Rigby5
Diamond Member
An act of war? The pipeline is located in international waters and you have zero proof we had anything to do with it.
Who else was trying to prevent Russia from selling gas and oil, except the US?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
An act of war? The pipeline is located in international waters and you have zero proof we had anything to do with it.
Wow...you're a pro Russian piece of shit...ain't ya
Newsflash...Germany is not at war with Russia
NewsflashNews flash, the US is committing acts of war against Russia.
Even economic sanctions on civilian goods is an act of war.
So obviously the most likely suspect is the US.
The US is trying to make Russia go broke by not allowing it to sell oil and gas.
The US made no such demands and those sanctions are legalThat is silly.
The US was demanding everyone else obey the illegal economic sanctions against Russian gas and oil.
And Germany can't do that, it would be too expensive.
They need Russian gas.
So they were buying it secretly.
The US likely found out, so then blew up the pipeline.
Why would it take years?
If I had a choice between Russians, Democrats or Republicans, Russians would be my last choice. But I couldn't reasonably turn down a vodka martini now could I?Wrong.
I have been pro-Russia since Castro, Vietnam, Korea, etc.
Russia got nothing out of helping those countries that the US was trying to force dictators on.
Its pretty clear that Russia has always been the good guy because they don't need colonial imperialism to make profits, the US does.
Newsflash
Rigby is a Russian troll
If I had a choice between Russians, Democrats or Republicans, Russians would be my last choice. But I couldn't reasonably turn down a vodka martini now could I?
Thank you Putin's Dog. We value your (his) opinionOf course I like Russia.
When the police were beating us up in the US when we protested the illegal mass murder we were committing in Vietnam, the only countries helping were Russia and China.
Are you saying the US was not evil for preventing elections in Vietnam and installing dictators like Diem instead>
Face facts, Russia has always been the "good guy" relative to the US.
We never prevented elections there. The war was legalOf course I like Russia.
When the police were beating us up in the US when we protested the illegal mass murder we were committing in Vietnam, the only countries helping were Russia and China.
Are you saying the US was not evil for preventing elections in Vietnam and installing dictators like Diem instead>
Face facts, Russia has always been the "good guy" relative to the US.
One of certainly, for a lot of its historyWe never prevented elections there. The war was legal
Russia was always the most evil nations in History.
The US made no such demands and those sanctions are legal
Is Putin's Dog still yapping?Wrong.
First of all, the US went after international banking, which prevents any country from using currency to buy Russian good. That is extortion.
{...
First, we have targeted Russia’s financial sector and key sources of revenue that sustain President Putin’s war machine. We’ve sanctioned Russia’s largest financial institutions and major state investment funds, and our partners in Europe have removed many of these banks from the SWIFT system that is critical to cross-border payments. By working with our partners, we’ve been able to immobilize a substantial part of the hard currency reserves of the Central Bank of Russia.
...}
Second is that economic sanctions harm individuals in Russia, who have nothing at all to do with government, and that clearly is completely illegal.
The fact economic sanctions are illegal goes back to the 1906 Geneva Conventions against starving out cities.
The US actions are also blatantly illegal because they are deliberately harming the inherent rights of individuals, and that is only legal after a legal trial.
Russia has not been found guilty of anything.
And the US won't let it be investigated by the UN, because then it is the US who would be found guilty.
Beijing Biden blew it up. Once this is all brought into the open, lefties will stop covering for biden and will pivot to defending why Biden did it.That's why Tucker Carlson is one of the best journalists in the US today! He is not afraid of telling it how it is!
Tucker Carlson: Tony Blinken's Statement Is an Admission the US Was Behind Nord Stream Pipeline Bombings (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Aerial view of blown Nord Stream pipeline near Bornholm Island.www.thegatewaypundit.com
We never prevented elections there. The war was legal
Russia was always the most evil nations in History.
One of certainly, for a lot of its history
They are not illegal.Wrong.
First of all, the US went after international banking, which prevents any country from using currency to buy Russian good. That is extortion.
{...
First, we have targeted Russia’s financial sector and key sources of revenue that sustain President Putin’s war machine. We’ve sanctioned Russia’s largest financial institutions and major state investment funds, and our partners in Europe have removed many of these banks from the SWIFT system that is critical to cross-border payments. By working with our partners, we’ve been able to immobilize a substantial part of the hard currency reserves of the Central Bank of Russia.
...}
Second is that economic sanctions harm individuals in Russia, who have nothing at all to do with government, and that clearly is completely illegal.
The fact economic sanctions are illegal goes back to the 1906 Geneva Conventions against starving out cities.
The US actions are also blatantly illegal because they are deliberately harming the inherent rights of individuals, and that is only legal after a legal trial.
Russia has not been found guilty of anything.
And the US won't let it be investigated by the UN, because then it is the US who would be found guilty.
Massacered twenty million people under the communist regimeName something "evil" Russia ever did?
Yes we had nothing to do with that and Minh siezed power then launched a warAre you just ignorant or lying?
There was supposed to a nation wide plebiscite in Vietnam in 1955.
It never happened because the US bribed Diem into a military coup, deposing Bau Dai, the legal representative of South Vietnam.
No elections were ever held in Vietnam until after we were defeated and forced out.
{...
The partition of Vietnam by the Geneva Accords was not intended to be permanent, and stipulated that Vietnam would be reunited after the elections.[115] But in 1955, the southern State of Vietnam's prime minister, Ngô Đình Diệm, toppled Bảo Đại in a fraudulent referendum organised by his brother Ngô Đình Nhu, and proclaimed himself president of the Republic of Vietnam.[115] This effectively replaced the internationally recognised State of Vietnam by the Republic of Vietnam in the south—supported by the United States, ...—and Hồ's Democratic Republic of Vietnam in the north, ....[115]
...}
Vietnam - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
And Eisenhower is on record admitting that we prevented elections in Vietnam because obviously Ho Chi Minh was going to win, by an extremely wide margin, practically unanimous.
There is no record of Ike saying thatAre you just ignorant or lying?
There was supposed to a nation wide plebiscite in Vietnam in 1955.
It never happened because the US bribed Diem into a military coup, deposing Bau Dai, the legal representative of South Vietnam.
No elections were ever held in Vietnam until after we were defeated and forced out.
{...
The partition of Vietnam by the Geneva Accords was not intended to be permanent, and stipulated that Vietnam would be reunited after the elections.[115] But in 1955, the southern State of Vietnam's prime minister, Ngô Đình Diệm, toppled Bảo Đại in a fraudulent referendum organised by his brother Ngô Đình Nhu, and proclaimed himself president of the Republic of Vietnam.[115] This effectively replaced the internationally recognised State of Vietnam by the Republic of Vietnam in the south—supported by the United States, ...—and Hồ's Democratic Republic of Vietnam in the north, ....[115]
...}
Vietnam - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
And Eisenhower is on record admitting that we prevented elections in Vietnam because obviously Ho Chi Minh was going to win, by an extremely wide margin, practically unanimous.