Crepitus
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2018
- 79,621
- 84,110
- 3,615
A months long effort to use the power of his office to gain political benefit isn't evidence? There was much testimony to that effect. What else would you require?That's not evidence...That's more speculation and supposition.Not even mulvany's email withholding the aid 90 minutes after tRump's infamous phone call?2. Of course when President Obama returned Iran's money it was meant to influence the favorably to the deal. The difference is it was not for personal gain, it was for the good of the nation. President Obama gained nothing from the deal. The current *president* was not working for the good of the county, but for the good of himself.
There is not one, single, solitary shred of direct and verifiable evidence to back up that party man stooge talking point....Zero.
There's a pile of evidence and it keeps growing.
Your "pile" adds up to bupkis.