Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, if you on your side of the aisle, ever manage to nominate a candidate against the wishes of your corporate approved leadership, and he/she addresses these issues, AS YOU SEE FIT, ie (focusing on corporations and employers)
know that I will listen and I will be interested.
I don't have a side of the aisle.
I like that we have established that we have the same goal, ie the best interests of the American people, both as a group and individually.
Not everyone is on that page. But we are. Let's keep that in mind.
Just wondering, do you think that I am on that page?
Your "adapt or die" comment shows that you, at best,, do not care about the interests of at least some Americans.
Actually, it shows the opposite. Wanting people to adapt and not just wait for the government to save them is looking out for their best interest. Call it though love!
I don't have a side of the aisle.
I like that we have established that we have the same goal, ie the best interests of the American people, both as a group and individually.
Not everyone is on that page. But we are. Let's keep that in mind.
Just wondering, do you think that I am on that page?
Your "adapt or die" comment shows that you, at best,, do not care about the interests of at least some Americans.
Actually, it shows the opposite. Wanting people to adapt and not just wait for the government to save them is looking out for their best interest. Call it though love!
Saying that they can "die" is not looking out for their interests. It is dismissing them.
Dishonest? I think you just don’t like the game. I think the best trade policy is free trade. It’s determined by the traders, not the government. You seem to think big gov is better at determining trade. I disagree.You seem to want government managed trade. That isn’t capitalism. Much more socialism. Do you believe in markets?Are you not a capitalist?There may be exceptions. The question was very broad. But if we prop up industries that we aren’t good at, we will just fall behind. Are you not a capitalist?
Gator was talking about people. "Adapt or die", is what he said.
Yes, but why do you ask?
Pretending that the choices are trade without any government trade policy, or "government managed trade", is something an anarchist would do.
A very dishonest anarchist.
Meanwhile in the real world, this thread is about Trade Policy. And no serious person would be pretending that the idea of trade policy is not legitimate in a capitalist system.
So, why you playing such a dishonest game?
He cares about long term interests.No. We have done it Trump's way for decades. I'm not interested.
Well, if you on your side of the aisle, ever manage to nominate a candidate against the wishes of your corporate approved leadership, and he/she addresses these issues, AS YOU SEE FIT, ie (focusing on corporations and employers)
know that I will listen and I will be interested.
I don't have a side of the aisle.
I like that we have established that we have the same goal, ie the best interests of the American people, both as a group and individually.
Not everyone is on that page. But we are. Let's keep that in mind.
Just wondering, do you think that I am on that page?
Your "adapt or die" comment shows that you, at best,, do not care about the interests of at least some Americans.
Die is a bit extreme, but it is in their long term interest to change and adapt.I don't have a side of the aisle.
I like that we have established that we have the same goal, ie the best interests of the American people, both as a group and individually.
Not everyone is on that page. But we are. Let's keep that in mind.
Just wondering, do you think that I am on that page?
Your "adapt or die" comment shows that you, at best,, do not care about the interests of at least some Americans.
Actually, it shows the opposite. Wanting people to adapt and not just wait for the government to save them is looking out for their best interest. Call it though love!
Saying that they can "die" is not looking out for their interests. It is dismissing them.
Die is a bit extreme, but it is in their long term interest to change and adapt.I like that we have established that we have the same goal, ie the best interests of the American people, both as a group and individually.
Not everyone is on that page. But we are. Let's keep that in mind.
Just wondering, do you think that I am on that page?
Your "adapt or die" comment shows that you, at best,, do not care about the interests of at least some Americans.
Actually, it shows the opposite. Wanting people to adapt and not just wait for the government to save them is looking out for their best interest. Call it though love!
Saying that they can "die" is not looking out for their interests. It is dismissing them.
Getting a job that is more productive is. There is no long term success in propping up a business that can't compete.Die is a bit extreme, but it is in their long term interest to change and adapt.Just wondering, do you think that I am on that page?
Your "adapt or die" comment shows that you, at best,, do not care about the interests of at least some Americans.
Actually, it shows the opposite. Wanting people to adapt and not just wait for the government to save them is looking out for their best interest. Call it though love!
Saying that they can "die" is not looking out for their interests. It is dismissing them.
Accepting a $9.00 and hour job to replace the $20 an hour job that went overseas so that someone that never created anything can get a better return is not in the countries best interest.
Getting a job that is more productive is. There is no long term success in propping up a business that can't compete.Die is a bit extreme, but it is in their long term interest to change and adapt.Your "adapt or die" comment shows that you, at best,, do not care about the interests of at least some Americans.
Actually, it shows the opposite. Wanting people to adapt and not just wait for the government to save them is looking out for their best interest. Call it though love!
Saying that they can "die" is not looking out for their interests. It is dismissing them.
Accepting a $9.00 and hour job to replace the $20 an hour job that went overseas so that someone that never created anything can get a better return is not in the countries best interest.
maybe Trump needs to lock up all the progressives and this stuff would stop.This is not something the government is good at. Trump policy was supposed to strengthen steel. But what has actually happened? US Steels stock has dropped like 80%.
U.S. Steel plans to lay off hundreds of workers in Michigan - Reuters
United States Steel Corp will temporarily lay off hundreds of workers at its Great Lakes facility in Michigan in coming weeks, according to a filing the steelmaker made with the State of Michigan.
Capitalists will always look for the most profit.Getting a job that is more productive is. There is no long term success in propping up a business that can't compete.Die is a bit extreme, but it is in their long term interest to change and adapt.Actually, it shows the opposite. Wanting people to adapt and not just wait for the government to save them is looking out for their best interest. Call it though love!
Saying that they can "die" is not looking out for their interests. It is dismissing them.
Accepting a $9.00 and hour job to replace the $20 an hour job that went overseas so that someone that never created anything can get a better return is not in the countries best interest.
They can compete. "Shareholders" simply are not satisfied with their returns. It always has to be more, more, more.
They aren't responsible for trump policy, though he sure spends like a progressive.maybe Trump needs to lock up all the progressives and this stuff would stop.This is not something the government is good at. Trump policy was supposed to strengthen steel. But what has actually happened? US Steels stock has dropped like 80%.
U.S. Steel plans to lay off hundreds of workers in Michigan - Reuters
United States Steel Corp will temporarily lay off hundreds of workers at its Great Lakes facility in Michigan in coming weeks, according to a filing the steelmaker made with the State of Michigan.
Of course they aren't, they are responsible for impeding Trump's policy, liar.They aren't responsible for trump policy, though he sure spends like a progressive.maybe Trump needs to lock up all the progressives and this stuff would stop.This is not something the government is good at. Trump policy was supposed to strengthen steel. But what has actually happened? US Steels stock has dropped like 80%.
U.S. Steel plans to lay off hundreds of workers in Michigan - Reuters
United States Steel Corp will temporarily lay off hundreds of workers at its Great Lakes facility in Michigan in coming weeks, according to a filing the steelmaker made with the State of Michigan.
Trump did his steel tariffs. The result isn't good. They should have impeded more it seems.Of course they aren't, they are responsible for impeding Trump's policy, liar.They aren't responsible for trump policy, though he sure spends like a progressive.maybe Trump needs to lock up all the progressives and this stuff would stop.This is not something the government is good at. Trump policy was supposed to strengthen steel. But what has actually happened? US Steels stock has dropped like 80%.
U.S. Steel plans to lay off hundreds of workers in Michigan - Reuters
United States Steel Corp will temporarily lay off hundreds of workers at its Great Lakes facility in Michigan in coming weeks, according to a filing the steelmaker made with the State of Michigan.
lol....you don't know jack except what the media enema supplies you.Trump did his steel tariffs. The result isn't good. They should have impeded more it seems.Of course they aren't, they are responsible for impeding Trump's policy, liar.They aren't responsible for trump policy, though he sure spends like a progressive.maybe Trump needs to lock up all the progressives and this stuff would stop.This is not something the government is good at. Trump policy was supposed to strengthen steel. But what has actually happened? US Steels stock has dropped like 80%.
U.S. Steel plans to lay off hundreds of workers in Michigan - Reuters
United States Steel Corp will temporarily lay off hundreds of workers at its Great Lakes facility in Michigan in coming weeks, according to a filing the steelmaker made with the State of Michigan.
I know the US Steel stock has plummeted and they are laying off workers. That must be our idea of success.lol....you don't know jack except what the media enema supplies you.Trump did his steel tariffs. The result isn't good. They should have impeded more it seems.Of course they aren't, they are responsible for impeding Trump's policy, liar.They aren't responsible for trump policy, though he sure spends like a progressive.maybe Trump needs to lock up all the progressives and this stuff would stop.This is not something the government is good at. Trump policy was supposed to strengthen steel. But what has actually happened? US Steels stock has dropped like 80%.
U.S. Steel plans to lay off hundreds of workers in Michigan - Reuters
United States Steel Corp will temporarily lay off hundreds of workers at its Great Lakes facility in Michigan in coming weeks, according to a filing the steelmaker made with the State of Michigan.
I like that we have established that we have the same goal, ie the best interests of the American people, both as a group and individually.
Not everyone is on that page. But we are. Let's keep that in mind.
Just wondering, do you think that I am on that page?
Your "adapt or die" comment shows that you, at best,, do not care about the interests of at least some Americans.
Actually, it shows the opposite. Wanting people to adapt and not just wait for the government to save them is looking out for their best interest. Call it though love!
Saying that they can "die" is not looking out for their interests. It is dismissing them.
It is just an expression, I thought we covered that.
Dishonest? I think you just don’t like the game. I think the best trade policy is free trade. It’s determined by the traders, not the government. You seem to think big gov is better at determining trade. I disagree.You seem to want government managed trade. That isn’t capitalism. Much more socialism. Do you believe in markets?Are you not a capitalist?Gator was talking about people. "Adapt or die", is what he said.
Yes, but why do you ask?
Pretending that the choices are trade without any government trade policy, or "government managed trade", is something an anarchist would do.
A very dishonest anarchist.
Meanwhile in the real world, this thread is about Trade Policy. And no serious person would be pretending that the idea of trade policy is not legitimate in a capitalist system.
So, why you playing such a dishonest game?
He cares about long term interests.Well, if you on your side of the aisle, ever manage to nominate a candidate against the wishes of your corporate approved leadership, and he/she addresses these issues, AS YOU SEE FIT, ie (focusing on corporations and employers)
know that I will listen and I will be interested.
I don't have a side of the aisle.
I like that we have established that we have the same goal, ie the best interests of the American people, both as a group and individually.
Not everyone is on that page. But we are. Let's keep that in mind.
Just wondering, do you think that I am on that page?
Your "adapt or die" comment shows that you, at best,, do not care about the interests of at least some Americans.
Die is a bit extreme, but it is in their long term interest to change and adapt.I like that we have established that we have the same goal, ie the best interests of the American people, both as a group and individually.
Not everyone is on that page. But we are. Let's keep that in mind.
Just wondering, do you think that I am on that page?
Your "adapt or die" comment shows that you, at best,, do not care about the interests of at least some Americans.
Actually, it shows the opposite. Wanting people to adapt and not just wait for the government to save them is looking out for their best interest. Call it though love!
Saying that they can "die" is not looking out for their interests. It is dismissing them.
