Trump's pending Impeachment

[Wry Catcher]

What goes around comes around. President Clinton was impeached for misleading a grand jury about sexual peccadilloes; Four*** of those (at least) who voted to impeach the Pres. later resigned for more egregious sexual activities.

Washingtonpost.com Special Report: Clinton Accused

Gingrich, Hyde, Livingston, Foley

Now, before the investigation of Trump's possible obstruction of the inquiry into Russia's effort to impact the election of Nov. 2016, an effort is being made to obstruct this effort by Trump's surrogates, and even his attorney's, press Sect's and members of his administration who have not been forth coming. The AG of the US clearly mislead the Congress when under oath he said I can't remember and other words to that effect doznes of times during six hours of testimony.

Any entity can conduct an investigation.. They can investigate a ham sandwich for Christ's sake.
Comey was fired by the POTUS. POTUS has absolute discretion to do so.
This investigation is going to lead to nothing.
But.....if it makes you orgasmic, so be it.

Why do you believe the investigation will lead to nothing?

Because if there were anything he would already have been impeached. All you have are the masterbatory fantasy's of progressive "newspeople" who have been feeding dimwits, like you, bull poo so that you will keep buying their crappy newspapers.

Once again you've posted an ad hominem. Time will tell who, if anyone, conspired with the Russian's to influence our elections and or made promises to mitigate or repeal the sanctions imposed on Russia by President Obama.

Your first sentence is nothing but a wish on your part, framed in ignorance. An investigation is in process, or will begin shortly; until a final report is issued, you and I have no idea as to the final outcome.

We're still waiting for evidence.

"We're still waiting for evidence"

You are? It seems evidence is the last thing Trump supporters seek. If you are waiting for evidence, be patient, an investigation is on going; the goal of every investigation is to find evidence which supports an indictment, or impeachment, or exculpatory evidence leading to clearing the name of those who were investigated.

The hypocrisy on the Right is infectious, this thread has created denial on steroids with not one tiny iota of evidence to exculpate anyone, including The President, of wrong doing.

 

[Rustic]

What goes around comes around. President Clinton was impeached for misleading a grand jury about sexual peccadilloes; Four*** of those (at least) who voted to impeach the Pres. later resigned for more egregious sexual activities.

Washingtonpost.com Special Report: Clinton Accused

Gingrich, Hyde, Livingston, Foley

Now, before the investigation of Trump's possible obstruction of the inquiry into Russia's effort to impact the election of Nov. 2016, an effort is being made to obstruct this effort by Trump's surrogates, and even his attorney's, press Sect's and members of his administration who have not been forth coming. The AG of the US clearly mislead the Congress when under oath he said I can't remember and other words to that effect doznes of times during six hours of testimony.

 

[PredFan]

What goes around comes around. President Clinton was impeached for misleading a grand jury about sexual peccadilloes; Four*** of those (at least) who voted to impeach the Pres. later resigned for more egregious sexual activities.

Washingtonpost.com Special Report: Clinton Accused

Gingrich, Hyde, Livingston, Foley

Now, before the investigation of Trump's possible obstruction of the inquiry into Russia's effort to impact the election of Nov. 2016, an effort is being made to obstruct this effort by Trump's surrogates, and even his attorney's, press Sect's and members of his administration who have not been forth coming. The AG of the US clearly mislead the Congress when under oath he said I can't remember and other words to that effect doznes of times during six hours of testimony.

 

[Iceweasel]

Come on guys, Wry took a half bottle of Viagra to get this thread going.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Is that the one with US dates instead of UK dates? Or is this a newly revised fake version after finding out the problems with the previous fake versions?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Why do you believe the investigation will lead to nothing?

It's been investigated for over half a year with DC leaking like a sieve. That doesn't speak to you and it also explains your problem.

You are a dishonest jerk and a partisan hack of embarrassing proportions:

• How long did the birthers whine about President Obama's legitimacy?
• How long did the Solyndra whine last, and that had zero impact our nations security
• HRC's e-mail might have been embarrassing, but no harm has been proved by anything hacked
• How many hearings on Benghazi, HRC and Obama did not fire a shot and no one knows what motivated the attack (other than nearly 100 years of Western Imperialism in the ME).

You're disgusting, deplorable and (intentionally) demented.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Is that the one with US dates instead of UK dates? Or is this a newly revised fake version after finding out the problems with the previous fake versions?

One more example and evidence of why the RWer's are both incompetent and dishonest. Seems their ethos mirror those of Trump.

 

[Iceweasel]

Why do you believe the investigation will lead to nothing?

It's been investigated for over half a year with DC leaking like a sieve. That doesn't speak to you and it also explains your problem.

You are a dishonest jerk and a partisan hack of embarrassing proportions:

• How long did the birthers whine about President Obama's legitimacy?
• How long did the Solyndra whine last, and that had zero impact our nations security
• HRC's e-mail might have been embarrassing, but no harm has been proved by anything hacked
• How many hearings on Benghazi, HRC and Obama did not fire a shot and no one knows what motivated the attack (other than nearly 100 years of Western Imperialism in the ME).

You're disgusting, deplorable and (intentionally) demented.

WTF does that have to do with anything I just said?

As far as Benghazi we know full well (no thanks to the former admin.) what motivated them. It was NOT the lie they put out to get Obama re-elected, it WAS terrorism. The fucked up the entire thing and it would have been very bad press at a critical time just before the elections.

On the plus side it sparked the hearings and that's how we found out about Hilly's email/server corruption so that may have cost her the election. Being the lying jackasses the left is they, to this day, are trying desperately to pin it on some other country.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Why do you believe the investigation will lead to nothing?

It's been investigated for over half a year with DC leaking like a sieve. That doesn't speak to you and it also explains your problem.

You are a dishonest jerk and a partisan hack of embarrassing proportions:

• How long did the birthers whine about President Obama's legitimacy?
• How long did the Solyndra whine last, and that had zero impact our nations security
• HRC's e-mail might have been embarrassing, but no harm has been proved by anything hacked
• How many hearings on Benghazi, HRC and Obama did not fire a shot and no one knows what motivated the attack (other than nearly 100 years of Western Imperialism in the ME).

You're disgusting, deplorable and (intentionally) demented.

WTF does that have to do with anything I just said?

As far as Benghazi we know full well (no thanks to the former admin.) what motivated them. It was NOT the lie they put out to get Obama re-elected, it WAS terrorism. The fucked up the entire thing and it would have been very bad press at a critical time just before the elections.

On the plus side it sparked the hearings and that's how we found out about Hilly's email/server corruption so that may have cost her the election. Being the lying jackasses the left is they, to this day, are trying desperately to pin it on some other country.

You don't know what motivated the attackers, so don't pretend you do. Doing so only proves what I know, you are a damn liar.

 

[bripat9643]

What goes around comes around. President Clinton was impeached for misleading a grand jury about sexual peccadilloes; Four*** of those (at least) who voted to impeach the Pres. later resigned for more egregious sexual activities.

Washingtonpost.com Special Report: Clinton Accused

Gingrich, Hyde, Livingston, Foley

Now, before the investigation of Trump's possible obstruction of the inquiry into Russia's effort to impact the election of Nov. 2016, an effort is being made to obstruct this effort by Trump's surrogates, and even his attorney's, press Sect's and members of his administration who have not been forth coming. The AG of the US clearly mislead the Congress when under oath he said I can't remember and other words to that effect doznes of times during six hours of testimony.

OH BOY! Leftist masturbatory fantasy. Even Comey said Trump never tried to imped the Russia hacking investigation. You pathetic little snowflakes just can't seem to keep all the balls you have in the air straight in your tinfoil hat heads.


.

"Even Comey", not the best defense, we will see what the special investigator comes up with, and Russia is not the only issue which may lead to high crimes and or a misdemeanor on the part of President Trump.

So you admit the job of the independent counsel is to find anything Democrats can use to impeach Trump?

LOL, you truly are stupid. if all you have is a Straw Man why bother to post?

That's not a straw man. That's exactly what you said, dumbass.

 

[bripat9643]

Any entity can conduct an investigation.. They can investigate a ham sandwich for Christ's sake.
Comey was fired by the POTUS. POTUS has absolute discretion to do so.
This investigation is going to lead to nothing.
But.....if it makes you orgasmic, so be it.

Why do you believe the investigation will lead to nothing?

Because if there were anything he would already have been impeached. All you have are the masterbatory fantasy's of progressive "newspeople" who have been feeding dimwits, like you, bull poo so that you will keep buying their crappy newspapers.

Once again you've posted an ad hominem. Time will tell who, if anyone, conspired with the Russian's to influence our elections and or made promises to mitigate or repeal the sanctions imposed on Russia by President Obama.

Your first sentence is nothing but a wish on your part, framed in ignorance. An investigation is in process, or will begin shortly; until a final report is issued, you and I have no idea as to the final outcome.

We're still waiting for evidence.

"We're still waiting for evidence"

You are? It seems evidence is the last thing Trump supporters seek. If you are waiting for evidence, be patient, an investigation is on going; the goal of every investigation is to find evidence which supports an indictment, or impeachment, or exculpatory evidence leading to clearing the name of those who were investigated.

The hypocrisy on the Right is infectious, this thread has created denial on steroids with not one tiny iota of evidence to exculpate anyone, including The President, of wrong doing.

In other words, you still don't have a shred of evidence.

 

[postman]

As far as Benghazi we know full well (no thanks to the former admin.) what motivated them. It was NOT the lie they put out to get Obama re-elected, it WAS terrorism. The fucked up the entire thing and it would have been very bad press at a critical time just before the elections.
.

I believe within 48 hours, they released that Benghazi was a terrorist act.

Then republicans spent the next two years arguing about those two days.

 

[S.J.]

As far as Benghazi we know full well (no thanks to the former admin.) what motivated them. It was NOT the lie they put out to get Obama re-elected, it WAS terrorism. The fucked up the entire thing and it would have been very bad press at a critical time just before the elections.
.

I believe within 48 hours, they released that Benghazi was a terrorist act.

Then republicans spent the next two years arguing about those two days.

Then why did Obama go in front of the U.N. 14 days later and blame it on the video?

 

[westwall]

Any entity can conduct an investigation.. They can investigate a ham sandwich for Christ's sake.
Comey was fired by the POTUS. POTUS has absolute discretion to do so.
This investigation is going to lead to nothing.
But.....if it makes you orgasmic, so be it.

Why do you believe the investigation will lead to nothing?

Because if there were anything he would already have been impeached. All you have are the masterbatory fantasy's of progressive "newspeople" who have been feeding dimwits, like you, bull poo so that you will keep buying their crappy newspapers.

Once again you've posted an ad hominem. Time will tell who, if anyone, conspired with the Russian's to influence our elections and or made promises to mitigate or repeal the sanctions imposed on Russia by President Obama.

Your first sentence is nothing but a wish on your part, framed in ignorance. An investigation is in process, or will begin shortly; until a final report is issued, you and I have no idea as to the final outcome.

We're still waiting for evidence.

"We're still waiting for evidence"

You are? It seems evidence is the last thing Trump supporters seek. If you are waiting for evidence, be patient, an investigation is on going; the goal of every investigation is to find evidence which supports an indictment, or impeachment, or exculpatory evidence leading to clearing the name of those who were investigated.

The hypocrisy on the Right is infectious, this thread has created denial on steroids with not one tiny iota of evidence to exculpate anyone, including The President, of wrong doing.

Yeah, we are. So far we have comey testifying to congress that pretty much everything that the NYT has been printing was shit. And that seems to be the extent of your "evidence".

 

[westwall]

As far as Benghazi we know full well (no thanks to the former admin.) what motivated them. It was NOT the lie they put out to get Obama re-elected, it WAS terrorism. The fucked up the entire thing and it would have been very bad press at a critical time just before the elections.
.

I believe within 48 hours, they released that Benghazi was a terrorist act.

Then republicans spent the next two years arguing about those two days.

You "believe" incorrectly. Rice was out on the various talking heads shows for over a week lying to the world.

 

[bripat9643]

As far as Benghazi we know full well (no thanks to the former admin.) what motivated them. It was NOT the lie they put out to get Obama re-elected, it WAS terrorism. The fucked up the entire thing and it would have been very bad press at a critical time just before the elections.
.

I believe within 48 hours, they released that Benghazi was a terrorist act.

Then republicans spent the next two years arguing about those two days.

They "released" it? You mean their lie was exposed within 48 hours.

 

[postman]

Then why did Obama go in front of the U.N. 14 days later and blame it on the video?

That's a lie. Here's part of the UN transcript

“That is what we saw play out in the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world,” he said.

“I know there are some who ask why we don’t just ban such a video,” said Obama. “The answer is enshrined in our laws: our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech.

“Here in the United States, countless publications provoke offense,” said the president.

Nowhere does he blame the video for Benghazi

 

[postman]

Remarks by the President to the UN General Assembly

Here's what Obama told the UN on September 25th.

Show me where he blames Benghazi on the video.

Oops....... Obama doesn't say anything like that.

 

[westwall]

[QUOTE="S.J., post: 17544101, member: 41356
Then why did Obama go in front of the U.N. 14 days later and blame it on the video?

That's a lie. Here's part of the UN transcript

“That is what we saw play out in the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world,” he said.

“I know there are some who ask why we don’t just ban such a video,” said Obama. “The answer is enshrined in our laws: our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech.

“Here in the United States, countless publications provoke offense,” said the president.

Nowhere does he blame the video for Benghazi[/QUOTE]








I guess you don't understand English. The operative sentence is here,

"as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world,"

which while not mentioning Benghazi specifically, blames the video for violence which we know was completely untrue EVERYWHERE. The video was responsible for nothing that occurred in the Middle East. obummer continued with his lie that the video was responsible for protests which we know to be absolutely false.

 

[bripat9643]

That's a lie. Here's part of the UN transcript

“That is what we saw play out in the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world,” he said.

“I know there are some who ask why we don’t just ban such a video,” said Obama. “The answer is enshrined in our laws: our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech.

“Here in the United States, countless publications provoke offense,” said the president.

Nowhere does he blame the video for Benghazi

ROFL! You are a fucking idiot. What do you think he's doing here if not blaming it on a video?

“That is what we saw play out in the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world,” he said.​