Twitter bans big Trump supporter, Bill Mitchell

[asaratis]

In keeping with Twitter's bias against our President and blatant support of a socialistic government, Bill Mitchell has been permanently suspended. Is @DonaldTrump next?

@Jack permanently suspends Big Trump supporter Bill Mitchell prior to the election

One of President Trump’s biggest supporters, Bill Mitchell, a user with a national presence, was permanently suspended. “[Mitchell] has been permanently suspended for violating the Twitter Rules by using one account to evade the suspension of another account,” a Twitter spokesperson said in an...

www.independentsentinel.com

 

[BULLDOG]

Interesting that Trump supporters have such a hard time staying within the rules. Makes sense. Trump never had to follow any rules, so his supporters don't want to either.

 

[asaratis]

Interesting that Trump supporters have such a hard time staying within the rules. Makes sense. Trump never had to follow any rules, so his supporters don't want to either.

Yea, right! You never hear about the liberal assholes that break the same "rules" and get a pass. Hate speech is an arbitrarily judged subjective issue. Moderator bias prevails at Twitter...just the same as it does on any moderated social media.

I left Twitter when they insisted I delete two posts that they deemed offensive to Muslims. I told them I intended to be offensive to RADICAL Muslims only, as was specified in both tweets. I also told them to go fuck themselves. My Muslim friends agreed with me.

 

[BULLDOG]

Interesting that Trump supporters have such a hard time staying within the rules. Makes sense. Trump never had to follow any rules, so his supporters don't want to either.

Yea, right! You never hear about the liberal assholes that break the same "rules" and get a pass. Hate speech is an arbitrarily judged subjective issue. Moderator bias prevails at Twitter...just the same as it does on any moderated social media.

I left Twitter when they insisted I delete two posts that they deemed offensive to Muslims. I told them I intended to be offensive to RADICAL Muslims only, as was specified in both tweets. I also told them to go fuck themselves. My Muslim friends agreed with me.

So you spouted some crap as you went out the door. You really showed them up, didn't you?

 

[bluzman61]

In keeping with Twitter's bias against our President and blatant support of a socialistic government, Bill Mitchell has been permanently suspended. Is @DonaldTrump next?

@Jack permanently suspends Big Trump supporter Bill Mitchell prior to the election

One of President Trump’s biggest supporters, Bill Mitchell, a user with a national presence, was permanently suspended. “[Mitchell] has been permanently suspended for violating the Twitter Rules by using one account to evade the suspension of another account,” a Twitter spokesperson said in an...

www.independentsentinel.com

Mitchell is an intelligent guy that always speaks the truth. Twatter, of course, can't handle the truth. Very sad.

 

[jackflash]

In keeping with Twitter's bias against our President and blatant support of a socialistic government, Bill Mitchell has been permanently suspended. Is @DonaldTrump next?

@Jack permanently suspends Big Trump supporter Bill Mitchell prior to the election

One of President Trump’s biggest supporters, Bill Mitchell, a user with a national presence, was permanently suspended. “[Mitchell] has been permanently suspended for violating the Twitter Rules by using one account to evade the suspension of another account,” a Twitter spokesperson said in an...

www.independentsentinel.com

Other than YouTube I terminated ALL my social networking sites loooong ago!

 

[asaratis]

Interesting that Trump supporters have such a hard time staying within the rules. Makes sense. Trump never had to follow any rules, so his supporters don't want to either.

Yea, right! You never hear about the liberal assholes that break the same "rules" and get a pass. Hate speech is an arbitrarily judged subjective issue. Moderator bias prevails at Twitter...just the same as it does on any moderated social media.

I left Twitter when they insisted I delete two posts that they deemed offensive to Muslims. I told them I intended to be offensive to RADICAL Muslims only, as was specified in both tweets. I also told them to go fuck themselves. My Muslim friends agreed with me.

So you spouted some crap as you went out the door. You really showed them up, didn't you?

No. My communications with them were by email, not tweets. Since then, they've sent several emails requesting that I rejoin them.

 

[asaratis]

In keeping with Twitter's bias against our President and blatant support of a socialistic government, Bill Mitchell has been permanently suspended. Is @DonaldTrump next?

@Jack permanently suspends Big Trump supporter Bill Mitchell prior to the election

One of President Trump’s biggest supporters, Bill Mitchell, a user with a national presence, was permanently suspended. “[Mitchell] has been permanently suspended for violating the Twitter Rules by using one account to evade the suspension of another account,” a Twitter spokesperson said in an...

www.independentsentinel.com

Other than YouTube I terminated ALL my social networking sites loooong ago!

When replying to a post, you need to drop BELOW THE BOTTOM [ / Q U O T E ] before you type your reply.

The way you do it, it looks like I said what you said.

I fixed your quote in my reply here. You need to edit your post.

This is your second notice of this type of error. Don't let it happen again!

 

[Dalia]

Hello Asaratis, long time no see . Twitter acts like all other networks and see even the media especially CNN which they cannot accept that someone can be a supporter of Trump I was banned from their site because I dared to tell them that they were not neutral all leftists are all the same they can't accept the choice of a other if is not like them .

 

[Lysistrata]

Interesting that Trump supporters have such a hard time staying within the rules. Makes sense. Trump never had to follow any rules, so his supporters don't want to either.

Then they complain when they get kicked out. Their rule-breaking has been tremendous under trump's administration. Violating the House rules, violating the Administrative Procedure Act, tearing up subpoenas, hiding things from Congress, lying to the public, refusing to report to the public on what they are doing, and on and on. And all the while talking about "law and order." I've never seen such a dishonest bunch in DC before trump moved in. This is not due to policy differences, just plain old dishonesty.

He called Harris "nasty," "mean," and "disrespectful," all because she went after barr, who does not have a reputation for honesty, but trump himself typifies these traits.

The article explained why he was banned. It's right there.

 

[asaratis]

Hello Asaratis, long time no see . Twitter acts like all other networks and see even the media especially CNN which they cannot accept that someone can be a supporter of Trump I was banned from their site because I dared to tell them that they were not neutral all leftists are all the same they can't accept the choice of a other if is not like them .

Dalia, dahling! It has been quite some time since we spoke. I have long admired you and your avatars! You have impeccable classiness!

Regarding bias, my contention is that anything and everything presented on social media, broadcast media, gaming devices, printed media and in some cases, art and music expresses the bias of those that produced the statements, in whatever form they are presented or manifested.

I accept the posit that it is certainly possible to design emotionless devices but that each such device, when put under control of a human or groups of humans can easily become a tool to be used in the expression of emotionally driven biases of the user(s).

This applies to any moderation device (essentially just a system of controlling output).

Cheers, my friend!

 

[asaratis]

Interesting that Trump supporters have such a hard time staying within the rules. Makes sense. Trump never had to follow any rules, so his supporters don't want to either.

Then they complain when they get kicked out. Their rule-breaking has been tremendous under trump's administration. Violating the House rules, violating the Administrative Procedure Act, tearing up subpoenas, hiding things from Congress, lying to the public, refusing to report to the public on what they are doing, and on and on. And all the while talking about "law and order." I've never seen such a dishonest bunch in DC before trump moved in. This is not due to policy differences, just plain old dishonesty.

He called Harris "nasty," "mean," and "disrespectful," all because she went after barr, who does not have a reputation for honesty, but trump himself typifies these traits.

The article explained why he was banned. It's right there.

All of this criticism is hypocrisy in light of what the impeachment circus orchestrated by Adam Schiff and Gerry Nadler did regarding lying to the American people and violating House rules. Those two assholes take the cake in the parade of sleazeball politicians.

You perfectly exemplify the liberal rule of accusing others of what you do.

 

[Lysistrata]

Interesting that Trump supporters have such a hard time staying within the rules. Makes sense. Trump never had to follow any rules, so his supporters don't want to either.

Then they complain when they get kicked out. Their rule-breaking has been tremendous under trump's administration. Violating the House rules, violating the Administrative Procedure Act, tearing up subpoenas, hiding things from Congress, lying to the public, refusing to report to the public on what they are doing, and on and on. And all the while talking about "law and order." I've never seen such a dishonest bunch in DC before trump moved in. This is not due to policy differences, just plain old dishonesty.

He called Harris "nasty," "mean," and "disrespectful," all because she went after barr, who does not have a reputation for honesty, but trump himself typifies these traits.

The article explained why he was banned. It's right there.

All of this criticism is hypocrisy in light of what the impeachment circus orchestrated by Adam Schiff and Gerry Nadler did regarding lying to the American people and violating House rules. Those two assholes take the cake in the parade of sleazeball politicians.

You perfectly exemplify the liberal rule of accusing others of what you do.

The Senate Intelligence Committee report should be quite interesting to read.

 

[asaratis]

Interesting that Trump supporters have such a hard time staying within the rules. Makes sense. Trump never had to follow any rules, so his supporters don't want to either.

Then they complain when they get kicked out. Their rule-breaking has been tremendous under trump's administration. Violating the House rules, violating the Administrative Procedure Act, tearing up subpoenas, hiding things from Congress, lying to the public, refusing to report to the public on what they are doing, and on and on. And all the while talking about "law and order." I've never seen such a dishonest bunch in DC before trump moved in. This is not due to policy differences, just plain old dishonesty.

He called Harris "nasty," "mean," and "disrespectful," all because she went after barr, who does not have a reputation for honesty, but trump himself typifies these traits.

The article explained why he was banned. It's right there.

All of this criticism is hypocrisy in light of what the impeachment circus orchestrated by Adam Schiff and Gerry Nadler did regarding lying to the American people and violating House rules. Those two assholes take the cake in the parade of sleazeball politicians.

You perfectly exemplify the liberal rule of accusing others of what you do.

The Senate Intelligence Committee report should be quite interesting to read.

Durham's as well.

 

[Lysistrata]

Interesting that Trump supporters have such a hard time staying within the rules. Makes sense. Trump never had to follow any rules, so his supporters don't want to either.

Then they complain when they get kicked out. Their rule-breaking has been tremendous under trump's administration. Violating the House rules, violating the Administrative Procedure Act, tearing up subpoenas, hiding things from Congress, lying to the public, refusing to report to the public on what they are doing, and on and on. And all the while talking about "law and order." I've never seen such a dishonest bunch in DC before trump moved in. This is not due to policy differences, just plain old dishonesty.

He called Harris "nasty," "mean," and "disrespectful," all because she went after barr, who does not have a reputation for honesty, but trump himself typifies these traits.

The article explained why he was banned. It's right there.

All of this criticism is hypocrisy in light of what the impeachment circus orchestrated by Adam Schiff and Gerry Nadler did regarding lying to the American people and violating House rules. Those two assholes take the cake in the parade of sleazeball politicians.

You perfectly exemplify the liberal rule of accusing others of what you do.

The Senate Intelligence Committee report should be quite interesting to read.

Durham's as well.

In keeping with Twitter's bias against our President and blatant support of a socialistic government, Bill Mitchell has been permanently suspended. Is @DonaldTrump next?

@Jack permanently suspends Big Trump supporter Bill Mitchell prior to the election

One of President Trump’s biggest supporters, Bill Mitchell, a user with a national presence, was permanently suspended. “[Mitchell] has been permanently suspended for violating the Twitter Rules by using one account to evade the suspension of another account,” a Twitter spokesperson said in an...

www.independentsentinel.com

The reason for booting this guy was explained in the article. He was using another account to evade a suspension. Are you denying this, and how do you know?

trump being permanently suspended would be a gift to the American People.

Durham is only investigating an investigation. The Intelligence Committee is dealing with trump's ties to a hostile foreign nation. Carter Page, who had extensive ties to Russia, was the original target of the investigation, and came under scrutiny before he joined the trump campaign. What do you want Durham to say? He was hand-picked by barr, so I might not lend his report much credence, given the circumstances and barr's seedy reputation.

 

[skye]

Social Media and their Left fascist tyrants are in total panic, censuring conservatives voices like there is no tomorrow.

They think that way they will stop the truth from coming out and wakening people up!

But it's too late, the cat is out of the bag already.

 

[Lysistrata]

Social Media and their Left fascist tyrants are in total panic, censuring conservatives voices like there is no tomorrow.

They think that way they will stop the truth from coming out and wakening people up!

But it's too late, the cat is out of the bag already.

This isn't "censorship." It has nothing to do with the content of this guy's speech. He had two accounts and had been suspended.

BTW: could the "conservatives" get some better speakers/writers? It seems that the bulk of their input is limited to a litany of complaints about somebody or some group who they don't like. Some discussion of ideas and policies would be helpful.