Typical hypocrite Graham

Luddly Neddite

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2011
63,947
9,980
2,040
Lindsey Graham Calls For Boston Bombing Suspect To Be Held As 'Enemy Combatant'

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) suggested on Friday that the Obama administration should toss the court system and Constitution out the window when handling the missing suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings.

In a series of tweets that came hours after it was revealed that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the suspect at large in the Boston marathon bombings, is a United States citizen, Graham urged the Obama administration to nevertheless consider treating him as an enemy combatant. The legal status has been used largely for members of al Qaeda and associated forces held at the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, military facility and elsewhere. Graham also suggested that the Obama administration should use a drone to track any suspects in the case.

Jerk is against killing foreign terrorists with drones but wants to trash the constitution in this case.

Who votes for these Repub idiots?
 
Lindsey Graham Calls For Boston Bombing Suspect To Be Held As 'Enemy Combatant'

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) suggested on Friday that the Obama administration should toss the court system and Constitution out the window when handling the missing suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings.

In a series of tweets that came hours after it was revealed that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the suspect at large in the Boston marathon bombings, is a United States citizen, Graham urged the Obama administration to nevertheless consider treating him as an enemy combatant. The legal status has been used largely for members of al Qaeda and associated forces held at the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, military facility and elsewhere. Graham also suggested that the Obama administration should use a drone to track any suspects in the case.

Jerk is against killing foreign terrorists with drones but wants to trash the constitution in this case.

Who votes for these Repub idiots?



"consider treating him as an enemy combatant"

Why not? Isn't that what Obama did with a recent US Citizen named Anwar al-Awlaki when he blew him to bits?

If this terrorist is part of a cell he should be treated the same way Anwar al-Awlaki was viewed. As a possible enemy combatant.
 
LOL, Conservatives detest Lindsay....and YOU were one of the ones complaining how we eat our own you dipshit.

As much as we detest this little coaerd islamic idiot he is an American and gets very benefit of being one.


Lindsey Graham Calls For Boston Bombing Suspect To Be Held As 'Enemy Combatant'

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) suggested on Friday that the Obama administration should toss the court system and Constitution out the window when handling the missing suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings.

In a series of tweets that came hours after it was revealed that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the suspect at large in the Boston marathon bombings, is a United States citizen, Graham urged the Obama administration to nevertheless consider treating him as an enemy combatant. The legal status has been used largely for members of al Qaeda and associated forces held at the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, military facility and elsewhere. Graham also suggested that the Obama administration should use a drone to track any suspects in the case.

Jerk is against killing foreign terrorists with drones but wants to trash the constitution in this case.

Who votes for these Repub idiots?
 
CaféAuLait;7118975 said:
Lindsey Graham Calls For Boston Bombing Suspect To Be Held As 'Enemy Combatant'

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) suggested on Friday that the Obama administration should toss the court system and Constitution out the window when handling the missing suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings.

In a series of tweets that came hours after it was revealed that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the suspect at large in the Boston marathon bombings, is a United States citizen, Graham urged the Obama administration to nevertheless consider treating him as an enemy combatant. The legal status has been used largely for members of al Qaeda and associated forces held at the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, military facility and elsewhere. Graham also suggested that the Obama administration should use a drone to track any suspects in the case.
Jerk is against killing foreign terrorists with drones but wants to trash the constitution in this case.

Who votes for these Repub idiots?



"consider treating him as an enemy combatant"

Why not? Isn't that what Obama did with a recent US Citizen named Anwar al-Awlaki when he blew him to bits?

If this terrorist is part of a cell he should be treated the same way Anwar al-Awlaki was viewed. As a possible enemy combatant.

AND Awlaki's minor son.

Obama can only use drones to track and kill Americans when violating another nations' airspace

:eusa_shhh:
 
Lindsey Graham Calls For Boston Bombing Suspect To Be Held As 'Enemy Combatant'

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) suggested on Friday that the Obama administration should toss the court system and Constitution out the window when handling the missing suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings.

In a series of tweets that came hours after it was revealed that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the suspect at large in the Boston marathon bombings, is a United States citizen, Graham urged the Obama administration to nevertheless consider treating him as an enemy combatant. The legal status has been used largely for members of al Qaeda and associated forces held at the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, military facility and elsewhere. Graham also suggested that the Obama administration should use a drone to track any suspects in the case.

Jerk is against killing foreign terrorists with drones but wants to trash the constitution in this case.

Who votes for these Repub idiots?

You think executing an American citizen without due process while he is driving down the road with his son and his son's friend is a legitimate function of federal power but placing a captured terrorist on trial as an enemy combatant is somehow a crazy notion? Everything is upside down in the liberal world. ?
 
CaféAuLait;7118975 said:
Lindsey Graham Calls For Boston Bombing Suspect To Be Held As 'Enemy Combatant'

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) suggested on Friday that the Obama administration should toss the court system and Constitution out the window when handling the missing suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings.

In a series of tweets that came hours after it was revealed that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the suspect at large in the Boston marathon bombings, is a United States citizen, Graham urged the Obama administration to nevertheless consider treating him as an enemy combatant. The legal status has been used largely for members of al Qaeda and associated forces held at the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, military facility and elsewhere. Graham also suggested that the Obama administration should use a drone to track any suspects in the case.

Jerk is against killing foreign terrorists with drones but wants to trash the constitution in this case.

Who votes for these Repub idiots?



"consider treating him as an enemy combatant"

Why not? Isn't that what Obama did with a recent US Citizen named Anwar al-Awlaki when he blew him to bits?

If this terrorist is part of a cell he should be treated the same way Anwar al-Awlaki was viewed. As a possible enemy combatant.

Apples and oranges. Tsarnaev is not out of the reach of domestic law enforcement.
 
So far, all the nutter rw's are in favor of throwing the Constitution in the trash.

Anybody surprised?

Me neither.
 
Lindsey Graham Calls For Boston Bombing Suspect To Be Held As 'Enemy Combatant'

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) suggested on Friday that the Obama administration should toss the court system and Constitution out the window when handling the missing suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings.

In a series of tweets that came hours after it was revealed that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the suspect at large in the Boston marathon bombings, is a United States citizen, Graham urged the Obama administration to nevertheless consider treating him as an enemy combatant. The legal status has been used largely for members of al Qaeda and associated forces held at the Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, military facility and elsewhere. Graham also suggested that the Obama administration should use a drone to track any suspects in the case.

Jerk is against killing foreign terrorists with drones but wants to trash the constitution in this case.

Who votes for these Repub idiots?

You think executing an American citizen without due process while he is driving down the road with his son and his son's friend is a legitimate function of federal power but placing a captured terrorist on trial as an enemy combatant is somehow a crazy notion? Everything is upside down in the liberal world. ?

I'm sick of you ant idiots always siding with terrorists against your own country.
 
Lindsey Graham Calls For Boston Bombing Suspect To Be Held As 'Enemy Combatant'



Jerk is against killing foreign terrorists with drones but wants to trash the constitution in this case.

Who votes for these Repub idiots?

You think executing an American citizen without due process while he is driving down the road with his son and his son's friend is a legitimate function of federal power but placing a captured terrorist on trial as an enemy combatant is somehow a crazy notion? Everything is upside down in the liberal world. ?

I'm sick of you ant idiots always siding with terrorists against your own country.

So Obama CAN only track and kill American citizens with drones when they're in a foreign country???
 
I've stopped caring about what most Republicans would do. After all, it was their guy who said, "We gotta fight 'em over there so we don't fight 'em over here!".

Well, this week, we fought them over here. Some more. Again.
 
You whiners carried on and on about this before. Why don't you look up those threads and whine all over them again.

OR, if you have access to this new thing called the interwebs, go to google dot com and look it up.

Either way, think for yourself for a change and yeah, yeah, yeah, I know, you want to neg rep me. Poor baby.

Edited to add, this is in reply to poor widdo hurty horty's post.
 
I've stopped caring about what most Republicans would do. After all, it was their guy who said, "We gotta fight 'em over there so we don't fight 'em over here!".

Well, this week, we fought them over here. Some more. Again.

And we won.

And if he had been in a foreign country, our president would have gone after him there.

Let the rw whiners whine. Let them side with the terrorists over their own country.
 
CaféAuLait;7118975 said:
Lindsey Graham Calls For Boston Bombing Suspect To Be Held As 'Enemy Combatant'



Jerk is against killing foreign terrorists with drones but wants to trash the constitution in this case.

Who votes for these Repub idiots?



"consider treating him as an enemy combatant"

Why not? Isn't that what Obama did with a recent US Citizen named Anwar al-Awlaki when he blew him to bits?

If this terrorist is part of a cell he should be treated the same way Anwar al-Awlaki was viewed. As a possible enemy combatant.

Apples and oranges. Tsarnaev is not out of the reach of domestic law enforcement.

So how do you explain the killing of a 16 year old American in a different attack 2 weeks after his father was killed? Abdulrahman Al-Awlaki had no connection to terrorism according to the NY times.

Oh that's right, he needed a better parent.

Robert Gibbs Says Anwar al-Awlaki's Son, Killed By Drone Strike, Needs 'Far More Responsible Father'

WASHINGTON -- A 16-year-old American boy killed in an Obama administration drone strike "should have [had] a far more responsible father," Obama campaign senior adviser Robert Gibbs says in a new video released by the group We Are Change.

Abdulrahman al-Awlaki was the son of Anwar al-Awlaki, an al Qaeda propagandist killed by a U.S. drone a year ago. But the child was killed in a separate strike some two weeks after his father was killed.

What justified that? The justification for Anwar's strike was:

It preliminarily concluded, based on the evidence available at the time, that Mr. Awlaki was a lawful target because he was participating in the war with Al Qaeda and also because he was a specific threat to the country.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/10/w...icas-cross-hairs.html?pagewanted=all|How&_r=0


I see nothing wrong in treating this man as an enemy combatant if he has ties to terrorist cells, if he is supporting Al Qaeda then he is also "participating in the war with Al Qaeda" as an enemy combatant IMO . I don’t understand the justification of treating some terrorists different than others if they are proved to be a threat to the US or have been.
 
rw sheeples hate to admit that drones kill many fewer innocents and cost next to nothing

rw sheeples want another war and trillions more in debt and hundreds of thousands of dead and maimed.

rw sheeples aren't gonna get what they want.
 
Your cowardice is noted punk. :)

I've stopped caring about what most Republicans would do. After all, it was their guy who said, "We gotta fight 'em over there so we don't fight 'em over here!".

Well, this week, we fought them over here. Some more. Again.

And we won.

And if he had been in a foreign country, our president would have gone after him there.

Let the rw whiners whine. Let them side with the terrorists over their own country.
 
He won't get any Miranda warning for 48 hours.

"High value detainee group" to do the first questioning.
 
LIndsay Graham is an idiot. He's such an idiot that he should be a democrat.

He sure as hell has nothing to do with conservatism.
 

Forum List

Back
Top