Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A 5 second blurp in a 3600 second fire driven inciting speech, obviously meant nothing, to the people there...
I recommend you not rely on McConnell as your reference for how Trump is defending his cases, then.
Yes, yes. You Democrats are so proud of yourselves for tumbling to the fact that lawyers and advocates make multiple arguments in defending against multiple attacks.Trump relied on McConnells interpretation that you can’t impeach after someone left office……It got him off
Now, his lawyers are claiming impeachment is the solution any time after a President has left office
Yes, yes. You Democrats are so proud of yourselves for tumbling to the fact that lawyers and advocates make multiple arguments in defending against multiple attacks.
Quote some of the words in that fire driven speech that were so inciting, specifically to do violence at the capitol.A 5 second blurp in a 3600 second fire driven inciting speech, obviously meant nothing, to the people there...
You mean by acting like lawyers?We are proud pointing out the rampant hypocrisy of Republicans
Sure. How’s Biden doing with that?Want to talk about filling Supreme Court vacancies?
You mean by acting like lawyers?
Sure. How’s Biden doing with that?
The answer is... YES.Judge Florence Pan started off her questioning of Trump lawyer John Sauer by offering a novel scenario.
“Could a president who ordered SEAL Team Six to assassinate a political rival and was not impeached, could he be subjected to criminal prosecution?” Pan asked.
After some back and forth, Sauer said, “Qualified yes, if he’s impeached and convicted first.”
Trump doubles down after DC hearing: ‘Most people agree that we’re entitled to immunity’ – as it happened
If the judges rule in favor of Trump, it could lead to the dropping of the criminal charges brought by special counsel Jack Smithwww.theguardian.com
This is not how democracies run. It is how imperial dictators run things. The US fought against this but perhaps the founders had not considered a trump when forming the constitution.
The answer is... YES.
...but thats why we have the 14th Amendment, just in case any president goes too far. You impeach him and then he is no longer immune from prosecution.
If presidents DONT have immunity, then we will bring Obama up on murder charges for executing a US citizen without a trial or jury. Obama murdered a 16 year old US citizen. I personally want him to have immunity for it, but democrats seem to think he should be fair game.
And ?The answer is... YES.
...but thats why we have the 14th Amendment, just in case any president goes too far. You impeach him and then he is no longer immune from prosecution.
If presidents DONT have immunity, then we will bring Obama up on murder charges for executing a US citizen without a trial or jury. Obama murdered a 16 year old US citizen. I personally want him to have immunity for it, but democrats seem to think he should be fair game for the GOP to go after.
That IS what will happen if Trump isnt immune. I mean, why WOULDNT we send him to prison for murder?If you can convince a Grand Jury that Obama or Bush committed criminal acts rather than acting in their role as President, you are welcome to do so. They are not above the law…..neither is Trump
That IS what will happen if Trump isnt immune. I mean, why WOULDNT we send him to prison for murder?
And this will not be good for our republic if every president gets charged for crimes by his successor, but we already know that you the US to fail.And ?
Whats to prove? Its not like he is denying it.Again, if you can prove a criminal act against Obama, you are welcome to try.
Meanwhile, it is Trump facing 91 felony charges
That IS what will happen if Trump isnt immune. I mean, why WOULDNT we send him to prison for murder?
Trump is going to be just fine. Unlike Obama (who thought he had immunity, so he never pardoned himself), Trump will be able to pardon himself after he is reelected.Go for it. Him and Trump can share a cell
Whats to prove? Its not like he is denying it.
Because dimocrap scum are stupid, I will explain it to you...... Assassinating a Political Rival is outside the scope of "Official Duties". So is walking up to a stranger and shooting him in the head.
So, no. There is no immunity.
It was a stupid question from a stupid dimocrap scumbag anyway. Figures other stupid dimocrap scum would seize on it.
When Presidents assassinate people, and yes, Virginia, they do. They almost always consult with Congress first. Unless it's during a time of conflict in which Congress has given POTUS an AUMF (authorization to use military force).
Such a stupid question from a stupid Judge that I knew stupid people would seize on.
We live in an Idiocracy. Scary that so many people are so stupid...... And we give them the right to vote. frightening
Don't know for sure which one it will be, but a Republican WILL be POTUS in one year and 10 days.
its Trump's lawyers clamoring for trump's immunity.
You're avoiding the point.lol…you all are reading waaaaay too much into this. It was a hypothetical…nobody is suggesting he would actually do that.
Again, this isn’t trump talking, it’s his lawyer…
