Two anti gun bills introduced in California

[PaintMyHouse]

Sell that Japan gun control crap to people who don't know the issue.

Sigh: How Japan Has Virtually Eliminated Shooting Deaths

This is David Kopel's actual study....and the Atlantic lies....

Japanese Gun Control

Robbery is almost as rare as murder. Indeed, armed robbery and murder are both so rare that they usually make the national news, regardless of where they occur.[29] Japan's robbery rate is 1.4 per 100,000 inhabitants. The reported American rate is 220.9.[30] People walk anywhere in Japan at night, and carry large sums of cash.[31]
III. A Police State

Illegal gun possession, like illegal drug possession, is a consensual offense. There is no victim to complain to the police. Accordingly, in order to find illegal guns, the Japanese police are given broad search and seizure powers. The basic firearms law permits a policeman to search a person's belongings if the officer judges there is 'sufficient suspicion that a person is carrying a fire-arm, a sword or a knife' or if he judges that a person 'is likely to endanger life or body of other persons judging reasonably from his abnormal behavior or any other surrounding circumstances'.[32] Once a weapon is found, the policeman may confiscate it. Even if the confiscation is later admitted to be an error, the firearm is sometimes not returned.[33](p.29)
In practice, the special law for weapons searches is not necessary, since the police routinely search at will. They ask suspicious characters to show them what is in their purse or sack.[34] In the rare cases where a policeman's search (for a gun or any other contraband) is ruled illegal, it hardly matters; the Japanese courts permit the use of illegally seized evidence.[35] And legal rules aside, Japanese, both criminals and ordinary citizens, are much the more willing than their American counterparts to consent to searches and to answer questions from the police.[36]
'Home visit is one of the most important duties of officers assigned to police...' explains the Japanese National Police Agency. In twice-a-year visit, officers fill out Residence Information Cards about who lives where and which family member to contact in case of emergency, what relation people in the house have to each other, what kind of work they do, if they work late, and what kind of cars they own.[37] The police also check on all gun licensees, to make sure that no gun has been stolen or misused, that the gun is securely stored, and that the licensees are emotionally stable.[38]
The close surveillance of gun owners and householders comports with the police tradition of keeping close tabs on many private activities.[39]

For example, the nation's official year-end police report includes statistics like 'Background and Motives for Girls' Sexual Misconduct'. The police recorded 9,402 such incidents in 1985, and determined that 37.4 per cent of the girls had been seduced, and the rest had sex 'voluntarily'. The two leading reasons for having sex voluntarily were 'out of curiosity' for 19.6 per cent, and 'liked particular boy', for 18.1 per cent.[40] The fact that police keep records on sex is simply a reflection of their keeping an eye on everything, including guns. Every person is the subject of a police dossier.[41]
Almost everyone accepts the paradigm that the police should be respected.


Because the police are so esteemed, the Japanese people co-operate with their police more than Americans do. Co-operation with the police also extends to obeying the laws which almost everyone believes in. The Japanese people, and even the large majority of Japanese criminals, voluntarily obey the gun controls.
There is no right to bear arms in Japan. In practical terms, there is no right to privacy against police searches. Other Western-style rights designed to protect citizens from a police state are also non-existent or feeble in Japan.


After the arrest, a suspect may be detained without bail for up to 28 days before the prosecutor brings the suspect before a judge.[42] Even after the 28 day period is completed, detention in a Japanese police station may continue on a variety of pretexts, such as preventing the defendant from destroying evidence. Rearrest on another charge, bekken taihö, is a common police tactic for starting the suspect on another 28 day interrogation process. 'Rearrest' may (p.30)occur while the suspect is still being held at the police station on the first charge. Some defendants may be held for several months without ever being brought before a judge.[43] Courts approve 99.5 per cent of prosecutors' requests for detentions.[44]


Criminal defense lawyers are the only people allowed to visit a suspect in custody, and those meetings are strictly limited. In the months while a suspect is held prisoner, the defense counsel may see his or her client for one to five meetings lasting about 15 minutes each. Even that access will be denied if it hampers the police investigation.

While under detention, suspects can be interrogated 12 hours a day, allowed to bathe only every fifth day, and may be prohibited from standing up, lying down, or leaning against the wall of their jail cells.[45] Amnesty International calls the Japanese police custody system a 'flagrant violation of United Nations human rights principles'.[46]


The confession rate is 95 per cent.[47]


As a Tokyo police sergeant observes, 'It is no use to protest against power'.[48] Suspects are not allowed to read confessions before they sign them, and suspects commonly complain that their confession was altered after signature.

The police use confession as their main investigative technique, and when that fails, they can become frustrated and angry. The Tokyo Bar Association states that the police routinely 'engage in torture or illegal treatment'. The Tokyo Bar is particularly critical of the judiciary for its near-total disinterest in coercion during the confession process. 'Even in cases where suspects claimed to have been tortured and their bodies bore physical traces to back their claims, courts have still accepted their confessions'.[49]


In Japan, the legal system is, in effect, an omnipotent and unitary state authority. All law enforcement administrators in Japan are appointed by the National Police Agency and receive their funding from the NPA. Hence, the police are insulated from complaints from politicians or other citizens.[50]


There is hardly any check on the power of the state, save its own conscience.


What does the breadth of police powers have to do with gun controls? Japanese gun controls exist in a society where there is little need for guns for self-defense. Police powers make it difficult for owners of illegal guns to hide them.


So how does Japan actually keep gun violence down.....

Most importantly, the Japanese criminal justice system is based on the Government possessing the inherent authority to do whatever it wishes. In a society where almost everyone accepts nearly limitless, unchecked Government power, people do not wish to own guns to resist oppression or to protect themselves in case the criminal justice system fails.

DAVID B KOPEL[*]
[*] Director, Firearms Research Project, Independence Institute, Golden, Colorado; Associate Policy Analyst, Cato Institute, Washington, DC; Technical Consultant, International Wound Ballistics Association, San Francisco, California. This article is based on a chapter in the author's book The Samurai, the Mountie, and the Cowboy: Should America Adopt the Gun Control of Other Democracies? The author would like to thank Professors Daniel Polsby, Noel Perrin, and Ian Ramsey for their helpful comments on earlier drafts. Errors are, of course, solely the author's.

Thank God he's entirely unbiased, or not...Dave Kopel Landing Page: Independence Institute

Yeah...well your link the Atlantic article uses him and lies about the reason he cites for Japan's low gun crime rate...he clearly states it is Japanese culture and their willingness to submit to the government.....there is not one thing they do that would fly over here.....

How odd that I disagree, but since they are speaking of Japan's history of gun control, and you fear that like a child does the dark, you would believe that.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Show me a single gun law that has worked anywhere silly boy. Norway has some of the strictest in the world. A scumbag murdered more people with a gun than any mass murderer has accomplished here in the States. You're a brainless retard.

As usual, gun laws work very well in Japan, which has, on average, fewer than 15 and as few as two gun murders a year for a population 2/5th as large as the US.

So how does Japan actually keep gun violence down.....

Most importantly, the Japanese criminal justice system is based on the Government possessing the inherent authority to do whatever it wishes. In a society where almost everyone accepts nearly limitless, unchecked Government power, people do not wish to own guns to resist oppression or to protect themselves in case the criminal justice system fails.

Very - few - guns...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

And again.....normal gun owners are not committing the crimes, actual criminals with long histories of violence and criminal convictions are....and criminals in all of those countries also easily get guns...the difference is our criminals commit murder more than theirs do....they get fully automatic rifles and grenades easily, they just don't use them to murder as often.....

But don't worry....the gun crime rates in these countries is going up.......look through their news papers.....

A nice (law-abiding) man just killed his own teenage son, who he thought was a burglar. Crime is not what I'm worried about, that is your concern.

 

[Flash]

No they weren't your kind. Your kind supported the big government of the UK.

Nope, those were Conservatives, known as Tories here then, who fled to Canada when we started the war.

Motivations of Loyalism

Yale historian Leonard Woods Larabee has identified eight characteristics of the Loyalists that made them essentially conservative and loyal to the king and Britain:[7]

• They were older, better established, and resisted radical change.
• They felt that rebellion against the Crown—the legitimate government—was morally wrong.
• They were alienated when the Patriots resorted to violence, such as burning houses and tarring and feathering.
• They wanted to take a middle-of-the road position and were angry when forced by the Patriots to declare their opposition.
• They had a long-standing sentimental attachment to Britain (often with business and family links).
• They were procrastinators who realized that independence was bound to come someday, but wanted to postpone the moment.
• They were cautious and afraid that chaos and mob rule would result.
• Some were pessimists who lacked the confidence in the future displayed by the Patriots. Others recalled the dreadful experiences of many Jacobite rebels after the failure of the last Jacobite rebellion as recently as 1745 who often lost their lands when the Hanoverian government won.[8][9][10]

Other motivations of the Loyalists were:

• They felt a need for order and believed that Parliament was the legitimate authority.[11]
• In New York, powerful families had assembled colony-wide coalitions of supporters, Men long associated with the DeLancey faction went along when its leadership decided to support the crown.[12]
• They felt themselves to be weak or threatened within American society and in need of an outside defender such as the British Crown and Parliament.[13]
• They had been promised freedom from slavery by the British.[14][15][16]
• They felt that being a part of the British Empire was crucial in terms of commerce and their business operations.[17][18][19]

Loyalist (American Revolution) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British march on Concord and Lexington was a campaign to take the fire arms away from the colonists so don't give me that Libtard revisionists bullshit about the colonists being the same as modern day Liberals because that dog don't hunt. You have read about that haven't you? Since you like to use Wekipedia so much go look up "the shot heard 'round the world".

The same kind of anti right to keep and bear arms bullshit you Libtards are doing today.

If you were around in 1776 you would have supported the government's campaign to remove firearms just like you are doing today. You Libtards can't help it.

No, they were not your kind. Your kind has no appreciation of the Bill of Rights. The minute it interferes with your despicable Left Wing anti Liberty agenda you want to do away with it.

Your kind does not recognize individual freedom, like the right to keep and bear arms Your kind demands obedience to the state and opposes the individual having the right to defend themselves from the state. That is why we ridicule you so much. You simply do not understand the concept of Liberty.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

No they weren't your kind. Your kind supported the big government of the UK.

Nope, those were Conservatives, known as Tories here then, who fled to Canada when we started the war.

Motivations of Loyalism

Yale historian Leonard Woods Larabee has identified eight characteristics of the Loyalists that made them essentially conservative and loyal to the king and Britain:[7]

• They were older, better established, and resisted radical change.
• They felt that rebellion against the Crown—the legitimate government—was morally wrong.
• They were alienated when the Patriots resorted to violence, such as burning houses and tarring and feathering.
• They wanted to take a middle-of-the road position and were angry when forced by the Patriots to declare their opposition.
• They had a long-standing sentimental attachment to Britain (often with business and family links).
• They were procrastinators who realized that independence was bound to come someday, but wanted to postpone the moment.
• They were cautious and afraid that chaos and mob rule would result.
• Some were pessimists who lacked the confidence in the future displayed by the Patriots. Others recalled the dreadful experiences of many Jacobite rebels after the failure of the last Jacobite rebellion as recently as 1745 who often lost their lands when the Hanoverian government won.[8][9][10]

Other motivations of the Loyalists were:

• They felt a need for order and believed that Parliament was the legitimate authority.[11]
• In New York, powerful families had assembled colony-wide coalitions of supporters, Men long associated with the DeLancey faction went along when its leadership decided to support the crown.[12]
• They felt themselves to be weak or threatened within American society and in need of an outside defender such as the British Crown and Parliament.[13]
• They had been promised freedom from slavery by the British.[14][15][16]
• They felt that being a part of the British Empire was crucial in terms of commerce and their business operations.[17][18][19]

Loyalist (American Revolution) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British march on Concord and Lexington was a campaign to take the fire arms away from the colonists so don't give me that Libtard revisionists bullshit about the colonists being the same as modern day Liberals because that dog don't hunt. You have read about that haven't you? Since you like to use Wekipedia so much go look up "the shot heard 'round the world".

The same kind of anti right to keep and bear arms bullshit you Libtards are doing today.

If you were around in 1776 you would have supported the government's campaign to remove firearms just like you are doing today. You Libtards can't help it.

No, they were not your kind. Your kind has no appreciation of the Bill of Rights. The minute it interferes with your despicable Left Wing anti Liberty agenda you want to do away with it.

Your kind does not recognize individual freedom, like the right to keep and bear arms Your kind demands obedience to the state and opposes the individual having the right to defend themselves from the state. That is why we ridicule you so much. You simply do not understand the concept of Liberty.

Liberals allowed you to keep your guns, when they were necessary for so many, but times have changed. Keep the rest of your I Hate Liberals crap to yourself, I'm not interested.

 

[2aguy]

You see silly oppressive crap like this and then when the Moon Bats say they are for "reasonable" gun laws you will just laugh at them.

These Libtards wouldn't know the meaning of the word "reasonable" if it bit them in the ass.

Reasonable would start with it's very, very hard to have what you need to do this eh?

Warning - graphic (death, destruction, pure fucking madness): https://www.anony.ws/i/2015/11/15/1447601843199.jpg

I know, what a fucking control-freak asshole I am...

Yes you are a control freak as are most busy body Moon Bats.

That is especially despicable seeing that the right to keep and bear arms is a right enumerated in the Bill of Rights. Have you ever heard of the Bill of Rights?

If you want to live in a country that doesn't allow functional AR-15s may I suggest Cuba or Australia or North Korea or even Britain? France doesn't allow them so you will be safe there, right?

Heard of the Bill of Rights? Yep, my kind wrote it. And no one is ever safe, anywhere on the face of the earth. Clear?

No..your kind sided with the king. The Founders today would be called Conservatives.....since Modern American Conservatives support the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and individual liberty...your kind hates freedom...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

No..your kind sided with the king.

Nope, I'm a liberal, dumbass. We threw his kind out, and now should do the same with yours. You are an American in name only.

 

[2aguy]

No they weren't your kind. Your kind supported the big government of the UK.

Nope, those were Conservatives, known as Tories here then, who fled to Canada when we started the war.

Motivations of Loyalism

Yale historian Leonard Woods Larabee has identified eight characteristics of the Loyalists that made them essentially conservative and loyal to the king and Britain:[7]

• They were older, better established, and resisted radical change.
• They felt that rebellion against the Crown—the legitimate government—was morally wrong.
• They were alienated when the Patriots resorted to violence, such as burning houses and tarring and feathering.
• They wanted to take a middle-of-the road position and were angry when forced by the Patriots to declare their opposition.
• They had a long-standing sentimental attachment to Britain (often with business and family links).
• They were procrastinators who realized that independence was bound to come someday, but wanted to postpone the moment.
• They were cautious and afraid that chaos and mob rule would result.
• Some were pessimists who lacked the confidence in the future displayed by the Patriots. Others recalled the dreadful experiences of many Jacobite rebels after the failure of the last Jacobite rebellion as recently as 1745 who often lost their lands when the Hanoverian government won.[8][9][10]

Other motivations of the Loyalists were:

• They felt a need for order and believed that Parliament was the legitimate authority.[11]
• In New York, powerful families had assembled colony-wide coalitions of supporters, Men long associated with the DeLancey faction went along when its leadership decided to support the crown.[12]
• They felt themselves to be weak or threatened within American society and in need of an outside defender such as the British Crown and Parliament.[13]
• They had been promised freedom from slavery by the British.[14][15][16]
• They felt that being a part of the British Empire was crucial in terms of commerce and their business operations.[17][18][19]

Loyalist (American Revolution) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You just described modern progressive/democrats/leftists.....

 

[2aguy]

No..your kind sided with the king.

Nope, I'm a liberal, dumbass. We threw his kind out, and now should do the same with yours.

Wrong....you are in no way similar to the Founders......you would have sucked up to the king all day long...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

No they weren't your kind. Your kind supported the big government of the UK.

Nope, those were Conservatives, known as Tories here then, who fled to Canada when we started the war.

Motivations of Loyalism

Yale historian Leonard Woods Larabee has identified eight characteristics of the Loyalists that made them essentially conservative and loyal to the king and Britain:[7]

• They were older, better established, and resisted radical change.
• They felt that rebellion against the Crown—the legitimate government—was morally wrong.
• They were alienated when the Patriots resorted to violence, such as burning houses and tarring and feathering.
• They wanted to take a middle-of-the road position and were angry when forced by the Patriots to declare their opposition.
• They had a long-standing sentimental attachment to Britain (often with business and family links).
• They were procrastinators who realized that independence was bound to come someday, but wanted to postpone the moment.
• They were cautious and afraid that chaos and mob rule would result.
• Some were pessimists who lacked the confidence in the future displayed by the Patriots. Others recalled the dreadful experiences of many Jacobite rebels after the failure of the last Jacobite rebellion as recently as 1745 who often lost their lands when the Hanoverian government won.[8][9][10]

Other motivations of the Loyalists were:

• They felt a need for order and believed that Parliament was the legitimate authority.[11]
• In New York, powerful families had assembled colony-wide coalitions of supporters, Men long associated with the DeLancey faction went along when its leadership decided to support the crown.[12]
• They felt themselves to be weak or threatened within American society and in need of an outside defender such as the British Crown and Parliament.[13]
• They had been promised freedom from slavery by the British.[14][15][16]
• They felt that being a part of the British Empire was crucial in terms of commerce and their business operations.[17][18][19]

Loyalist (American Revolution) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You just described modern progressive/democrats/leftists.....

Nope.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

No..your kind sided with the king.

Nope, I'm a liberal, dumbass. We threw his kind out, and now should do the same with yours.

Wrong....you are in no way similar to the Founders......you would have sucked up to the king all day long...

Nope. But how would you know since you are never smart enough to actually ask a real question. That doesn't fit your agenda.

 

[2aguy]

Show me a single gun law that has worked anywhere silly boy. Norway has some of the strictest in the world. A scumbag murdered more people with a gun than any mass murderer has accomplished here in the States. You're a brainless retard.

As usual, gun laws work very well in Japan, which has, on average, fewer than 15 and as few as two gun murders a year for a population 2/5th as large as the US.

So how does Japan actually keep gun violence down.....

Most importantly, the Japanese criminal justice system is based on the Government possessing the inherent authority to do whatever it wishes. In a society where almost everyone accepts nearly limitless, unchecked Government power, people do not wish to own guns to resist oppression or to protect themselves in case the criminal justice system fails.

Very - few - guns...

You must not understand what you read...

So how does Japan actually keep gun violence down.....

Most importantly, the Japanese criminal justice system is based on the Government possessing the inherent authority to do whatever it wishes.

In a society where almost everyone accepts nearly limitless, unchecked Government power, people do not wish to own guns to resist oppression or to protect themselves in case the criminal justice system fails.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Show me a single gun law that has worked anywhere silly boy. Norway has some of the strictest in the world. A scumbag murdered more people with a gun than any mass murderer has accomplished here in the States. You're a brainless retard.

As usual, gun laws work very well in Japan, which has, on average, fewer than 15 and as few as two gun murders a year for a population 2/5th as large as the US.

So how does Japan actually keep gun violence down.....

Most importantly, the Japanese criminal justice system is based on the Government possessing the inherent authority to do whatever it wishes. In a society where almost everyone accepts nearly limitless, unchecked Government power, people do not wish to own guns to resist oppression or to protect themselves in case the criminal justice system fails.

Very - few - guns...

You must not understand what you read...

So how does Japan actually keep gun violence down.....

Most importantly, the Japanese criminal justice system is based on the Government possessing the inherent authority to do whatever it wishes.

In a society where almost everyone accepts nearly limitless, unchecked Government power, people do not wish to own guns to resist oppression or to protect themselves in case the criminal justice system fails.

Yet again, Very - few - guns...

 

[2aguy]

Show me a single gun law that has worked anywhere silly boy. Norway has some of the strictest in the world. A scumbag murdered more people with a gun than any mass murderer has accomplished here in the States. You're a brainless retard.

As usual, gun laws work very well in Japan, which has, on average, fewer than 15 and as few as two gun murders a year for a population 2/5th as large as the US.

So how does Japan actually keep gun violence down.....

Most importantly, the Japanese criminal justice system is based on the Government possessing the inherent authority to do whatever it wishes. In a society where almost everyone accepts nearly limitless, unchecked Government power, people do not wish to own guns to resist oppression or to protect themselves in case the criminal justice system fails.

Very - few - guns...

You must not understand what you read...

So how does Japan actually keep gun violence down.....

Most importantly, the Japanese criminal justice system is based on the Government possessing the inherent authority to do whatever it wishes.

In a society where almost everyone accepts nearly limitless, unchecked Government power, people do not wish to own guns to resist oppression or to protect themselves in case the criminal justice system fails.

Yet again, Very - few - guns...

So how does Japan actually keep gun violence down.....

Most importantly, the Japanese criminal justice system is based on the Government possessing the inherent authority to do whatever it wishes.

In a society where almost everyone accepts nearly limitless, unchecked Government power, people do not wish to own guns to resist oppression or to protect themselves in case the criminal justice system fails.

 

[Flash]

[

Liberals allowed you to keep your guns, when they were necessary for so many, but times have changed. Keep the rest of your I Hate Liberals crap to yourself, I'm not interested.

You are a very confused Moon Bat so I am going to explain it to you once again.

Your kind supported the government's effort to increase taxes on the American people and to take away the right to keep and bear arms. Both caused the American people to rebel against the government. The same kind of Liberal government nowadays that is trying to increase our taxes and take away our right to keep and bear arms.

The same thing you nitwits are doing today with your support of gun control and higher taxation so don't give that Libtard bullshit about you would have been on the side of the rebellious colonists during the Revolution. If you claim that it will only make you look like a fool..

You can lie all you want and you may even be delusional but you can't run away from it. You are simply wrong. You know it and I know it.

 

[westwall]

Show me a single gun law that has worked anywhere silly boy. Norway has some of the strictest in the world. A scumbag murdered more people with a gun than any mass murderer has accomplished here in the States. You're a brainless retard.

As usual, gun laws work very well in Japan, which has, on average, fewer than 15 and as few as two gun murders a year for a population 2/5th as large as the US.

So how does Japan actually keep gun violence down.....

Most importantly, the Japanese criminal justice system is based on the Government possessing the inherent authority to do whatever it wishes. In a society where almost everyone accepts nearly limitless, unchecked Government power, people do not wish to own guns to resist oppression or to protect themselves in case the criminal justice system fails.

Very - few - guns...

You must not understand what you read...

So how does Japan actually keep gun violence down.....

Most importantly, the Japanese criminal justice system is based on the Government possessing the inherent authority to do whatever it wishes.

In a society where almost everyone accepts nearly limitless, unchecked Government power, people do not wish to own guns to resist oppression or to protect themselves in case the criminal justice system fails.

Don't forget the belligerent Japanese were mostly all killed. That no doubt helps as well. Plus culturally they are far different from whites. PMH is simply talking out of his ass as usual.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Don't forget the belligerent Japanese were mostly all killed. That no doubt helps as well. Plus culturally they are far different from whites. PMH is simply talking out of his ass as usual.

Very strict gun laws, meaning few guns, and very few gun murders. Yes, I'm sure the two are totally unrelated.

It must be because of rice. Sure, that's it, we just need all Americans to eat rice everyday and all our gun violence goes away.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

[

Liberals allowed you to keep your guns, when they were necessary for so many, but times have changed. Keep the rest of your I Hate Liberals crap to yourself, I'm not interested.

You are very confused Moon Bat so I am going to explain it to you once again.

Your kind supported the government's effort to increase taxes on the American people and to take away the right to keep and bear arms. Both caused the American people to rebel against the government. The same kind of Liberal government nowadays that is trying to increase our taxes and take away our right to keep and bear arms.

The same thing you nitwits are doing today with your support of gun control and higher taxation so don't give that Libtard bullshit about you would have been on the side of the rebellious colonists during the Revolution. If you claim that it will only make you look like a fool..

You can lie all you want and you may even be delusional but you can't run away from it. You are simply wrong. You know it and I know it.

You have no way of knowing what "my kind" is, you only tell, you never ask.

 

[westwall]

Don't forget the belligerent Japanese were mostly all killed. That no doubt helps as well. Plus culturally they are far different from whites. PMH is simply talking out of his ass as usual.

Very strict gun laws, meaning few guns, and very few gun murders. Yes, I'm sure the two are totally unrelated.

It must be because of rice. Sure, that's it, we just need all Americans to eat rice everyday and all our gun violence goes away.

No, they're not. As I said the violent Japanese were mostly all killed in WWII. They have strict gun laws yet criminals have absolutely no problem getting them and in fact there are more guns that the Japanese government knows are in the country, than there are gangsters.
The reason why the Japanese have fewer gun crimes is because they still prefer using edged weapons. In other words it's a cultural thing.
Not that you understand culture.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Don't forget the belligerent Japanese were mostly all killed. That no doubt helps as well. Plus culturally they are far different from whites. PMH is simply talking out of his ass as usual.

Very strict gun laws, meaning few guns, and very few gun murders. Yes, I'm sure the two are totally unrelated.

It must be because of rice. Sure, that's it, we just need all Americans to eat rice everyday and all our gun violence goes away.

No, they're not. As I said the violent Japanese were mostly all killed in WWII. They have strict gun laws yet criminals have absolutely no problem getting them and in fact there are more guns that the Japanese government knows are in the country, than there are gangsters.
The reason why the Japanese have fewer gun crimes is because they still prefer using edged weapons. In other words it's a cultural thing.
Not that you understand culture.

No, I'm sure it's the rice. The fact that they have .5 guns per 100 people and we have 178 times that many has absolutely nothing to do with it.

Gotta be the damn rice, those smart little slant-eyes...