JQPublic1
Gold Member
- Aug 10, 2012
- 14,220
- 1,543
- 280
- Thread starter
- #81
It is a satirical narrative and display using the Frankenstein monster as a prop to get my message across; nothing more. Obviously it worked. You got caught up in it and can't let go. As the author and artist who produced the caricature you now know as Trumpenstein, I set the rules of what it is and I am the sole authority on divulging my intentions on producing it. Perhaps there is a resemblance to Shelly's monster but it isn't Shelly's monster. It; is TRUMPENSTEIN...a whole new monster brought to life under a whole new set of circumstances. Trumpenstein is REAL, Frankenstein was fiction!It's a reference to Frankenstein's monster, inherently, in name and design.You've given your irrelevant opinion, now scoot. Someone who isn't a Trump-Bot might be stimulated to action by my sig and thread. BTW Trumpenstein has no reference. It is an original..it IS the reference.You are correct that you're free to reference things incorrectly. Otherwise, your post is just drivel.Well, Trumpenstein is MY original invention and I reserve the right to post it as I see fit. My satirical invention has nothing to do with Mary Shelly's creation. I just borrowed an aspect of the name she used to draw attention to Trump's menacing presence on the political stage. Now, do you understand? Trump is far more dangerous than Frankenstein's monster///AGREED?..... Fred. His father's name was Fred.Well let's take it back to the author of the original novel, Mary Shelly. She named her classical novel, "Frankenstein."
Was the novel about Dr. Frankenstein or was it about the monster he created. To answer that I had to ponder the moral of the story. Shelly's message was meant to convey the perils of men delving into things reserved for God. From that perspective, it would seem her book was about the nefarious deeds of Dr. Frankenstein. Thereby she entitled it "Frankenstein." Ironically, The first name of Trump's father was Frank. Perhaps I should have named the Trump monster FrankenTrump. I will consider that in future renderings and discourse.
Still, the Trumpenstein theme resonates and is an apt name for describing the potential for what lies ahead. There is no doubt as to the message my sig and this thread sends!
Regardless of your message, the name is wrong. You're calling Trump a monster, and Frankenstein was not the monster. You can try to contort it all you like, but you still got it wrong. On the other hand, you could have called it "Trumpenstein's Monster" and I wouldn't have been able to nitpick your fear mongering.