Two Far-Right Websites Attributed to David DePape to Smear Conservatives Were FABRICATED – They Were Created Friday and Deleted Saturday

-No authority ever said it.

-It was only promoted and spread in right wing blogs and media.

-The original source is unknown

-Common sense.... How would the right wing media know he was in his underwear, when no one in the police ever said such?

-Right wing media is now retracting their "story"
You get fished by every hook that come down the pike.
And you'll swear till your grave that it's all 100% true.
 
Facebook should be charged with something for putting up the fake blog.
 
Unlike almost everyone else, I AM able to back my opinions with credible sources when needed. Yes.
You are Peanut Gallery joke, with 12 IQ partisan opinions and Never a link.
At least you've dropped your Hasidic Supremacy routine.

In threads like this links are important as new info breaks.
(except to you. You'll make up whatever suits your juvenile mental state.)
`
An ad hominem...how mature.
 
More NaziCon fake news! Gutter garbage! Trying to follow Twitter to the Shitter!
Your leaders are a bunch of perverts. Clinton going to Epstein's Island multiple times, even ditching his security detail. Biden taking inappropriate showers with his own daughter, and now the husband of another one of your leaders. Having sex with a male prostitute. You loons are nuts.
 
I am secretly the owner and Admin of the board hoping to get rid of some of the Low IQ MAGAts who are WAY over-represented here and make a mockery of this place and the truth.
Do you wonder why Demented Brestwall gives you all those likes?

Just kidding.
`
You're a loon, a stupid one at that.
 
Lord, forgive me, but I had my antenna up with a lot of others when the story about all this was changing so fast wondering if we weren't dealing with another October surprise in the form of a Jussie Smollett scenario. A scenario intended to generate sympathy and refocus attention on right wing extremist hate crimes or whatever.

I am now convinced Paul Pelosi was injured, despite the shifting accounts of what injuries he has, but I don't think we at all have the whole story on this.
It is a hoax similar to the Jussie Smollett hoax, but also different in one way:

Jussie Smollett planned his hoax for days, weeks or months before he executed the plan. This was a reactive hoax, dreamed up and executed within hours of Pelosi's husband getting caught fighting the gay prostitute in his home. The Democratic Hoax Machine jumped into action without hesitation.

In a way, I admire them. If I got a call just after 2:00 AM that my wife was caught fighting with a lesbian escort, could I think that fast? I doubt it, and Nancy Pants couldn't either of course.

Most likely it was a "journalist" who came up with this, taking one step out of the process, the coordination with the media. I'm guessing that Nancy called one of her media activists and that activist had a lightbulb go off and pulled this stunt.
 
It is a hoax similar to the Jussie Smollett hoax, but also different in one way:

Jussie Smollett planned his hoax for days, weeks or months before he executed the plan. This was a reactive hoax, dreamed up and executed within hours of Pelosi's husband getting caught fighting the gay prostitute in his home. The Democratic Hoax Machine jumped into action without hesitation.

In a way, I admire them. If I got a call just after 2:00 AM that my wife was caught fighting with a lesbian escort, could I think that fast? I doubt it, and Nancy Pants couldn't either of course.

Most likely it was a "journalist" who came up with this, taking one step out of the process, the coordination with the media. I'm guessing that Nancy called one of her media activists and that activist had a lightbulb go off and pulled this stunt.
Well hopefully a REAL reporter will get hold of the original police report and that might clear up some of it. The police would have to be in on the hoax if that is what this is, and I'm not ready at all to believe it was a hoax. But even the police accounts are really weird and often don't agree. So who knows?
 
Well hopefully a REAL reporter will get hold of the original police report and that might clear up some of it. The police would have to be in on the hoax if that is what this is, and I'm not ready at all to believe it was a hoax. But even the police accounts are really weird and often don't agree. So who knows?
I'm talking about the hoax of the two quickly created websites. That's another difference. Unlike Jussie, Paul Pelosi was really attacked, I'm sure.

The incident clearly happened, Paul Pelosi was hit on the head with a hammer by a gay prostitute at 2:00 AM. The websites were intended to provide an alternate explanation to the obvious assumption one would make about a San Francisco senior citizen fighting a forty-something male hooker at his house.
 
I'm talking about the hoax of the two quickly created websites. That's another difference. Unlike Jussie, Paul Pelosi was really attacked, I'm sure.

The incident clearly happened, Paul Pelosi was hit on the head with a hammer by a gay prostitute at 2:00 AM. The websites were intended to provide an alternate explanation to the obvious assumption one would make about a San Francisco senior citizen fighting a forty-something male hooker at his house.
Maybe. I didn't make any assumptions about that honestly, but I sure would like to interview some cops and anybody else who was there. There are so many versions out there and so little curiosity on the part of media there about obviously very strange things related to this story, there is no way to know what actually did happen.

But yes, I will accept that Paul Pelosi was injured, but at least one police version is that after they told both men to drop the hammer, DePape grabbed it and hit Pelosi with the hammer at least once after they arrived and could see it from outside the door. They tackled DePape immediately and put him under arrest. So how did Pelosi's hands and arm get injured? And if DePape is in the hospital too, what are his injuries and how did he get them?

Who let the police in? All the televised news conferences have said is the 'somebody' opened the door and the police saw the two struggling with a hammer in the entryway. Who opened the door and wouldn't that person be an important material witness?

The media has not said and seems to be entirely uncurious about all that. So it looks like we have a situation of not journalism but gossip - OR - the police and media have been instructed in what they are allowed to report.

And once their narrative of the assailant being a rightwing Trump and Q supporting nutjob fell apart, they don't seem to be very interested in reporting it at all anymore.
 
Maybe. I didn't make any assumptions about that honestly, but I sure would like to interview some cops and anybody else who was there. There are so many versions out there and so little curiosity on the part of media there about obviously very strange things related to this story, there is no way to know what actually did happen.
Correct. Often with such stories, there is a delay between the initial reporting and the lies and spin. So you can look back to the real-time reports and see that the lies and spin don't match up with that actual news reporting. This time the story already had the lies attached to it before it got out.

But yes, I will accept that Paul Pelosi was injured, but at least one police version is that after they told both men to drop the hammer, DePape grabbed it and hit Pelosi with the hammer at least once after they arrived and could see it from outside the door. They tackled DePape immediately and put him under arrest. So how did Pelosi's hands and arm get injured? And if DePape is in the hospital too, what are his injuries and how did he get them?
That's a good point about he non-head injuries. Maybe Pelosi was injured in the struggle with DePape before the police got there. Maybe the police were not so quick to react to DePape's attack on Pelosi after Pelosi followed the command to drop the hammer. A delay of only a few seconds while the SF police considered the legal ramifications of taser, or gun, or hands-on, would have allowed DePape to swing the hammer at Paul and for Paul to block the swings, getting defensive injuries.

Who let the police in? All the televised news conferences have said is the 'somebody' opened the door and the police saw the two struggling with a hammer in the entryway. Who opened the door and wouldn't that person be an important material witness?
Yes, and that person is clearly being covered up. Maybe it was a maid, maybe it was another gay friend, or maybe it was a drug dealer. It was someone who would embarass the Pelosi family by what they saw, or by who there were. If not, why cover them up?
The media has not said and seems to be entirely uncurious about all that. So it looks like we have a situation of not journalism but gossip - OR - the police and media have been instructed in what they are allowed to report.

And once their narrative of the assailant being a rightwing Trump and Q supporting nutjob fell apart, they don't seem to be very interested in reporting it at all anymore.
We'll never know the truth, and the fact that Nancy's husband had a gay prostitute in the house would be hurtful to any politician but a San Francisco area representative.
 
Correct. Often with such stories, there is a delay between the initial reporting and the lies and spin. So you can look back to the real-time reports and see that the lies and spin don't match up with that actual news reporting. This time the story already had the lies attached to it before it got out.


That's a good point about he non-head injuries. Maybe Pelosi was injured in the struggle with DePape before the police got there. Maybe the police were not so quick to react to DePape's attack on Pelosi after Pelosi followed the command to drop the hammer. A delay of only a few seconds while the SF police considered the legal ramifications of taser, or gun, or hands-on, would have allowed DePape to swing the hammer at Paul and for Paul to block the swings, getting defensive injuries.


Yes, and that person is clearly being covered up. Maybe it was a maid, maybe it was another gay friend, or maybe it was a drug dealer. It was someone who would embarass the Pelosi family by what they saw, or by who there were. If not, why cover them up?

We'll never know the truth, and the fact that Nancy's husband had a gay prostitute in the house would be hurtful to any politician but a San Francisco area representative.

All valid observations.

At least one account even said DePape did housesitting for the Pelosi's before. Several reports quote Paul Pelosi and Nancy Pelosi saying he was a 'friend'. How much can we trust the reporting at this time?

I would respect Nancy's request for privacy at this time, but the leftist looney press made that impossible once they tried to drag Trump and 'fascist' MAGAs into the story when there is zero valid evidence for that. Why isn't the media curious and reporting on whomever set up the fake websites trying to portray DePape as a right wing extremist?

If they are going to make Patriots the villain for political purposes, then it's fair game for discussion and push back.
 
And again noting that the underwear thing may or may not be true. . .

This is a typical tweet we're seeing on Twitter today, and I had to laugh:


For those without Twitter, a popular tweeter going by the moniker of Catturd2--he has almost 1 million followers--tweeted:
Remember ... if two guys in their underwear get into a hammer fight at 2am - it's Trump's fault.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top