Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’

[LA RAM FAN]

Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’

Bob Brigham
24 Nov 2017 at 20:58 ET
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebook2.7KShare to TumblrTumblrShare to MoreMore78

Former Watergate prosecutors Jill Wine-Banks and Nick Akerman joined MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Friday night to discuss the latest revelations about Michael Flynn potentially flipping and testifying against President Donald Trump.

Acknowledging her history, Hayes asked Wine-Banks whether there was enough evidence for an obstruction of justice charge against President Trump.

Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’

Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!

uh how about putting behind bars mass murderers the clintons,Bushs and Obama FIRST before even thinking about Trump.

 

[easyt65]

Mueller has nothing.

He has 2 indictments of tax evasion from 2009.

Poppa is a plant who wore a wite and shopped a book deal

Muller's own crimes of hiding Russian crimes in 2009

He has abandoned his tasking to dig into Israel and Turkish Cleric

The media and fellow lawyers just teported he has a history of being a F*-Up
- Now we know whete Comey got it from - his mentor...

This butt-hurt circus has been exposed for what it is...past time to shut it down...and put the Investigator and accusers under Special Counsel for their crimes...

 

[easyt65]

Just libs lying...

Most all they’ve got is innuendo, and hope others consider it true. Lol

Actually, we have the former FBI director testifying to Congress that Trump asked him to drop the Flynn investigation, and we have Trump on television saying he fired Comey over the "Russian thing". It looks pretty bad, and it prompted a special counsel and two congressional committees. Those are facts. And they are problematic facts for a person trying to say he was not obstructing justice.

Your interpretation - nothingburger!

Keep grasping for those straws...

 

[Faun]

These morons believe that President Trump firing an incompetent Comey is somehow illegal.

Firing the guy who is investigating you is going to end up how? Think hard now!

Comey was not investigating Trump. Back to the drawing board with you!

Have a nice day!

Comey was investigating Trump's former national security advisor, Michael Flynn; and Trump asked Comey to drop that investigation.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Mueller has nothing.

He has 2 indictments of tax evasion from 2009.

Poppa is a plant who wore a wite and shopped a book deal

Muller's own crimes of hiding Russian crimes in 2009

He has abandoned his tasking to dig into Israel and Turkish Cleric

The media and fellow lawyers just teported he has a history of being a F*-Up
- Now we know whete Comey got it from - his mentor...

This butt-hurt circus has been exposed for what it is...past time to shut it down...and put the Investigator and accusers under Special Counsel for their crimes...

Oh look, another Miss Chloe! I have never seen so many clairvoyants in one place!

Without magical powers, you could not possibly know what information or evidence the Mueller team does or does not possess.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Just libs lying...

Most all they’ve got is innuendo, and hope others consider it true. Lol

Actually, we have the former FBI director testifying to Congress that Trump asked him to drop the Flynn investigation, and we have Trump on television saying he fired Comey over the "Russian thing". It looks pretty bad, and it prompted a special counsel and two congressional committees. Those are facts. And they are problematic facts for a person trying to say he was not obstructing justice.

Your interpretation - nothingburger!

Keep grasping for those straws...

None of that was interpretation. All of it is fact. You're not a very honest person.

 

[August West]

They always say Mewler has some secret stash of super top secret evidence.

That's a lie. What is said is that Mueller MAY have evidence, and that we wouldnt know it if he did. It is YOU who claims to know whether or not he does. As always, you are more guilty of the things of which you accuse everyone else.

Mueller will not reveal his evidence until Crooked Donnie testifies under oath

Well I guess that is one explanation for why no evidence will ever appear

Why tip your hand too early?

This is the phase where they give him more rope

If we had evidence of an indictment, we would have an Indictment.

We were told trump would be out of office by last summer. Instead we are hearing the same nonsense about secret evidence that's just going to end the admin that no one will reveal so they give Trump more rope to hang himself. How do you not see the lie here?

You were told by who that Trump would be out of office by last summer? I think I see the lie here.

 

[Avatar4321]

That's a lie. What is said is that Mueller MAY have evidence, and that we wouldnt know it if he did. It is YOU who claims to know whether or not he does. As always, you are more guilty of the things of which you accuse everyone else.

Mueller will not reveal his evidence until Crooked Donnie testifies under oath

Well I guess that is one explanation for why no evidence will ever appear

Why tip your hand too early?

This is the phase where they give him more rope

If we had evidence of an indictment, we would have an Indictment.

We were told trump would be out of office by last summer. Instead we are hearing the same nonsense about secret evidence that's just going to end the admin that no one will reveal so they give Trump more rope to hang himself. How do you not see the lie here?

You were told by who that Trump would be out of office by last summer? I think I see the lie here.

Almost every leftist embracing this delusional theory that Hillary didn't lose the election because Donald trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election.

Though to be fair some gave him a full year.

 

[beagle9]

These morons believe that President Trump firing an incompetent Comey is somehow illegal.

Firing the guy who is investigating you is going to end up how? Think hard now!

Comey was not investigating Trump. Back to the drawing board with you!

Have a nice day!

Comey was investigating Trump's former national security advisor, Michael Flynn; and Trump asked Comey to drop that investigation.

. Uh no he didn't... That's already be debunked.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

These morons believe that President Trump firing an incompetent Comey is somehow illegal.

Firing the guy who is investigating you is going to end up how? Think hard now!

Comey was not investigating Trump. Back to the drawing board with you!

Have a nice day!

Comey was investigating Trump's former national security advisor, Michael Flynn; and Trump asked Comey to drop that investigation.

. Uh no he didn't... That's already be debunked.

It has? Please, enlighten us.

 

[beagle9]

Mueller has nothing.

He has 2 indictments of tax evasion from 2009.

Poppa is a plant who wore a wite and shopped a book deal

Muller's own crimes of hiding Russian crimes in 2009

He has abandoned his tasking to dig into Israel and Turkish Cleric

The media and fellow lawyers just teported he has a history of being a F*-Up
- Now we know whete Comey got it from - his mentor...

This butt-hurt circus has been exposed for what it is...past time to shut it down...and put the Investigator and accusers under Special Counsel for their crimes...

Oh look, another Miss Chloe! I have never seen so many clairvoyants in one place!

Without magical powers, you could not possibly know what information or evidence the Mueller team does or does not possess.

. But two former Watergate prosecutors know ?? More leaked secrets like the underhanded Comey engaged in ?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Mueller has nothing.

He has 2 indictments of tax evasion from 2009.

Poppa is a plant who wore a wite and shopped a book deal

Muller's own crimes of hiding Russian crimes in 2009

He has abandoned his tasking to dig into Israel and Turkish Cleric

The media and fellow lawyers just teported he has a history of being a F*-Up
- Now we know whete Comey got it from - his mentor...

This butt-hurt circus has been exposed for what it is...past time to shut it down...and put the Investigator and accusers under Special Counsel for their crimes...

Oh look, another Miss Chloe! I have never seen so many clairvoyants in one place!

Without magical powers, you could not possibly know what information or evidence the Mueller team does or does not possess.

. But two former Watergate prosecutors know ?? More leaked secrets like the underhanded Comey engaged in ?

Again...third time....they are referring to the publicly known, circumstantial evidence.

 

[beagle9]

These morons believe that President Trump firing an incompetent Comey is somehow illegal.

Firing the guy who is investigating you is going to end up how? Think hard now!

Comey was not investigating Trump. Back to the drawing board with you!

Have a nice day!

Comey was investigating Trump's former national security advisor, Michael Flynn; and Trump asked Comey to drop that investigation.

. Uh no he didn't... That's already be debunked.

It has? Please, enlighten us.

. Go to some credible news sources and wal-la.

 

[beagle9]

Mueller has nothing.

He has 2 indictments of tax evasion from 2009.

Poppa is a plant who wore a wite and shopped a book deal

Muller's own crimes of hiding Russian crimes in 2009

He has abandoned his tasking to dig into Israel and Turkish Cleric

The media and fellow lawyers just teported he has a history of being a F*-Up
- Now we know whete Comey got it from - his mentor...

This butt-hurt circus has been exposed for what it is...past time to shut it down...and put the Investigator and accusers under Special Counsel for their crimes...

Oh look, another Miss Chloe! I have never seen so many clairvoyants in one place!

Without magical powers, you could not possibly know what information or evidence the Mueller team does or does not possess.

. But two former Watergate prosecutors know ?? More leaked secrets like the underhanded Comey engaged in ?

Again...third time....they are referring to the publicly known, circumstantial evidence.

. Oh yeah.. Well it was sure played as if it was the final nail in the coffin.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Firing the guy who is investigating you is going to end up how? Think hard now!

Comey was not investigating Trump. Back to the drawing board with you!

Have a nice day!

Comey was investigating Trump's former national security advisor, Michael Flynn; and Trump asked Comey to drop that investigation.

. Uh no he didn't... That's already be debunked.

It has? Please, enlighten us.

. Go to some credible news sources and wal-la.

The credible news sources are all reporting that Comey testified that Trump asked him to drop the inveatigation into Flynn. Because that's a fact. So I think you're going to need more than a little dance.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Mueller has nothing.

He has 2 indictments of tax evasion from 2009.

Poppa is a plant who wore a wite and shopped a book deal

Muller's own crimes of hiding Russian crimes in 2009

He has abandoned his tasking to dig into Israel and Turkish Cleric

The media and fellow lawyers just teported he has a history of being a F*-Up
- Now we know whete Comey got it from - his mentor...

This butt-hurt circus has been exposed for what it is...past time to shut it down...and put the Investigator and accusers under Special Counsel for their crimes...

Oh look, another Miss Chloe! I have never seen so many clairvoyants in one place!

Without magical powers, you could not possibly know what information or evidence the Mueller team does or does not possess.

. But two former Watergate prosecutors know ?? More leaked secrets like the underhanded Comey engaged in ?

Again...third time....they are referring to the publicly known, circumstantial evidence.

. Oh yeah.. Well it was sure played as if it was the final nail in the coffin.

So, you misinterpreted and got fooled...but that's everyone else's fault...? No.

 

[bripat9643]

Keep dreaming....the last two sure things for you guys...manafort and papadopolous.......one was indicted for bank fraud, the other for lying to the FBI......neither one connected the dots to Trump....so keep dreaming.......

Again, if you think that all that there was to it was that, you are dreaming.

Papadoloplous can draw a direct line between Trump and the Russians.

Exactly. As soon as Trump lied that Papadopoulos was only a volunteer and he hardly knew him within minutes this photo appeared on the web. BTW, this pic was from Trump’s own Instagram account. LolView attachment 162622

Papadopoulos wasn't paid. He was a volunteer. Do you think Trump remembers everyone of the 100s of volunteers working for his campaign?

 

[bripat9643]

Comey was not investigating Trump. Back to the drawing board with you!

Have a nice day!

Comey was investigating Trump's former national security advisor, Michael Flynn; and Trump asked Comey to drop that investigation.

. Uh no he didn't... That's already be debunked.

It has? Please, enlighten us.

. Go to some credible news sources and wal-la.

The credible news sources are all reporting that Comey testified that Trump asked him to drop the inveatigation into Flynn. Because that's a fact. So I think you're going to need more than a little dance.

Comey is a liar, and not even the fake news outlets have reported any such thing.

The lying just never stops with you, does it?

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’

Bob Brigham
24 Nov 2017 at 20:58 ET
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebook2.7KShare to TumblrTumblrShare to MoreMore78

Former Watergate prosecutors Jill Wine-Banks and Nick Akerman joined MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Friday night to discuss the latest revelations about Michael Flynn potentially flipping and testifying against President Donald Trump.

Acknowledging her history, Hayes asked Wine-Banks whether there was enough evidence for an obstruction of justice charge against President Trump.

Two ex-Watergate prosecutors agree ‘there’s enough evidence right now to indict Donald Trump’

Wow, this nothingburger is piled high 10 feet high with every kind of meat you can think of. It is fucking juicy!!! Trump is fucking going down!

Yep, and also enough evidence to indict this-

 

[beagle9]

Comey was not investigating Trump. Back to the drawing board with you!

Have a nice day!

Comey was investigating Trump's former national security advisor, Michael Flynn; and Trump asked Comey to drop that investigation.

. Uh no he didn't... That's already be debunked.

It has? Please, enlighten us.

. Go to some credible news sources and wal-la.

The credible news sources are all reporting that Comey testified that Trump asked him to drop the inveatigation into Flynn. Because that's a fact. So I think you're going to need more than a little dance.

. Now we are regurgitating the old news trying to make a senseless point ? Trump denies the allegation, and so the back and forth is endless.