained. New York lost a lot of its' soul under Giuliani.

 

[B. Kidd]

Stop n frisk expansion is an affront to the constitution.

Constitution shouldn't change because you are in a rich neighborhood.

What in the Constitution prevents it? Guilliano reduced crime by a lot in NYC with it. Now it's back up with the socialist in charge.

Ya know . That whacky "unreasonable search " thing of in the bill o rights . The 4th I believe.

How is it unreasonable if they catch a lot of criminals that way?

And, of course, white 'wannabe gangsta's' and skinheads will be subjected to them, too. It also works, so no problemo..........