U.S. militia girds for trouble as presidential election nears

Flaunting the law and cheating are the best way to invite violenice. We're not a banana Republic where the elites can stuff the ballots for their corrupt candidate.

I agree, we are not a banana republic, yet. If Donald Trump wins the election we would be better off if we become one; in fact under Trump's leadership we will become an oligarcy under a fascist leadership, much like Russian under Putin.
 
This was already posted last night snowflake.

"First loyalty does not belong to your flag, your country, nor the constitution. Your loyalty, first, last, and always, belongs to your own race, your own kind",

is a signature line of someone who has never taken the pledge to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, one who has taken ethnocentrism to a pathological extreme, and yet has accepted the benefits of citizenship protected by bravery of the men and women of every color, ethnicity, creed and faith who have and have given their all even for a bum like him.
Can't help where I was born sparky. I didn't ask to be born here. I was actually born in the occupied Confederate States of America. The US can leave any time it wants to! Oh and no I do not place a higher value on a damn piece of paper than I do my own race.

Every walked the battle fields of the civil war? The graves of the Gray are mostly teenagers, some as young as 14 sent into battle by slave owners who put other people's kids into harms way trying to save their life style.
The fact you think the war for southern independence was about slavery tells me all I need to know about you.

States rights was all about keeping black men, women and children into slavery. The Civil War and the issue of slavery in America was an issue a quarter century before the first shot at Charleston. Don't ever try to rewrite history, you lack the knowledge, intelligence and ability to write a cogent argument.
 
This was already posted last night snowflake.

"First loyalty does not belong to your flag, your country, nor the constitution. Your loyalty, first, last, and always, belongs to your own race, your own kind",

is a signature line of someone who has never taken the pledge to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, one who has taken ethnocentrism to a pathological extreme, and yet has accepted the benefits of citizenship protected by bravery of the men and women of every color, ethnicity, creed and faith who have and have given their all even for a bum like him.
Can't help where I was born sparky. I didn't ask to be born here. I was actually born in the occupied Confederate States of America. The US can leave any time it wants to! Oh and no I do not place a higher value on a damn piece of paper than I do my own race.

Every walked the battle fields of the civil war? The graves of the Gray are mostly teenagers, some as young as 14 sent into battle by slave owners who put other people's kids into harms way trying to save their life style.
The fact you think the war for southern independence was about slavery tells me all I need to know about you.

States rights was all about keeping black men, women and children into slavery. The Civil War and the issue of slavery in America was an issue a quarter century before the first shot at Charleston. Don't ever try to rewrite history, you lack the knowledge, intelligence and ability to write a cogent argument.
I am beyond exhausted and arguing with idiots such as yourself just isn't worth my time or energy. I will leave that to the reeducation camps we throw you in when we win. :D
 
"First loyalty does not belong to your flag, your country, nor the constitution. Your loyalty, first, last, and always, belongs to your own race, your own kind",

is a signature line of someone who has never taken the pledge to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, one who has taken ethnocentrism to a pathological extreme, and yet has accepted the benefits of citizenship protected by bravery of the men and women of every color, ethnicity, creed and faith who have and have given their all even for a bum like him.
Can't help where I was born sparky. I didn't ask to be born here. I was actually born in the occupied Confederate States of America. The US can leave any time it wants to! Oh and no I do not place a higher value on a damn piece of paper than I do my own race.

Every walked the battle fields of the civil war? The graves of the Gray are mostly teenagers, some as young as 14 sent into battle by slave owners who put other people's kids into harms way trying to save their life style.
The fact you think the war for southern independence was about slavery tells me all I need to know about you.

States rights was all about keeping black men, women and children into slavery. The Civil War and the issue of slavery in America was an issue a quarter century before the first shot at Charleston. Don't ever try to rewrite history, you lack the knowledge, intelligence and ability to write a cogent argument.
I am beyond exhausted and arguing with idiots such as yourself just isn't worth my time or energy. I will leave that to the reeducation camps we throw you in when we win. :D

You're not man enough to put me in any camp, you're what is known by members of my career to be a punk. I'm disappointed the powers that be didn't ban you for the outright threat to me and my family. If Trump loses I look forward to a punk like you coming after me.
 
Flaunting the law and cheating are the best way to invite violenice. We're not a banana Republic where the elites can stuff the ballots for their corrupt candidate.

I agree, we are not a banana republic, yet. If Donald Trump wins the election we would be better off if we become one; in fact under Trump's leadership we will become an oligarcy under a fascist leadership, much like Russian under Putin.

Obama used the IRS and NSA against Republicans but Trump's a fascist.

You Progs live in bizzaroland
 
upload_2016-11-3_23-46-38.jpeg


There's already been plenty of unrest prior to the election...

So if Trump wins does this mean that by the OP's standards we can consider anyone that incites unrest, riots, and shoots police traitors?

*****SMILE*****



:)
 
re-opened..

The OP is a relevant current event for debate, personal threats against another member of this board is and should be shut down immediately. Thank you for doing so.

The taking up arms against the US, based on Trump's allegation that he would lose, if and only if the voting process is rigged, is seditious; he has incited a dangerous lunatic force which put at risk LE on every level of government.

Such behavior is not only not Presidential [consider McCain's remark to the women who called out candidate Obama as a Muslim] but dangerous and potentially a violation of 18 US Code Chap. 115.

Those who support Trump have every right to extol his virtues (I don't believe he has any).

They would actually have to do something with those arms, take over a post office or something, to be considered criminal.

Hanging out with legal firearms on your own property is basically a form of speech.

That is not what I posted, so you've once again lied by omission. Are you stupid, or do you actually believe you can convince others of your fucked up opinions by misleading them? Of course, one can fool some of the people all of the time, but not those of us who are not biddable and can think for ourselves.

What you posted was some guys practicing for armed conflict, and saying that they won't fire the first shot, but they will defend themselves. They said they would provide "protection" to protesters outside of voting places. They did not say how or if they would be armed while doing so, and more than likely they are aware of local laws governing firearm possession in public and will follow them.

Then you go off on a rant about treason and these people "taking up arms against the government" when they have no immediate plan to do so.

You are the one comparing armed people possibly standing around while others protest to armed insurrection. Your attempt to inflate and exaggerate is noted, and as usual seen as the hack tactic you are known and loathed for.
 
re-opened..

The OP is a relevant current event for debate, personal threats against another member of this board is and should be shut down immediately. Thank you for doing so.

The taking up arms against the US, based on Trump's allegation that he would lose, if and only if the voting process is rigged, is seditious; he has incited a dangerous lunatic force which put at risk LE on every level of government.

Such behavior is not only not Presidential [consider McCain's remark to the women who called out candidate Obama as a Muslim] but dangerous and potentially a violation of 18 US Code Chap. 115.

Those who support Trump have every right to extol his virtues (I don't believe he has any).

They would actually have to do something with those arms, take over a post office or something, to be considered criminal.

Hanging out with legal firearms on your own property is basically a form of speech.

That is not what I posted, so you've once again lied by omission. Are you stupid, or do you actually believe you can convince others of your fucked up opinions by misleading them? Of course, one can fool some of the people all of the time, but not those of us who are not biddable and can think for ourselves.

What you posted was some guys practicing for armed conflict, and saying that they won't fire the first shot, but they will defend themselves. They said they would provide "protection" to protesters outside of voting places. They did not say how or if they would be armed while doing so, and more than likely they are aware of local laws governing firearm possession in public and will follow them.

Then you go off on a rant about treason and these people "taking up arms against the government" when they have no immediate plan to do so.

You are the one comparing armed people possibly standing around while others protest to armed insurrection. Your attempt to inflate and exaggerate is noted, and as usual seen as the hack tactic you are known and loathed for.
Just curious here. Who do they expect to defend themselves against? If they`re that paranoid they shouldn`t be allowed to play with guns being that paranoia is a symptom of mental disease.
 
re-opened..

The OP is a relevant current event for debate, personal threats against another member of this board is and should be shut down immediately. Thank you for doing so.

The taking up arms against the US, based on Trump's allegation that he would lose, if and only if the voting process is rigged, is seditious; he has incited a dangerous lunatic force which put at risk LE on every level of government.

Such behavior is not only not Presidential [consider McCain's remark to the women who called out candidate Obama as a Muslim] but dangerous and potentially a violation of 18 US Code Chap. 115.

Those who support Trump have every right to extol his virtues (I don't believe he has any).

They would actually have to do something with those arms, take over a post office or something, to be considered criminal.

Hanging out with legal firearms on your own property is basically a form of speech.

That is not what I posted, so you've once again lied by omission. Are you stupid, or do you actually believe you can convince others of your fucked up opinions by misleading them? Of course, one can fool some of the people all of the time, but not those of us who are not biddable and can think for ourselves.

What you posted was some guys practicing for armed conflict, and saying that they won't fire the first shot, but they will defend themselves. They said they would provide "protection" to protesters outside of voting places. They did not say how or if they would be armed while doing so, and more than likely they are aware of local laws governing firearm possession in public and will follow them.

Then you go off on a rant about treason and these people "taking up arms against the government" when they have no immediate plan to do so.

You are the one comparing armed people possibly standing around while others protest to armed insurrection. Your attempt to inflate and exaggerate is noted, and as usual seen as the hack tactic you are known and loathed for.
Just curious here. Who do they expect to defend themselves against? If they`re that paranoid they shouldn`t be allowed to play with guns being that paranoia is a symptom of mental disease.

Until they actually do something, who cares? Just because you don't think government can turn on people, doesn't mean it cannot happen.
 
So if Trump wins does this mean that by the OP's standards we can consider anyone that incites unrest, riots, and shoots police traitors?
Are the people against Trump forming armed militias?



Have police officers died in Dallas, Baton Rouge, and other areas of the country lately?

*****SMILE*****
Suspect in Officer Deaths Has History of Racial Provocations


:)

And a Trump supporter murdered 2 in Iowa recently. Your point?
Suspect in Officer Deaths Has History of Racial Provocations
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: xyz
re-opened..

The OP is a relevant current event for debate, personal threats against another member of this board is and should be shut down immediately. Thank you for doing so.

The taking up arms against the US, based on Trump's allegation that he would lose, if and only if the voting process is rigged, is seditious; he has incited a dangerous lunatic force which put at risk LE on every level of government.

Such behavior is not only not Presidential [consider McCain's remark to the women who called out candidate Obama as a Muslim] but dangerous and potentially a violation of 18 US Code Chap. 115.

Those who support Trump have every right to extol his virtues (I don't believe he has any).

They would actually have to do something with those arms, take over a post office or something, to be considered criminal.

Hanging out with legal firearms on your own property is basically a form of speech.

That is not what I posted, so you've once again lied by omission. Are you stupid, or do you actually believe you can convince others of your fucked up opinions by misleading them? Of course, one can fool some of the people all of the time, but not those of us who are not biddable and can think for ourselves.

What you posted was some guys practicing for armed conflict, and saying that they won't fire the first shot, but they will defend themselves. They said they would provide "protection" to protesters outside of voting places. They did not say how or if they would be armed while doing so, and more than likely they are aware of local laws governing firearm possession in public and will follow them.



Then you go off on a rant about treason and these people "taking up arms against the government" when they have no immediate plan to do so.

You are the one comparing armed people possibly standing around while others protest to armed insurrection. Your attempt to inflate and exaggerate is noted, and as usual seen as the hack tactic you are known and loathed for.

Nice spin, sadly for you it won't turn.

How many times did crazy right wingers post the photo of two black men not carrying long guns outside a polling place? 100 times, more maybe?

Unorganized militias do not vet their membership. They do not have access to criminal records or psychiatric reports or even if some them were kicked out of our armed forces as unfit.

In the immortal words of Dick Cheney, go f yourself.
 
re-opened..

The OP is a relevant current event for debate, personal threats against another member of this board is and should be shut down immediately. Thank you for doing so.

The taking up arms against the US, based on Trump's allegation that he would lose, if and only if the voting process is rigged, is seditious; he has incited a dangerous lunatic force which put at risk LE on every level of government.

Such behavior is not only not Presidential [consider McCain's remark to the women who called out candidate Obama as a Muslim] but dangerous and potentially a violation of 18 US Code Chap. 115.

Those who support Trump have every right to extol his virtues (I don't believe he has any).

They would actually have to do something with those arms, take over a post office or something, to be considered criminal.

Hanging out with legal firearms on your own property is basically a form of speech.

That is not what I posted, so you've once again lied by omission. Are you stupid, or do you actually believe you can convince others of your fucked up opinions by misleading them? Of course, one can fool some of the people all of the time, but not those of us who are not biddable and can think for ourselves.

What you posted was some guys practicing for armed conflict, and saying that they won't fire the first shot, but they will defend themselves. They said they would provide "protection" to protesters outside of voting places. They did not say how or if they would be armed while doing so, and more than likely they are aware of local laws governing firearm possession in public and will follow them.



Then you go off on a rant about treason and these people "taking up arms against the government" when they have no immediate plan to do so.

You are the one comparing armed people possibly standing around while others protest to armed insurrection. Your attempt to inflate and exaggerate is noted, and as usual seen as the hack tactic you are known and loathed for.

Nice spin, sadly for you it won't turn.

How many times did crazy right wingers post the photo of two black men not carrying long guns outside a polling place? 100 times, more maybe?

Unorganized militias do not vet their membership. They do not have access to criminal records or psychiatric reports or even if some them were kicked out of our armed forces as unfit.

In the immortal words of Dick Cheney, go f yourself.

Not this "crazy right winger". They looked like prissy wanna be Public Enemy backup singers.

And your last statement is again meaningless. Someone may do something because they may be unstable because they may be armed because they may be confronted.
 
"First loyalty does not belong to your flag, your country, nor the constitution. Your loyalty, first, last, and always, belongs to your own race, your own kind",

is a signature line of someone who has never taken the pledge to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, one who has taken ethnocentrism to a pathological extreme, and yet has accepted the benefits of citizenship protected by bravery of the men and women of every color, ethnicity, creed and faith who have and have given their all even for a bum like him.
Can't help where I was born sparky. I didn't ask to be born here. I was actually born in the occupied Confederate States of America. The US can leave any time it wants to! Oh and no I do not place a higher value on a damn piece of paper than I do my own race.

Every walked the battle fields of the civil war? The graves of the Gray are mostly teenagers, some as young as 14 sent into battle by slave owners who put other people's kids into harms way trying to save their life style.
The fact you think the war for southern independence was about slavery tells me all I need to know about you.

States rights was all about keeping black men, women and children into slavery. The Civil War and the issue of slavery in America was an issue a quarter century before the first shot at Charleston. Don't ever try to rewrite history, you lack the knowledge, intelligence and ability to write a cogent argument.
I am beyond exhausted and arguing with idiots such as yourself just isn't worth my time or energy. I will leave that to the reeducation camps we throw you in when we win. :D
Riiiiiiiight.....Jade Helm is standing by with Wal Mart death camps.
 
Can't help where I was born sparky. I didn't ask to be born here. I was actually born in the occupied Confederate States of America. The US can leave any time it wants to! Oh and no I do not place a higher value on a damn piece of paper than I do my own race.

Every walked the battle fields of the civil war? The graves of the Gray are mostly teenagers, some as young as 14 sent into battle by slave owners who put other people's kids into harms way trying to save their life style.
The fact you think the war for southern independence was about slavery tells me all I need to know about you.

States rights was all about keeping black men, women and children into slavery. The Civil War and the issue of slavery in America was an issue a quarter century before the first shot at Charleston. Don't ever try to rewrite history, you lack the knowledge, intelligence and ability to write a cogent argument.
I am beyond exhausted and arguing with idiots such as yourself just isn't worth my time or energy. I will leave that to the reeducation camps we throw you in when we win. :D

You're not man enough to put me in any camp, you're what is known by members of my career to be a punk. I'm disappointed the powers that be didn't ban you for the outright threat to me and my family. If Trump loses I look forward to a punk like you coming after me.
He threatened you and your family? Wow!
 
Every walked the battle fields of the civil war? The graves of the Gray are mostly teenagers, some as young as 14 sent into battle by slave owners who put other people's kids into harms way trying to save their life style.
The fact you think the war for southern independence was about slavery tells me all I need to know about you.

States rights was all about keeping black men, women and children into slavery. The Civil War and the issue of slavery in America was an issue a quarter century before the first shot at Charleston. Don't ever try to rewrite history, you lack the knowledge, intelligence and ability to write a cogent argument.
I am beyond exhausted and arguing with idiots such as yourself just isn't worth my time or energy. I will leave that to the reeducation camps we throw you in when we win. :D

You're not man enough to put me in any camp, you're what is known by members of my career to be a punk. I'm disappointed the powers that be didn't ban you for the outright threat to me and my family. If Trump loses I look forward to a punk like you coming after me.
He threatened you and your family? Wow!

yes. the re-education camp "threat", the diet coke of internet threats.

JoeB has been using that line for years, now you get your panties in a bunch over it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top